NSC idle despite security challenges
The National Security Committee (NSC), the country's top civilian-led forum for security policymaking, did not meet even once in the past year, marking an unprecedented lapse in its functioning, according to the annual performance review issued by the Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT).
The annual performance evaluation of the NSC conducted by PILDAT for the timeframe from March 5, 2024, to March 4, 2025, highlights a disturbing trend in the governance structure.
Established in 2013, the NSC did not convene a single meeting throughout the yearmaking 2024-25 the first time in history that the committee remained completely inactive.
While the federal cabinet regularly meets, there was no indication either that the cabinet committee on defence which provided such a forum before the creation of NSC, has been re-operationalised.
The report noted that former premier Nawaz Sharif, during his tenure from 2013-17, convened only eight NSC meetings, while Shahid Khaqan Abbasi – during his tenure of August 2017-May 2018 – significantly increased the frequency, averaging nearly 10 meetings per year.
Imran Khan – prime minister from 2018 to 2022 – averaged approximately three NSC meetings annually, whereas Shehbaz Sharif, in his previous tenure from 2022 to 2023, convened an average of five per year.
However, in the past year (2024) of the current PML-N-led coalition government, which took office in March 2024, the NSC has not met a single time.
The absence of NSC meetings is also reflected in the government's responses to security incidents. Instead of convening the NSC, the government seems to have relied on military-led forums such as the corps commanders conference and the apex committee of the National Action Plan.
This has further sidelined the NSC's role in structured policymaking, the report noted.
The report pointed out that another critical concern was the continued absence of a national security advisor (NSA), leaving a strategic vacuum in Pakistan's security policy framework.
In contrast, countries with established national security mechanisms, such as the United Kingdom, ensure regular NSC meetings, often on a weekly basis, to proactively manage security risks.
"PILDAT believes Pakistan's lack of an institutionalised national security approach weakens democratic oversight and limits the country's ability to respond effectively to security threats through structured consultations."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Embattled Thai PM faces call to step down to avert coalition revolt
BANGKOK: Thailand's embattled Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra faced the prospect of losing her government's majority on Friday, as a vital coalition partner looked set to demand her resignation and senators launched a legal bid to remove her from office. Paetongtarn, the politically inexperienced daughter of divisive tycoon and former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, is fighting fires on multiple fronts, struggling to breathe life into a stagnant economy facing steep U.S. tariffs and under pressure to take a tougher stand on a territorial row with Cambodia that has seen their troops mobilise at the border. The United Thai Nation party, the second-largest partner in her alliance, will demand Paetongtarn, 38, step down as a condition for it to remain in the Pheu Thai Party-led coalition, two UTN sources told Reuters, requesting anonymity because they were not authorised to speak to media. 'If she doesn't resign, the party would leave the government,' one source said. 'We want the party leader to tell the PM as a courtesy.' Though Paetongtarn received a boost on Friday with another coalition partner, the Democrat Party, pledging its support, Thailand's youngest premier is still in an untenable position, with her majority hinging on UTN staying in the alliance following Wednesday's exit by the larger Bhumjaithai Party. It is unclear when UTN will announce its position and a spokesperson said the party would wait for its leader to inform the prime minister of its decision. Reflecting concerns in financial markets, the Thai baht weakened for a fifth consecutive session on Friday and was on course to log its worst week in four months. Thai govt on brink after coalition partner pulls out Tumultuous past Paetongtarn's battle to stay in power demonstrates the declining strength of Pheu Thai, the populist juggernaut of the billionaire Shinawatra family that has dominated Thai elections since 2001, enduring military coups and court rulings that have toppled multiple governments and prime ministers. But Paetongtarn is facing domestic anger and the prospect of an internal revolt over Wednesday's embarrassing leak of a phone call between her and Cambodia's influential former leader Hun Sen - once seen as a Shinawatra family ally - which her critics say posed a threat to Thailand's sovereignty and integrity. During the conversation, Paetongtarn called for a peaceful resolution of the border dispute and disparaged an outspoken Thai army general who she said 'just wants to look cool', a red line in a country where the military has a high profile and significant political clout. Pressure mounted on Friday from outside her government, with 69 senators petitioning both the Constitutional Court and an anti-graft agency over the phone conversation leak, seeking a determination and an investigation, respectively, into whether Paetongtarn breached leadership moral standards. Activists also met on Friday to schedule a major protest in Bangkok starting on June 28 to demand Paetongtarn resigns, among them groups with a history of crippling rallies against Shinawatra administrations. Paetongtarn has not commented on the turmoil in her government and has tried to present a united front on the Cambodia issue, appearing on Thursday alongside military chiefs and vowing to defend sovereignty. The premier visited military units at the Cambodia border on Friday, where she handed out food packages to soldiers and was given a tour by Lieutenant General Boonsin Padklang, the regional commander whom she criticised in the leaked call. Paetongtarn's options for staying in power are limited unless her allies can succeed in behind-the-scenes horse-trading. A snap election could damage Pheu Thai and play into the hands of the progressive opposition People's Party, the largest force in parliament. Two Pheu Thai sources told Reuters the party is confident Paetongtarn can avoid resigning or dissolving parliament and her government is considering a major cabinet reshuffle to fill vacant positions.
