'Don't Be Fooled': Govt's Freshwater Reforms Means More Pollution In Your Water & Commercial Control Of Public Resources
Press Release – Choose Clean Water
Choose Clean Water says its important for the public to make submissions on the changes (these can be made until 27 July 2025) but its just as important for the public to contact MPs and Ministers directly to voice their opposition.
29 May 2025
Freshwater campaigners are saying 'don't be fooled' by the Coalition Government's rhetoric in today's freshwater policy announcement. What it really means for New Zealanders is more pollution in rivers, lakes, and drinking water sources and the handing over of more power to commercial interests to control a fundamental public resource.
The Coalition Government made its long-awaited announcement on freshwater policy reform today and Choose Clean Water's spokesperson Tom Kay says it confirms what has been feared.
'Ministers are using comforting words like 'balance' but the details of this policy demonstrate that this is not about balance or protecting the public. The Government is proposing to remove existing bottom lines and change the long overdue prioritisation of the health of people and waterways provided by Te Mana o Te Wai.'
'Don't be fooled, this is a massive blow for the health of our water and the health of our communities.'
Te Mana o te Wai is a vastly improved decision-making framework in the existing National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020. It requires regional councils to provide for the protection of the health of waterways and the health needs of people (i.e. access to safe, good quality drinking water) before commercial uses can be considered. It was strengthened following the failure of previous National Policy Statements in 2011, 2014, and 2017 to improve the health of freshwater in New Zealand, and widespread public support for the Government to act.
'What Te Mana o te Wai finally provided, in the 2020 version of our national freshwater policy, was sufficient weight to the public interest and need for healthy water. Before this, people's drinking water and waterways were regularly losing out to commercial pressures, which we saw result in sick rivers and lakes, the drying up of rivers and groundwater, and undrinkable water sources around the country.'
'In the 2020 national policy statement, it was finally recognised that communities couldn't continue like that—it was unstable, unsustainable, and unhealthy.'
The group says Minister Hoggard's ACT party has consistently misrepresented Te Mana o Te Wai and used race-baiting to generate misguided anger towards a policy that protects all New Zealanders.
Leader of the ACT Party, David Seymour, has stated that Te Mana o te Wai is 'the same as waving crystals over the water to drive out evil spirits, and it's truly bonkers.'
'This is not only nasty and insulting but it's also plain wrong,' says Kay.
'Te Mana o te Wai is simply a framework that says we have to ensure our water is healthy enough to support itself and our people before it can support commercial interests. It doesn't rule out business—it just says that business can't occur at the cost of our communities' health.'
Previous consultation on changes to freshwater policy under the Resource Management Act demonstrated most regional councils support Te Mana o te Wai.
'Not only that, groups from Water NZ to Seafood NZ to Forest & Bird to public health advocates support Te Mana o te Wai because it makes priorities clearer for decision makers and provides better protection for the health of waterways and people.'
Minister Hoggard and Minister McClay's announcement is consistent with the Coalition Government's approach to handing over more power to extractive commercial interests and removing basic protections for New Zealanders.
'Polluting industries have massively influenced this freshwater policy. The Government is following the requests of groups like DairyNZ who have asked the Government to remove bottom lines and for industry control of instruments like farm plans. This Coalition Government is captured by big industries, we saw it with tobacco and now we're seeing it with agribusiness.'
Choose Clean Water says it's important for the public to make submissions on the changes (these can be made until 27 July 2025) but it's just as important for the public to contact MPs and Ministers directly to voice their opposition.
