Ryanair quietly drops carbon offset option for passengers on its flights
Europe's largest airline,
Ryanair
, has quietly dropped a carbon offsetting service for passengers, where for €2 they could partially compensate for the emissions generated by their journey, with the funds going to designated green projects.
Ryanair has also dropped is its carbon calculator, a digital tool introduced in 2021 that gave consumers the option of fully offsetting the emissions from their flight.
This calculated the emissions per passenger on every Ryanair route and allowed customers to pay the full carbon cost of their flight and contribute to environmental initiatives.
Last week, the 'Customer Carbon Offsetting' section of the airline's website, with a detailed explainer and outline of where raised money goes to, was still featuring, but following a query from The Irish Times, it is no longer visible.
READ MORE
Asked whether the option had been discontinued, the airline said: 'That's correct, as there was very little interest or uptake from passengers.'
[
Are the tools for measuring greenhouse gas emissions fit for purpose?
Opens in new window
]
The carbon calculator was announced with advertising messages stating, 'Ryanair goes greener' and '100 per cent of customer contributions go to our climate projects'.
Some months later, its chief executive
Michael O'Leary
announced only 1 per cent of passengers had taken up the offer, but that subsequently climbed to 3 per cent.
The airline declined to indicate the total figure committed by passengers.
When extending the option, Ryanair said it was 'committed to being a net carbon neutral airline by 2050 and the expansion of our offset scheme will further pave our way to achieving this goal while helping our environmental partners further their carbon reduction programs'.
These contributions, with 'independent certification', supported environmental initiatives including Renature Monchique – a reforestation project in the Algarve
;
the distribution of energy-efficient cookstoves in Uganda by First Climate; Balikesir's Wind Power Plant Project in Turkey, and Improved Kitchen Regimes in Malawi powered by CO2 Balance
(the latter two in partnership with Shell).
By 2022, the airline said hundreds of thousands of customers had contributed more than €3.5 million to environmental projects, while it already had the lowest CO² emissions per passenger per kilometre of any major airline in Europe. It said that by switching to Ryanair, passengers could reduce their emissions.
UCC energy analyst Prof Hannah Daly, in response to the Ryanair decision, said 'the climate impact of aviation can't be swept under the carpet'.
'Giving the impression that the highly polluting impact of flying can be made sustainable with token and cheap offsetting schemes is misleading; offsetting schemes don't compensate for the carbon emitted from flying,' she said.
Governments were increasingly scrutinising sustainability claims made by companies, 'and this should be welcomed', Prof Daly added.
The airline, which is the biggest aviation emitter in Europe, has also committed to scaling up the use of sustainable aviation fuels. But it has fallen foul of advertising authorities on its green claims and carbon offsetting. It has repeatedly referred to itself as the '
greenest and cleanest airline in Europe'
.
[
'All we hear from Michael O'Leary is climate change denial'
Opens in new window
]
In 2020, a claim in an advertisement that Ryanair is 'Europe's ... lowest-emissions airline' was found to be misleading by the UK's advertising regulator. Also in 2020, Ryanair dropped two carbon-offset projects funded by passengers after claims they do little or nothing to reduce total emissions.
The airline dropped a tree-planting scheme in Ireland before a single sapling was planted, and pulled funding from a whale-watching project. Critics said the schemes were 'woefully inadequate' at cancelling out the massive amount of greenhouse gas Ryanair produces each year.
After conducting an investigation into CO² compensation claims in the airline industry, the
Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets
(ACM) accused Ryanair in 2023 of using misleading sustainability claims.
Statements such as 'Fly greener to [X destination]' might give the wrong impression that consumers can fly 'green' with Ryanair, it ruled.
Also, it rejected claims suggesting offsetting emissions would lead to sustainable flights.
Edwin van Houten, director of ACM's consumer department, said: 'Businesses must be honest and clear about the sustainability claims they make.
'Even with CO²-compensation schemes, flying remains a highly polluting way of travelling. Airlines may offer CO² compensation schemes, but they cannot give the impression that CO² compensation will make flying sustainable.'
[
Can the aviation industry really go green?
Opens in new window
]
Ryanair then implemented changes to its website, including adding a clear message that CO² compensation does not make flying itself more sustainable.
Messages such as 'Fly greener to […]' were changed to factual messages such as 'compensate your estimated CO² emissions'.
In addition, icons such as green leaves were removed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Privatisation of AIB
Sir, – The privatisation of AIB has been greeted in many quarters as a celebration. In fact, it should be regarded as history repeating itself as a potential tragedy. It is welcome AIB management admits its 'profound regrets the bank had to be rescued by the State' and admits that 'it owes a great debt of gratitude to the taxpayer' for the vast support given to the then largest indigenous private sector firm in Ireland. Diarmaid Ferriter reminds us that 'The Irish banking management culture was reprehensible in relation to customer charges, interest rates, facilitation of tax evasion and calamitous risk taking.' (' How can we stop corporate gombeen men running amok again? Credit unions could be the answer ,' June 20th). Banking is similar to a utility like water, the roads, electricity and gas lines. Banking is too important to hand back a dominant company to a small group of self-interested, self-supporting private individuals. READ MORE SMEs and individuals will suffer. History will repeat itself. – Yours, etc, PAUL SWEENEY, Milltown, Dublin 6.
