Federal Reserve may need less forward guidance in uncertain times, San Francisco Fed chief says
The US central bank should consider giving less forward guidance about its monetary policy intentions, particularly in uncertain times, San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly said on Sunday.
'Words have power, which is a great tool. But words can be harder to reverse than the interest rate,' Daly said in remarks prepared for delivery to the Western Economic Association International annual conference that did not include any comments on the economic or monetary policy outlook. 'They set expectations, which can be hard to change in the event the economy evolves differently than we expect.'
San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
In 2021, the Fed said it would keep expanding its balance sheet and would not raise rates until inflation was on track to exceed its 2% goal for some time, an approach it felt was warranted given that inflation had under-run the 2% goal for years. Analysts and many Fed policymakers now say they believe the Fed was late to start raising rates to fight rising inflation in part because of this definitive guidance.
'The lesson for me from that period is that being definitive in highly uncertain times comes with a price,' Daly said. The central bank should, she said, be flexible and dynamic in how it communicates to the public.
The Fed is currently reevaluating its policy framework, and Daly said her remarks were not specifically about that effort. The Fed is also expected to redo its approach to communications, including potential changes to its so-called 'dot plot' setting out Fed policymakers' expected rate paths and used by markets as a guide to where the Fed expects rates to go.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump just made the Fed's rate deliberations even more complicated
The Federal Reserve was already wrestling with a lot of uncertainty about the future path of monetary policy, and President Trump's weekend strike on Iran's nuclear sites will likely make that path even cloudier in the near term. The uncertainty of the part of central bank policymakers was already evident last week in the Fed's latest "dot plot" outlining future interest rate moves. While eight officials saw two cuts still happening in 2025, seven officials predicted no cuts at all — up from the four officials who made that call previously. Trump's strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend inject yet another layer of unknowns into those discussions as central bank officials prepare for their next meeting in July and gauge the impact of the president's trade, tax and immigration policies on the path of inflation and economic growth. There are worries from some Fed watchers that a sustained increase in oil prices would add to the inflationary impulse already present in the US from Trump's tariffs. Wall Street analysts at JPMorgan Chase (JPM) have warned that a prolonged conflict and the potential closure of the critical Strait of Hormuz could drive oil prices as high as $120 a barrel, pushing US inflation back toward 5%. That could bolster the argument of some hawks at the Fed that rates need to stay where they are for longer to protect against another inflation surge. On the other hand, there is also an argument circulating on Wall Street that the conflict could push the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates sooner than expected. "A sustained rise in oil prices could cause the Fed to strike a more dovish tone," Oxford Economics chief US economist Ryan Sweet wrote in a recent note to clients before Trump's attack, arguing that an extended oil shock could dent demand and potentially spill over into an otherwise resilient labor market. For this view to hold, Fed officials would have to get comfortable with the idea that any sudden spikes in oil prices tend to cause only a temporary rise in inflation that can be overlooked — and that any such shock could pose a bigger threat to growth and jobs than to inflation itself. Fed Chair Jerome Powell told reporters last Wednesday that while it's possible there could be higher energy prices, what has tended to happen when with turmoil in the Middle East is a spike in energy prices that tends to come down. "Those things don't generally tend to have lasting effects on inflation," Powell said at a press conference after the Fed held rates steady for the fourth meeting in a row. "Although of course in the 1970s, they famously did, because you had a series of very, very large shocks. But, we haven't seen anything like that now. The U.S. economy is far less dependent on foreign oil than it was back in the 1970s." Powell will likely be asked for his views of how Trump's new actions will affect the economy as he appears before House and Senate committees Tuesday and Wednesday, as part of a regular semi-annual appearance before Congress. The Fed will also get a new look at inflation this Friday with the release of the May Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report. Economists expect annual "core" PCE — which excludes the volatile categories of food and energy — to have clocked in at 2.6%, up from the 2.5% seen in April. Over the prior month, economists project "core" PCE at 0.1%, unchanged from May. One influential voice at the Fed did get louder about the case for cuts in the days before Trump's attack, dismissing concerns that any inflation from the president's tariffs could be long lasting. In fact, Fed governor Christopher Waller on Friday told CNBC that rates could be cut at the next meeting on July 29-30. "We could do this as early as July,' Waller said. 