Drone deliveries aren't attracting many complaints but experts say that's not a sign of public endorsement
A lack of complaints from the public has been cited as a reason why 'drone delivery' services should be allowed to expand in Australia — but experts say the reason there was just three complaints last year is because the system is so difficult to navigate.
Someone who felt spied on while in the bath as drones flew overhead 28 times in just three hours was among the very few complainants who navigated the bureaucratic nightmare to lodge objections to pilot projects for drone delivery above the suburbs.
Despite there being an estimated 3 million drones in Australia, in 2024 there were only three complaints about general drone noise to the government department that regulates it.
Previously-secret documents show the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) pushed to reduce restrictions and hand-balled monitoring of drone noise to the Department of Infrastructure, which says in general the issue is "difficult to respond to".
Noise is just one of the issues. One of Australia's foremost experts in the field, Julia Powles from the University of Western Australia (UWA), says the companies involved in drone delivery pilots want the sky for themselves.
"The vision is to architect highway infrastructure across our sky scape," she says.
Documents released under the Freedom of Information (FOI) system suggest that around sites where the deliveries are being trialled, the 'highway in the skies' may already be emerging.
"I've been sitting in the bath and watched them through the window fly past with direct line of sight," wrote one complainant in Harrison in the ACT, about 15 kilometres north of Parliament House.
"This frequent noise is incredibly disruptive and irritating. It also seems excessive!"
Commercial services such as Google's Wing promise to deliver hot coffee and fast food from shopping centres to the suburbs.
"Enjoy your latte, without the line," it promises.
But the documents reveal the difficulty of complaining about drone noise from the services to the appropriate channel.
Local and state governments have also been overridden by the Department of Infrastructure, which has taken control of regulation about drones and wants to see expansion in the sector.
UWA associate professor Dr Powles says the number of complaints is being used as "a proxy of community tolerance" for drones — she describes it as a "poor metric", and that's probably an understatement.
There are an estimated 3 million recreational drone owners in Australia, according to CASA's annual report, with an estimated additional 2.1 million people planning to buy a drone within the next year.
Drone delivery trials have been held in the ACT, Victoria and Queensland. But in the first years of operation there was confusion about who was responsible for complaints about noise from the operations.
"Do you go to your city council? Do you go to the federal government? Do you go to the state? And actually, the Department of Infrastructure didn't even know that it was responsible in the first instance," Dr Powles says.
People trying to complain about a drone, particularly noise, quickly find themselves in a morass of laws and buck-passing:
For Dr Powles, the confusing system throws up two problems.
"One, how do you even complain? And the second, how do you complain about what the ambition of these companies, which is to be able to operate at a scale that is commercially valuable."
She says for the systems to make a profit it will require tens of thousands of drones over Australian cities
In 'back-pocket notes' prepared ahead of a Senate Estimates hearing, the Department of Infrastructure says the increase in drones and Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) "may lead to greater impacts on the community (e.g. noise, security and privacy concerns), which need to be managed appropriately to enable the positive social and economic benefits".
In response to questions from the ABC, the department says it "works with a range of stakeholders to ensure community feedback about drone delivery operations is captured and considered, even where complaints are not made directly to the department".
Wing, which is owned by Google's parent company, did not respond to a request for comment.
The documents bear out the difficulty of making complaints about small devices travelling through the sky at high speed, which disperse noise over a great distance.
For example, the City of Logan — the fastest growing area of Brisbane and home to almost 400,000 people — received zero complaints about the drone trial for the six months from October 2023.
The Department of Infrastructure logged nine complaints about noise from different trial sites, taking the total to 98 since 2020.
Last year it received three complaints about general drone noise.
Not that it matters, because the department struggles to do anything about it.
"General noise complaints are difficult to respond to," the Department of Infrastructure wrote, in an internal document about the 'drone noise framework'.
Responding to the bathtub complaint mentioned at the top of this report, a Department of Infrastructure staffer [whose name is redacted in the documents] apologises and suggests it is unlikely that Wing was responsible for the noise because "Wing has ceased its delivery service in the ACT".
They suggest it is more likely a drone used for construction or emergency services, saying they are a "critical element in almost every aspect of emergency operations, e.g. policing".
"It is possible that the drone you heard was not Wing's and unfortunately it is not possible for us, based on the information you provided, to confirm the purpose of the drone flights you saw."
But in subsequent emails, it becomes clear the drones were from Wing.
"I can confirm we were flying at the times noted, so it's likely the noise feedback is regarding our drones," a Wing staff member emailed.
