Technical Outlook Favors Tactical Options Strategy on PDD Holdings Stock (PDD)
At first glance, circumstances don't look appealing for PDD Holdings (PDD). A global e-commerce holding company, PDD is, of course, tethered to the health of the Chinese consumer economy. Its two core platforms are Pinduoduo, a social-commerce enterprise, and Temu, a budget online marketplace that brings significantly discounted goods directly from China. However, with the advent of President Donald Trump's trade tariffs, such businesses face extra scrutiny.
Confident Investing Starts Here:
To be sure, diplomats from both the U.S. and China have finished a first round of negotiations, concluding with a new framework. While details have been modest, the deal includes assurances on the supply of rare-earth minerals and potential tariff easing. At the same time, critics have lashed out, not only due to the lack of specifics but also in the form of skepticism that any meaningful progress has been made.
Fundamentally, though, investors should note that the Trump administration likely understands the consequences of acting too aggressively and thus is unlikely to be irrational. It's like the reason why the President tends to walk back hard-hitting policies and rhetoric. Just the fact that this framework has materialized is evidence that the White House isn't really prepared to go toe-to-toe with the Chinese.
That's good news for PDD stock from an investment perspective. It might even be better news for bullish options traders like me.
Understanding the Architecture of Speculation for PDD Stock
For traditional buy-and-hold investors, they often deal with long-term frameworks. When analysts assign price targets, they're usually 12-month forecasts. Such an extended period provides ample flexibility for the underlying thesis to unfold. Subsequently, the research that investors conduct focuses on the 'why' of a particular asset or enterprise.
On the other hand, traders are focused on the 'how' — as in, how much, how fast, and how likely. In other words, traders live in the world of probabilities. This is because options expire, meaning that a proposed strategy cannot just address the magnitude of movement (or the y-axis); the trade must also pan out within the allocated time period (x-axis).
When it comes to statistical analysis, traders must have a firm understanding of the overall architecture. For most practical applications, there are two types of probabilities: derivative and conditional. The former represents the odds of a particular outcome materializing across the entire distribution of the target dataset. In colloquial terms, the derivative probability is a baseball player's batting average last season.
On the other end of the statistical spectrum, the latter concept represents the odds of an event materializing from a specific subset of the data. To extend the baseball analogy, a conditional probability would be the equivalent of a player's batting average when there are runners in scoring position (RISP).
For the purposes of trading, conditional probability is essentially the 'probability of the now' — how likely is the proposed setup to work when you decide to pull the trigger? While the above concept may sound simple, calculating conditional probabilities requires critical discretization. Going back to the baseball analogy, batting average with RISP can be calculated because RISP is a discrete event — if there are no runners on second or third base, then there is no RISP.
Similarly, the only practical way to discretize price action is to convert it into market breadth sequences — or sequences of accumulative and distributive sessions. By doing so, the dataset speaks one coherent language that is categorizable, quantifiable, and ultimately projectable.
Analyzing Market Breadth to Narrow Down a Bullish Strategy
Ultimately, market breadth is a representation of demand, and demand is a binary construct — it's either happening or it's not. Further, the balance of demand can provide traders with a statistical framework for the likelihood of transition from one behavioral state to another based on past conditional analytics.
For example, in the past two months, PDD stock printed a '7-3-U' sequence: seven up weeks, three down weeks, with a net positive trajectory across the 10-week period. Since making its public market debut, this sequence materialized 44 times. In 54.55% of cases, the following week's price action results in upside, with a median return of 8.16%.
On Friday, PDD stock closed at $100.58. Should the implications of the 7-3-U pan out as projected, PDD stock could reach nearly $109 in short order, perhaps in a week or two.
Based on the market intelligence above, the most aggressive speculators may consider the 102/105 bull call spread expiring July 3. This transaction involves buying the $102 call and simultaneously selling the $105 call, for a net debit paid of $127 (which is the most that can be lost in the trade). Should PDD stock rise through the short strike price (105) at expiration, the maximum reward is $173, a payout of over 136%.