'I think we've got room to bring it down, and then we can kind of see what happens with inflation,' he said, adding the central bank could pause if needed due to a shock from developments in the Middle East. One of his colleagues, San Francisco Fed president Mary Daly, is not on the same timetable. 'For me, I look more to the fall,' Daly said in a separate interview on CNBC. 'By then, we'll have quite a bit more information, and businesses are telling me that's what they're going to look to for some resolution.' Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin additionally told Reuters in an interview published Friday that he was not in any rush to cut due to concerns that tariffs could push inflation up and data showing the labor market remains resilient. That aligns with statements made by Powell. He noted last week that recent inflation reports have been favorable, but that goods prices have been moving up following the introduction of new tariffs and there could be more of that this summer. "We're beginning to see some effects, and we do expect to see more of them over the coming months." Thus, the right thing to do for now, he added, is 'hold where we are' on rates. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bond Traders Look to Fed Officials for Clues on Rate Cut Timing
(Bloomberg) -- Bond investors are on alert for hints on when the Federal Reserve will deliver the two 2025 interest-rate cuts officials projected at their latest policy meeting. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports They'll also closely watch geopolitical developments after the US attacked nuclear sites in Iran over the weekend. Traders have been pricing in a solid chance that officials deliver a quarter-point reduction at their September meeting. Speeches by Fed officials and a reading of the central bank's preferred gauge of inflation may help them hone the timing further. Chair Jerome Powell will testify before lawmakers Tuesday and Wednesday as part of the central bank's semi-annual monetary policy report. The Treasury will sell $69 billion two-year, $70 billion five-year and $44 billion seven-year notes in the latest test of investor demand for US debt. What to Watch Economic data: June 23: S&P Global US manufacturing, services, composite PMIs; existing home sales June 24: Philadelphia Fed non-manufacturing activity' current account balance; FHFA house price index; S&P CoreLogic CS HPI; Richmond Fed manufacturing index and business conditions; Conference board consumer confidence June 25: MBA mortgage applications; new home sales; building permits June 26: Advance goods trade balance, imports and exports; initial jobless claims; wholesale and retail inventories; GDP Annualized QoQ (1Q); GDP price index (1Q); personal consumption (1Q); core PCE price index (1Q); Chicago Fed national activity index; durable and capital goods orders; pending home sales; Kansas City Fed manufacturing activity June 27: Personal income and spending; PCE price index and core PCE; Bloomberg June US economic survey; U. of Michigan sentiment and inflation expectations; Kansas City Fed services activity Fed calendar: June 23: Fed governor Christopher Waller; Vice chair for supervision Michelle Bowman; Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee; New York Fed President John Williams and Fed Governor Adriana Kugler June 24: Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack; Fed Chair Jerome Powell testifies before the House committee on financial services; Williams; Boston Fed President Susan Collins; Fed Governor Michael Barr June 25: Powell testifies before Senate committee on banking, housing, and urban affairs June 26: Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin; Hammack; Barr June 27: Williams, Fed Governor Lisa Cook; Hammack Auction calendar: June 23: 13-, 26-week bills June 24: 6-week bills, two-year notes June 25: 17-week bills; two-year floating rate notes; five-year notes June 26: 4-, 8-week bills; seven-year notes Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Are you worried about rising petrol prices due to the Middle East crisis? Have your say
The crisis in the Middle East has further intensified after US president Donald Trump authorised strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites. Oil prices had already been rising in recent weeks as a result of the tensions. On Monday, they surged to a five-month high after Iran signalled it may close the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for the US strikes on its nuclear facilities. Read more: Trump just made the Fed's rate deliberations even more complicated Goldman Sachs has predicted further surges in the coming days. For ordinary consumers, the knock-on effect on petrol prices is under the spotlight. Even before the strikes on Iran, rising fuel prices were expected to cause further headaches for weary consumers, as Yahoo Finance UK's Vicky McKeever reported. Around a fifth of the world's oil consumption flows through the strait of Hormuz, which is the entry and exit point to the Persian Gulf. Any potential disruption to the supply of oil is unlikely to be good news for consumers. Are you concerned about rising petrol prices and what it could mean for your household budget? Have your say and vote in our poll now. Read more: UK consumers braced for petrol price hikes Oil jumps to 5-month high after Iran votes to close Strait of Hormuz Trending tickers: IAG, Novo Nordisk, Shell, Stellantis, LVMH Yahoo Finance UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
