Vandalised ex library in Abergavenny won't yet become mosque
The disused grade II listed Carnegie Library, in Abergavenny, was set to be brought back into use by the Monmouthshire Muslim Community Association as a community centre and the county's first mosque.
Though Monmouthshire County Council's cabinet had agreed it would offer the association a 30-year lease on the building that was last used as a pupil referral unit that decision will now have to go back to the cabinet which has 10 working days to meet and reconsider.
A council committee meeting, called after three opposition councillors objected, could have accepted the decision but in a tied vote agreed to refer it back to the cabinet on the casting vote of scrutiny chair Jane Lucas.
Some 48 hours before Wednesday's pre-arranged meeting the building, on the edge of the town centre, was vandalised with the words 'No Masjid' sprayed on one of its walls and crosses beside the doors along with the word 'no'. Masjid is Arabic for place of worship or mosque.
The committee cited nine reasons, following its three hour meeting which included more than 30 minutes in a confidential session due to discussion around finances, why the cabinet should reconsider the decision.
A photograph showing the anti-Muslim vandalism of the former Abergavenny Library.
During the meeting the Labour cabinet member for finance, Cllr Ben Callard, who lives near the proposed mosque, defended how the former library had been declared as surplus to the council's requirements, last November, at a cabinet meeting and then the decision to grant the lease was also taken to the cabinet.
If councillors disagreed with disposal of the building the November decision should have been called in, said Cllr Callard.
He said taking the decisions in public had given them 'oxygen' but disputed all leases could be subject to full public consultation.
The Llanfoist and Govilon councillor said: 'I don't see how we can as a landlord enter leases if we have to bring them to a scrutiny committee.'
Cllr Callard since 2022 the council has entered 37 leases, with the figure rising to 63 when also considering short term arrangements and licences, and said: 'For no others was there a demand to review them or for prior scrutiny or to use the call in process.'
Abergavenny Town of Sanctuary organised a show of support for the proposed mosque outside the Monmouthshire council chamber with some town councillors including Mayor Philip Bowyer and some members of the Monmouthshire Muslim Community Association.
He also defended the terms of the lease, agreed in principle at a £6,000 a year rent, and said it was on a 'full repair basis' and said: 'That doesn't make it very attractive to businesses. It's a huge commitment to take on a building of that age.'
Councillors had questioned the value of the lease as an earlier council document stated an ambition of raising a rental income of £25,000 to £30,000 a year from the former library.
The council's landlord services manager, Nick Keys, said leases of 25, 30 and 99 years are common for the council to grant, with long term security often required by grant funding bodies such as the National Lottery, and the 30 year lease was requested.
Mr Keys added the council also has clauses such as rent reviews. Final terms of the lease were still to be agreed.
Conservative member for Shirenewton Louise Brown, one of the three councillors who called the decision in, questioned why the invitation to tender hadn't specified the building could be used for commercial purposes under its restrictive covenant.
The former Abergavenny Library.
Llanelly Hill independent Simon Howarth said members weren't aware of decisions related to the library as they hadn't been added to the council's forward work planner.
Devauden Conservative Rachel Buckler described the library building as one of Abergavenny's 'most important civic buildings.'
The committee said the cabinet should consider a re-tender with specifications including an independent valuation, a survey of the building, consideration of the building's history and importance, a public consultation and the possibility of selling the building.
