International Baccalaureate diploma pause devastating
Two students, who were supposed to begin their International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IBDP) in September, say they are "angry" over the decision to pause the course for the next academic year.Ben and Shea said they were told about the decision a day before their offers were due to come out."I didn't get much time to process what I was doing, it was straight from you're not doing International Baccalaureate, now pick your A-levels," Ben saidThe Committee for Education, Sport and Culture said only 14 students had signed up to the diploma for the 2025/2026 academic year and pausing the course would allow teachers to be used more "effectively".
'Unreasonable and devastating'
"I get more angry as I think about it because it seems quite unreasonable and really quite devastating," Shea said."It feels a bit like a personal violation letting us know so late, although the actual final choice was made the day we found out, I think education [The Committee for Education, Sport and Culture] could've gone about it in a better way. "They could've let the school know earlier so that we could have more time to decide what we'll do next."Ben, who wants to go to Cambridge University, said he could not think of a "single benefit" of pausing the diploma.He said: "There is no logical pathway that I can go down, from the start of this year when we were given International Baccalaureate as an option and all encouraged to do it, to it being cut off to all of us in such a quick space of time."
President of the committee, Deputy Andrea Dudley-Owen, said there was not enough uptake for the course to be viable."The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme has been and remains a valued part of our Sixth Form Centre's curriculum for some years now."However the educational experience of the students, with so few in each class, with the inevitable transfer of some students to other subject areas at the beginning of these courses, would have been suboptimal. "With this decision to pause the diploma, school leaders can now use staff more effectively to make a wider impact across education."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
How Labour's VAT raid made private school pupils fair game for hate
For months Ben* was heckled by local school children on his way home. A group of them targeted him on the bus, shouting 'posh boy' whenever they saw him. The taunting was so relentless that for a while last year the 15-year-old changed the time he left school to avoid running into his aggressors. He has asked that we don't use his real name so that he remains unidentifiable. His mother says that this happened in autumn last year, when Labour's anti-private school rhetoric was at its peak. In October, Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, tweeted a viral post in which she caricatured private schools as out-of-touch institutions with embossed stationery and AstroTurf pitches. Our state schools need teachers more than private schools need embossed stationery. Our children need mental health support more than private schools need new pools. Our students need careers advice more than private schools need AstroTurf pitches. — Bridget Phillipson (@bphillipsonMP) October 5, 2024 Ben is far from the only child who has faced abuse in the wake of Labour's VAT raid. The Education Not Taxation group, which includes more than 25,000 private school parents, said it is aware of dozens of examples of children who say they have been abused on their way to and from school. Private school children have often been a target of bullies in the past. But the group says the language and rhetoric used by Labour ministers in the past year to justify adding VAT to school fees has poured fuel on the flames, and created a reason to accept this behaviour. Phillipson's viral post on X, seen by more than six million people, is one of many examples of language some have deemed to be divisive and creating an 'us vs them' mentality. Conservative MP Luke Evans said her comments 'reeked of prejudice and propagates a class war', while shadow minister Nigel Huddleston said they were 'shockingly ill-judged'. Both called for her to apologise. In April, the Education Secretary accused private schools of 'crying wolf' over the impact of the 20pc levy, despite more than 75 institutions closing since October, according to the Independent Schools Council. Recent figures from the Department for Education also revealed four times as many pupils have left private schools in the past year than the Government's forecast. Mary*, from London, is both a private school parent and a state school governor. Her eldest child goes to an independent school while her youngest is at a state school. Mary, like Ben, does not want to use her real name because she is scared of experiencing further backlash. 'It can be confusing because it feels as if Labour cares about my daughter but not about my son,' she says. 'The language Labour has used is dangerous. It's given people ammunition to say things to your face.' In a recent meeting with other state school parents, Mary says she was heckled and told 'you are part of the problem' because one of her children attended a private school. She says: 'In my role as a governor, we had to explain the financial difficulties to parents. I was in a meeting and a mother stood up and said I was part of the problem because I had denied funding to the school by moving my child to an independent school. 'There were 30 people in that room and nobody said anything. Nobody stepped in, that was the shocking part. People afterwards messaged me to say she was out of line, but the fact nobody wanted to speak up… I felt publicly shamed.' 