China first quarter emissions fell despite rising power demand
China plans to peak carbon emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. PHOTO: AFP
BEIJING - Surging renewable energy meant China's carbon emissions fell in the first quarter of 2025 despite rapidly rising power demands, a key milestone in the country's energy transition, analysis from a think tank showed on May 15.
China's trade war with the United States remains a wildcard, however, especially if Beijing acts to stimulate polluting industrial sectors in response, the report notes.
China, the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) that drive climate change, plans to peak carbon emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060.
It has invested heavily in its renewable energy sector, building almost twice as much wind and solar capacity as every other country combined, according to research published last year.
New wind, solar and nuclear capacity meant China's CO2 emissions fell by 1.6 per cent year-on-year in the first quarter and one per cent in the 12 months to March, said analyst Lauri Myllyvirta at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (Crea).
China's emissions have dipped before, but those reductions were driven by falling demand, such as during strict Covid-19 lockdowns in 2022.
This time the drop came despite China's total power demand growing 2.5 per cent in the first quarter, said the report published in Carbon Brief.
'Growth in clean power generation has now overtaken the current and long-term average growth in electricity demand, pushing down fossil fuel use,' Mr Myllyvirta said.
'The current drop is the first time that the main driver is growth in clean power generation.' he added.
Power sector emissions fell 5.8 per cent in the first quarter, offsetting rises in emissions from coal use in the metals and chemicals industries.
But the report cautioned that emissions could rise again if Beijing seeks to stimulate carbon-intensive sectors to try to counteract the trade war with Washington.
China also remains 'significantly off track' for a key 2030 target to reduce its carbon intensity – carbon emissions relative to GDP – under the Paris climate agreement.
China pledged to achieve a 65 per cent reduction in carbon intensity by 2030 from 2005 levels.
'The future path of China's CO2 emissions hangs in the balance, depending on trends within each sector of its economy, as well as China's response to (US President Donald) Trump's tariffs,' Mr Myllyvirta said.
Beijing has agreed to a 90-day pause on sky-high tariffs with Washington, but the shape of a final truce remains unclear.
China has sought to position itself as a leader in combating climate change at a time when Mr Trump is promoting fossil fuel extraction and has withdrawn from multilateral climate agreements.
Despite China's renewable energy boom, coal remains a vital part of its energy mix.
China began construction on 94.5 gigawatts of coal power projects in 2024, 93 per cent of the global total, according to a February report by Crea and US-based Global Energy Monitor.
Much of that is expected to be for backup power, however.
In April 2025, China said that wind and solar energy capacity had surpassed mostly coal-based thermal capacity for the first time, according to data for the first quarter. AFP
Find out more about climate change and how it could affect you on the ST microsite here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
36 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Around military bases in the US, unease over what comes next
The past few days have served as a solemn reminder of the unsettling emotions military service can bring. PHOTO: AFP Around military bases in the US, unease over what comes next Follow our live coverage here. WASHINGTON – For some families who gathered this weekend at Fort Benning in Georgia, the past few days have served as a solemn reminder of the unsettling emotions military service can bring. On June 20 , a group of Army enlistees graduated from basic training. On J une 21 , President Donald Trump bombed Iran. On June 22 , service members and their loved ones pondered an uncertain future. 'People can lose their life, so I'm worried,' said Ms Michele Bixby, 24, of upstate New York, whose brother had just graduated. 'But it's what he wanted to do; it's what he loves to do. He's going to move forward with it no matter what.' One day after the administration announced it had carried out airstrikes at three nuclear sites in Iran, the mood in some communities around military bases on US soil varied from firm support to bitter disagreement. But one sentiment stood out among those interviewed: concern for the safety of America's troops everywhere. No one knows how the strikes on Iran could affect service members. Mr Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, emphasised on June 22 that the administration did not want an open-ended war. But Iranian leaders have vowed to retaliate, and US military installations in the Middle East, with more than 40,000 active-duty troops and civilians employed by the Pentagon, are already potential targets. That reality, along with the potential repercussions for the entire military, was on the minds of many people around US bases at home, even as service members accepted that reality as part of the job. 'A lot of the families around here are quickly realizing this is a real threat; this is something we need to be worried about,' said Ms Meghan Gilles, 37, a self-described military brat who works in the Army Reserve's human resources division at Fort Campbell in Kentucky, a training site and home to the 101st Airborne Division. At Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, Blake Carlson, a 23-year-old Army National Guard combat medic who was visiting from Austin, Texas, said that he could be deployed. 