'We have a good existing national policy statement for freshwater. It puts us all on the path to restoration and health over time and still allows for productive land use to support communities. The Coalition Government is making changes New Zealand simply doesn't need and that will take us backwards.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
39 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
New Zealand hints at support for US over Iran
There are several points of contrast. First are NZ's Opposition parties, which soon after the bombing declared it contrary to international law and called on the Government to say so as well. Second is Australia, which came out yesterday and supported the bombing. But it is more likely that NZ will continue to follow the example of Britain and Canada. That is to avoid the issue of whether it supports or opposes the bombing of three nuclear facilities, to stay silent on whether it was justified or unjustified, not to offer a view as to whether it was lawful or unlawful under international law, and to emphasise what should happen from now on: de-escalation and diplomacy. Unlike NZ, in the 24 hours after the bombing, the Australian Government came under domestic pressure from its highly vocal defence hawks to unequivocally support the bombing. And it did so today. 'The world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and we support action to prevent that - that is what this is,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said. Even if it is a bit squirmish about the legalities of America's unilateral strike, Australia's status as an ally is baked into not just Anzus but into the $368 billion Aukus submarine supply deal. And with Aukus currently under review by the Trump Administration, it is not hard to see why Labor might have seen it as against its national interest to quibble about whether the US acted contrary to international law. No wonder the general response to Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong was why had it taken Australia 24 hours to say that. Britain, although equally the No 1 ally to the US with Australia, is in a different position. While it too has come under pressure from the Conservative opposition to back the US action, the UK Labour Government has stronger grounds for resisting. Its position as an intermediary between Iran and the US – not to mention between Europe and the US - is important. Britain, along with France and Germany, was meeting with the Iranian Foreign Minister in Geneva the day before the bombing. Despite US President Donald Trump dismissing their attempts at mediation, it will be important to keep those channels open. And if the UK and European players are to maintain credibility with Iran in such a role, they cannot afford to be cheerleading the US against such Iranian humiliation. Minister of Defence Judith Collins and Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters announce an operation to assist New Zealanders stranded in Iran and Israel at RNZAF Base, Whenuapai, on Sunday. Photo / Sylvie Whinray Foreign Minister Winston Peters on Sunday and Monday morning took a non-committal position on the basis of not having enough information. You could tell that well-established US hawk was itching to back the US, but he resisted. He is, after all, part of a three-party Coalition, and with the Prime Minister on the other side of the world for a Nato summit, he and his officials needed time to work on their positioning. But no amount of waiting for information is going to change the fact that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recorded in May that Iran's nuclear stockpiles include 400kg of uranium enriched up to 60% - beyond what it required for supposedly civilian use. No amount of denial by Iran is going to persuade leaders of most Western countries that Iran was not far away – possibly months - from producing a nuclear weapon. And no amount of extra information is going to change the claim by the US that its actions were of collective self-defence and were lawful. NZ is committed to the 'international rules-based order'. Whenever it calls out Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, it describes it as 'illegal.' But whether something is lawful or unlawful under international law is often debatable, especially when it involves the US. When Peters talks about wanting more information, he is not referring to waiting for the final piece of legal advice that will tip the scales and have NZ declare the US actions unlawful. The only direction in which he would want to shift is further towards supporting the US, not criticising it. By 3pm yesterday, Peters had issued a fuller statement calling for diplomacy and dialogue, and noting the US statement to the UN Security Council in defence of its actions. It also noted NZ's history of advocating for disarmament, opposing Iran's nuclear programme, and stated more bluntly than he has stated before: 'Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons'. That may not be an unequivocal statement of NZ's support for the US action, but it certainly moves closer to it. And perhaps that is where NZ's position will rest.
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
How Would An Escalation In Conflict In The Middle East Impact New Zealand