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
KPK budget FY26
EDITORIAL: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) unveiled a 2119 billion-rupee budget outlay for next fiscal year with a projected surplus of 157 billion rupees — an amount that is lower by 15.8 billion rupees from what was budgeted by the federal government as its share in the 1217 billion-rupees provincial surplus (based on 14.62 percent KPK's share in the divisible pool). Given that the Sindh government budgeted a deficit of 38 billion rupees, instead of a surplus of 298 billion rupees budgeted by the federal government, a critical partner in propping up the PML-N government at the Centre, the KPK government's surplus must have come as a pleasant surprise for the Centre. In this context, it is relevant to note that the Sindh government has cited major risks associated with federal transfers pledged in the budget given that it is a usual occurrence for the federal budget to present unrealistic tax targets (in the current year the shortfall is projected at one trillion rupees). However, the KPK budget formulators took the innovative and more appropriate measure to release a document titled 'Fiscal Risk Statement', which itemised a range of issues that would impact on the revenue and expenditure side of the budget, a list that includes: (i) general economic risks associated with geopolitical tensions, including with neighbouring countries, which present the possibility of potential disruptions in trade and investment flows, posing threats to economic stability and growth; (ii) specific fiscal risks associated with lower tax collections by the FBR than budgeted, leading to lower than budgeted total transfers to KPK which, in turn, was at a variance of negative 4 percent in two years — 2021-22 and 2022-23 — and which widened to negative 19 percent in 2023-24 and registered negative 8.79 percent in 2024-25; and (iii) structural or institutional risks. KPK's outstanding debt portfolio increased by 6.41 percent due to an increase in net receipts (disbursements less principal repayments) and decrease in foreign currency exchange rate from 285 to 280 which had a weighted average impact of -1.75 percent. However, it was rightly flagged that a portion of the province's foreign debt portfolio remains linked to variable international benchmarks such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), Japanese Yen Tokyo Overnight Average Rate (TONA), and the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR). While recent trends indicate a slowdown or pause in global rate hikes, any future tightening by major central banks could increase the cost of debt servicing. Two further observations on the budget are in order. First, tax on agriculture income is budgeted at 130 billion rupees next fiscal year, the same amount that was generated in the revised estimates of 2024-25 (against the budgeted amount of 114 billion rupees in the outgoing fiscal year), which makes one wonder what is the expected implementation of the legislated tax on the income of farmers, as per the International Monetary Fund's condition, to be implemented from 1 July 2025 with the effectivity pre-dated to 1 January 2025. And secondly, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's flagship project, Insaaf Sehat Card plus programme, is budgeted to receive 41 billion rupees next fiscal year and coverage list of medical conditions has been expanded to include liver, kidney, bone marrow and cochlear transplants/implants and related issues. Preparing a medium-term strategy paper, as required by the multilaterals, does not add real value to the federal budget as it itemises a wish-list of the future with, if past precedents are anything to go by, little likelihood of being taken seriously by the economic team leaders. However, one would recommend to the federal government (as well as all other provinces) to prepare a fiscal risk statement each year that would go a long way in adequately responding to routine challenges to budgeted revenue and expenditure claims that sadly are routinely violated. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Policy issues in the EFF programme — III
Covid-19 pandemic, and then the catastrophic floods in 2022, both of which had significant climate change causality – towards which Pakistan has contributed very little in terms of global carbon footprint – and pushed the country to take on considerable amount of loan — on top of its already difficult situation in terms of debt distress before these two events — that has created a meaningful gross financing issue for the country over the last few years, and over a medium term horizon. Multilateral support during both these events has been seriously lacking, including the one-time SDR allocation by IMF to the tune of around USD 2.7 billion in August 2021 – where allocation rather than being based on needs in the exceptional environment of the pandemic, was made as per the usual criteria of quota – was significantly far less than what was needed. Despite repeated calls by development activists internationally, and similar demands made