'It's what I signed up for,' he said. 'If I have to, I'll do it.' But his mother and brother hoped the country would not be dragged into the escalating conflict in the Middle East. Some people who were interviewed stood by Mr Trump and agreed with his assertions that the targeted bombings were unlikely to lead to a wider conflict. Mr Carlson's mother, Ms Tonya Carlson, said she hoped the attack would force Iran to negotiate with the United States. Others stood by Mr Trump's statement that Iran posed an imminent threat – a point that contradicts recent national security assessments. 'Iran doesn't need to have nuclear weapons, for sure,' said Mr Tony Saluzzo, 72, a former combat engineer who served in the US offensive against Iraq and lives near Fort Campbell. Mr James Arthur, a 42-year-old retired Coast Guard captain who lives north of Tampa, Florida, and was visiting the Air Force Armament Museum at the Eglin base, said that the Iran airstrikes happened 'about two decades too late'. Other former service members castigated Trump for bombing Iran without congressional approval. The Constitution's framers included language to ensure that wars would not be entered rashly, said Mr Paul Oyler, a Navy veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and who lives near the Naval Air Station Lemoore in California, where he was based while on active duty. He said he would have agreed with the airstrikes if there were a proven, credible threat to the region, but 'I don't have any reason to believe that Iran was in possession of actual nuclear weapons.' Mr Denver Thiery, 30, who works on military maintenance contracts and lives in Trenton, Kentucky, near Fort Campbell, said he would remain firmly behind Trump. But he also acknowledged that it was difficult to know exactly what capabilities Iran possessed. 'I don't know the truth of what's going on,' he said. 'I don't know if they really have nuclear warheads or not. I don't know what I can support anymore.' Ms Meghan Gilles , the reservist, whose father is a veteran and whose husband is an active-duty serviceman, was troubled by the decision to edge the country to war at the very moment the government was cutting funding for Veterans Affairs. The administration is taking away a lot of benefits for veterans and 'then just sending them off again to be the world police,' Ms Gilles said. If the current conflict worsens, military members and veterans said, they would put aside their disagreements over Mr Trump and support one another. But one veteran lamented what he said such a scenario would ultimately mean. 'I learned from my time on active duty that war is devastating,' Navy veteran Oyler said. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
IMF's Georgieva warns of broader risks from US strikes on Iran
Managing director Kristalina Georgieva said the IMF is looking particularly at how the unfolding conflict in the Middle East will impact oil and gas risk premia. PHOTO: AFP IMF's Georgieva warns of broader risks from US strikes on Iran Follow our live coverage here. International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva warned that the US strikes on Iran could potentially have broader impacts beyond energy channels, as global uncertainty escalates. 'We are looking at this as another source of uncertainty in what has been a highly uncertain environment,' said Ms Georgieva in an interview with Bloomberg TV on June 23 . The biggest shock so far has been seen in energy prices, which the IMF is watching closely, but 'there could be secondary and tertiary impacts. Let's say there is more turbulence that goes into hitting growth prospects in large economies – then you have a trigger impact of downward revisions in prospects for global growth'. Global benchmark Brent surged as much as 5.7 per cent to US$81.40 (S$105) a barrel early in Asia on June 23 , before paring much of that gain in heavy trading. The IMF already downgraded its global growth prospects for 2025 in April, when it warned that the US-led world trade 'reboot' would slow growth. Ms Georgieva said the first two quarters of 2025 have shown that trend holding, and while the world will likely avoid a recession there's also higher uncertainty, which has a tendency to hold down growth prospects. The world is bracing for Iran's response after unprecedented US airstrikes on the country's nuclear facilities set traders and governments worldwide on edge. President Donald Trump's decision to deploy bunker-busting bombs to hit sites in Iran pushed the Middle East into uncharted territory and raised geopolitical risks at a time when the world economy was already facing severe uncertainty over trade tensions. More immediately, Ms Georgieva said the IMF is looking particularly at how the unfolding conflict will impact oil and gas risk premia. In the oil market, options volumes are spiking, and the futures curve has shifted to reflect tensions about tighter near-term supplies. 'Let's see how events will develop,' she said, adding that she's watching whether there may be disruptions to energy supply delivery routes or spillovers to other countries. 'I pray no.' As for the US economy itself, the IMF chief said she sees disinflation continuing, although the country is not in a state where the Federal Reserve feels comfortable cutting rates right now. 'What we expect toward the end of the year is possibly for the Fed to apply judgment that the time may have come for some adjustment in interest rates downwards,' said Ms Georgieva. She pointed to strength in the US labor market and solid pay gains helping consumers. At the same time she warned that the more volatility there is, the worse the situation is for businesses. 'When there is uncertainty, what happens? Investors don't invest, consumers don't consume, and that holds growth prospects down.' BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Iran's short-range weapons pose a threat to US Bases
