Democratic Rep.: To Safeguard America's Future, We Need To Safeguard Taiwan's
Did you know that most Americans can't find Taiwan on a map? That may sound like a joke, but unfortunately, it's not. A 2022 Morning Consult poll found that only 34 percent of Americans could correctly identify Taiwan's location. Some even thought it was in the Arctic Circle.
Taiwan may not be top of mind for most Americans, but it should be—because the future of our prosperity, our security, and our democratic values is deeply tied to the future of Taiwan.
The contrast between both sides of the Taiwan Strait, between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China (PRC), is a stark one. Taiwan is a vibrant and free democracy. On the other side of the Taiwan Strait, in contrast, Xi Jinping wields supreme power over all matters of state. Taiwan is governed by the will of the people; the PRC is governed by the will of one man.
A Taiwan flag is seen at a harbor in Keelung on April 1, 2025.
A Taiwan flag is seen at a harbor in Keelung on April 1, 2025.
I-HWA CHENG/AFP via Getty Images
But Taiwan is more than just a beacon of freedom—it's one of America's most important economic partners. In fact, it's our seventh-largest trading partner and a critical customer for American farmers. Taiwan is the No. 2 importer of Illinois corn and No. 3 importer of Illinois soybeans. On a per capita basis, Taiwan buys 47 times more wheat than China. And Taiwanese companies like TSMC are investing billions to build advanced semiconductor fabs right here in the U.S.—securing our tech future and creating American jobs.
This is not charity. It's strategic partnership. Taiwan supports American jobs. Taiwanese investment strengthens our supply chains. And Taiwan's democracy serves as a counterweight to the rising authoritarianism of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
But that partnership is under threat. Xi has ordered the People's Liberation Army (PLA) to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. PLA warplanes violated Taiwan's airspace more than 3,000 times last year. In response to Taiwan's elections, the PLA staged military drills simulating a blockade and missile strikes. Any conflict over Taiwan is incredibly dangerous. A war over Taiwan could wipe $10 trillion off global GDP and plunge the U.S. into a deep depression.
So what do we do? We must stand with Taiwan. Not to provoke conflict, but to deter it. Peace across the Taiwan Strait is not just a regional concern; it's an American interest.
The Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the U.S. and the CCP recently held a hearing titled "Deterrence Amid Rising Tensions: Preventing CCP Aggression on Taiwan." We heard from former Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell, who reminded us that Taiwan is not just important—it's indispensable. Taiwan produces more than 90 percent of the world's most advanced semiconductors, supports American farmers, and acts as an international example of freedom and democracy.
Campbell also emphasized that Taiwan's fate is being closely watched by our allies—from Japan and South Korea to our NATO allies. If authoritarianism triumphs in Taiwan, it could embolden aggression elsewhere. We see this clearly with China's enabling and support of Russia in its deadly war in Ukraine. Supporting Taiwan, Campbell argued, is not just good policy—it's a global credibility test for the United States.
The military balance in the Taiwan Strait has shifted. The PLA now fields a force that vastly outnumbers Taiwan's—and it continues to rehearse amphibious invasions, missile strikes, and blockades. But Taiwan still holds advantages: geography, a strong civil society, and—most importantly—deepening ties with the United States and our allies.
That's why we need to act now. The U.S. should expedite arms deliveries to Taiwan, especially asymmetric defenses like sea mines, anti-ship missiles, and drones. We should strengthen Taiwan's food and energy reserves, boost military and disaster relief training programs, and deepen economic ties—especially in agriculture, energy, and tech.
The Taiwan Relations Act, passed in 1979, declared that peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait are in America's interest—and that any attempt to determine Taiwan's future by force is "of grave concern" to the United States. That bipartisan law still guides us today and inspires new legislation like the Six Assurances to Taiwan Act and Taiwan Allies Fund Act, which I'm proud to lead in Congress.
We are in a decisive moment. The Select Committee's hearing made clear that deterrence is only credible if it's bipartisan, sustained, and backed by real investment. That's why I'm working with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to ensure the U.S. is prepared—not for a war, but to prevent one.
In a world growing more dangerous by the day, Taiwan remains one of our best friends. It's time we treated it that way.
Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi serves as ranking member of the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the U.S. and the Chinese Communist Party and represents Illinois' 8th Congressional District.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
Iran strikes US base after Trump bombing. Are you concerned about war? Tell us.
Last week, we asked you if the US should go to war with Iran. It looks like President Trump decided for us. We want to know how you feel about that. Last Thursday, on June 19, President Donald Trump said he would decide 'within the next two weeks' whether the United States would engage directly in the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel. Two days later, Trump announced the completion of a 'successful' attack on Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. On Monday, June 23, Iran responded by striking a U.S. military base in Qatar. And thus begins, perhaps, another U.S. 'forever war' in the Middle East. If you, like me, spent your entire life with America entrenched in Middle East conflicts – where friends and community members have laid down their lives for wars based on lies – then perhaps you, like me, are less than thrilled at this prospect. (Scroll down or click here to share your opinion with us.) And we're not alone. Do you think the US should have bombed Iran? In an Economist/YouGov poll released before the bombing, 60% of respondents said the U.S. military should not get directly involved. A majority – 56% – said that negotiations should continue. A Washington Post poll conducted June 18 found a similar pattern, with the majority of respondents opposing air strikes. And when USA TODAY conducted our own reader survey, we received an overwhelming response saying the United States should not get involved and America should refrain from official intervention. Previously: Should US go to war with Iran or support Israel from afar? Take our poll. | Opinion In the aftermath of the bombing, Americans – and the world – seem as divided as ever on the decision. Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, applauded the move and even encouraged it, telling The Wall Street Journal that he told the president, 'This will reset our relationship with the rest of the world.' Meanwhile MAGA faithful Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, took to X on Monday to break with Trump, writing, 'It feels like a complete bait and switch.' Less than a week later, we want to know if that feeling has changed. Do you think Trump was right to bomb Iran? Do you think he should have waited for approval from Congress? What do you think Iran – and America – will do next? Are you concerned about the threat of nuclear war? Why did Trump strike Iran? Will it change anything? Questions have swirled in the immediate fallout from the June 21 bombing. In a speech that evening, Trump claimed Iran's three major sites had been 'obliterated.' But less than a day later, the picture was much less certain, with weapons experts, Iranian officials and even Russia contesting the true impact of the attack. These new developments beg the question: Was it worth it? And, with countries pledging to arm Iran with nuclear weapons anyway, did it even change anything? We want to know what you think. Take our poll below, or send us an email with the subject line "Forum US Iran war" to forum@ We'll publish a collection of responses from all sides of the conversation in our next installment of the Opinion Forum. Janessa Hilliard is the director of audience for USA TODAY Opinion and Opinion at Gannett.
Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
Oz nudges Senate Republicans to ease off on Medicaid cuts
House Republicans are aiming to slash funding for the nonpartisan watchdog for waste, fraud and abuse within the federal government by nearly half in the next fiscal year, according to spending bill text released Sunday night. The House Appropriations subcommittee funding Congress and its support agencies, led by chairman David Valadao (R-Calif.), is set to mark up their fiscal 2026 measure Monday evening, with the full committee set to act Thursday. The Legislative Branch bill would provide $6.7 billion — $51 million below the current funding level, which was set in fiscal 2024. Per tradition, the House bill does not touch any Senate funding. 'Chairman Valadao's bill puts the American people first — in strengthening the institutions that represent them, protecting effective governance, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars,' said House Appropriations Committee Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) in a statement. The deepest cuts in the bill are to the Government Accountability Office, an arm of Congress that would see a $396.5 million reduction from current levels to $415.4 million. GAO has served as the nation's chief investigator of wrongdoing at federal agencies for more than a century, but has been fighting for months as Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration have attempted to undercut its legal conclusions and independence. Now, they are attempting to shrink the agency into submission as it pursues nearly 40 investigations into whether the White House is illegally withholding, or 'impounding,' money Congress had previously approved. Also tucked into the bill is a major policy change that would eliminate the GAO's ability to bring civil action against the executive branch over impoundments of funds. 'GAO's work makes it possible for the legislative branch to hold government accountable,' said Daniel Schuman, executive director of the American Governance Institute. 'Congress needs independent expert advice, which is exactly what GAO provides.' Also on the chopping block is the Library of Congress, which is another legislative branch agency also engaged in a power struggle against intrusion by the Trump administration. The bill allocates $767.6 million for the Library of Congress, which is $84.5 million below the current funding level and $133.7 million below the FY26 request. 'This bill does nothing to safeguard against the growing levels of executive overreach into legislative branch agencies,' said Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the legislative branch subcommittee. Some other key provisions in the GOP-written bill include: Capitol Police: The Capitol Police would see a $84.4 million boost to their funding under the bill, bringing the total to $891 million. Some lawmakers had asked for an increase in office funding for use for security, but the bill flat-funds the Members Representational Allowance, which can be used for some member security purposes. Member Pay: The bill would continue the member pay freeze that has been in effect since 2013, halting automatic cost of living increases that members of Congress are supposed to get under law. Gay marriage: The bill includes language that prohibits discrimination against any person who 'speaks, or acts' in accordance with a 'sincerely held religious belief, or moral conviction, that marriage is, or should be recognized as, a union of one man and one woman.'
Black America Web
28 minutes ago
- Black America Web
D.L. Hughley Joins Fort Worth's Juneteenth Walk for Freedom
Source: Michael S. Schwartz / Getty D.L. Hughley joined the annual Opal's Walk for Freedom in Fort Worth, Texas, to commemorate Juneteenth. The event, inspired by the tireless efforts of Dr. Opal Lee, the 'Grandmother of Juneteenth,' celebrates the abolition of slavery and the resilience of the African American community. RELATED: 10 Powerful Speeches on Juneteenth and the Fight for Racial Justice RELATED: Trump Complains About Juneteenth, X Shows Off His Hypocrisy This year's walk saw hundreds of participants, including families, lawmakers, and community leaders, marching the symbolic 2.5 miles. The distance represents the two-and-a-half years it took for enslaved people in Texas to learn of their freedom after the Emancipation Proclamation. Although Dr. Lee, now 98, was unable to attend due to health reasons, her legacy and mission were palpable throughout the event. D.L. Hughley emphasized the importance of preserving and celebrating history, especially in the face of efforts to diminish its significance. 'So much of our history is under attack right now,' Hughley remarked. 'Juneteenth and us celebrating this day nationally is a long time coming. It's about educating people on what it means.' Congressman Marc Veasey echoed these sentiments, highlighting Juneteenth as a cornerstone of American history. 'It's not just Black history; it's Texas history, it's American history,' he stated, underscoring the need for continued education and reflection. Dr. Opal Lee's journey to make Juneteenth a national holiday began at age 89, culminating in 2021 when President Joe Biden signed the Juneteenth National Independence Day Act. Her advocacy remains a call to action, urging people to reflect on the question, 'Are we free yet?' Her mantra, 'None of us are free if we're not all free,' continues to inspire. Juneteenth, celebrated on June 19, marks the day in 1865 when enslaved people in Galveston, Texas, learned of their freedom. Today, it stands as a powerful reminder of resilience, progress, and the ongoing pursuit of equality. Events like Opal's Walk for Freedom ensure that this history is honored and shared with future generations. SOURCE | Fox 4 Dallas/Fort Worth SEE ALSO