Article – RNZ Explainer – America jumped into the war between Israel and Iran over the weekend, as US President Donald Trump announced air strikes on Iran's three principal nuclear sites. The intervention of the US in the conflict has raised concerns worldwide about what's next, including how it might affect New Zealand, from citizens overseas to the price of petrol. Here's a look at what you need to know so far. What's NZ's role in the conflict? Are we going to war? New Zealand has maintained a cautious stance politically as the conflict between Iran and Israel has ramped up in recent weeks. That remains the case today, with the prime minister urging that diplomatic talks resume. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, who is overseas for a NATO summit, told RNZ's Morning Report that New Zealand wanted to see a peaceful stable and secure Middle East. 'The way to get there is a political solution rather than military action, it's actually through dialogue and diplomacy.' As a small country that is thousands of miles away from the conflict, all New Zealand could do was to advocate for what it thought should happen, he said. 'What we don't need is more military action, we need a political solution to all of these issues in the Middle East.' On Sunday, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said ongoing military action in the Middle East was 'extremely worrying'. Peters previously said before the weekend escalation that the provocative behaviour by both Israel and Iran was to be criticised, and New Zealand would not take sides in a conflict of this nature. 'There are no innocent parties in this conflict,' he said. Will this latest Middle East conflict affect the price of petrol – and everything else? The escalation poses a major threat to New Zealand's economy, RNZ's Susan Edmunds reports. Infometrics chief executive Brad Olsen said if there were attacks on US shipping, or attempts to limit access through the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices could spike. Iran's parliament reportedly voted on Monday morning (NZ time) to close the Strait of Hormuz, which around 20 percent of the world's oil travels through. 'If [Iran] do ratchet up the tension further, if this starts to broaden out into shipping attacks, I think market expectations and worries about oil supply will increase substantially. The question is, just to what degree do you price this and how do markets look at that?' Koura KiwiSaver founder Rupert Carlyon said the biggest risk was to inflation. 'If it does turn into a broader Middle East war and potentially shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, then we are likely to see higher oil prices, which will flow through to everything and shipping delays making it harder and more expensive to import things here in New Zealand.' What about Kiwis who are in Iran or Israel? Nearly 250 New Zealanders are now registered as being in Iran and Israel as a Defence Force Hercules makes its way to the region to help. New figures provided to RNZ and recorded on SafeTravel show 119 New Zealanders in Iran and 117 in Israel. RNZ understands some of those people may have managed to flee somewhere safer, but have not yet updated their status with SafeTravel. The Defence Force announced on Sunday it is sending a plane to the Middle East to assist any New Zealanders stranded in Iran or Israel. The plane is not part of any military combat operations. The C-130J Hercules, along with government personnel, left Auckland on Monday morning. It will take several days for it to arrive. Peters said New Zealanders should do everything they can to leave now, if they can find a safe route. 'We know it will not be safe for everyone to leave Iran or Israel, and many people may not have access to transport or fuel supplies,' he said. 'If you are in this situation, you should shelter in place, follow appropriate advice from local authorities and stay in touch with family and friends where possible.' Peters earlier said the number of New Zealanders registered in Iran had jumped since the escalation of the crisis. 'We thought, at a certain time, we had them all counted out at 46,' he said. 'It's far more closer to 80 now, because they're coming out of the woodwork, despite the fact that, for months, we said, 'look, this is a danger zone', and for a number of days we've said, 'get out if you possibly can'.' There were 101 New Zealanders registered in Israel. Again, Peters said the figure had risen recently. New Zealanders in Iran and Israel needing urgent consular assistance should call the Ministry's Emergency Consular Call Centre on +64 99 20 20 20. How are New Zealanders with ties to the region coping? Elham Salari, an Iranian in New Zealand told RNZ on Sunday she was deeply worried for her family members back home. 'I'm so scared. I'm so stressed… all I'm thinking is 'What's going to happen next?' Trump said he wants peace… but Iran's regime will not let it go easily. There will be a bigger war. It's going to destroy our country and our people are going to die.' Salari said she had woken up to messages from her family on Sunday who confirmed they were safe, but she had not been able to get back in contact with them since. Meanwhile, New Zealand Jewish Council spokesperson Ben Kepes said people should not conflate the actions of the Israeli government and the Israeli military with Jews worldwide. Iran has said multiple times that it does not believe Israel has a right to exist, he said. 'Most New Zealanders when they understand the issues would say that regardless of whether they support the actions of the Israeli government, that Israel has a right to exist as a sovereign nation.' Kepes said he was a Jew in New Zealand and did not hold an Israeli passport, nor vote for the government in Israel. 'I have zero control over Israel, so holding me responsible of the actions of the government is not only absurd, but it's a stereotype that is really dangerous.'