What makes this trade attractive is the implied shift in sentiment. As a baseline, the chance that a long position in PDD stock will be profitable over any given week is only 50%. With the statistical response of the 7-3-U sequence, the odds of upside have tilted in favor of the bulls.
Granted, it's a modest advantage, but the trade does favor the long side of the transaction. Additionally, the market is arguably unfamiliar with the risk-modeling protocol mentioned above.
Is PDD Stock a Good Buy?
On Wall Street, PDD stock carries a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on eleven Buy, eight Hold, and two Sell ratings over the past three months. PDD's average stock price target of $124.45 implies approximately 21% upside potential over the next twelve months.
Leveraging Probability to Take Advantage of PDD Stock
While the investment narrative for PDD Holdings is arguably compelling, it may take a while for analysts' projected price targets to materialize. On the flipside, speculators can use the leverage of options to potentially extract significant gains over a short period of time, so long as they're willing to take the risk of losing their entire principal. However, through the usage of conditional probabilities, one can improve the odds of success.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
an hour ago
- Business Upturn
LPRO DEADLINE ALERT: ROSEN, A GLOBALLY RESPECTED LAW FIRM, Encourages Open Lending Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important June 30 Deadline in Securities Class Action
NEW YORK, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: New York, N.Y., June 21, 2025. Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ: LPRO) between February 24, 2022 and March 31, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important June 30, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Open Lending securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Open Lending class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than June 30, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose materially adverse facts about Open Lending's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants: (1) misrepresented the capabilities of Open Lending's risk-based pricing models; (2) issued materially misleading statements regarding Open Lending's profit share revenue; (3) failed to disclose Open Lending's 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had become worth significantly less than their corresponding outstanding loan balances; (4) misrepresented the underperformance of Open Lending's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Open Lending's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Open Lending class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gold prices should hit $4,000 as U.S. deficits may overshadow the Israel-Iran conflict, BofA says
Wars and geopolitical conflicts typically aren't long-term growth drivers for gold prices, according to analysts at Bank of America, which sees the precious metal reaching $4,000 an ounce over the next year. Despite the Israel-Iran conflict heating up, the outlook for gold is likely to be swayed more by the U.S. budget deficit. Gold is often seen as a safe-haven asset during times of global turmoil, but wars and geopolitical conflicts typically aren't long-term growth drivers for gold prices, according to analysts at Bank of America. In fact, gold has actually dipped 2% in the week since Israel began its airstrikes on Iran. Meanwhile, tensions are ramping as reports Saturday said B-2 stealth bombers are headed over the Pacific. That's as President Donald Trump weighs involvement in the conflict, potentially with bombers dropping massive 'bunker busters' on heavily fortified Iranian nuclear sites. In a note on Friday, BofA analysts said they expect gold prices to reach $4,000 per ounce in the next year, representing an 18% jump from current levels. 'While the war between Israel and Iran can always escalate, conflicts are not usually a sustained bullish price driver,' they wrote. 'As such, the trajectory of the US budget negotiations will be critical, and if fiscal shortfalls don't decline, the fallout from that plus market volatility may end up attracting more buyers.' The Israel-Iran conflict has drawn attention away from Trump's tax-and-spending bill making its way through Congress. While the House and Senate versions have key differences that need to be reconciled before it can become law, the bill's fiscal impact is still expected to add trillions of dollars to U.S. deficits in the coming years. That's raised fears about the sustainability of U.S. debt and global demand for the flood of Treasury bonds that will be issued to finance all the red ink. And amid Trump's trade war, the U.S. dollar—traditionally viewed as a haven asset—has suffered as well, slumping against other top currencies and providing more upside to gold. Central banks around the world have dumped $48 billion in Treasuries since late March alone. At the same time, central banks keep buying gold, continuing a trend that began years earlier. A recent survey from the World Gold Council found that geopolitical instability and potential trade conflicts are chief reasons why central banks in emerging economies are shifting toward gold at a much faster rate than those in advanced economies. BofA estimated the central banks' gold holdings are now equivalent to just under 18% of outstanding U.S. public debt, up from 13% a decade ago. 