'Labour's derogatory rhetoric to blame' One private school family putting their heads above the parapet are Sarah Lambert, 59, and her 14-year-old daughter Ava. The Telegraph revealed in February that the local council is now spending more than £8,000 a year in taxi fares to take Ava to the nearest available state school 25 miles away, after the family were no longer able to afford her school fees. Lambert, a nurse practitioner, says the fallout from appearing in the media has been 'brutal'. While more juvenile comments focused on cliches about their supposed wealth, she says that at its most sinister, online trolls trawled through her social media accounts to find images of her daughter. 'They found a picture and said 'well she deserves it because she's so ugly'. Another one said 'who would want that child in their school?'. It's been horrendous. There have been things like 'oh dear so your poor child has to mix with normal people'. 'Don't talk to me about normal people. My sister works in retail. My mum is a retired social worker. I'm a nurse. How much more normal could you want?' She adds: 'I found myself thinking, how is this normal for people to be able to feel like they could attack a 13-year-old child? I truly believe it was the rhetoric that the Government gave at the time. They wanted people to think we all drive Chelsea tractors. 'This Sunday I'm working from eight in the morning until midnight as a nurse, but that is not what Bridget Phillipson wants to portray.' Alicia Kearns, the Conservative MP for Rutland and Stamford, who represents Lambert, says: 'Labour's rhetoric is laced with derogatory language and ridicule of families in independent schooling.' She adds: 'Whether ministers like it or not, their responsibilities extend to the education of all children. Yet the Secretary of State has made her priorities clear, having not visited a single independent school since taking office, while meeting with trade unions weekly. 'Education shouldn't be an experiment in class warfare, our children deserve better. Yet Labour's rhetoric lays bare their envy and blind pursuit of ideology irrespective of the consequences for all families and children.' The Department for Education was approached for comment.
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Government gives final £200m to Greater Cambridge Partnership
A transport delivery body has secured its final tranche of funding from the government and will receive £200m over the next five years. The Greater Cambridge Partnership (GCP) was set up in 2014 after the government granted the area a city deal worth £ funding is for big infrastructure projects to support economic growth in and around Cambridge and has been handed down in stages over a number of years, with the first £300m already received. The organisation has passed its second gateway review, which is where the government checks its progress. The GCP is made up of Cambridge City Council, South Cambridgeshire District Council, Cambridgeshire County Council, Cambridge University and the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Business its creation it has delivered projects such as the Chisholm trail, a cycle route linking the north and south of the city and overseen works to cycle routes on roads such as Milton Road and Histon Road. The group is also currently overseeing the relocation of Waterbeach train station, new busways and a new road layout at Addenbrooke's Hospital. Whilst some projects have been widely welcomed, others have received objections. These include the Cambourne to Cambridge busway, which is going to be the subject of a public inquiry in September. The gateway review was submitted in spring 2023 and was assessed by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MCLG). A meeting of the GCP's joint assembly on Thursday heard it had passed the review. Brian Milnes, a Liberal Democrat councillor on South Cambridgeshire District Council who is a member of the GCP's executive board, said: "[The government] have recognised the schemes and projects, which we have developed in consultation with communities, businesses and people, will meet the needs of Greater Cambridge. "Without the city deal investment, the continued growth of our area would not be possible - the Local Plan would not be delivered."He also added that the group has a mission to "complete the job" for a "joined-up transport network". This will include the introduction of autonomous vehicles. The GCP is a time-limited organisation, which is expected to disband once the city deal has been completed. It has faced calls to be scrapped, including from Paul Bristow, the current mayor of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority. He argued that the funding and responsibilities should be passed on to his organisation, which was set up in 2017. Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Telegraph
7 days ago
- Telegraph
Silence on bullying at universities ‘like Post Office scandal', says Cambridge chancellor hopeful
