logo
‘I'm forking out £70k to become a lawyer, but the salary is a pittance'

‘I'm forking out £70k to become a lawyer, but the salary is a pittance'

Telegraph04-06-2025

Going into a white-collar profession, like law or engineering, has long guaranteed a lucrative and stable career.
You would go to university to qualify for a specific job and be set for life – all with little or no student debt.
But for young people entering the workforce now, the equation is less simple.
Taking on the huge burden of student loans and any further qualification costs, while facing stagnant wages, means that the traditional professions, with their years of training and low pay, look far less enticing. Meanwhile, minimum wage is rising to around the same rate as graduate pay.
Application numbers for practical degrees in traditional white-collar industries – law, accounting and finance, medicine and engineering – have increased in the past five years, with growth as much as 36pc.
But some students are graduating to find that the 'easy' path to a white-collar career is now broken.
'What is the point?'
Naomi Cicconie, 39, is an unusual law student. She served five years in the military before joining the prison service, and then worked in a children's home while she did her law degree at the University of South Wales.
She has spent £54,000 on her degree, and will have to pay out a further £13,900 on the Legal Practice Certificate (LPC), which she is planning to start later this year. All in, that's nearly £70,000 just to qualify as a lawyer, not including living costs.
The entry-level salary in Wales, where she lives and works, is around £22,000. Cicconie says that even once she is fully qualified, she'll likely earn between £28,000 and £42,000.
'You're spending all of this money to get a job [with a salary] that is under 50pc of what you've borrowed to qualify. It makes no sense,' she says. 'I am at a stage now where I am thinking to myself, 'What is the point?''
Corporate law comes with famously large salaries, especially for those working at American firms in the City, where those who have just qualified can expect to be paid as much as £180,000.
But for most of those outside big cities, working in certain types of law, or in legal aid – a crucial aspect of the justice system which Cicconie works in – six-figure salaries are unthinkable. Cicconie says many of her colleagues have left, blaming low pay.
She adds: 'I would say to anyone who is joining a bit later, and wants to get on with their career, don't go anywhere near [legal aid]. Unless you're lucky to be in the financial position where you don't have the stress of needing to earn a certain amount of money.'
Soaring student debt and stagnant wages
The economic situation for all young people is tough. The average graduate salary 15 months on from their studies, for those who graduated in 2022, was £27,500, according to the Higher Education Statistics Authority. In 2010, the average was £20,000 – if salaries had kept pace with inflation, they would now be more than £30,000.
Pay for all full-time employees decreased by 2pc in real terms between 2010 and April last year, according to House of Commons research. For those aged between 22 and 29, it dropped by 10pc.
And while average graduate pay has fallen in real terms by about 4pc over the past two decades, the minimum wage has risen by 60pc, according to analysis by the Resolution Foundation.
It means that someone working full-time on minimum wage can earn £25,000 a year, similar to or higher than some graduate salaries. It found that 20 years ago, the median graduate starting out in their career earned around two-and-a-half times the minimum wage.
Add to this the burden of student debt. University tuition fees are set to rise for the first time in eight years when the new academic year starts this September, from £9,250 to £9,535.
The average graduate has a debt of more than £48,000, according to the Student Loans Company, and newer graduates face a more onerous repayment system, especially if they are what are considered high earners.
Most professions require a university degree, unless they are on apprenticeship schemes – and many require extra qualifications, such as Cicconie's LPC, some of which have to be paid for out of the student's own pocket. Many legal firms now prefer the Solicitor's Qualifying Exam (SQE), which will cost a total of £4,908 from this September, having risen from £4,790.
Even once a young professional has qualified, pay remains suppressed. Engineers, for example, are much less well-paid in the UK than the US, with an average salary of £37,000 compared to entry-level pay of $74,000 (£55,000) for American graduates, according to Glassdoor.
Low pay is not the only problem. Working from home, quickly changing workplaces with badly organised training, and the threat of the rise of AI, all contribute to a sense of rising frustration. The chief executive of AI firm, Anthropic, has predicted that it will destroy half of all entry-level white-collar jobs in five years.
Meanwhile, vacancy levels are back to pre-pandemic levels, according to the Recruitment and Employment Confederation, with a 5.5pc drop in openings compared to November last year. Demand for workers surged initially as the economy recovered from the pandemic, but has slowed down since.