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
US-Iran Conflict ‘Extremely Worrying', NZ Backs Diplomacy
Article – RNZ Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says more military action isn't the answer to deal with Middle East conflict. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says New Zealand wants to see a peaceful stable and secure Middle East, but more military action isn't the answer . The United Nations Security Council was meeting in emergency session on Monday (NZ time) on the US on three key nuclear facilities at the weekend. UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres said the US bombing marked a perilous turn in a region already reeling. Iran called on the 15-member body to condemn what it called a 'blatant and unlawful act of aggression', Reuters reported. Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says the government wants to know all the facts before taking a position on the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. Luxon told Morning Report the way to get to a stable region was a political solution rather than military action. 'It's actually through dialogue and diplomacy.' As a small country that was thousands of miles away from the conflict all New Zealand could do was to advocate for what it thought should happen, he said. 'What we don't need is more military action, we need a political solution to all of these issues in the Middle East.' Luxon said New Zealand was not given advance notice about the US strikes on Iran which were 'obviously pretty surgical in targeting those nuclear assets'. There was a lot of conjecture about how close Iran's programme had been to breaching 60 percent uranium enrichment, a precursor to nuclear arms, Luxon said. 'But that's all to be revealed in due course. What I'd say for right now is what we can do is we an urge those parties to get into a pattern of dialogue and diplomacy as difficult as that may well be'. Peters told Morning Report he was looking for evidence on the level of Iran's nuclear preparedness. 'I'm looking for the evidence to do with the nuclear enrichment programme that was way outside the negotiated position they've been taking all this time. 'That is, they've been marvellously good at negotiating their way out of things and the question is have they kept to their commitments, have they breached their international obligations. Let's find that out before we rush to judgement.' A Defence Force C-130J Hercules is leaving for the Middle East on Monday to help any New Zealanders stranded in Iran or Israel. Peters reiterated New Zealanders should do everything they can to leave now if they could find a safe route. He said the crisis could get far worse. 'We just don't know, and if we don't know you've got to take the greatest precaution you possibly can.' On Sunday, Peters said ongoing military action in the Middle East was 'extremely worrying'. It was critical escalation was avoided, and New Zealand strongly support efforts towards diplomacy and urged all parties to return to talks, 'Iran's nuclear activities have long worried New Zealand. We want Iran to comply with its international obligations. Our concern is that further military action is not going to deliver a sustainable solution to this problem.' Labour's defence spokesperson Peeni Henare backed Peters' calls for a return to talks, but said the government should acknowledge the US breached international law and be 'perhaps a bit stronger' in the first instance. Henare said Trump's statements had made it 'quite clear' what had happened. 'Countries can't call for peace and de-escalation, only to take the action that's been taken.' Waikato University law professor Alexander Gillespie said the airstrikes were 'clearly' illegal in terms of international law. 'There's nowhere in the UN charter that says you can bomb someone who won't negotiate with you. But whether you get to a point where that is actually condemned is going to be very different,' he said. 'There's the theory of international law, with the UN Charter, and then there's the reality of international politics at the moment, which means that America will not be condemned internationally by the Security Council or even through the International Court of Justice.' The prime minister is heading to NATO this week. New Zealand is not a member, but in recent years has been invited as a partner along with fellow Indo-Pacific Four nations Australia, Japan and South Korea. While Christopher Luxon would be 'on the margins,' Gillespie expected he would be watching closely to see what like-minded partners were saying. 'This is an act which is not self-defence, and even if you argued it was pre-emptive self-defence, it wasn't necessary because there were other options of diplomacy still open. It will create difficulties if we speak out and say that, I don't think we're in a position to do that right now, for fear of the reaction that you get from America.' Australia's government has already issued a statement on the airstrikes. 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security,' the statement said. 'We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy.' Defence Force plane leaves today The government is sending a C-130J Hercules plane to the Middle East, along with Defence Force and Foreign Affairs personnel, to assist New Zealanders stranded in Iran and Israel. Defence minister Judith Collins said the plane was a contingency, and would not be able to aid in evacuation flights until airspace restrictions in the region eased. In the meantime, those who were able to leave via a safe route were urged to do so. Peters said the flights would get people to a safe place. 'We're not bringing them home. We're getting them to where they can make arrangements to get home.' The government has been warning New Zealanders in the region to leave for a long time, Peters said. The number of New Zealanders registered as being in Iran or Israel had increased in recent days. The decision to send the Hercules was made even before knowledge of the airstrikes had come through. 'Our anxiety was enunciated and formulated into policy, warnings, and collections of views months ago. We've been saying it, and it's a sad circumstance here, but we said 'look this is very dangerous, get out,'' Peters said. Citing security reasons, Collins would not say where the plane and personnel would be based. Both Henare and Gillespie supported the move. 'I think if we're ready and on standby, at the very least, to make sure we can respond to our citizens and their needs, and also those of our diplomatic staff, I think that's a really smart move,' Henare said. Gillespie said sending a plane was prudent in case the situation worsened quickly, and the damage became more indiscriminate.