'That tally should be a warning for US policymakers. Ongoing apprehension over trade and US fiscal deficits may well divert more central bank purchases away from US Treasuries to gold,' analysts warned. Meanwhile, the market still doesn't appear to be overexposed to gold. BofA estimated that investors have allocated just 3.5% of their portfolios to gold. And regardless of how Congress ends up rewriting the budget bill, analysts said deficits will remain elevated. 'Therefore, market concerns over fiscal sustainability are unlikely to fade no matter the result of Senate negotiations,' BofA predicted. 'Rates volatility and a weaker USD should then keep gold supported, especially if the US Treasury or the Fed are ultimately forced to step in and support markets.' This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Top economist who previously sounded the alarm on tariffs sees a possible scenario where Trump ‘outsmarted all of us'
Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, laid out a potential scenario where President Donald Trump's tariffs are extended long enough to ease economic uncertainty while also providing a significant bump to federal revenue. That comes as the 90-day pause on Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs' is nearing an end. Businesses and consumers remain in limbo over what will happen next with President Donald Trump's tariffs, but a top economist sees a way to leave them in place and still deliver a 'victory for the world.' In a note on Saturday titled 'Has Trump Outsmarted Everyone on Tariffs?', Apollo Global Management Chief Economist Torsten Sløk laid out a scenario that keeps tariffs well below Trump's most aggressive rates long enough to ease uncertainty and avoid the economic harm that comes with it. 'Maybe the strategy is to maintain 30% tariffs on China and 10% tariffs on all other countries and then give all countries 12 months to lower non-tariff barriers and open up their economies to trade,' he speculated. That comes as the 90-day pause on Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs,' which triggered a massive selloff on global markets in April, is nearing an end early next month. The temporary reprieve was meant to give the U.S. and its trade partners time to negotiate deals. But aside from an agreement with the U.K. and another short-term deal with China to step back from prohibitively high tariffs, few others have been announced. Meanwhile, negotiations are ongoing with other top trading partners. Trump administration officials have been saying for weeks that the U.S. is close to reaching deals. On Saturday, Sløk said extending the deadline one year would give other countries and U.S. businesses more time to adjust to a 'new world with permanently higher tariffs.' An extension would also immediately reduce uncertainty, giving a boost to business planning, employment, and financial markets. 'This would seem like a victory for the world and yet would produce $400 billion of annual revenue for US taxpayers,' he added. 'Trade partners will be happy with only 10% tariffs and US tax revenue will go up. Maybe the administration has outsmarted all of us.' Sløk's speculation is notable as he previously sounded the alarm on Trump's tariffs. In April, he warned tariffs have the potential to trigger a recession by this summer. Also in April, before the U.S. and China reached a deal to temporarily halt triple-digit tariffs, he said the trade war between the two countries would pummel American small businesses. More certainty on tariffs would give the Federal Reserve a clearer view on inflation as well. For now, most policymakers are in wait-and-see mode, as tariffs are expected to have stagflationary effects. But a split has emerged. Fed Governor Christopher Waller said Friday that economic data could justify lower interest rates as early as next month, expecting only a one-off impact from tariffs. But San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly also said Friday a rate cut in the fall looks more appropriate, rather than a cut in July. Still, Sløk isn't alone in wondering whether Trump's tariffs may not be as harmful to the economy and financial markets as feared. Chris Harvey, Wells Fargo Securities' head of equity strategy, expects tariffs to settle in the 10%-12% range, low enough to have a minimal impact, and sees the S&P 500 soaring to 7,007, making him Wall Street's biggest bull. He added that it's still necessary to make progress on trade and reach deals with big economies like India, Japan and the EU. That way, markets can focus on next year, rather near-term tariff impacts. 'Then you can start to extrapolate out,' he told CNBC last month. 'Then the market starts looking through things. They start looking through any sort of economic slowdown or weakness, and then we start looking to '26 not at '25.' This story was originally featured on