The Irish Sun
7 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Full list of banned food and drinks passengers cannot bring onboard on TUI, easyJet, Ryanair and Jet2 flights
PASSENGERS flying with TUI, easyJet, Ryanair or Jet2 this summer are being urged to check the full list of banned food and drinks before heading to the airport – or risk having their items taken away. From cold snacks to hot drinks and alcoholic beverages, the rules on what you can and can't take onboard vary between airlines – and breaking them could lead to your items being confiscated before take-off. Advertisement 4 Passengers travelling from the UK are being urged to double-check airline guidelines before heading to the airport Credit: Getty 4 That's because under current post-Brexit regulations, any food products containing meat or dairy are banned Credit: Getty 4 Alcohol must be purchased on the flight if you want to enjoy a drink in the air Credit: Getty Passengers travelling from the UK are being urged to double-check That's because under current post-Brexit regulations, any food products containing meat or dairy – including sandwiches, yoghurts or even packed lunches bought in the airport – are banned from being taken into the EU, regardless of where they were purchased. Here's a breakdown of what's banned or restricted on flights operated by the UK's biggest budget carriers: TUI offers complimentary meals and drinks on flights lasting over seven hours. Advertisement Read more on Travel For shorter journeys, snacks and beverages can be bought onboard via a trolley service – but passengers are also allowed to bring their own food. However, TUI is clear that any food brought onboard must be 'low-risk,' such as cold snacks or pre-made sandwiches. The airline also warns it cannot heat food for passengers, aside from baby bottles. Crucially, passengers are not allowed to drink any alcohol they've brought from home or bought in duty-free – even if it's sealed. Advertisement Most read in Travel Alcohol must be purchased on the flight if you want to enjoy a drink in the air. EasyJet is fairly relaxed about food onboard, and passengers are welcome to bring their own meals. However, they should be aware of liquid restrictions and destination-specific rules. According to the airline: 'You can bring food into the cabin, although we do sell a range of delicious food and drink on board. Advertisement "There's a 100ml limit for liquid food, like soup or custard.' Hot drinks are allowed if purchased at the airport, but they must have a secure lid to reduce the risk of burns during The airline also reminds passengers to check rules at their destination – some countries have stricter customs policies around food items. Ryanair takes a mixed approach, allowing passengers to bring their own cold food and soft drinks under its 'feel free' policy – but strictly banning hot drinks and alcohol. Advertisement The airline advises: 'In the interest of safety we cannot allow passengers to board the plane with hot drinks or consume their own alcohol during the flight.' That means even if you've bought alcohol in duty-free or at the airport, you won't be allowed to drink it onboard. Cabin crew are authorised to confiscate items if rules are broken. Jet2 operates one of the strictest policies when it comes to food and drink. Advertisement According to the airline: 'You may not bring hot food or hot drinks onboard the aircraft.' Passengers are also warned not to carry any items that are 'unsuitable for carriage' – this includes food that is strong-smelling, fragile or perishable, and anything that may impact the comfort or safety of others. Despite these rules, Jet2 does offer a wide selection of food and drinks for purchase during the flight, with options for most dietary requirements. 4 Cabin crew are authorised to confiscate items if rules are broken Credit: Getty Advertisement
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on planning in Ireland: vital clarity must be restored
An Coimisiún Pleanála was quietly ushered into existence last week. The Minster for Housing, James Browne, formally established the body which has taken of the role of An Bord Pleanála, the previous appeals body for planning applications. It had lost the confidence of the public and the previous government amidst serious governance failures and lengthy planning delays. The establishment of the new commission comes as a worrying sense of drift envelopes this Government's efforts to address the seemingly intractable shortage of housing. The lengthy gestation of the new body is in itself evidence of a seeming lack of urgency. The Planning and Development Bill which created it was was first brought before the Dáil in November 2023, but was only passed by the Oireachtas last October. That was an inexcusably long time, even allowing for committee debate. It took another six months for the minster to commence the section relating to the planning commission. Many other measures remain to be commenced. The costs of such delay are clear for all to see. The latest figures from the Central Statistics Office - published last Friday - show that residential construction activity is falling. READ MORE Paul Reid, a former head of both Fingal County Council and the Health Service Executive has been appointed chairman of the governing body of the new commission. He would seem well qualified to meet the challenges of leading the new body. The biggest is restoring public, political and industry confidence in the speed and clarity of the planning process which rightly carries much of the blame for the housing shortage. The new statutory targets that have now been set for decisions on planning cases including critical infrastructure projects for transport, water, grid and energy as well large-scale residential developments , need to be met. For that to happen the new body will have to get the resources it needs when it needs them. If it doesn't, then the new commission risks being seen as little more than old wine in a new bottle.
