logo
Home Affairs Committee Makes Decisions on Interest of Justice Criterion and Other Matters Contained in Immigration Amendment Bill

Home Affairs Committee Makes Decisions on Interest of Justice Criterion and Other Matters Contained in Immigration Amendment Bill

Zawya04-06-2025

The Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs yesterday made concrete decisions on various contentious issues within the Immigration Amendment Bill, including the acceptable location to codify the interest of justice criterion of the Bill. This brings the Bill closer to completion to bring it in line with Constitutional Court judgements.
The committee has resolved that the interest of justice criterion that guides immigration officials in making detention decisions for undocumented immigrants will now be codified in the Bill's regulations. Despite various views on the matter, the decision was premised on the view that the department's standard operating procedure are inaccessible to the public and can be amended without stakeholder interaction. Also, the committee was of the view that codifying it in the regulations would enable oversight accountability by Parliament.
Meanwhile, the committee has resolved that the Bill directly and adequately addresses the unconstitutional provisions identified by the Constitutional Court and, at this juncture, will be ideal to remedy those defects. As a result, the committee has decided that some of the recommendations identified by the stakeholders during the public participation process, including the protection of the rights of immigrant children, should be deferred to the ongoing process to review of the White Paper on Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection.
'The committee reiterates its view that the White Paper is even more urgent now to ensure policy certainty on immigration issues, hence its call for the department to expedite its processing. To avoid a piecemeal approach to legislation development, the White Paper should provide a clear framework of the migration system in the country.
As a result of the committee's decision, which consequently requires the amendment of Section 7 of the principal Act and is not in the Bill, the committee will write to the National Assembly in line with NA Rules 286 (4)(c) to seek permission to amend a section of the principal Act that is not in the Bill.
The Parliamentary Legal Unit, together with the Office of the State Law Advisor, have been mandated to draft the A list of the Bill reflective of the committee's resolutions. The A list will be considered in the scheduled meeting on 10 June 2025. The committee remains committed to concluding the process and ensuring the closure of gaps identified by the Constitutional Court judgement.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Republic of South Africa: The Parliament.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US strikes give Iran right to exit nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iranian lawmaker says
US strikes give Iran right to exit nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iranian lawmaker says

Middle East Eye

time5 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US strikes give Iran right to exit nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iranian lawmaker says

Iran has the legal right to withdraw from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) based on its Article 10 following US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, Parliament foreign policy committee head Abbas Golroo said in a statement on X on Sunday. Article 10 postulates that an NPT member has "the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country".

South Africa: Multi-billion Limpopo mega-project has ground to a halt
South Africa: Multi-billion Limpopo mega-project has ground to a halt

Zawya

time2 days ago

  • Zawya

South Africa: Multi-billion Limpopo mega-project has ground to a halt

Seven years after its launch by President Cyril Ramaphosa, the multi-billion Musina Makhado Special Economic Zone (MMSEZ) in Limpopo is at a standstill. R67.5m has been spent on consultants and R50m on roads and infrastructure. But there is no infrastructure, no electricity connection, no roads and no water. Described on its website as 'a flagship of the Limpopo Provincial Government' the MMSEZ is 'a green field investment platform consisting of two sites' - Artonvilla, near Musina, intended for light manufacturing, and Mopani, near Makhado, intended for heavy industry. The zone claims to offer 'state of the art logistics facilities promoting operational excellence'. But though the MMSEZ was touted to bring in R40bn in investments, so far only one company has made a firm commitment to invest. A report by the chair of the MMSEZ board, Nndweleni Mphephu, to the Limpopo Economic Development, Environment and Tourism department, shows how little has happened in what was to be a mega industrial park in the heart of the Limpopo Valley. The report, dated 28 May, follows questions in Parliament and an oversight visit by MPs to the area. According to the Minister of Trade Industry and Competition Parks Tau, R2.27bn would be needed for bulk infrastructure on the site, and R1.07bn had been set aside between 2020/1 and 2026/7 in the provincial budget. In response to a question in Parliament in May from the DA's Toby Chance, Tau added that the DTIC's Industrial Zones Programme was helping the MMSEZ with advisory support. Some of the money has already been spent, much of it on consultants. In his report, Mphephu gives a list of consultants, service providers and contractors who have benefited to date. Spending of just over R85.2m was approved for consultants, of which just over R67.5m has already been paid to 17 consultants, including engineers, planners, quantity surveyors, project managers and horticulturists. Just under R40m has been paid to service providers, including Eskom. According to the report, three contractors have so far benefited, including Tshiamiso Trading 1 and Tshiamiso Trading 2, which received a R200m contract for roads and stormwater infrastructure and a R99.3m contract for bulk sewer and wastewater treatment works. A contract for R134m was awarded to Rembu Construction, also for the construction of bulk sewer and wastewater treatment works. But though some earthworks have been done by Tshiamiso on the northern site, there are no finished roads, electricity or water on either site. After being paid just over R50.4m, Tshiamiso had to stop work on the northern site, after beginning bush-clearing, because the land belonged to a different organ of state and transfer had to take place first, the report says. Tshiamiso has now terminated the contract and is claiming more money from the MMSEZ, citing non-payment for standing time. This dispute is currently in litigation. Tshiamiso Trading is also accused of unlawfully removing white rock materials from another site to the MMSEZ site without the owner's consent or any formal agreement or compensation. The MMSEZ southern site was gazetted as a Special Economic Zone in 2017, but it turns out that the northern site at Artonvilla has yet to be gazetted, according to a response by Tau to a question in Parliament. Tau said the Limpopo government had indicated it would submit a request before the end of June 2025 to gazette the northern site. In his report, Mphephu noted fierce 'oppositions, dissenting views and pushbacks' mostly from environmental groups, over the southern site. Some of these were challenging the Environmental Impact Assessment in the Polokwane High Court. But in the absence of an interdict, the report says, 'all activities leading to the development, including township establishment processes are expected to proceed.' When President Cyril Ramaphosa publicly announced the MMSEZ in September 2018 following his return from the Forum for Africa and China Cooperation, it came with the promise of an initial investment value of more than R40bn. To date, little of that money appears to have materialised. Responding to questions in Parliament in May, Tau gave a list of investment pledges amounting to more than R8.64bn, of which R2.1bn has been verified and validated from eight prospective investors. But according to the report, only the China-based Kinetic Development Group has come to the party, with a R16bn promise of a ferrochrome smelter on the southern site, once township development on the site is approved, and subject to EIA approvals. If investors do come, one of the biggest questions will be: where is the water going to come from in this semi-arid area? The MMSEZ has approached the Water Services Authority (Vhembe) and the catchment management agency (the Department of Water and Sanitation, DWS) in the region to determine whether they have capacity, either from treated or raw water, to supply the developments. According to the report, Vhembe agreed to provide the MMSEZ with some of its allocation for raw water to kickstart development on the northern site. The DWS said treated water could be brought from Zimbabwe by pipeline for the future development of the site. 'For the south, a few boreholes were drilled in order to start the development of the site. For further development, a pipeline needs to be built to connect to the bulk pipeline from Zimbabwe. Furthermore, two dams are earmarked to be constructed in future to specifically provide water to the site as it grows,' the report says. According to the report, the MMSEZ has now implemented a 'turnaround plan' including a review of the design of roads and stormwater. A division of the Industrial Development Corporation has been appointed as implementing agent, with four professional engineers assigned to the MMEZ full-time. Construction on the first projects will start in September, the report says. This article is published in association with the Limpopo Mirror / Zoutpansberger. Published originally on GroundUp.© 2025 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

