
If a Constable taking Rs100 is removed from post, how is Bachhu Khabad still a cabinet minister: AAP's Isudan Gadhvi
Calling the Rs71 crore MGNREGA scam case filed against the sons and nephew of Gujarat Cabinet minister Bachhu Khabad just the tip of the iceberg, and saying it could go up to several hundred crores, Isudan Gadhvi, the chief of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Gujarat on Wednesday asked how the Panchayat Minister, whose family members had carried out a financial scam in his own department, was still in the state cabinet and had not been asked to step down even as the action against his family members had come from the Gujarat Police itself.
Gadhvi asked, 'If a Police Constable taking a bribe of Rs100 is removed from service, how is Bachhu Khabad still a cabinet minister?'
'All his family members have looted Gujarat and so we demand he be removed as a minister and be investigated himself. When the panchayat minister himself is at his post and his family are under investigation, which officers will carry out an impartial investigation?' asked Gadhvi.
Speaking at a press conference in Ahmedabad on Wednesday, Gadhvi further said, 'We also believe that the MGNREGA scheme scam is on the statewide scale. All of the money is coming into the scheme, is for giving 100 days employment to the poor. The ministers of BJP, various officials and the panchayat minister himself are involved in this scam. This should be investigated across the state. We will keep protesting till Khabad does not resign.'
Gadhvi also dragged the Congress party into the scam, a development that came after Congress MP Shaktisinh Gohil on April 18 said that they would contest the assembly by-elections for Visavadar and Kadi assembly seats solo and not in alliance with AAP.
This development was highly surprising for everyone, especially for AAP, who have, since the beginning of their campaign for the Visavadar-Bhesan assembly seat in Junagadh, reiterated time and again that they hoped and believed that the Congress would stand by their understanding of not fielding a candidate in Visavadar by-election since the AAP had adhered to a previously struck bargain of not fielding it's candidates in the by-election for the Vav Assembly seat held in November 2024.
In fact, this claim of an 'understanding' between the AAP and Congress over the Visavadar-Bhesan seat, a very important constituency for the two INDIA alliance partners since it was the constituency of Gujarat's former BJP CM Keshubhai Patel, has been reiterated ever since AAP's Gopal Italia announced his nomination for the seat on March 24, 2025.
Speaking on this development, Isudan Gadhvi said, 'When the by-election came, AAP refrained from fielding candidates in Manavadar, Khambhat and Vijapur and then subsequently in Vav as well because We thought the Congress would have a better chance of defeating the BJP. But today it appears a big Congress leader from Saurashtra and his company are involved in the MGNREGA scam. Perhaps that is why they have conspired to field a candidate in Visavadar by-election.'
Calling the Congress move highly suspect, Gadhvi also mentioned the understanding between the two parties regarding the Vav and Visavadar by-elections.
A Congress leader told the Indian Express that it was Shaktisinh Gohil and Tushar Chaudhary of their party who had initially investigated the 'MGNREGA scam' and then written to CM Bhupendra Patel to take action in the MGNREGA scam.
The Indian Express also spoke to Dr Manish Doshi, spokesperson of the Gujarat Pradesh Congress Committee (GPCC), regarding the allegations made by AAP. He said, 'If the AAP really want to do some work, they shouldn't do politics on the matter and rather ask questions of the BJP government. You want support from the Congress but also make allegations on it.'
When asked whether there was an understanding between the two parties with regards to the Vav and Visavadar seats, Dr Doshi said, 'Whenever there is an understanding, you have to discuss candidates. You cannot just unilaterally announce a candidate and then ask the Congress to support you.'
Notably, since Keshubhai Patel left the BJP and won the Visavadar seat from his newly-formed GPP in 2012, the seat has never been won back by the BJP. While Harshadkumar Ribadiya won the by-election of 2014 that was prompted by Keshubhai's resignation on health grounds, and then again in 2017, the seat was then won by Bhupendra (Bhupat) Bhayani of AAP in 2022. The current by-election was necessitated after Bhayani left AAP and joined the BJP in 2023.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's strike on Iran raises strategic, political risks ahead of retaliation
Trump's strike on Iran raises strategic, political risks ahead of retaliation Two days after offering Iran a two-week deadline to avoid military action, US President Donald Trump announced airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. The attack, carried out Saturday evening, June 21, marked a sharp escalation in tensions and introduced new uncertainties regarding military outcomes and domestic political fallout. 'Two weeks' turned out to be two days. On Thursday, Trump presented Iran with a negotiation window to avert a strike. By Saturday, he declared the strikes 'very successful' in a social media post, adding, 'Now is the time for peace.' Also read: In his own words: Trump's Iran strike tests his rhetoric on ending wars by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Air conditioners without external unit. (click to see prices) Air Condition | Search Ads Search Now Undo It remains unclear whether the original deadline was a tactical feint or if negotiations, reportedly led by Trump envoy Steve Witkoff, collapsed behind the scenes. Trump's message of seeking peace contrasts with the risks of retaliation from Iran , which had previously warned against US involvement in the conflict initiated by Israel. Iran retaliation expected as strike objectives unclear Live Events Among the sites struck was the Fordow nuclear facility, considered a critical component of Iran's uranium enrichment infrastructure. Analysts note that Iran maintains a range of retaliatory capabilities and that the airstrikes may not have neutralized its nuclear operations. Iran's response to direct US involvement is now the central question. The US airstrikes followed weeks of Israeli operations aimed at degrading Iranian military capabilities. However, Tehran retains substantial resources and has warned that further escalation could prompt regional consequences. Trump's strategy appears to involve pressuring Iran into negotiations. However, analysts question whether military action will succeed where diplomacy during Israeli strikes did not. 'Now is the time for peace,' Trump wrote, but Iran's previous refusal to engage under fire suggests continued resistance, not compliance. Also read: Trump wins immediate praise from Republicans in Congress after announcing strikes on Iran It will take time to determine whether the strikes inflicted lasting damage on Iran's fortified nuclear facilities. If they failed to achieve their core objectives, calls for additional US military action may increase, placing greater pressure on the administration and military planners. Domestic backlash grows over US military escalation Saturday's strikes also carry significant domestic political implications. Critics from both major parties have questioned the strategic necessity of the operation. Within Trump's own 'America First' political movement, concerns are growing over US involvement in another potential Middle East conflict. If the operation is limited to a one-off strike, Trump may contain the political fallout. However, any move toward sustained engagement risks alienating voters who supported his non-interventionist stance during the 2024 campaign. Trump frequently highlighted that he initiated no new wars during his first term and criticized prior administrations for foreign entanglements. Having taken decisive military action, the president now faces a situation where subsequent developments may fall outside his control.