The costly hurdles to entering a profession
For some would-be white collar workers, getting into their desired profession has come with unexpected training and costly qualifications.
One biochemistry graduate, who completed his undergraduate degree in 2022 and now works for the NHS in the north of England, says he's frustrated about poor communication about how much more training he would need.
He needs a specific technical qualification, but there are only so many training positions available, for which you need to be sponsored. He explains: 'To do an Institute of Biomedical Science training portfolio, you have to be sponsored and in an approved laboratory. Usually by taking a trainee Band 5 position, of which there are naturally a limited number.
'This is incredibly frustrating as it bottlenecks the whole process and, for me at least, wasn't clearly explained at university. It feels like I'm banging my head against a brick wall.'
Architects are among those who face years-long training requirements. After an undergraduate degree, a year in practice, and then a master's degree, young landscape architects also face a two-year process to gain 'chartered' status. And after having jumped through these various hurdles, and totted up years' worth of student debt, pay in architecture is notoriously low.
One 27-year-old landscape architect, who has finally completed his formal training, says: 'My main thought is that it is unnecessarily long. I don't think we need to spend the amount of time at university that we did.
'Although it is fun, and I enjoyed doing my masters, when I look back on it I think I would have benefited from spending more time in practice.'
Another young landscape architect says that while there are jobs available in the UK, the bigger salaries are in Scandinavia and the US. There, he says, 'it's paid a lot higher, it's valued more'.
While training, landscape architects in the UK can expect between £17,000 and £20,000, he says, but once you have a master's degree, this increases to around £30,000.
To get there, he took on tens of thousands in student debt for his degrees, including a master's that cost £12,000, and maintenance. But like many young people he avoids looking at how much student loan he owes. 'I would imagine most people try not to think about it, don't they? I am probably quite deep in a hole.'
'Have I just wasted three years?'
Some young people pursuing a 'traditional' white-collar career feel like they fell – or were pushed – into it. One final year student at Glasgow University says that she 'leaned in' to the pressure to study law because her parents told her she would be good at it.
'I am now in my final year and I look back and I never really asked myself if this is something I want,' she says. 'I think of doing law at the end of it as an actual punishment. It's really scary, because I look back and think, 'Have I just wasted three years?''
She worries that she rushed into a 'professional' degree, and that she might have got more fulfilment studying something she enjoyed more.
'It's not a bad thing to have under my belt. But I do look back and wonder whether I would have been better off studying something else. I have friends who are studying degrees such as sculpture and environmental practice. I find their curriculum so much more enriching, although not a proper profession.'
Increasing numbers of school leavers are choosing a different path, opting for degree apprenticeships, which sets them up for the same careers but without the student debt.
Iyioluwa Adesan, 25, joined NatWest as a digital apprentice.
He says: 'My parents, like many others, viewed university as the only credible route to success because it was the only route they had been exposed to. But deep down, I knew I wasn't naturally suited to the academic, theory-heavy approach of a traditional university. I was more practical. I needed a different kind of learning environment.'
Adesan spent five years at NatWest, completing an undergraduate degree, and now works to connect potential apprentices to full-time work. Those working in accounting and finance apprenticeships can expect to earn an average of £29,945 after five years.
But Adesan did feel cut out of the social life of university. He says: 'The social side was different. There was no freshers' week or vibrant campus life in the traditional sense.'
There were friendships made at work, he says, and over time he developed a professional network. He adds: 'I want to help shift the perception around apprenticeships. They are not a second option, just a less visible one.'
He's now started his own company, supporting other apprentices.
Conor Cotton, of Not Going To Uni, said: 'We continue to see a clear increase in interest around non-university routes, especially apprenticeships.
'For many young people, the recent announcement on increasing tuition fees has become an even stronger reason to avoid student debt, and developing practical skills is becoming increasingly appealing compared to the traditional university route.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marriage Diaries: Should I get a prenup for my second wedding or trust my husband-to-be?
Marriage Diaries: Should I get a prenup for my second wedding or trust my husband-to-be?

