Naval base for Galway could form part of Ireland's first maritime security strategy
Galway could be considered as the location for a new naval base as part of Ireland's first ever maritime security strategy.
A public consultation on the strategy was announced by Tánaiste Simon Harris on Thursday.
Mr Harris, who is also Minister for Defence, said it would map out an approach for the next five years with a particular focus on how to deal with 'emerging threats and vulnerabilities' and the protection of the country's
sub-sea infrastructure
.
Announcing the consultation process during the Dáil's defence question time, he said it will run for four weeks and invite individuals and groups with interest to make a submission.
READ MORE
'The intention is to have a new maritime security strategy approved and published before the end of this year. We're an island nation with one of the largest sea areas in Europe and it's absolutely vital that we have a robust and effective maritime security strategy in place,' he said.
[
Ireland must stop 'free-riding' on security 'gifted by others'
Opens in new window
]
[
Opinion: State needs to invest in Navy and Air Corps
Opens in new window
]
'I think this strategy would be crucial to assessing any
potential threats and vulnerabilities
.'
Mr Harris said there would 'absolutely be a need' for more naval facilities as Fianna Fáil TD John Connolly highlighted the recommendation of the Commission on the Defence Forces for a base for the Naval Reserve in Galway.
'I think this should form part of the strategy,' Mr Connolly said. 'The West coast between Limerick and Donegal really has no coastal cover in terms of maritime defence and this is quite a wide area.'
The Galway West TD pointed out that some of the transatlantic sub-sea cables come through Galway and Mayo.
Mr Harris said he intended to speak directly to the Naval Service and to the Chief of Staff on plans for the expansion of such bases. Ireland's sole naval base is located at Haulbowline, Co Cork.
'Getting this strategy right is so important. We live in a country where around 78 per cent of our energy needs are imported on ships or via pipelines. Around 90 per cent of our trade is transported by sea and 95 per cent of international data and voice transfers are rooted through our undersea fibre optic cables,' he said.
'The majority of transatlantic data passes through the cables situated in Ireland's economic exclusive zone.'
He stressed that strategic planning would be crucial to assessing potential threats and vulnerabilities and urged 'the many people who have an expertise in this, to make their views known'.
'[They should] bring forward their ideas on how we can put in place a strategy that will ensure we really take the critical opportunity to have a new and a robust approach to safeguarding our waters.'
Mr Harris said the Government is also looking at a new national security plan for Ireland more broadly. Co-ordinated by the Department of the Taoiseach, its purpose will be to ensure there are no 'silos' or overlapping pieces of legislation and that 'the maritime situation can also be considered in that context'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
37 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
EU foreign ministers to meet over Middle East, Ukraine
EU foreign ministers are meeting in Brussels at the start of a week of high-level diplomacy on the Middle East and Ukraine, with the NATO summit in The Hague tomorrow and a summit of EU leaders on Thursday. Foreign ministers will give their initial response to an EU report which holds that Israel is in breach of its obligations under its trade arrangements with Europe due the conduct of its war in Gaza and its activities in the occupied West Bank. Ministers are also expected to reiterate calls for a de-escalation of the Israel-Iran crisis following the US bombing of key Iranian nuclear sites. Foreign ministers will begin with a briefing from the EU intelligence and situation centre on the unfolding crisis over Israel's attack on Iran, which has now been joined by the United States. In a statement, Tánaiste Simon Harris said he was deeply concerned by the very real risk of an extremely dangerous spiral of escalation in the Middle East following the US military action. He said the EU had a role in spearheading a diplomatic solution to the crisis. However, US President Donald Trump has made it clear he does not see any role for the European Union. Separately, foreign ministers will give their first assessment of a searing indictment of Israel's policy on Gaza and the West Bank in a report produced by the EU's Special Representative for Human Rights. The review, circulated to member states on Friday, held that Israel is in violation of Article 2 of the EU Israel Association Agreement, which binds both sides to human rights and international humanitarian law obligations. Last night, Israel dismissed the report as a "moral and methodological failure," saying it should be dismissed entirely. EU chief diplomat Kaja Kallas will take stock of how foreign ministers view the findings before briefing EU leaders later in the week. It seems likely that a menu of options to hold Israel to account - possibly including trade sanctions - will not be presented to foreign ministers until their next meeting in July.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Dublin Airport will eventually exceed 40 million passengers a year, Minister for Transport predicts
Imposing annual passenger caps on Dublin Airport will be 'arbitrary' as even the 40 million cap being sought by airport operator DAA will be surpassed within a short period, Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien says. The cap of 32 million passengers a year, which has been in place since 2008, was breached in 2023 and 2024. Mr O'Brien said the number of passengers passing through the airport was likely to exceed 36 million this year. He said it was a clear aim in the Programme for Government to end the restriction on passenger numbers. READ MORE 'I want to see the cap in Dublin Airport removed. I think any artificial stifling of growth within Dublin Airport, it would be counterproductive for the country,' he said. Last week, Fingal County Council, which is the local authority with responsibility for the airport, issued an enforcement notice that gave DAA a two-year period to comply with the planning conditions imposed by An Bord Pleanála in 2008. However, there is a High Court-imposed stay pending the outcome of proceedings taking by a number of airlines against the cap. Mr O'Brien said that stay was likely to remain until the second half of next year. He said the Government was now working on a new National Aviation Policy to address the issues of the volume of traffic around the State's main airport hub. He said a key ruling by An Bord Pleanála on night flights at the airport – expected within weeks – would be critical. At present no flights are allowed to take off from or land on the north runway between 11pm and 7am. The night-time movements of aircraft in the airport are restricted to 65 overall. DAA has applied for those restrictions to be eased and there is expectation that aircraft will be allowed on the north runway between 6am and midnight daily. This change has been strongly opposed by residents living in St Margaret's and The Ward, two communities located at the perimeter of the airport. Mr O'Brien, a TD for the constituency, said he was very conscious of the concerns of those communities and the challenges they faced. 