"We're going to review the routing in that area and explore adjustments that will likely reduce some of the overflight the resident reached out about."
Jake Goldenfein is a law and technology scholar at Melbourne Law School and an chief investigator in the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society.
"It's a very unusual situation where people would be complaining about noise directly to a federal department," he says.
"If you're going to complain about noise, you would complain to the state level Environment Protection Authority (EPA) or the state police or your local council."
Dr Goldenfein says the Department of Infrastructure, which has taken control of drone regulation, wants to see expansion in the sector.
"The regulation is trying to build a new market for drone delivery services," he says.
"It needs to do that in a way that takes into account what the industry actors are capable of doing and what they want.
"So yes, industry absolutely has a big say in what the law looks like when it comes to these kinds of technology products."
In email correspondence regarding noise approvals, CASA outlines a meeting between it, Wing and the department.
CASA wants "further detail" on how Wing is engaging with operators such as other airfields and for the company to establish "agreements/understanding with the operators to communicate and deconflict".
But when it asked about interactions between the company and the department "with regards to noise considerations for Melbourne operations" the discussions ended with a question — "is this a federal or local consideration with regards to existing operating restrictions?"
No answer was forthcoming in the documents.
But the agency was clear — it's not us.
Responding to questions, CASA reiterated that it has "no role in noise" regarding drones and is a safety regulator that doesn't touch on privacy or environmental issues.
However it does host educational resources and, if followed, its safety rules would work to reduce drone noise.
In 2024 CASA laid 12 fines, of between $825 and $1,565, to people who breached laws concerning drones, such as flying over populated or prohibited areas.
Responding to questions about drone delivery services, a spokesperson for the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts said operators are required to provide the department with information about noise complaints as a condition of their approval.
"[Additionally] before a new drone delivery operation starts in an area, the department reaches out to the affected local council(s) to inform them of the department's role and to request that they forward any noise related complaints to us.
Dr Goldenfein says by drawing focus to the issue of drone noise we're missing the larger picture, because they will get quieter.
"Noise kind of became the only thing that communities could complain about. It was the only thing that there was a clear process by which communities could engage with," he says.
He describes the shape of the delivery trials as "quite strategic" as an effort to channel public concerns about drones to be simply about noise.
As Julia Powles reflects, there are bigger issues on the horizon.
"I think there are very few people who'd say that what we really need is to elevate the problems of our terrestrial traffic to the sky."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
US share exodus: Aussies sell their US stocks on Trump fears
Australian retail investors are ditching the United States and moving their money to 'stable' economies on the back of US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day.' New retail data from investing platform eToro, who asked 10,000 retail investors across 14 countries, including 1,000 from Australia showed a sharp trend away from America. According to eToro's data the downturn in enthusiasm for US markets reflects broader economic uncertainty, with 37 per cent of Aussie investors citing the global economy as the biggest threat to their investments – the highest figure recorded since Q2 2022. Inflation follows as the second biggest concern at 17 per cent. Instead of investing abroad, local investors are increasing their exposure to Australian markets. eToro managing director Robert Francis told NewsWire a combination of US policies and high valuations have retail investors sceptical of investing in the world's largest market going forward. 'People are beginning to realise the US exceptionalism isn't what it was a year or two ago with the inauguration of Trump has meant a lot of uncertainty,' he said. Rayeiris Maduro Rondon, an investor based in Sydney after relocating from Venezuela told NewsWire it is her opinion that the days of the US exceptionalism has 'paused' as she shifts to Europe and China. 'I view this more as a period of recalibration rather than decline,' she said. 'Historically, when markets trade at elevated valuations for extended periods, investors begin to see high multiples as 'the normality' and price in unrealistic growth expectations. 'That's where the U.S. stands today.' While she still holds some US investments on a 'reasonable valuation,' she said there are better opportunities abroad. 'In Europe and Asia, I'm finding businesses with higher returns on capital and strong cash flows trading at deeply discounted valuations, making them far more attractive from a risk-adjusted perspective,' she said. Alert not alarmed Australian investors are split on what the current market volatility means for them. eToro's survey data showed 35 per cent of Aussies are more vigilant about their portfolio while a further 28 per cent are feeling anxious. On the flipside, 24 per cent are actually hopeful or excited about the large market swings. This optimism extends to investing strategies, with over a quarter of Aussie retail investors seeing a decline of 10 per cent or less as an opportunity to buy the dip. eToro's market analyst Josh Gilbert said investors are alert but not all of them are alarmed. 'Many see recent market dips as buying opportunities, which signals a level of confidence in long-term market resilience, he said. 'The risk of being out of the market altogether is something savvy investors are acutely aware of. 