The library service was relocated to the Town Hall in 2015.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Children in Need funds group that claims gender-critical views are racist
BBC Children in Need has helped fund a group that claims gender-critical beliefs are rooted in 'white supremacy'. Anti-Racist Cumbria has claimed that opposition to gender ideology – the idea that people can choose to become a man or woman – is rooted in 'patriarchy' and 'oppression'. The charity that works with local schools claimed that the views of JK Rowling and other gender-critical feminists are the result of 'white supremacy'. In a lengthy statement, the charity added that 'defining womanhood as 'biological' is dangerous' and can lead down a 'slippery slope of white supremacy thinking'. BBC Children in Need, which is independent of the BBC's leadership and funded by public donations, is currently helping to fund this charity. It will provide a £42,500 grant for a two-year period, topping up a previous £50,000 allocation, to launch a TikTok channel to share 'anti-racist educational resources' and news about its youth outreach work. 'Politically black' Children in Need is listed as a funder of Anti-Racist Cumbria in its most recent annual accounts. This work has included a youth club pitched at 'black and brown' youngsters, including those who are 'politically black'. Founded in 2020, Anti-Racist Cumbria also provides courses that 'promote anti-racism' in schools, and runs workshops with businesses covering issues such as 'white privilege' and 'understanding whiteness'. This work is supported financially by foundations, National Lottery funding, and Westmorland and Furness council, which in February raised council tax by 4.99 per cent. The charity moved on to the transgender debate in a lengthy criticism of gender-critical feminists following the Supreme Court ruling in April that made clear 'women' were legally defined by their biological sex. This followed a legal battle launched by campaign group For Women Scotland to challenge the Scottish Government's decision to count anyone 'living as a woman' in official statistics on the number of female board members. Anti-Racist Cumbria claimed following the Supreme Court decision: 'The activism of so-called 'gender-critical feminists', supported by the likes of JK Rowling and the Trump movement, will not stop here. 'The fight against trans rights does not exist in isolation, and although it is dressed up as 'women's rights', it's a direct result of patriarchy and white supremacy as systems of oppression.' The post also included an image of JK Rowling smoking a cigar 'on her superyacht', the charity claimed in a picture caption, while many 'transgender people have experienced homelessness'. The lengthy article about the gender ruling, on the 'resources' section of the charity's website, also touched on issues of women's safety, which it claimed were preludes to 'fascism'. 'The road to fascism' The charity shared an image of young female campaigners with the Women's Safety Initiative UK, which aims to 'expose the dangers of uncontrolled immigration' with regard to sexual assaults on women. Anti-Racist Cumbria stated on its website that the Women's Safety Initiative UK is raising concerns about foreign sex criminals, stating: 'The fight for women's rights is being used to hide the dark underbelly of not only transphobia, but racism too. 'It is not a stretch to say that the road that we are being driven down is the road to fascism.' Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, director of campaign group Don't Divide Us, has criticised the charity's ideological claims. She said: 'This is a perfect illustration of how racism has become unmoored from its original meaning. Accusing a person or organisation of being a racist or white supremacist used to be something we reserved for the BNP or the National Front. It used to mean something. 'Now it's been utterly diluted by activists, who use 'white supremacy' as a snarl because they can't defend their own arguments. BBC Children in Need should not be funding organisations that cheapen the meaning of racism.' BBC Children in Need said that the charity is 'independently governed and does not take a position on matters of public policy. None of the funding awarded by BBC Children in Need supports policy or campaigning activity'. It added: 'We are currently funding the Young Black Arctivists project for young black British people in Cumbria, to create and deliver educational resources that encourage unity across communities.' Anti-Racist Cumbria has provided training to staff at Wordsworth's former home of Dove Cottage, now a museum that is seeking to root out the poet's colonial past as revealed by the Telegraph.
Spectator
7 hours ago
- Spectator
How the ‘experts' got the grooming gang scandal so wrong
At this stage we can't predict what the government's new grooming gangs inquiry will say. But one thing is overwhelmingly likely: many will feel the heat. This includes police who stood back in the face of clear patterns of child sexual exploitation by young Pakistani men to avoid racial tension; social workers desperate not to offend their largely unassimilated Muslim clients; and councillors and politicians who said 'move on, nothing to see here' because of fears that Muslim voters might disown anyone who rocked the multicultural boat. With few exceptions, academics were some of the keenest to suppress discussion about groooming gang abusers' origins or ethnicity Even more interesting, however, is the light all this this has thrown on academia. With few exceptions, academics were some of the keenest to suppress discussion about the abusers' origins or ethnicity. Any reference to this, it was constantly said, risked spreading anti-Muslim racism, distracting attention from more important problems, 'racialising crime', ''othering' South Asian men' and characterising them as 'folk devils'. Paper after paper, seminar after seminar, was devoted to pushing variants on these themes. At first sight this looks odd. Police and social services at least had an incentive to make their jobs easier; so too politicians anxious about their voter base. But academics with no skin in this game? Why should they engage so hard in support of one side? Partly, one suspects, this may be due to the university environment. Ten years ago, a survey found 77 per cent of academics backed Labour, the Lib Dems or the Greens. Only 