'I've been at pains to say to DAA to operate under the good neighbour principle,' he said. He said some people in the St Margaret's area were in effect living right beside the runway. He said the airport should improve its voluntary purchase package as the impact was significant on a small number of households. 'They can't be forgotten,' he said. However, Mr O'Brien said the airport needed to expand and that included passenger numbers. He said if decision on night flights was in favour of expanding the hours then that would help passenger numbers grow. 'A total of 3 per cent of GDP comes from activity around the airport campus. It's a critical driver for economic growth, and supports about 20,000 jobs directly and about 130,000 indirect jobs.' He said basing numbers on forward projections over 10 years the number of passengers would exceed 40 million each year before then. 'One should ask the question, if DAA applies for a passenger cap of 40 million how long will that last? Is that cap going to be [surpassed]? Therefore should you have an arbitrary cap?' Mr O'Brien also said he had consulted Attorney General Rossa Fanning and may bring forward legislation to prevent what he sees as overly restrictive limits. He said the cap was put in 2008 as a response to inadequate transport infrastructure at the airport. He said the situation had changed since then, with a change in terms of roads, public transport and access.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
We like to romanticise Ireland's past, but too much remembering could be bad for us
There is no comparison between the Provisional IRA and the Irish Volunteers who staged the Easter Rising in 1916. Patrick Pearse's generation of republicans never set off bombs in crowded pubs or on shopping streets , indiscriminately murdering civilians. They never pulled people out of vehicles and shot them dead because they were Protestants . But there is one parallel that Gerry Adams was able to point to at his successful defamation case against the BBC : the Rising had no democratic legitimacy. When the issue of the Provisional movement's lack of electoral mandate for 'atrocities' was mentioned in court, Adams replied : 'Pádraig Pearse. James Connolly. The men and women who went out in 1916, they had no mandate for what they were doing.' Adams has a point, but it doesn't reflect well on the IRA of which he has always denied being a part. It reflects poorly on an ill-thought-out insurrection that the State now publicly reveres above any other episode in Ireland's journey to independence. Twenty years ago, then-taoiseach Bertie Ahern announced the reinstatement of an Easter Monday military parade at the General Post Office in Dublin. He said there was a need to 'reclaim' 1916 from hardline nationalists. But two decades on, has the move backfired? READ MORE Fr Séamus Murphy, who teaches philosophy at Loyola University Chicago, believes so. 'I don't demand that the State disown the men of 1916. But it has to stop praising them and calling their action the foundation of the State,' Murphy says. The Jesuit priest explores the question further in a new book Confronting the Irish Past: The 1912-1923 Decade in Light of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement. It is an unusual work in that it tries to bring philosophical insights to bear on Irish history. Murphy, who has written extensively on just war theory and Irish neutrality, asks some deep questions about the ethics of commemoration: What duties do we have to our ancestors? How much commemoration is too much? Is there a hierarchy of 'emotional hurt' from historical events? Murphy examines the work of the German Jewish political philosopher Hannah Arendt , who believed history 'needed not so much to be explained as to be confronted'. This meant, among other things, acknowledging the 'ongoing impact' of events – and how political violence leaves a scar on society that can be unpicked in the future. Too much remembering can have negative effects on a population. In Northern Ireland , people were horrified at the recent clashes with police officers during street protests. But the thuggery was not entirely surprising in a province where two communities have been glorifying acts of violence for decades. Elsewhere in the world, commemoration of historical victimhood can be weaponised to commit crimes against humanity. 'It's a human thing. We remember our people's sufferings, while being indifferent to those of others, including the sufferings our tribe or nation inflict on the others. In the latter case, we can be inclined to say: they had it coming, they deserved it,' says Murphy. Ultimately, the question arises: who is history meant to serve – the living or the dead? 'It is bad for us to behave in the present as if our ancestors, dead grandparents, etc, no longer mattered in any sense. It would be treating them with contempt. Same goes for how we behave in the present with respect to how it would likely affect future generations,' says Murphy. But we should not be afraid to adapt history 'for the needs of the living'. That includes foregrounding the celebration of those events that pave the way for the future we wish to see. 'The nationalist side – our people – has to acknowledge that, just as Sinn Féin /IRA's political enemy in Northern Ireland from the 1970s to today was the SDLP – or any other party with a significant nationalist following – so the political target of the 1916 Rising was not the British government or the Ulster unionists but the Home Rule party,' says Murphy. ' John Redmond and the Home Rule party were moving, slowly, to doing a Bertie Ahern and signing a Good Friday Agreement, recognising that unionists couldn't be compelled into a united Ireland. The Rising is the scream of rage against that. We can't – without engaging in massive pretence – claim to endorse the Rising and the Good Friday Agreement with no qualification: they contradict each other at several points.' Here lies a test for all of us. To create a shared future on this island, and internationally, we must move beyond uncritically celebrating the actions of any particular tribe. Standing in our way is an imagined moral duty to people who are long dead and who had their own flaws. Surely our overriding moral duty is for the living? [ How Tuam, synonymous with a dark side of Irish history, can finally 'do the right thing' Opens in new window ] WB Yeats 's line 'Was it for this ... that all that blood was shed?' has an emotional force in debates on Ireland's future. But, says Murphy, 'just as you shouldn't feel compelled by your dead parents' wish that you should become a neurosurgeon – or a priest – so a political agenda of a previous generation cannot compel today's political action. Your parents have no right to say – adapting Yeats – to you, if you choose to be a journalist rather than what they wanted: was it for this that we made all those sacrifices?'
