Reeves ‘failed' to back English councils in spending review, MPs warn
The Treasury will pump an additional £3.4 billion per year into councils by 2028/29, compared with 2024/25, which combined with yearly council tax rises is set to boost their spending power by 3.1% in real terms.
But Mr Forster warned that 'in the detail of the statement', the Government 'is only investing an extra 1.1% in local government next year and the year after'.
The Liberal Democrat MP told the Commons he was 'very disappointed' with the Chancellor's statement and asked: 'What does the Chancellor say to councils across the country and to my constituents of Woking to justify that lack of investment?'
Ms Reeves replied: 'Well, that's real-terms increases in spending every year, that this Labour Government are giving to local authorities.
'And that compares to the Conservative-Liberal Democrat administration from 2010 to 2015 that cut real spending by 2.9% every year, so I'm much happier to stand on my record as Chancellor than what the Liberal Democrats did when they had a chance of being in government.'
Woking issued a section 114 notice two years ago, in June 2023, when it faced having to plug a £1.2 billion deficit.
Billpayers in the Surrey borough faced a 9.99% council tax rise the following year.
Mr Forster, who is a member of the Commons Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee, told the PA news agency: 'In today's spending review, the Chancellor has failed to invest in local government – and she is refusing to acknowledge the harm this will cause.
'In my constituency of Woking, our local authority has already gone bankrupt, I fear more will soon follow. Following the former Conservative administration bankrupting Woking, we have seen public toilets close.'
He called on the Government to 'support councils more'.
The spending review which Ms Reeves fronted on Wednesday pledged 'wider reforms' which 'will ensure funding is effectively targeted, based on an updated assessment of need, and will consolidate funding to give local authorities greater flexibility to innovate'.
Local government reorganisation will 'improve the join-up between local services, enabling councils to deliver services more efficiently', according to The Treasury.
Conservative MP for Broxbourne Mr Cocking, who is also a member of the Commons committee, described the spending review as 'devastating'.
He said: 'Councils that are going through local government reorganisation, where councils that have been run really well, are going to be potentially lumbered into new super-unitary councils, with councils that haven't managed their finances well'.
Mr Cocking said that where authorities merge, 'you'll find that residents that have got sound council finances, have had good services, are now going to be subsidising areas that have made bad decisions', and added that the spending review failed to compensate for this.
Surrey's district and county councils are set to merge, with new single-tier authorities taking on town hall functions, as part of the Government's push towards 'unitary' councils throughout England set out in last year's English Devolution White Paper.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
22 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why targeting wealthy non-doms means we'll all pay higher taxes
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Winston Churchill was right when in 1906 he said, 'for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle'. Time and again governments have discovered that introducing new taxes or increasing existing ones lead to behavioural changes by those who are liable to pay them. The result is that there is less of what is being taxed and that the revenues are inevitably lower than estimated. It could be Britain's 18th-century window tax, which resulted inevitably in fewer windows – as people bricked them up to cut their tax bill. Or it could be the taxes on candles, tea, hair powder, dog's tails, hearths and bricks. The list goes on. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Then there's the behavioural change that could be the result of forcing Scottish taxpayers earning more than £30,318 to pay more in tax than they would in England. It's no surprise that some Scots have chosen to become English taxpayers, including people working for the Scottish Government or its agencies. Increasing taxes is not the way to create a more prosperous future (Picture: Henry Nicholls) | AFP via Getty Images Budget cuts and higher taxes This is called 'capital flight' and has reportedly led to Scots settling just across the Border and working from home, only occasionally travelling for a meeting in Scotland. Not only do these people take their tax payments elsewhere, it also means they spend more in their new location, depriving Scottish businesses of their economic activity. The SNP has been warned about the impact on countless occasions, including by its own advisors – the result is that tax revenues are inevitably lower than estimated, resulting in unplanned expenditure cuts and higher taxes to make up the difference. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The same phenomenon is now being seen with the UK Government's tax changes for those known as 'non-doms'. The strict definition can be complex but simply put it means people of foreign birth living in the UK but not considered domiciled here because they will eventually return home. Being a non-dom meant you could have a remittance-based tax payment where you would pay British taxes on your earnings within the UK, but not on your earnings outside the UK. For especially wealthy people, often known as ultra-high, net-worth individuals (UHNWIs), this meant they might be paying very large tax bills in the hundreds of thousands (or more) on their UK earnings to our Treasury but also paying taxes in other countries where their overseas earnings were sourced. Millionaires and billionaires leaving Due to proposals first introduced by Conservative Chancellor Jeremy Hunt and confirmed by Labour's Rachel Reeves, the remittance-based tax regime for non-UK-domiciled people was abolished in April. Hunt had said it would raise £2.7 billion additional revenue when he was Chancellor, Reeves predicted £2.6bn and the Office of Budget Responsibility estimated £9bn in the first year and £33.9bn over the Parliament but with a 'very high' uncertainty factor because of the unknown behavioural responses of non-doms. The Institute of Fiscal Studies estimated only £1.8bn. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But taxing for prosperity does not work. In 2024, 10,800 millionaires and 12 billionaires left the UK – taking their direct tax payments, significant investments and economic activity with them. The Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) estimated a loss to Treasury revenues of £12.2bn by 2029, arguing that if 25 per cent of non-doms left the UK, the tax changes would start to cost the Treasury money. Initial estimates put the departures at 10 per cent, but they are continuing to leave at a worrying pace. An Oxford Economics study found that 98 per cent of those studied said that, in reaction to the Tory/Labour proposals, they would leave the UK sooner and 63 per cent said they were planning on leaving within two years. Unsurprisingly, some 83 per cent of non-doms identified liability for inheritance tax on their worldwide assets as a key driver of their decision to emigrate. Although the selection of the survey may have reflected a bias towards the wealthiest non-doms, some 60 per cent of tax advisors said they expected more than 40 per cent of clients to leave Britain's shores within two years of the change. It's capital flight on a grand scale and, just like the Scottish Government before them, the UK Governments were warned there was a serious risk of this outcome. Farage as 'Robin Hood' Now Nigel Farage has stepped in to announce a new Reform UK policy that will create a new system called the Britannia Card. Foreign applicants would pay £250,000 for a ten-year visa on arrival which would make them free from tax (including inheritance tax) on their foreign assets. The Britannia Card could then be renewed for a further ten years. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The principle is similar to tax systems operated in other countries such as Italy and Greece but is a good deal more attractive (cheaper) to the non-doms, and consequently will raise less money for the Treasury. At £25,000 a year compared to €200k in Italy or €100k in Greece, the Britannia Card could be priced higher. Maybe Farage is intentionally pitching it low because so many non-doms will have left that attracting them back in four years' time after a general election will be very difficult. With other attractions that London offers, the cost of attracting UHNWIs could probably start higher and be reduced if it does not work. In an interesting twist, described as making Farage a modern-day Robin Hood, any Britannia Card visa fee income would go straight to the lowest paid as a tax bonus, possibly worth £600 each. Reform is selling that as taking from the wealthiest to give to the poorest workers – but it will only work if the non-doms return. Staying in Dubai or Doha might remain their preferred choice – but at least we now have a political offering where some UK politicians recognise you can't tax yourself into prosperity.
Rhyl Journal
28 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Zelensky welcomed to No 10 for meeting with Starmer ahead of Nato summit
The Ukrainian president arrived in Downing Street where he was expected to discuss Britain's ongoing support for his war-torn nation on Monday afternoon, after being welcomed to Windsor Castle for lunch with Charles. Mr Zelensky, who is usually seen wearing military fatigues, wore a black blazer and trousers throughout his Monday visits. He and Sir Keir embraced on the doorstep of No 10, where a red carpet had been rolled out for the Ukrainian leader. Charles and Mr Zelensky were earlier pictured chatting as they made their way through Windsor Castle, and smiling as they shook hands in the Grand Corridor. During his visit to London, the Ukrainian leader was also welcomed to the Palace of Westminster and met Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle and his Lords counterpart, Lord McFall of Alcluith. His arrival in the UK follows reports that Russia fired 352 drones and 16 missiles at Ukraine overnight, killing at least 10 civilians including seven in Kyiv. Mr Zelensky said preliminary reports indicated Russia had used North Korean missiles to attack Kyiv and described those two countries, and Iran, as a 'coalition of murderers'. His visit to London takes place the day before Nato leaders are set to meet in The Hague for a two-day summit, with increased defence spending top of the agenda. Mr Zelensky has been invited to the summit but will not take part in its main discussions, and it is still unclear whether he will attend at all. Ahead of the visit, a Downing Street spokesman said Sir Keir would 'reiterate our steadfast support for Ukraine' during his meeting with Mr Zelensky.
Rhyl Journal
28 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Murray hails ‘brilliant opportunities' of UK Government's industrial strategy
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer unveiled the document on Monday, pinpointing key industries believed to have the most potential for growth such as artificial intelligence, offshore wind and batteries for electric vehicles. The 160-page document put Scotland 'at the heart of the UK's energy transition', as well as talking up commitments to a £750 million supercomputer in Edinburgh and £200 million in development funding for the Acorn carbon capture and storage facility in Aberdeenshire. The Prime Minister also announced a cut to electricity bills for industrial businesses, £30 million for the video games sector – with a number of high profile developers based in Scotland – and £30 million for research and development for each of the devolved nations. Delighted to be in Cockenzie, East Lothian for the launch of the UK Industrial Strategy today. Lots of brilliant opportunities for Scotland from the 8 growth sectors. Jobs, investment, regeneration and skills. — Ian Murray MP (@IanMurrayMP) June 23, 2025 In a post on X following a visit to the promote the strategy, the Scottish Secretary said: 'Delighted to be in Cockenzie, East Lothian, for the launch of the UK industrial strategy today. 'Lots of brilliant opportunities for Scotland from the eight growth sectors. 'Jobs, investment, regeneration and skills.' The strategy was also praised by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar. 'Labour's industrial strategy delivers for Scotland – unlocking economic potential, raising wages, boosting living standards, and delivering the growth we need,' he said. Asked about his response to the UK Government's announcement on Monday, First Minister John Swinney touted his own Government's work on industry. 'Of course, we have in Scotland our own approach to industrial strategy, which involves working with our universities, with our economic development agencies to ensure that we attract investment and can support development within the economy,' he told the PA news agency. 'Last week, we saw that Scotland, for the 10th year in a row, was the most successful part of the United Kingdom for the attraction of inward investment other than London and the south east. 'So that's an indication that the Scottish Government's got its priorities correct, its focus correct on the attraction of investment, because we're contributing to make Scotland an incredibly successful investment location.'
