Move faster on firms' public contracts ban, Grenfell survivor urges Government
Efforts to ban companies linked to the Grenfell fire from public contracts must speed up, a survivor of the fire has said ahead of the eighth anniversary.
Bereaved and survivors of the blaze will gather on Saturday in west London for the annual commemoration of the disaster which claimed 72 lives.
It is likely to be the final anniversary which takes place with the tower still standing in its current form, as demolition work could begin in September.
Former tower resident Edward Daffarn, who had previously raised safety concerns and predicted a 'catastrophic event' at the tower seven months before the fire, said this year's memorial will be 'all the more poignant' for that reason.
But Mr Daffarn is hopeful a new documentary about the blaze, due to air on Netflix next week, will spur Government efforts to take action against companies linked to fire.
He told the PA news agency: 'One thing that this documentary needs to do is it needs to put pressure on the Government to ensure that the companies involved are not able to access public funding, and I'm hoping that this documentary will accelerate that process.'
The Cabinet office confirmed in February that seven companies were facing possible bans – cladding firm Arconic, insulation firm Kingspan, former Celotex owners Saint-Gobain, fire inspectors Exova, design and build contractor Rydon, architect Studio E and subcontractor Harley Facades.
It is understood investigations were launched into all of them in March, looking into whether any engaged in professional misconduct for the purposes of the Procurement Act 2023, potentially leading them to be debarred from public contracts.
No timeline has been given for how long it might be before outcomes are known.
The final Grenfell Tower Inquiry report, published in September, concluded victims, bereaved and survivors were 'badly failed' through incompetence, dishonesty and greed.
The west London tower block was covered in combustible products because of the 'systematic dishonesty' of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said.
He called out 'deliberate and sustained' manipulation of fire-safety testing, misrepresentation of test data and misleading of the market.
Mr Daffarn said the documentary will be the first 'that truly exposes and brings into people's living rooms' the 'cowardice of the corporates and how profit was put before people'.
He said; 'I hope that people who watch the documentary come to understand that although Grenfell happened eight years ago, there's a lot that still hasn't been resolved and, as a consequence, the companies involved with Grenfell just seem to want to brush everything under the carpet and carry on making money.
'And I think the documentary clearly exposes how little these companies and individuals have been held to account for their roles in Grenfell.'
On Government efforts, which Sir Keir Starmer first announced last September, to debar companies, Mr Daffarn said the process is 'too slow' and bereaved and survivors are 'still waiting' for companies to face consequences.
He said anyone left angered by the documentary could avoid buying products from companies criticised in the report to 'make sure that those companies understand that there is a consequence of their actions'.
Bereaved and survivors have long campaigned for criminal charges to be brought over the disaster.
Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026.
The near 10-year wait for justice has been described by families as 'unbearable'.
The decision to bring the tower block down was confirmed earlier this year and prompted mixed reaction, with some people feeling their views had not been properly taken into consideration.
Sharing his own opinion, and acknowledging the difficulty others feel in seeing the tower regularly, Mr Daffarn said: 'I think the anniversary is made all the more poignant by the fact that this is the last time that we will meet with the tower in situ.
'We haven't got justice yet. It feels wrong to be pulling the tower down while so much remains unresolved.'
The Government said while some had hoped the building could remain in place as a reminder of what happened, others had reported this would be 'too painful'.
The demolition process is expected to take around two years.
A Government spokesperson said: 'As we approach the eighth anniversary of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, our thoughts remain with the bereaved families, survivors and the immediate community.
'This government remains committed to ensuring that what happened at Grenfell is never forgotten, and to delivering the change needed so it can never happen again.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
35 minutes ago
- The Sun
Woman dies and nine injured in horror M4 crash as motorway shut ‘for most the day' with cops launching urgent hunt
A WOMAN has died in a car crash that hospitalised nine other people last night. The fatal crash happened on the M4 between junctions 16 and 17, just before 11.30pm last night. 1 A womanin her 40s sadly died at the scene, and another woman in her 70s was seriously injured Five other people in the car had minor injuries. There were also three people travelling in the second car who were hurt and were taken to hospital with minor injuries. Wiltshire Police's Serious Collision Team are at the scene carrying out an investigation into what happened. The motorway is likely to be closed westbound for most of the day, likely causing disruption for a large number of people. Cops received reports that a white vehicle may have been involved and left the scene. Any witnesses to the collision or anyone who may have dashcam footage are asked to contact the serious collision investigation team on 01225 694597, quoting log number 399.
BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Highland-wide holiday lets control zone proposed by councillors
A Highland-wide control zone to limit Airbnb-style lets has been suggested as a way of tackling a shortage of homes across the proposing the move said 7,011 short-term let licences had been granted across the Highlands, but only four lets are not banned in control areas, but operators need planning permission as well as a short-term lets councillors said the powers could be used where there was local demand for them. Highland Council officials said control area status for the whole of the Highlands would require research and, if it was introduced, could mean additional costs and workload for its planning department. The idea of Highland-wide status has been suggested by Inverness councillors Michael Gregson and Duncan a paper going to next week's meeting of the full council, they said the region needed more than 24,000 homes over the next 10 added: "The private long-term rental market has shrunk disastrously: estate agents are withdrawing from letting out properties because of the shortage of properties available. "Even taking into account the efforts of Highland Council and the Housing Associations, there is a shortage of affordable housing."The councillors said the local authority should first ask the Scottish government to revisit its original plan to have an overprovision policy within short-term lets said if that was not possible, then to seek approval for Highland control area their response, officials said there would be financial implications for the local authority around both suggestions from the also said there could be potential challenges to Highland-wide of Edinburgh Council had to amend its licensing scheme following a court ruling. The whole of the City of Edinburgh Council area was designated Scotland's first short-term let control area in September 2022.A law requiring operators to have a licence came into force across Scotland in October the following Council's first control zone was approved in December 2023 and covers Badenoch and who supported its introduction said it was needed because workers and local young people had difficulties finding affordable the Association of Scotland's Self-Caterers (ASSC) said at the time that targeting legitimate small businesses to address longstanding housing issues showed "a muddled sense of priorities".
BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Life Factory contractors angry over unpaid work 'worth thousands'
Contractors who worked on a £2.89m government-funded renovation project have said it is "disgusting" they have not been paid for all their to create a community space at The Life Factory in Glastonbury paused in 2024 after Somerset Council had concerns about its progress and stopped releasing funds to Red Brick Building Centre, which was responsible for the BBC understands about 15 creditors are awaiting payment, including one who claimed he is owed about £380,000. He described the impact as "catastrophic".Somerset Council said the situation was "regrettable", while the Red Brick Building board said it had been liaising with creditors to "work out what to do". Keith Jackson is director at TML Building Services, which was contracted by Beckery Construction Company (BCC), a subsidiary of Red Brick, to carry out structural works at The Life told the BBC he had not been paid since January 2024 and claims he is owed about £380,000 for work, including removing the floor and roof."We never knew the project was in trouble until a halt was called," he said."Why can't we be paid for the work we've done? Why should we suffer for other people's incompetence?"He said the situation had a "terrible effect" on his company."We haven't got any finances," he explained. "We've got several jobs we could go to, but we don't have the money to go. "We owe other subcontractors a considerable amount of money, but also it's taken our future away." Funding to develop the community and learning space was awarded to Red Brick Building Centre, a social enterprise, under the Glastonbury Town West Audit Partnership (Swap) is looking into what went wrong. In a report, it said it had "no assurance" sound governance or financial controls were in place at Red Brick Building or Somerset also found "no evidence" of a plan to deliver the project "within budget, scope and on time".The report said BCC was set up to keep costs down, but confused the relationship between parties which lead to a communication breakdown, poor governance and a lack of also found standard HR procedures were not followed at BCC, including around sub-contractor recruitment and timesheet records. 'Huge strain' J&E Construction SouthWest was also contracted by BCC to renew the internal floors and roof structure of The Life director Tom Popham claimed he is owed a significant sum in unpaid invoices. He said the situation put a "huge strain" on him, but a loyal client base and his other business meant he was able to pay his contractors and suppliers. However, he said the company is now facing "slow growth"."We haven't got the money in the bank that we used to," he added. He described the council's decision not to release more funds as "disgusting". "I have lost all faith in Somerset Council," he said."I do think they [the council] should settle up if we can prove what we've done." Somerset Council said: "It is deeply regrettable this is having an impact on local contractors with legitimate claims, but we are not contractually responsible for any payments to them."It added the Swap report confirmed the council's concerns about the project and made it "clear" it "cannot release further payments".In a previous statement the council's chief executive Duncan Sharkey said the authority accepted its monitoring of the project "could have been strengthened". A new board started operating at Red Brick at the end of 2023 and its chair Indra Donfrancesco said it is "heartbreaking" contractors have not been paid."There hasn't been a day in this last year where we haven't been trying to work out with them what to do," she added."It is absolutely devastating on every level."A statement from the new Red Brick board said the previous leadership set up BCC in 2022 to manage the scheme and appointed a full-time project manager. It claimed there were "serious" procedural and reporting "failures" and said: "In hindsight, both Red Brick and Somerset Council lacked the capacity to provide proper oversight".Ms Donfrancesco said the previous Red Brick board should have had more of a "financial forecast" of where money was going, what the project would look like and the contractors involved. John Capper, one of two former directors of BCC, said in a statement that Red Brick's board signed the funding agreement and so responsibility lies with said the project manager, who was also a BCC director and full-time employee of Red Brick, was "managerially responsible" for the project's delivery and the "reporting and adherence" to procedures."He reported on a regular basis to the Red Brick board as overseers of the project," Mr Capper said that, during his time as a director, "no concerns" were raised by the council or Red Brick board regarding the issues in the Swap report."However, I did raise my own concerns with the Red Brick board and the Somerset Council officer, which is the reason why I left," he Poizer, the other BCC director and the project manager, declined to comment until the audit process is complete. What now? Ms Donfrancesco said the new board will work with the council to try to find a way to satisfy the funding agreement."Should an alternative viable plan for regenerating the derelict building come to fruition over the coming months, the remaining funds could still be released," she audit work continues. A Swap report found a considerable sum is due to be paid to contractors and creditors, but said the amount was unconfirmed as some costs could be ineligible and some invoices are in a recent council meeting, auditors described the work as complex and could not give a timeline as to when it will be complete.
