logo
‘Sickening': Sydney unit owners face levies of up to $220,000 to replace flammable cladding

‘Sickening': Sydney unit owners face levies of up to $220,000 to replace flammable cladding

News.com.au14 hours ago

Owners in a Sydney apartment building blindsided by eye-watering special levies of up to $220,000 to replace dangerous flammable cladding say they have been 'failed' at all levels and left facing ruinous out-of-pocket costs.
Sluggish remediation works, drawn-out legal battles and onerous retrospective changes to building codes have left many owners in a seemingly never-ending limbo.
Ferres Wang, 43, purchased her one-bedroom unit in Pyrmont's Harbour Mill Apartments off the plan in 2012 for $580,000.
The stunning development, built on the site of the old Edwin Davey & Sons Flour Mill near the Sydney Fish Markets, comprises 136 apartments across two 10-storey towers with a distinctive chequerboard exterior.
Ms Wang, a tech entrepreneur, said she was attracted to the location close to Darling Harbour.
'Also the design is quite cool,' she said.
The building, completed in 2015, was one of dozens identified as high-risk by the NSW government's cladding taskforce which undertook a survey of local properties in the wake of the 2017 Grenfell fire in London which claimed 72 lives.
But five years on from the initial fire safety order from the City of Sydney, and nearly two years after entering a contract with a cladding remediation firm, the multimillion-dollar works have stalled.
The builder, Hitech Remedial, has identified additional scope that will more than double its initial contract.
On Tuesday, owners will be asked to vote on variations totalling $5.96 million, including additional cladding removal, vertical cavity barriers and replacement balustrades.
The initial budget for the works was $7.8 million, $5.4 million of which was Hitech's contract. The works are being funded by a no-interest loan through the NSW government's Project Remediate, with up to $19.5 million available.
'The variations are required to properly undertake the work to remove and replace the ACP cladding, and deal with other issues identified during the repairs, and to comply with a fire order from City of Sydney Council to remove the ACP cladding,' Tuesday's strata meeting notice states.
Ms Wang said the huge additional cost has left residents stunned.
'On average, each owner here is now facing a $70,000 to $220,000 levy, and we've been warned that even more variations are coming next year,' said Ms Wang, who will be on the hook for $70,000 for her 60 square metre apartment if the variation is approved.
For penthouse owners, the bill will be up to $220,000.
'One is retired, he [told me] this is their entire life savings,' Ms Wang said.
It's expected residents will be required to begin paying special levies for the works in the first half of next year.
Ms Wang, who runs data and AI start-up DataNoLie, says she will be forced to divert money she would have used to invest in growing her business.
'For me this really is hardship,' she said.
'This is a systemic disaster for apartment owners across NSW. It feels like the entire system — strata, builder, tribunal, regulatory bodies — has failed us. The government's retrospective cladding laws place the full financial burden on owners, with no strong legal or audit mechanisms in place.'
Ms Wang filed a case with the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) seeking to block Tuesday's vote but her request for an urgent hearing before the meeting was denied.
'I was told this didn't qualify as 'hardship' despite the enormous financial burden and the lack of legal safeguards being followed,' she said.
Around 30 per cent of owners live in the building, and Ms Wang said meetings to approve the remediation budgets were only attended by around 30 people.
'More than 100 owners, they don't know, don't care or are Chinese investors overseas,' she said.
A spokeswoman for Hitech Remedial declined to comment, saying enquiries should be directed to Project Remediate.
The owners corporation has also commenced NSW Supreme Court proceedings against the original developer, Leichhardt-based Ceerose, over the cladding defects. That case is listed for a directions hearing in July.
'We confirm that there are legal proceedings brought by the owners corporation involving Ceerose which are currently in procedural directions stages and include claims related to cladding,' a Ceerose spokesman said. 'The proceedings are being defended by Ceerose.'
Similar stories are playing out across the state.
As of early 2023, the NSW government had inspected 4182 buildings, with remediation underway or ordered by the relevant authority for 192.
The NSW Audit Office found in April 2022 that most high-risk buildings in NSW had likely been identified.