'The recent rebound in global equities since April has reinforced that view, even in uncertain times.' It has been a volatile ride for investors since Mr Trump took office for global markets initially rallying before hitting a bear market on April 2, with the announcement of Liberation Day. The wide-ranging tariffs were touted as Liberation Day for the US, with Mr Trump arguing it would level out the playing field. In a list of countries, Australia was 21st with a 10 per cent tariff on all goods imported into the US. The ASX slumped 11.4 per cent in the five days following 'Liberation Day', while the US S & P 500 fell around 12 per cent while the Dow Jones dropped 11 per cent. In both the Australia and the US shares quickly recovered after Mr Trump announced a temporary pause on his tariff policies. Mr Francis said this was a dramatic turnaround in investor confidence with the market initially rallying when Mr Trump returned to office. 'The whole market was buoyant with Trump's inauguration,' he said. 'I mean, we all thought investors, market commentators, all thought that we were going to see a continued bullish trend in the market. 'But given what we're seeing now around trade conflicts, tariffs that are being implemented, this is kind of, where is this going to go? 'All of this means that there's a level of uncertainty right now that doesn't bring confidence in investing in the US'. Some still move to safe assets Commodities have also been a favourite of Australian investors as they look to protect their positions. According to eToro's results, fears mount over a weaker US dollar and persistent inflation, Aussie retail investors are repositioning their portfolios, with nearly half of respondents having adjusted allocations or planning to. Mr Gilbert said 60 per cent of respondents said they expect gold prices to increase in the next 6–12 months, which reinforces its traditional role as an inflation hedge. 'Interestingly, we've seen Bitcoin's growing status among younger investors as a similar hedge. 'Out of local retail investors who are adjusting their portfolios based on a weaker USD, 27 per cent of Gen Z respondents said they will buy more crypto, the highest out of all generations. Indeed, 52 per cent of local Gen Z investors already hold crypto.'
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Australian government calls for de-escalation of war in Iran as Coalition endorses US strikes
The Australian government has offered no endorsement of the United States' strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, instead issuing a statement reiterating calls for de-escalation as the opposition put forward its support for the military action. Donald Trump announced the United States had dropped "a full payload of bombs" on the Fordow nuclear site on Sunday, along with strikes on two other locations, declaring Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities "completely and totally obliterated". In response, a government spokesperson said: "We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security. "We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy." A short time after the government released its statement, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and acting Shadow Foreign Minister Andrew Hastie said the Coalition supported Mr Trump's "proactive action" to bomb the facilities, more than a week after Israel launched an attack on Iran. "The world can never accept a nuclear-armed Iranian regime, and today the United States military has taken proactive action to ensure that we never need to," they said in a statement. "While Australians will never seek conflict in the world, we can never forget that the Iranian regime is a militantly theocratic autocracy … It is the Iranian people who are the victims of this brutal regime and we stand in solidarity with them." Current and former Liberal politicians were also quick to offer their strong support for the strikes, calling on the government to do the same. Former prime minister Scott Morrison said Mr Trump was left with no other option given the risks of Iran's nuclear program, while Liberal Senator Dave Sharma told Sky News it was "essential that Australia supports what the United States has done". Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is yet to respond to the developments personally. Earlier on Sunday, before Mr Trump announced the strikes, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said the government's position was de-escalation while noting it recognised Israel's right to defend itself and the risk of Iran's nuclear program. "We are worried about the prospect for escalation here, and we have been urging de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy, and we continue to do that," he told Sky News. In an address to the nation late on Saturday night, local time, Mr Trump described the action as a "spectacular military success", while a spokesperson for Iran's nuclear organisation told state media the Fordow site experienced limited damage. The extent of the damage is yet to be independently assessed. Mr Trump later posted to Truth Social — a social media platform — that any Iranian retaliation on the United States would be "met with a force far greater than what was witnessed tonight". Early on Sunday, Mr Hastie, who is also a veteran, warned that any escalation of the war was "dangerous and risky" and could bring unintended consequences. Speaking to ABC's Insiders minutes before Mr Trump announced the attack, he said: "We could see regime change, a collapse of the Iranian regime, large-scale migration and refugees across the world, but particularly Europe. We don't know who would fill the power vacuum." "If there is one lesson I take out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, it's be careful what you wish for." He also said there needed to be greater transparency over how the United States uses Australian military bases, calling on the government to be clear about what the military alliance involves. Mr Marles this week did not say whether American forces could make use of Australian military bases in the north in an action against Iran, stating "we have a system of full knowledge and concurrence" of operations from Australia. "We need greater transparency, to talk about operationalising the alliance, building guard rails for combat operations and defining our sovereignty," Mr Hastie said. "This will make things clearer for us, so we can better preserve our national interests." Greens leader Larissa Waters said in a statement that the government "must not allow the use of Australian US military bases like Pine Gap in this conflict". "Australia must always work for peace and de-escalation. Australia is not powerless, and we cannot be involved in another brutal war in the Middle East," she said. "Only when countries like Australia push back and hold to principles and international law and back them up with material actions, will there be a chance for peace."