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Marriage Diaries: Should I get a prenup for my second wedding or trust my husband-to-be?

Should you be planning the end of your marriage before you've even tied the knot? This is the question that's been plaguing me for the past few weeks. I'm 58 years old, and next March will be marrying Steve, 60. It will be a second wedding for both of us: I have three young adult daughters and he has a son. Steve and I are taking great pleasure in planning the next stage of our lives together. But – in between conversations about which location would suit our intimate ceremony, and what dress I should wear as a 50-something bride – I can't help but wonder whether we should get a prenuptial agreement. I'm so preoccupied about this decision that it's been keeping me awake at night. I've been fully open with Steve about my dilemma. He's quite relaxed about the subject, and isn't offended (at least, that's what he tells me) but doesn't think a prenup is necessary. I think this comes down to how we both experienced the end of our last marriages. My divorce from my ex-husband came through six years ago. It was nasty and protracted and expensive, mostly because my ex tried to hide money abroad and attempted to bully me into submission when I was hoping to appeal to his – ultimately absent – better nature. In the end, I had to hire a top family law firm. After a draining process – which ended up in court with a finance dispute resolution – I received a fair settlement. But it cost me the best part of £50,000 and a whole lot of tears. On the other hand, Steve's experience of divorce was far more pleasant. He and his wife had an amicable 'no fault' settlement, which barely involved lawyers. His son was also grown up, so it was less traumatic for everyone. After the sale of the London marital home, my children and I moved into a small cottage in West Sussex which I decorated with great care: I feel happy and settled here. I love my current home so much that Steve has agreed to move in with me while he rents out his Yorkshire house. When it comes to our respective finances, Steve and I are comfortable, but neither of us are rich: I'd say that financially, we are in a similar situation. We are both self-employed in the arts world and our properties are worth about the same. Prenuptial agreements didn't used to be binding in the UK, but I've consulted a lawyer who has told me that – done the right way – they can be. The problem is, setting up a legally watertight agreement could cost up to £4,000. My best friend is telling me that I'm being cynical and defeatist. Having known me for most of my life, she agrees that Steve is a far nicer man than my ex. I should embrace this happy new path with joy, she says, and not throw shade on the occasion by being negative. But she hasn't been through the pain of divorce: she hasn't seen how a white-wedding day can turn into a miasma of bitterness and hatred. I'm just not sure I could go through all that again. All I really care about is keeping this well-loved roof over my head, should we separate – this basic security is everything to me. 'We're both nice people,' says Steve. 'In the worst-case scenario we would sort it out, and I would never take your home from you.' But is it naive to believe this statement, uttered when things are at their rosiest? Surely one of the gifts of reaching midlife is learning from experience, and not making the same mistakes again. Should I listen to my gut and instruct a lawyer? Or am I being negative and doomy – and would my time (and money) be better spent on booking a super-luxurious honeymoon?

Parliament serves food off German-made plates – sparking huge patriotism row and calls for Palace to 'buy British'
Parliament serves food off German-made plates – sparking huge patriotism row and calls for Palace to 'buy British'

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Parliament serves food off German-made plates – sparking huge patriotism row and calls for Palace to 'buy British'