A spokesman for the NSW Building Commission said Project Remediate was currently working with around 80 owners corporations to remove combustible cladding through packages of interest-free loans and construction program management services.
'The program also helps owners corporations to resolve underlying conditions that are sometimes revealed when cladding is removed, saving owners from potentially costly repairs in the future,' he said.
'This includes fixing issues with waterproofing or structural components of the building to ensure the new cladding system is safe, weatherproof and structurally sound. Where the underlying issues have been caused by defective work by the building's original builder or developer, NSW legislation allows owners to claim using statutory warranties and other protections available within the statutory periods specified under the legislation.'
Strata lawyer Amanda Farmer said since the closure of Project Remediate to new applications, owners had largely been left on their own.
'As far as I'm aware there is no state or federal grant program to help strata buildings cover the cost of replacement,' she said.
'What we're seeing is individual owners are now having to shoulder 100 per cent of these costs coming to them in the way of large special levies at are running into $30,000 a lot, $50,000, up to six figures. It's sickening.'
Ms Farmer cautioned against taking the legal route.
'The problem with suing is it takes many years to progress through the court system and you may end up with something of a Pyrrhic victory if the builder and developer have nothing, are straw companies by the end of it,' she said.
Other owners have previously sought remedy from builders and developers alleging breaches of statutory warranties under NSW's Home Building Act 1989.
In 2020, NSW passed the Design and Building Practitioners Act, which imposed new statutory obligations to ensure designs and building work are compliant with the Building Code of Australia (BCA), with a 10-year duty of care period.
'There may be now in NSW the opportunity to claim under a 10-year warranty period, [but] that's very new and still being tested through the courts,' Ms Farmer said.
'I think buildings should rightly be very careful commencing any litigation now. It can take years to resolve and in the meantime you're sitting in a building with potentially dangerous cladding.'
The harsh reality is owners in affected buildings have few options.
'A building has a very strict legal obligation to properly repair its common property, so if it has received advice from an expert fire safety engineer that this is dangerous combustible cladding then the law is very well settled, the owners corporation has to act on that and protect its occupants,' Ms Farmer said.
'It's a really unenviable position for strata owners to be in but from a legal perspective they don't have a choice.'
With remediation quotes typically running into multiple millions, many buildings are opting to take out strata loans offered by a handful of boutique lenders.
'It can be a 10 or 20-year loan at interest rates over 9 per cent,' Ms Farmer said.
'In my experience that is usually what most buildings are opting for because they're finding most owners don't have the cash funds. Having a strata loan on the books then impacts the value of everybody's investment. Purchasers looking to buy [will knock the price down].'
Ms Farmer said many owners were being forced to simply sell.
'That is sometimes the only option, and as I said it's a really difficult decision because you're going to be taking a hit on your sale price,' she said.
'If you're in a position you have to sell, you have to take what you can get. I'm definitely seeing more of that, not just in the cladding context but all around with our ageing buildings that need a lot of work very fast.'
In NSW, former Building Commissioner David Chandler oversaw the most extensive reforms to the state's defect-plagued apartment building sector in response to years of high-profile disasters, like the mass evacuation of residents from Opal Tower in Sydney Olympic Park on Christmas Eve 2018.
While the crackdown on dodgy developers was long overdue, concerns have been raised that the onerous requirements under the Design and Building Practitioners Act have sent remediation costs for older buildings soaring.
'The side effect of that very strict legislation is that it also applies to existing buildings, much older buildings that are doing remedial work,' Ms Farmer said.
'Works are now three times, four times more expensive under this new legislation. A leaking balcony that may have cost $50,000 to fix in 2020 is now costing $200,000. That is a big problem, and there's a fair bit of advocacy being done to government at the moment trying to get some relief.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US share exodus: Aussies sell their US stocks on Trump fears
US share exodus: Aussies sell their US stocks on Trump fears

