Iran: Time Magazine accused of supporting regime change over Khamanei cover

Time magazine's latest cover featuring Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has sparked criticism online, with users accusing the publication of drumming up support for the idea of regime change in Iran following Israel's surprise attack on the country last week.
The cover, published on X on Thursday, features a half-torn poster of Khamenei with the headline: "The New Middle East" featured prominently on the page.
"Western press is setting the stage for the aggression against Iran," said one user. "What they call 'The New Middle East' is fragmented, failed states whose resources and people they think they are entitled to exploit."
Another user said: "It hasn't even been a week and there's already a new Middle East?! How? Am I missing a ceasefire, a regime collapse, or a revolution?"
Many social media users also drew parallels between Time's Khamanei image and the March 2003 issue of the magazine, which was published just weeks before the US invasion of Iraq.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The cover features a man painting over a poster of Saddam Hussein, the country's leader who was later captured by US forces after the invasion which plunged the country into years of chaos and violence.
A clear propaganda piece:
1. Tearing out the page as though Iran's time has come (it hasn't)
2. Drumming up 'Iran's threat' (unfounded)
3. Painting Israhell as the hero in 'Israel's Gamble' (LIE)
4. Justifying American intervention so it's justified (it's not)
FOR SHAME! — Claudiopoi (@claudiopoy) June 19, 2025
In addition to the title "Life after Saddam Hussein", the March 2003 issue also promoted an article about "[President George W] Bush's high-risk plan to occupy Iraq and remake the Middle East".
"We're not exaggerating when we say it's the same playbook," one user wrote on X.
TIME's new cover, same as the old cover. pic.twitter.com/nPXNfT6TXM — Network Radio (@Anarcho1776) June 19, 2025
Israel launched its attacks last week claiming that Iran was on the verge of building nuclear weapons.
But the Islamic Republic has repeatedly denied seeking nuclear weapons, a position supported by the most recent assessments from the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, and the US intelligence community.
The attacks have since escalated into an exchange of rockets between Tel Aviv and Tehran.
Israel's attacks have killed several top military generals and nuclear scientists and targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, but it has also struck residential buildings, hospitals, civilian infrastructure and the Iranian state television headquarters, killing hundreds of civilians in what is being viewed by many as an operation geared towards regime change.
On Thursday, Israel's defence minister said Khamenei "can no longer be allowed to exist".
Israel's defence minister - following an Iranian missile that hit the Soroka medical complex - said that Khamenei "can no longer be allowed to exist", while Prime Minister Netanyahu said Iran would "pay the full price" for its attack.
In an interview with US broadcaster ABC on Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked about reports that US President Donald Trump vetoed an Israeli plan to assassinate Khamenei.
"It's not going to escalate the conflict, it's going to end the conflict," Netanyahu replied, not denying Trump's rejection nor such Israeli plans. Israel, he added, is "doing what we need to do".
Trump himself remains elusive about his plans. While he has approved plans to attack Iran, he has reportedly made no final decision.
Recent reports suggest that Trump is waiting to see if he can get Iran to renounce its nuclear programme by threatening to join Israel's attacks.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Arabian Post

32 minutes ago

• Arabian Post

China's Iran Oil Bet Hits Strategic Snag

China is confronting significant disruption to its Iranian crude oil supply, risking both its energy security and geopolitical ambitions in the Middle East. With over 90 per cent of Iran's oil exports directed to China via Kpler, the contraction of that flow places Beijing's $400 billion 2021 cooperation deal in jeopardy. Major Chinese independent refiners, the so‑called 'teapots' in Shandong province, are enduring mounting losses as deepening discounts on Iranian oil clash with soaring global prices. Discounts have widened to between $3.30 and $3.50 a barrel against ICE Brent for July cargoes – up from approximately $2.50 in June – contributing to refinery utilisation dropping to around 51 per cent, down from 64 per cent a year ago. Despite Israel's airstrikes targeting Iranian energy infrastructure and concerns over potential U.S. sanctions, Iran has maintained its exports through a shadow tanker fleet and strategic logistics adjustments. Kpler reports that crude loadings have reached a five‑week high of about 2.2 million barrels per day, assisted by the use of a less exposed jetty on Kharg Island and pre‑positioning of floating stocks nearer to China – including approximately 8 million barrels stationed offshore China. ADVERTISEMENT In 2024, Iranian shipments to China peaked at 1.6 million barrels per day, but that volume had already declined to roughly 740,000 bpd by April 2025, as broader Middle East instability and tightening sanctions exerted pressure. Rival supplies from OPEC+ producers like Saudi Arabia and the UAE may partially compensate, yet analysts emphasise that prolonged disruption would still erode Beijing's strategic leverage and diplomatic role in the region. For China, this dependence on Iranian crude is part of a broader ambition to deepen its influence across the Middle East as a counterweight to the West. The initial rationale behind the 25‑year deal encompassed energy security, infrastructure projects, trade expansion, and regional diplomacy. But the conflict's escalation threatens those objectives, undermining China's established pipeline for cheap oil and complicating its efforts to mediate regional tensions. Economists note the urgency for Beijing to accelerate its shift toward renewable energy and domestic self-reliance. China had already reached a milestone with renewables comprising 56 per cent of its electricity capacity in 2024. The current moment has intensified calls to reduce external vulnerabilities and accelerate electrification. At present, the Chinese government has refrained from military engagement, calling for de-escalation and abstaining from direct intervention in support of Iran. Instead, it is pursuing regional diplomacy while guarding its considerable investments. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson emphasised the need to 'prevent the region from spiralling into greater turmoil', particularly to secure stable energy imports. However, should the conflict deepen, or if key Iranian oil infrastructure suffers irreparable damage, China's reliance on opaque supply routes and shadow trading may no longer suffice. Its medium‑term strategy of presenting itself as a credible peace broker in the Middle East faces growing strain amid diverging interests between Iran and Gulf states. China appears poised to rely more heavily on Gulf crude, yet that reliance comes with its own geopolitical calculations. Riyadh and Abu Dhabi together hold significant spare capacity – over 4 million barrels per day – which may cushion global shocks but do little to salvage China's ambition to sustain influence via energy partnerships. The unfolding developments in the Israel–Iran arena have exposed strategic fissures in a partnership that once appeared unshakeable. Even as Iran adapts tactically to maintain its export pipeline to China, Beijing must confront the reality that maintaining influence in the region demands resilience beyond discounted barrels and shadow fleets.

