As G7 leaders meet, allies ask: Is Trump with us or against us?
Ongoing trade instability and turmoil in Ukraine and the Middle East are set to dominate talks, as leaders of the world's largest advanced economic powers gather in Canada for this year's Group of Seven (G7) summit.
With uncertainty over those major issues largely arising from the White House's economic and foreign policy, allies are likely to ask whether U.S. President Donald Trump stands with them, or against them on major geopolitical points.
The G7 comprises the U.S., U.K., Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan, as well as representatives from the European Union and other guest participants. The leaders of Australia, Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia, Ukraine, South Africa and South Korea have also been invited to this year's gathering.
These summits aim to facilitate a consensus on the biggest global economic and geopolitical challenges and to coordinate actions to tackle them.
The problem for the group this year comes from within, however, with Trump's array of trade tariffs and a potential global trade war looming as live threats — barring for the U.K., which signed a trade deal with Washington in May.
The summit takes place while Trump's 90-day pause on "reciprocal" tariffs is still in effect, with Japan and the EU looking to strike a deal before the July 9 deadline, when higher trade duties — currently lowered to 10% by Trump in the interim to allow deals to be negotiated — could return with a vengeance.
Canada was hit with a 25% tariff on autos and 50% duty on steel and aluminum imports, while goods not covered by the USMCA trade pact, which includes Mexico, are also subject to duties. Canada retaliated with its own 25% tariff on U.S. imports, although it has suspended some of those in order to protect domestic industries.
Bilateral meetings between Trump and leaders looking for a trade deal are expected to take place at the G7 summit over the next few days, but the odds of any big bang deals being struck is uncertain.
Host Canada certainly looks to be avoiding any obvious signs of disunity, having abandoned the usual communique that's issued at the end of G7 summits on how the group plans to work together to tackle joint challenges.
This could seek to avoid a repeat of the acrimonious conclusion to the previous summit in Canada back in 2018 when Trump, during his first term in office, retracted the U.S.' support for the joint statement. The summit in France in 2019 was the last gathering Trump attended.
"The G7 was formed fifty years ago so the world's advanced-economy democracies could align on shared economic and geopolitical challenges. But what happens when the cause of instability is coming from inside the G7? That's the question confronting the leaders as they assemble this week in Kananaskis," John Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council, said in a research note ahead of the summit.
"Trump will try to coordinate the [G7] group against China's economic coercion. But the rest of the leaders may turn back to Trump and say that this kind of coordination, which is at the heart of why the G7 works, would be easier if he weren't imposing tariffs on his allies," he added.
There is also the thorny issue of support for Ukraine — or Russia's rehabilitation, with Trump on the fence about further sanctions on Moscow — as well as the escalating crisis in the Middle East, where recent attacks between Israel and Iran have left hundreds dead and raised concerns about the global economy.
Israel's staunch ally the U.S. stepped in to help shoot down Iranian missiles, while other global leaders have called to de-escalate tensions.
This backdrop of tariffs and conflict could well give rise to fireworks at the June summit in Canada, given Trump's often contrarian and mercurial nature, analysts say.
"The last time Trump attended a G7 leaders' summit in Canada, in 2018, he treated it like a reality TV show," analysts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies said in analysis ahead of the meeting.
"With Trump's tariff war in full swing and targeting the other countries in attendance, this meeting could be even more contentious than his last visit," they noted. To avert another disastrous end to the G7 summit, the CSIS said global leaders needed to acknowledge and act upon Trump's concerns "about U.S. global leadership."