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

US share exodus: Aussies sell their US stocks on Trump fears

Australian retail investors are ditching the United States and moving their money to 'stable' economies on the back of US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day.' New retail data from investing platform eToro, who asked 10,000 retail investors across 14 countries, including 1,000 from Australia showed a sharp trend away from America. According to eToro's data the downturn in enthusiasm for US markets reflects broader economic uncertainty, with 37 per cent of Aussie investors citing the global economy as the biggest threat to their investments – the highest figure recorded since Q2 2022. Inflation follows as the second biggest concern at 17 per cent. Instead of investing abroad, local investors are increasing their exposure to Australian markets. eToro managing director Robert Francis told NewsWire a combination of US policies and high valuations have retail investors sceptical of investing in the world's largest market going forward. 'People are beginning to realise the US exceptionalism isn't what it was a year or two ago with the inauguration of Trump has meant a lot of uncertainty,' he said. Rayeiris Maduro Rondon, an investor based in Sydney after relocating from Venezuela told NewsWire it is her opinion that the days of the US exceptionalism has 'paused' as she shifts to Europe and China. 'I view this more as a period of recalibration rather than decline,' she said. 'Historically, when markets trade at elevated valuations for extended periods, investors begin to see high multiples as 'the normality' and price in unrealistic growth expectations. 'That's where the U.S. stands today.' While she still holds some US investments on a 'reasonable valuation,' she said there are better opportunities abroad. 'In Europe and Asia, I'm finding businesses with higher returns on capital and strong cash flows trading at deeply discounted valuations, making them far more attractive from a risk-adjusted perspective,' she said. Alert not alarmed Australian investors are split on what the current market volatility means for them. eToro's survey data showed 35 per cent of Aussies are more vigilant about their portfolio while a further 28 per cent are feeling anxious. On the flipside, 24 per cent are actually hopeful or excited about the large market swings. This optimism extends to investing strategies, with over a quarter of Aussie retail investors seeing a decline of 10 per cent or less as an opportunity to buy the dip. eToro's market analyst Josh Gilbert said investors are alert but not all of them are alarmed. 'Many see recent market dips as buying opportunities, which signals a level of confidence in long-term market resilience, he said. 'The risk of being out of the market altogether is something savvy investors are acutely aware of. 'The recent rebound in global equities since April has reinforced that view, even in uncertain times.' It has been a volatile ride for investors since Mr Trump took office for global markets initially rallying before hitting a bear market on April 2, with the announcement of Liberation Day. The wide-ranging tariffs were touted as Liberation Day for the US, with Mr Trump arguing it would level out the playing field. In a list of countries, Australia was 21st with a 10 per cent tariff on all goods imported into the US. The ASX slumped 11.4 per cent in the five days following 'Liberation Day', while the US S & P 500 fell around 12 per cent while the Dow Jones dropped 11 per cent. In both the Australia and the US shares quickly recovered after Mr Trump announced a temporary pause on his tariff policies. Mr Francis said this was a dramatic turnaround in investor confidence with the market initially rallying when Mr Trump returned to office. 'The whole market was buoyant with Trump's inauguration,' he said. 'I mean, we all thought investors, market commentators, all thought that we were going to see a continued bullish trend in the market. 'But given what we're seeing now around trade conflicts, tariffs that are being implemented, this is kind of, where is this going to go? 'All of this means that there's a level of uncertainty right now that doesn't bring confidence in investing in the US'. Some still move to safe assets Commodities have also been a favourite of Australian investors as they look to protect their positions. According to eToro's results, fears mount over a weaker US dollar and persistent inflation, Aussie retail investors are repositioning their portfolios, with nearly half of respondents having adjusted allocations or planning to. Mr Gilbert said 60 per cent of respondents said they expect gold prices to increase in the next 6–12 months, which reinforces its traditional role as an inflation hedge. 'Interestingly, we've seen Bitcoin's growing status among younger investors as a similar hedge. 'Out of local retail investors who are adjusting their portfolios based on a weaker USD, 27 per cent of Gen Z respondents said they will buy more crypto, the highest out of all generations. Indeed, 52 per cent of local Gen Z investors already hold crypto.'

How you could get $20,000 back in your tax
How you could get $20,000 back in your tax