A number of US bases are within range of Iran's short-range weapons. PHOTO: REUTERS Follow our live coverage here. WASHINGTON – Iran vowed to retaliate against American bases in the region even before the United States attacked its nuclear sites on June 21 , and US intelligence agencies have long warned that the military should prepare for such a response. While Iran will likely attempt a fierce barrage, US and Israeli officials said before the attacks on June 21 that Israel's strikes in recent days had severely damaged Iran's ability to mount attacks, wiping out launchers and damaging military bases. In more than a week of fighting before the US attacks, the Israeli air force struck Iranian missile launchers and launch teams, and Iran depleted its stockpile of medium-range missiles, according to US and Israeli officials. In an address from the White House on June 21 , President Donald Trump warned Iran against further actions, and demanded that Tehran 'make peace.' 'There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' Mr Trump said. 'But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill.' Iran could ignore Mr Trump's comments and deploy its remaining medium-range missiles, or its short-range weapons and cruise missiles, which could be used to threaten US bases in the Middle East, according to experts. Mr Nicholas Carl, who studies Iran for the American Enterprise Institute's Critical Threats Project, said those weapons have too short a range to be directly fired against Israel. But a number of US bases are within range. In addition to cruise missiles and rockets, Iran also has an ample supply of attack drones, which could be particularly effective if they are smuggled to Shiite militias in Iraq and fired at US bases there, US officials said. And the Iran-backed Houthi militia in Yemen, which reached a ceasefire agreement with the United States in May , could resume its attacks on shipping in the Red Sea. 'Iran has many ways of imposing pressure on the West and the international community writ large,' Mr Carl said in an interview before the strike on the three nuclear sites. US officials said Iran would probably use its bases in the southern part of the country to launch missile attacks on US bases in the Persian Gulf. The fighting has strained Israel's supply of missile interceptors and Iran's capacity to attack. When the war began, Iran had some 2,000 long and midrange weapons, one of the largest collections in the region, according to Israeli officials. US officials have generally accepted that estimate. It is not clear how much of Iran's arsenal remains. The country has fired off hundreds of missiles, and Israel has damaged sites where they are stored. Israel's strikes on missile launchers have been even more significant, limiting Iran's ability to fire missiles and large-scale barrages, US officials and outside experts said. Israel's campaign has also hurt Iran's ability to coordinate attacks, according to experts and Israeli officials. US bases in the Middle East are protected by missile defences , and Iran would likely have to fire a large coordinated barrage of missiles to penetrate them. Mr Carl said Iran's capacity to fire large numbers of missiles is increasingly limited. At least half of Iran's launchers have been destroyed. 'As you begin to whittle away at the launchers, the Iranian ability to summon these large volumes of missile fire is diminished,' Mr Carl said. 'And that is a huge problem for Iran.' The Israeli attacks have forced Iran to change its tactics and operations. Mr Carl said that in response to Israel's strikes on missile crews preparing to launch weapons, Iran appeared to be trying to launch missiles more quickly. 'The Iranians appear to be accelerating their launch timeline,' Mr Carl said. 'That means it is harder to coordinate large-scale attacks across the country.' Key weaknesses in Iran's arsenal were revealed in attacks on Israel in 2024 . Israeli and US air defence proved adept at intercepting missiles. Iranian targeting is imperfect, and many missiles miss their targets. Quality control problems have led to significant numbers of malfunctions. To overcome those problems, Iran needs to be able to fire large numbers of missiles simultaneously. But as long as Israeli pressure on launch sites continues, experts say, Iran will struggle to fire large barrages, which could limit its ability to retaliate against US bases. US missile defences – ranging from Patriot batteries to Aegis destroyers – have the capacity to defend military bases in the region. Those defences will be more effective against small barrages of weapons. Iranian officials have said that US bases in Iraq would probably be their first targets, either with a direct missile strike or by rockets or drones fired by pro-Iran militias. Iran may not want to strike US bases in Arab countries, but that calculation would probably change after the US attacks on Iran's underground Fordo nuclear site, and other sites in Natanz and Isfahan, US officials said. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