THE UK Parliament is serving food off German plates - sparking a huge patriotism row. Furious MPs slammed the "outrageous" practice and called on the Palace of Westminster to put country first and 'buy British". The members dining room in the House of Commons is used by MPs and is one of the grandest restaurants in the building. Its elaborate menu boasts that "wherever possible we use British produce'. But it serves its grub on plain white plates and saucers which are made by Villeroy and Boch - a German firm founded in 1748. Gareth Snell, Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central - known as 'The Potteries because of its proud ceramics industry - slammed the practice. He told The Sun on Sunday: "Britain has the best ceramics in the world - but our own parliament is serving food off German plates. 'This is outrageous and it is unpatriotic. 'Parliament should support businesses in areas like mine and buy British crockery.' 2 Britain's once booming potteries industry has been hammered by sky high energy costs. Many firms have shed jobs and some have closed. Mr Snell is launching a Buy British potteries campaign - and is urging the parliamentary authorities to lead by example and only use UK-made plates. Robert Flello, CEO of Ceramics UK, said: 'Why is the UK House of Commons using German cups and saucers and plates in the dining room used by MPs? 'It is outrageous. They need to be told to buy British. There is no excuse. 'Our potteries produce the best quality crockery. 'Buying British goods is a matter of national pride and will also help an industry struggling because our energy costs are going through the roof. 'If you go to any other country - France or Italy say - I bet their state institutions are using crockery made in their own country.' Parliament has lots of different restaurants and cafes serving food off a wide range of crockery bought from suppliers from around the world. While it uses some crockery made in the UK, it does not have a policy to only buy British. A House of Commons spokesman said:'We source a wide range of crockery from firms within the UK, as well as from those based elsewhere. All purchasing is in line with relevant legislation for public bodies, which prioritises value for money."

Families on Universal Credit have days left to apply for free £300 vouchers this month – check if you're eligible
Families on Universal Credit have days left to apply for free £300 vouchers this month – check if you're eligible

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Families on Universal Credit have days left to apply for free £300 vouchers this month – check if you're eligible

THOUSANDS of families on Universal Credit can claim up to £300 this month. This leg-up comes from the government's Household Support Fund (HSF) - a huge £742 million fund going straight to councils across England. 2 The HSF is a government-backed scheme designed to help vulnerable households with essentials like food, energy bills and other living costs. Each local council is given the freedom to decide how to distribute the money, making sure it directly helps the people who need it most in their area. City of Doncaster Council is distributing a one‑off cash payment through HSF. Those typically eligible for this support are already receiving one of the following: Housing benefit Local Council Tax Reduction Universal Credit which includes the housing element Means-tested free school meals Households on Universal Credit can receive food vouchers worth £100 if they have one dependent child. Those with two children will pick up £200, while households with three or more children will be given £300 to help cover food costs. City of Doncaster Council defines a dependent child as one for whom you receive Child Benefit. Besides families with children, other eligible households - including those without children - can receive £100 to help cover energy bills. The council is also allocating £150,000 towards local food banks and its hygiene bank. Families can get FREE washing machines, fridges and kids' beds or £200 payments this summer – and you can apply now An additional £100,000 will boost community hubs, helping vulnerable households right in the community. Meanwhile, a huge £400,000 is now earmarked for the updated Local Assistance Scheme. How can people get the payment? Those who have received help from the Household Support Fund in the past - and still meet the criteria - will not need to apply. Instead, the payment will automatically hit their bank accounts. But they will need to contact the council if their bank details have changed. Those previously paid by cheque will receive the payment by cheque - unless they provide the council with their bank details. Others will need to apply between now and July. Click here to claim a Household Support Fund payment. Can those who live outside Doncaster claim support? Yes, councils throughout the country are actively assisting families through the Household Support Fund scheme. Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council is giving thousands of families a helping hand - offering free washing machines, fridges and kids' beds or £200 towards the cost of energy. Those in Leeds can get payments of up to £150. By using the government's council locator tool, it's easy to find out which local authorities are offering support and the eligibility criteria. Household Support Fund explained Sun Savers Editor Lana Clements explains what you need to know about the Household Support Fund. If you're battling to afford energy and water bills, food or other essential items and services, the Household Support Fund can act as a vital lifeline. The financial support is a little-known way for struggling families to get extra help with the cost of living. Every council in England has been given a share of £742million cash by the government to distribute to local low income households. Each local authority chooses how to pass on the support. Some offer vouchers whereas others give direct cash payments. In many instances, the value of support is worth hundreds of pounds to individual families. Just as the support varies between councils, so does the criteria for qualifying. Many councils offer the help to households on selected benefits or they may base help on the level of household income. The key is to get in touch with your local authority to see exactly what support is on offer. The last round ran until the end of March 2025, but was extended. The most current round is running between April 2025 and March 2026. 2

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store