News.com.au

time5 hours ago

  • News.com.au

How you could get $20,000 back in your tax

For most Aussies, tax time means either a nice tax refund that can boost your savings, or the sneaking suspicion you've left money on the table. According to new research from Officeworks, lots of Aussies are getting tax time wrong – and it's costing us serious money. From lost receipts to missed deductions, and even more in between, the result is the average taxpayer is donating hundreds or even thousands of dollars extra to the ATO just because they don't know better. Below I've included some of the most common tax mistakes and how much they could be costing you. And spoiler alert, if you're falling into these traps it could cost you more than $18,000 over the next decade. So whether you're a regular employee, working for yourself, or running a side hustle, here are the top tax mistakes to avoid – and how you can keep more of your hard earned money. Not claiming what you're entitled to One of the biggest mistakes made by Aussies at tax time is a simple one – not claiming all the deductions you're entitled to. According to H&R Block, people who lodge their own tax return miss out on deductions that cost them an average of $525.50 each year. And it's not even just the big things people miss. Officeworks research found that just 24 per cent of people claim deductions for office furniture, 20 per cent claim pens, and 46 per cent are deducting electronics and tech accessories. Given how many people are working from home, and buying things they use for their work, this shows there are a heap of people missing out on deductions. If you're spending money on deductible items for your work, you're entitled to claim them – but only if you're tracking them – and then actually include these expenses in your claim. Nearly 30 per cent of Aussies lose receipts and end up claiming less, according to Officeworks EOFY research. That could easily mean $500 in missed deductions (or even more), meaning $185 less in your tax refund based on a 37 per cent marginal tax rate. This mistake is an easy one to avoid, it just requires a little bit of organisation. The ATO accepts digital receipts, so you can make your life easier by filing digital receipts on your computer, using an app, or choosing a supplier like Officeworks that offers digital receipts or their own app for tracking. That way at the end of the year, you'll have everything organised and in one place, making your claim easier – and most importantly making sure nothing is missed. Not planning at EOFY Bad timing can be just as costly as bad habits when it comes to your tax return prep. The research from Officeworks shows that 44 per cent of Australians make work related purchases before 30 June to boost their tax deductions. When your deductible expenses land before 30 June rather than after 1 July, this means you'll get the deduction, and the refund a full year sooner. But if you miss the window, you could miss out on the deduction. If you have another $500 in expenses deferred or forgotten, that's potentially another $185 missed this year. Not getting the right help with your return Lots of Aussies still lodge their own tax returns, and for some people that's completely fine. But the data shows a clear benefit to getting some good help with your tax prep. People that lodge their tax returns through a tax agent receive an average tax refund of $3550, compared to $2576 for self-lodgers. This reflects a difference of $974 every year, or almost a thousand dollars you could potentially be missing out on by doing your own tax return (even after fees). And to make getting some help here even easier, the cost of a tax agent is fully tax deductible. Total cost of these mistakes These tax mistakes may seem small, but they add up. Across the four areas outlined here, you're looking at a total of $1870 less back in your refund this year. Over the course of a decade, that's a total of $18,695 – or almost $20,000 being left on the table. The wrap The tax system is full of opportunities to get more out of the money you already have, and keep more of your hard earned income – but only if you understand the rules and how to use them to your advantage. Most people aren't trying to dodge tax on purpose. It could be that you're too busy, unsure, or maybe even a little overwhelmed. But by avoiding a few common mistakes, and being just a little bit more intentional, you could be saving tens of thousands of dollars, maybe even more over the years ahead. To get the most out of your tax refund this year, and use the money as a platform to start the new financial year in a stronger position, there are a few things you need to look out for. Keeping your receipts, tracking everything (even the small stuff), being strategic with your timing, and getting good help – it all makes a big difference. If you want some help with your money and investing, you can book a call with Pivot Wealth here.

One delayed Spirit of Tasmania ship to arrive in August, premier says
One delayed Spirit of Tasmania ship to arrive in August, premier says

ABC News

time6 hours ago

  • ABC News

One delayed Spirit of Tasmania ship to arrive in August, premier says

The newest Spirit of Tasmania ship is finally set to leave Europe and start heading to Tasmania in just over a week. It follows a lengthy saga involving mechanical delays and an infrastructure debacle. Spirit of Tasmania IV was due to leave Finland late last year, but ferry operator TT-Line failed to build its berth on time. The ship was then moved to a port in Scotland while the Liberal government explored options to lease it out. That is where it has been for the past six months. The ship was expected to leave in May, but then an issue was detected with its liquid natural gas (LNG) system. Finnish shipbuilder Rauma Marine Construction has managed to modify the system, and the ship has been undertaking sea trials. On Sunday, Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff revealed the ferry would be expected to leave Scotland and make its way to Australia in 10 days' time. He said the journey would take about six weeks, with the predicted arrival in August. The ship will head to Hobart where it will receive final fit-outs. Its berth in Devonport is not expected to be completed until at least October 2026. It is unclear what will happen to the ferry until it can be used to transport passengers between Tasmania and the mainland. The ship is one of two new ferries that were built in Finland. Spirit V is still undertaking sea trials. The Spirit of Tasmania saga was one of three reasons listed on Labor's successful no-confidence motion against the Premier. The no-confidence motion eventually led to the calling of the election. During its campaign, Labor has drawn attention to the many issues with the project and promised that both ships would be home before Christmas. On Sunday, Labor leader Dean Winter also said he would make sure the new ferries could refuel with locally produced LNG at their home port. The two new ferries have a dual fuel system, meaning that they can run on both diesel and LNG. Mr Winter said upgrading the LNG facilities in Devonport will trigger more that $70 million in private investment and create 150 construction jobs and 15 ongoing roles. Tasmanian Gas Pipeline chief executive Wacek Lipski said this was not new technology and the fact private companies ran on it proved it made economic sense. "All up there's 50,000 tonnes of carbon emissions to be saved by switching to LNG," Mr Lipski said. "The vessels are covered by safeguard mechanisms … [that] means the vessels must reduce emissions now and by 2030 be 43 per cent from where they are now. Mr Lipski said his company had the capital and technical knowledge to take on the project, it just needed an agreement with ferry operator TT-Line. The Liberals said all refuelling options were being planned for. "These are matters that are already being addressed by TT-Line," Mr Rockliff said. "All options will be canvassed to ensure that we do have the right infrastructure."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store