News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
How you could get $20,000 back in your tax
For most Aussies, tax time means either a nice tax refund that can boost your savings, or the sneaking suspicion you've left money on the table. According to new research from Officeworks, lots of Aussies are getting tax time wrong – and it's costing us serious money. From lost receipts to missed deductions, and even more in between, the result is the average taxpayer is donating hundreds or even thousands of dollars extra to the ATO just because they don't know better. Below I've included some of the most common tax mistakes and how much they could be costing you. And spoiler alert, if you're falling into these traps it could cost you more than $18,000 over the next decade. So whether you're a regular employee, working for yourself, or running a side hustle, here are the top tax mistakes to avoid – and how you can keep more of your hard earned money. Not claiming what you're entitled to One of the biggest mistakes made by Aussies at tax time is a simple one – not claiming all the deductions you're entitled to. According to H&R Block, people who lodge their own tax return miss out on deductions that cost them an average of $525.50 each year. And it's not even just the big things people miss. Officeworks research found that just 24 per cent of people claim deductions for office furniture, 20 per cent claim pens, and 46 per cent are deducting electronics and tech accessories. Given how many people are working from home, and buying things they use for their work, this shows there are a heap of people missing out on deductions. If you're spending money on deductible items for your work, you're entitled to claim them – but only if you're tracking them – and then actually include these expenses in your claim. Nearly 30 per cent of Aussies lose receipts and end up claiming less, according to Officeworks EOFY research. That could easily mean $500 in missed deductions (or even more), meaning $185 less in your tax refund based on a 37 per cent marginal tax rate. This mistake is an easy one to avoid, it just requires a little bit of organisation. The ATO accepts digital receipts, so you can make your life easier by filing digital receipts on your computer, using an app, or choosing a supplier like Officeworks that offers digital receipts or their own app for tracking. That way at the end of the year, you'll have everything organised and in one place, making your claim easier – and most importantly making sure nothing is missed. Not planning at EOFY Bad timing can be just as costly as bad habits when it comes to your tax return prep. The research from Officeworks shows that 44 per cent of Australians make work related purchases before 30 June to boost their tax deductions. When your deductible expenses land before 30 June rather than after 1 July, this means you'll get the deduction, and the refund a full year sooner. But if you miss the window, you could miss out on the deduction. If you have another $500 in expenses deferred or forgotten, that's potentially another $185 missed this year. Not getting the right help with your return Lots of Aussies still lodge their own tax returns, and for some people that's completely fine. But the data shows a clear benefit to getting some good help with your tax prep. People that lodge their tax returns through a tax agent receive an average tax refund of $3550, compared to $2576 for self-lodgers. This reflects a difference of $974 every year, or almost a thousand dollars you could potentially be missing out on by doing your own tax return (even after fees). And to make getting some help here even easier, the cost of a tax agent is fully tax deductible. Total cost of these mistakes These tax mistakes may seem small, but they add up. Across the four areas outlined here, you're looking at a total of $1870 less back in your refund this year. Over the course of a decade, that's a total of $18,695 – or almost $20,000 being left on the table. The wrap The tax system is full of opportunities to get more out of the money you already have, and keep more of your hard earned income – but only if you understand the rules and how to use them to your advantage. Most people aren't trying to dodge tax on purpose. It could be that you're too busy, unsure, or maybe even a little overwhelmed. But by avoiding a few common mistakes, and being just a little bit more intentional, you could be saving tens of thousands of dollars, maybe even more over the years ahead. To get the most out of your tax refund this year, and use the money as a platform to start the new financial year in a stronger position, there are a few things you need to look out for. Keeping your receipts, tracking everything (even the small stuff), being strategic with your timing, and getting good help – it all makes a big difference. If you want some help with your money and investing, you can book a call with Pivot Wealth here.