South African Post Office's (SAPO) Turnaround Strategy Raises More Questions Than Answers, Says Committee Chair
South African Post Office's (SAPO) Turnaround Strategy Raises More Questions Than Answers, Says Committee Chair

Zawya

time2 days ago

  • Zawya

South African Post Office's (SAPO) Turnaround Strategy Raises More Questions Than Answers, Says Committee Chair

The Chairperson of the Select Committee on Economic Development and Trade, Ms Sonja Boshoff, has expressed concern regarding the work of the business rescue practitioners (BRPs) on the South African Post Office's (SAPO) turnaround strategy. The BRPs presented the plan on Wednesday, stating that progress Is being made and that, in the long term, their vision is to transform the Post Office into an e-commerce hub and a multipurpose service centre. However, Ms Boshoff said troubling realities remain. Chief among these is the retrenchment of over 4 000 employees, with no clarity as to whether further retrenchments have been halted. 'Service delivery at the Post Office has significantly deteriorated, and the entity continues to survive on state bailouts. Public confidence has been completely eroded, and the long-term sustainability of SAPO remains in serious jeopardy,' Ms Boshoff said. She further raised concern about the request to present substantial portions of the turnaround strategy in a closed session. 'SAPO is a state-owned enterprise funded by public money. The use of in-camera briefings must remain the exception, not the rule. Such briefings should only be permitted in instances of legitimate commercial sensitivity – not as a tool to shield institutional failures from public scrutiny and parliamentary oversight.' The strategy, as presented, offers limited detail in terms of innovation and measurable outcomes. While it references digitisation, a revised branch footprint, and hybrid financing models, these aspects remain vague, lacking clear implementation timelines and funding clarity. Ms Boshoff said it is troubling that no investor has yet shown serious interest in supporting the turnaround of the Post Office. 'Meanwhile, key questions remain unanswered: How many of the retrenched employees have actually received support through the TERS fund? What efforts have been made to engage the private sector in restoring core service functions? On what basis is SAPO still classified as a 'strategic national asset' while continuing to rely on repeated state bailouts? How will the proposed hybrid funding model work in practice, and who will ultimately bear the financial risk?' 'It is imperative that public institutions – particularly those under business rescue and funded by taxpayers – operate with transparency, accountability, and defined performance indicators. A turnaround plan cannot rely on slogans or structural tinkering. It must restore credibility, modernise operations and rebuild trust with the South African public who depend on these services.' Ms Boshoff emphasised that as the committee continues its oversight work, it will insist on greater clarity, stronger accountability and full transparency from all parties involved in the business rescue process. 'The relevance of the Post Office in the broader communications and logistics sector is fast diminishing. This can only be reversed through genuine diversification of its service offering and complete modernisation of its operations,' she concluded. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Republic of South Africa: The Parliament.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store