Hans India
33 minutes ago
- Hans India
Minister writes to CM on apathy over illegal mining cases
Bengaluru/Raichur: Law Minister H K Patil on Saturday said he had written a letter to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah expressing concerns over administration apathy towards taking illegal mining cases in the state to a logical end. He also wanted the culprits to be punished, and the lost wealth recovered. The senior minister, who is also in-charge of Parliamentary Affairs, has written a seven-page letter dated June 18, pointing out that only 7.6 per cent of all the cases related to illegal mining that allegedly took place between 2007 and 2011 leading to the loss of an estimated Rs 1.5 lakh crore to the government, have been investigated so far. In the letter he noted that there is outrage among people that the government has not shown honesty and commitment in its efforts towards ensuring commensurate punishments and recovery of the state's wealth, despite such a large-scale loot. He also reminded Siddaramaiah that he had led a 320-km foot march to Ballari against the illegal mining scam in 2010, when the Congress was in opposition. Patil had headed the Cabinet sub-committee, during the first Siddaramaiah-led Congress government (2013-18), which had brought the extent of loss caused by illegal mining. In Raichur, replying to questions by reporters regarding the letter, Patil said, '...I have brought it to the notice of the chief minister what has to be done, thereby it has to serve the state and the government has to get a good name, so the letter has been written. It is not a political letter. It is written in the interest of the state and its people. The CM has seen the letter and has taken the matter seriously.' Asked whether he is suspicious that documents on illegalities may be destroyed, he said with the intention that such things should not happen. He has cautioned the administration and the concerned department. Noting that the Congress party has done a padayatre (foot march) against illegal mining fifteen years ago, the minister said, despite so many years and inspite of cabinet sub-committee under 2013-18 Siddaramaiah-led Congress government submitting a report about the quantum of loss, the action taken is not satisfactory. 'Out of more than 12,000 illegal mining cases being registered, only about 7 per cent have been investigated. In just 2 per cent of these seven per cent, which means in only 0.2 per cent of the total number of cases, verdicts have come and cases have seen a conclusion,' he said. Asserting that a logical end has to be given to all these pending cases, Patil said the government lost Rs 1.5 lakh crore because of illegal mining, and with the intention that serious steps are taken in this regard, he has written a letter to the CM. He said nine cases were handed over for the CBI probe. They said they will probe only three among them and sent back the remaining six. Similarly, the cases that were referred to the Special investigation Team (SIT), most of them have still not been subjected to probe. 'So I have written the letter.' Patil, in his letter, has said that the government can still act as there is still time. Asking the government to take all the necessary measures, he suggested appointing a Recovery Commissioner as per the provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, 1946. He has also sought the creation of a new SIT to take up investigation of cases that have not been probed, and setting up a special court to try these cases.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
US attacks on Iran: ‘Well done', Donald Trump gets praise from Republicans, sole Democrat John Fetterman
US-Iran war updates: United States President Donald Trump has recieved 'immediate praise' from Republicans in Congress and at least one Democrat, for bombing three nuclear sites in Iran. Dissenting from his fellow party-mates, Pennsylvania's Democract Senator John Fetterman, joined Republicans in praising Donald Trump for joining Israel's offensive against Iran, according to an AP report. Posting on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), South Carolina's Republican Senator Lindsey Graham wrote: 'Well done, President Trump'. Congressional Republicans — and at least one Democrat — immediately praised President Donald Trump after he said Saturday evening that the U.S. Further, Senator John Cornyn, the Republican rep of Texas called the US military bombing three sites in Iran a 'courageous and correct decision.' And Alabama Senator Katie Britt, also Republican, called the bombings 'strong and surgical'; while Oklahoma's Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin posted: 'America first, always.' The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate — and correct — decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Wicker posted on X that 'we now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies.' The quick endorsements of stepped up U.S. involvement in Iran came after Trump had publicly mulled the strikes for days and many congressional Republicans had cautiously said they thought he would make the right decision. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Saturday evening that 'as we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., were briefed ahead of the strikes on Saturday, according to people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. Johnson said in a statement that the military operations 'should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says.' House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., said he had also been in touch with the White House and 'I am grateful to the U.S. servicemembers who carried out these precise and successful strikes." Breaking from many of his Democratic colleagues, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, an outspoken supporter of Israel, also praised the attacks on Iran. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS,' he posted. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities.' Both parties have seen splits in recent days over the prospect of striking Iran. Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican and a longtime opponent of U.S. involvement in foreign wars, posted on X after Trump announced the attacks that 'This is not Constitutional.' Many Democrats have maintained that Congress should have a say. The Senate was scheduled to vote as soon as this week on a resolution by Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine requiring congressional approval before the U.S. declared war on Iran or took specific military action. Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House intelligence panel, posted on X after Trump's announcement: 'According to the Constitution we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop.'