"In previous meetings, G7 members have made clear their interest in addressing technological advancements, public health, major wars, and other issues beyond the group's traditional mandate. With many international institutions today paralyzed by geopolitical rivalries, the world needs concerted action now more than ever," they noted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
30 minutes ago
- CBS News
Israel says 21 people wounded as Iran fires dozens of missiles following U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities
Tel Aviv, Israel — Iran launched a wave of missiles at Israel on Sunday morning, wounding at least 21 people — four of them seriously, paramedics said — after the U.S. joined Israel's week-long attacks on the Islamic Republic's nuclear sites. Iranian missiles made impacts in four sites across Israel: in Haifa, Tel Aviv, Be'er Yaakov and Nes Ziona, according to Israel's Magen David Adom emergency response service. Searches were underway for people believed to be trapped under the rubble of a collapsed building in Tel Aviv, local media reported. The Israel Defense Forces told CBS News that Iran had launched about 30 missiles at Israel. Israeli security forces and first responders gather at the site of an Iranian strike that hit a residential building in the Ramat Aviv area in Tel Aviv, June 22, 2025. JACK GUEZ/AFP/Getty Images circulating on both Israeli television and social media platforms showed serious damage to buildings, as well as injured people being rescued by first responders. The IDF said in a statement that during the missile barrage, no alert sirens had gone off in Haifa, despite there having been an impact from a missile there. "The possibility that there was an issue with the interceptor is being looked into," the IDF said, referring to its missile defense systems. "There was no malfunction in the alert system and a previous warning had been issued to the area." The Iranian assault took place hours after President Trump announced that the U.S. military had carried out strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites: Isfahan and Natanz, and the well-fortified Fordo enrichment facility. In a briefing in Washington on Sunday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said the U.S. operation, called "Midnight Hammer," used seven B2 bombers carrying bunker-busting bombs to attack Fordo and Natanz. It struck Isfahan, which had already been heavily bombed by Israel in previous days, with Tomahawk missiles launched by submarines. Since the beginning of Israel's "Operation Rising Lion" against Iran, its National Public Diplomacy Directorate says Iran has fired over 450 missiles at Israel and 400 drones. 24 people in Israel have been killed in Israel, all of them in the early days of Iran's retaliatory attacks last week. As of Friday, the Washington-based group Human Rights Activists in Iran, which relies on a network of contacts in the country, said 722 people had been killed in the country by Israel's strikes, with the attacks hitting 25 of the Islamic Republic's 31 provinces.
Politico
31 minutes ago
- Politico
Israel is not dragging America into war with Iran, its president says
Israeli President Isaac Herzog said Sunday Israel is 'not dragging America' into a war with Iran after President Donald Trump announced he bombed three Iranian nuclear sites. 'We are leaving it to the decision of the head of, the president of the United States and his team,' he said on CNN's State of the Union, 'because it had to do with America's national security interest, period. We are not intending and we don't ask for America now to go to war because the Iranians are threatening Israel. The decision was taken because the Iranian nuclear program was a clear and present danger to the security interests of all of the free world.' Despite Trump claiming in an address to the nation Saturday night that Iran's nuclear sites had been 'completely and totally obliterated,' Herzog told host Kasie Hunt he could not say whether this was the case, instead claiming that the sites had been 'hit very hard, both by the Israeli attacks and absolutely by the American attack overnight.' Herzog also said that while Israel was not actively working toward a regime change in Iran, it would be a 'very blessed' outcome. 'After all, this regime is a very oppressive regime,' he said. Herzog reminded Hunt that he is the head of state in Israel, but noted that his authority was limited; it is the Israeli Security Cabinet led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that oversees war planning. He said he did not know the 'exact details' of communication between Trump and Netanyahu, but that there was 'a very close and intimate dialogue' between the two. Israel and Iran have exchanged strikes for over a week, with Iran firing dozens of missiles at Israel on Sunday. Iran threatened to retaliate against the U.S. for its airstrikes, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warning of 'everlasting consequences' and saying he does not know 'how much room there is left for diplomacy.'
Bloomberg
33 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Stakes His Legacy on Iran Attack
Welcome to a special edition of Balance of Power on the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Each weekday we bring you the latest in global politics. If you haven't yet, sign up here. By unleashing American military power on Iran, President Donald Trump has plunged the Middle East — and the world — into a moment of dangerous uncertainty.