The National

2 hours ago

• The National

Global stocks mixed as Israeli and Iranian air strikes go on

Global stocks were mixed on Friday amid the Iran-Israel air strikes and as the US weighed options to become more involved in the conflict that has been raging for more than a week, damaging investor sentiment. Both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq composite finished lower, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed slightly higher. S&P 500 fell by 0.2 per cent and Nasdaq Composite by 0.5 per cent when markets closed on Friday. Dow Jones Industrial Average was up by 0.08 per cent. 'The worsening global geopolitical weather keeps investors in a cautious mode, and will likely prevent them from taking too much risk,' said Ipek Ozkardeskaya, a senior analyst at Swissquote Bank. The news that 'the US is giving itself two weeks to decide whether to intervene in Iran – which is slightly better than earlier reports suggesting they would go in this weekend – has somehow eased tensions,' she said. US President Donald Trump said he will decide 'in the next two weeks' whether his country will join Israel in attacking Iran, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday. The move eased concerns about an imminent attack on Iran by the US. However, if the Washington becomes involved in the conflict, it is expected to exacerbate the situation and hit investor sentiment. Israel and Iran conflict, which began on June 13 following air strikes by Israel on Tehran has rattled investors, with global stocks plunging and oil prices rising on the first day of the war. Gold prices also rose as investors rushed to safe-haven assets amid uncertainties in the market. Analysts expect markets to remain volatile in the coming days. 'While the immediate prospect of a US intervention in Iran may have diminished, the fact this is reportedly a two-week hiatus means it will remain a live issue for the markets going into next week,' AFP reported, quoting Dan Coatsworth, an investment analyst at AJ Bell. In Europe, London's FTSE 100 closed 0.2 per cent lower, while Paris' CAC 40 gained 0.5 per cent. Frankfurt's DAX was up 1.3 per cent. In Asia, Hong Kong's Hang Seng index edged 1.3 per cent higher and Shanghai's composite was down 0.07 per cent, with Japan's Nikkei down 0.2 per cent. Investors are also keeping a close eye on the US Federal Reserve. On Wednesday, the Fed kept interest rates unchanged and also forecast a slower pace of cuts as it expects higher inflation because of tariffs. This week's decision was the fourth consecutive time the Fed has held rates steady after lowering them by 100 basis points to about 4.33 per cent last year. However, a senior official at the Fed has suggested that the US central bank should consider cutting interest rates as soon as next month. 'We could do this as early as July,' Fed Governor Christopher Waller said on CNBC. 'That would be my view, whether the committee would go along with it or not.'

Al Etihad

2 hours ago

• Al Etihad

GCC Group at UN renews condemnation of Israeli attacks on Iran, its nuclear facilities

21 June 2025 10:19 NEW YORK (WAM)The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Group at the United Nations reiterated Saturday its condemnation of the Israeli attacks on Iran and its nuclear facilities, warning of the serious repercussions of these attacks on the security and stability of the Group described them as a clear violation of the principles of international law and the UN came in a speech delivered by Deputy Permanent Representative of the State of Kuwait to the United Nations, Minister Plenipotentiary Faisal Al-Enezi, on behalf of the GCC Group before the emergency session of the UN Security Council to discuss the escalation between Israel and Iran, Kuwait News Agency (KUNA) GCC Group reiterated the group's firm position on the grave dangerous events taking place in the region, noting that the Gulf Cooperation Council countries are continuing their intensive diplomatic efforts to de-escalate and prevent its escalation, out of a desire to prioritise diplomacy and also called for the utmost restraint and an immediate cessation of hostilities under these delicate and sensitive circumstances, which require vigilance and wisdom from Group also calls for avoiding risks and expanding the scope of the conflict, and for returning to the path of dialogue and negotiations, as the best and only way to overcome the current crisis and ensure sustainable regional and international security and stressed the need for the Security Council and the international community to assume their responsibilities towards immediately halting this war, preventing escalation, and pushing forward the continuation of US-Iranian negotiations on the Iranian nuclear issue, mediated by the Sultanate of Oman. The Group also emphasised the need to respect the sovereignty of states and adhere to the fundamental principles and foundations based on the United Nations Charter, international law, and refraining from the use or threat of force.