The culture of silence on bullying at universities is like the Post Office scandal, a candidate in the running to be the next Cambridge University chancellor has claimed. Prof Wyn Evans, one of 10 hopefuls who could become Cambridge University's next figurehead, said academics were routinely made to feel as if their allegations about bullying and harassment were isolated cases. In an interview with The Telegraph, the astrophysics professor at Cambridge's Institute of Astronomy claimed he was subject to 'prolonged retaliation' after he tried to blow the whistle over mistreatment of a colleague. Prof Evans raised concerns with the university in July 2021 that a female member of staff in his department in the 'throes of extreme mental distress' was being bullied by a more senior employee, adding that he was worried about her welfare as a result. Cambridge University appointed an independent barrister to investigate the claims, but also tasked them with probing separate allegations made about Prof Evans's own behaviour. It took more than a year and a half before the investigation was completed. The barrister concluded that Prof Evans's intervention met the legal threshold for whistleblowing, but that the behaviour reported by him did not constitute bullying. The lawyer dismissed the personal allegations made against Prof Evans and said the claimant provided no evidence to substantiate them. Prof Evans told The Telegraph that the drawn-out process had an enormous impact on his mental health, and that at his lowest ebb during the investigation, he had thoughts of ending his own life. 'Not even a droplet of compassion' 'My problems all started when I intervened on [my colleague's] behalf. I contacted a prominent figure in the university for help in dealing with the victim… No help was offered. There was not even a droplet of compassion for the victim,' he said. 'As is very common in whistleblowing cases, there was then prolonged retaliation against me. The retaliation caused significant disruption to my work and my mental health. I went on sick leave. Sleep was an elusive luxury [and] I was plagued with recurrent nightmares.' The astrophysics professor has promised to introduce an ombudsman at Cambridge University to investigate 'serious abuses or mismanagement' if elected chancellor. The scientist, whose research is around the formation of the Milky Way, launched a blog about his ordeal in 2023 calling for other academics to come forward with their own experiences. The 21 Group, named after the percentage of Cambridge University employees who reported being subjected to bullying or harassment in an internal staff survey, has seen almost 300 academics from around the world share their stories about bullying and harassment to date. Prof Evans described their revelations as similar to the Post Office scandal, in which victims were repeatedly told they were the only ones struggling with the company's faulty Horizon software despite more than 900 of them later being wrongly prosecuted for theft. 'If you remember in the sub-postmaster scandal, the Post Office was telling each individual sub-postmaster that, you know, 'it's just you were having problems with Horizon'. And it was only when they got together and they found that it was actually very common and almost ubiquitous, and the Post Office had been telling untruths,' he said. 'So it's something similar to that, that by helping all these people come together, we're much more powerful at fighting back against the universities. The knowledge that what has happened to you has happened to many other people is powerful because you realise that it isn't an individual personal experience.' The 21 Group has seen more than 8,000 visitors to its website in the past week alone, according to Prof Evans, with most academics active on the platform claiming to be from research-intensive universities across the UK. Some allege they have been stripped of research funding as part of power struggles with more senior colleagues. Free speech 'There are many young researchers who find their grants blocked because of sort of academic jealousy or of the feeling of being threatened. I think that's actually very common,' said Prof Evans. He claimed the issue was at the heart of broader free speech problems at universities, with institutions failing to properly address bullying and harassment allegations for fear of reputational damage. In his independent report into Prof Evans's whistleblowing claims, the external barrister appointed by Cambridge University said he regretted the length of time that the investigation took and 'the effect this will undoubtedly have had on all those involved'. The barrister also raised concerns that several staff members pulled out of providing testimony over fears they would face retaliation. Prof Evans, a don at the university for more than 20 years, claimed it was 'all quite unlike the Cambridge University as it really could be'. 'The magnificent role the university could play in encouraging greater empathy, diversity, kindness and inclusion as well as public interest in scholarship and learning, is undermined by its poor culture,' he said. 'Culture is set by the people at the top. This is one of things I would change as chancellor.' Cambridge University said it strongly refuted Prof Evans's claims. The astrophysics professor will run against rival candidates including Sandi Toksvig, the comedian and ex-presenter of the Great British Bake Off, and Gina Miller, the anti-Brexit campaigner, in the race to become the next Cambridge chancellor. The successful candidate will replace Lord Sainsbury of Turville, who was elected to the role in 2011 and stepped down last year. He had succeeded Prince Philip, the late Duke of Edinburgh, who held the position for 35 years. Voting is set to take place both online and in-person for the first time next month, with a winner set to be announced in the week beginning July 21, 2025. A spokesperson for Cambridge University said: 'We strongly dispute claims made in this version of events but cannot comment further on ongoing cases. The university takes allegations of bullying and harassment extremely seriously.'