under Barbados's PM Mia Mottley-led 'Bridgetown Initiative', nothing of substance has been done in this regard by the IMF. Table 3b titled 'Pakistan: External Gross Financing Requirements and Sources, 2022/23–2029/30' from May 2025 released 'IMF Country Report No. 25/109' highlights this otherwise much needed provision of IMF SDR allocation to be zero over the medium-term, which is the entire period covered in the table. On the contrary, financing requirements are huge – from FY2025-26 to FY2029-30 they are projected at USD 19.3 billion, USD 19.8 billion, USD 31.4 billion, USD 23.1 billion, and USD 22.2 billion, respectively – even after including very modest levels of current account deficit — for the same fiscal years, being projected at USD 1.5 billion, USD 2.1 billion, USD 3.9 billion, USD 4.7 billion, and USD 5.7 billion, respectively. Policy issues in EFF programme — I Pakistan's exports depend heavily on imported intermediaries, which are not possible to be appropriately make in the wake of lack of meaningful support from IMF in terms of enhanced SDR allocation — on top of releases to the tune of only USD 1 billion from time to time over roughly three-year EFF programme, which began in September 2024, and which are quite insignificant when seen in the context of the huge gross financing requirements — since the quota-based SDR allocation as assistance in the pandemic in August 2021 was low to start with, and since then likely climate change caused floods-related losses have not received much multilateral support, not to mention that the country is among the top-ten most vulnerable countries with regard to climate change crisis, and faces significant gross financing requirements over the medium term. Hence, in the absence of meaningful SDR allocation, and the adoption of otherwise unjustified over-board austerity policy, it is hard to import needed level of intermediaries for exports, which is among the main sustainable sources to achieve macroeconomic stability, to come out of the debt distress, and to move towards higher economic growth. Moreover, a lack of exports would mean lack of capacity to sustainably meet debt obligations, where unlike IMF's assessment in the report that 'Public debt remains sustainable over the medium-term… near-term risks of sovereign stress remain high…' both short-term, and medium-term risks are high, especially due to significant downside risks on account of a very volatile geopolitical situation – the recent Iran-Israel conflict saw a sudden spike in oil prices from around USD 65 per barrel to around USD 75 per barrel — and fast-unfolding climate change crisis — the Finance Minister reportedly indicated a significant role of climate change in reducing in reducing agricultural yield of major crops over the current fiscal year — creating upward pressures on imports payments, along with likely hurting exports, which overall means further increase in external financing gap, and may also result in greater debt distress. Policy issues in the EFF programme – II Instead of realizing the need to provide meaningful support in terms of enhanced SDR allocation — which is a global need being highlighted over the last few years, as indicated above, as a number of developing countries are facing serious debt distress — IMF is dealing with this situation in a routine way, in terms of the usual prescription of country enhancing its productive efficiency, which is in general a rather long-term variable in the presence of non-radical economic reform strategy that the neoliberal, and over-board austerity-based current EFF programme is not allowing. In the meantime, the country is stuck in a low-growth equilibrium. Lack of needed much larger reform scope in the current EFF programme, austerity-based approach not allowing greater investment into the demos to enhance their economic empowerment, and political voice to put greater pressure on public policy for radical, and deeper reforms, and no enhanced allocation of SDRs – not even once over the medium-term, which is the entire time horizon reflected in the programme document – coupled with a highly volatile environment of polycrisis, will likely not allow the country to reach sustainable macroeconomic stability. This in turn, would not allow the country to board an upward moving economic growth trajectory in any sustainable way. In that sense, the current EFF programme is just providing financial support mainly for a few more years to pass in a low-growth environment, which will neither help in creating basis for enhancing the export base for meaningfully dealing with the debt distress, including bringing gross financing needs to a sustainable level, nor will allow build-up of economic growth, and resilience to lower the otherwise fast-increasing poverty levels – where close to half of the population is below poverty line as per recently released World Bank figures – and to be better prepared for climate change crisis, and related 'Pandemicene' phenomenon; where Pakistan is among the top-ten climate change crisis affected countries. (Concluded) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