11 per cent were for the Tories. Today, the figure is possibly even more skewed. This doesn't just mean many academics are instinctively likely to support an approach based on racial identity politics. More seriously, all articles have to be peer reviewed. Peer reviewers within the humanities professoriate are only human. With the best will in the world, one suspects an article trying to minimise the relevance of ethnicity in favour of other factors is likely in practice to get an easier ride. But there is more to it than this. Few admit it, but there is something of a Faustian pact between universities and their state funders and providers of research grants, built on the fiction that in the humanities as much as in traditional sciences the state is investing in cutting-edge advances in knowledge. As a result, today's humanities academics, especially young ones with careers to make or lose, are pressured not only to produce more papers, but also to make their publications 'innovative', and in addition to strive for what is referred to as 'impact', a somewhat protean term that essentially means getting noticed by the great and the good. There are, put bluntly, big brownie points in getting called before a parliamentary committee or quango. The resulting incentive is baneful and perverse. Far from encouraging people to take a sober look at subjects like the sex grooming figures in Rochdale or Oldham and propose low-key, possibly unpalatable, measures to deal with them, the ambitious academic is much better advised to take a different, radical, line – indeed, the more radical the better. Much more attractive to university managers is the construction of new narratives based on theories of the impact of systemic racism or racist media, or on abstract notions of the 'othering' of particular groups. And there is the bonus that if you have radical ideas you're more likely to gain impact by being invited to address that parliamentary committee. This isn't necessarily to criticise the academics concerned. As often as not they have little choice but to promote their increasingly abstract and abtruse theories (many of which are intellectually dodgy owing to their tenuous link with empiricism and regular adoption of incomprehensible and conclusory jargon, but that's another story). But this phenomenon does have one very important result. Fifty years or so ago academics commanded a natural respect. If a professor pronounced on a social problem, with a few exceptions what they said was probably understandable to a layperson, soundly anchored in empiricism, and demonstrative of common sense. This was what made people take notice and take what they said seriously. Today, academics increasingly sound like just another part of the progressive commentariat, albeit with an annoying habit of unashamedly using increasingly esoteric words and, when challenged, insisting that it's not surprising we can't understand their high-powered science. That is their right. But there is also another side to this. If academics go down this road, they have little if any right to respect for their opinionated ramblings, and no particular claim to be listened to by government. We can only hope that the members of the grooming gang inquiry have the good sense to keep this in mind, and treat the earnest pronouncements of the new professoriate with the pointed scepticism they deserve.
The Independent
19 hours ago
- The Independent
Ministers ‘abusing' anti-terror laws against Palestine activists
Former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf has said the Government is 'abusing' anti-terror laws against pro- Palestine activists as tens of thousands of protesters marched in London. A protest organised by groups under the Palestine Coalition banner marched to Whitehall from Russell Square in central London on Saturday afternoon. Organisers estimated that 350,000 people attended the protest, with those marching waving Palestinian flags and chanting 'free, free Palestine' and 'stop bombing Iran'. Many protesters chanted 'shame on you' as they walked past dozens of counter-protesters, organised by pro-Israeli group Stop The Hate, near Waterloo Bridge. The Metropolitan Police said a person was arrested after a bottle was thrown towards the counter-protesters. They added that 'a group appeared on Waterloo Bridge trying to block traffic' following the protest, with officers intervening to clear the road. The demonstrations come after reports on Friday that the Home Secretary will ban Palestine Action after the group vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Yvette Cooper has decided to proscribe the group, making it a criminal offence to belong to or support Palestine Action, after footage posted online showed two people inside the RAF base, with one appearing to spray paint into an aircraft's jet engine. Addressing crowds at the national march for Palestine in Whitehall, former SNP leader Mr Yousaf said: 'While we stand a stone's throw from Downing Street, let's make it clear to the Prime Minister: You try to intimidate us with your anti-terror laws by abusing them, but you'll never silence us as we speak out against the genocide that you're supporting. 'We're not the terrorists – the ones that are literally killing children, they are the terrorists.' A pro-Palestine protester said it was 'absolutely horrendous' that the Government is preparing to ban Palestine Action. Artist Hannah Woodhouse, 61, told the PA news agency: 'The Government, since yesterday, have said they're also going to start to try to proscribe peace activists who are trying to take action against the genocide – so Palestine Action are now being targeted by our Government, which is absolutely horrendous.' Ms Woodhouse, who is from London, added: 'Counter-terrorism measures, it seems, are being used against non-violent peace protesters. 'The peace activists are trying to do the Government's job, which is to disarm Israel. The duty of any government right now is to disarm a genocidal state.' Musician Paloma Faith told pro-Palestine campaigners that she would not 'stick to music and stay away from politics'. Speaking to crowds at the march, the songwriter, 43, added: 'Those who facilitate these crimes against humanity need to be made accountable, not those of us who are compassionate and humane enough to stand against it.' Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn told protesters that politicians were seeking to 'turn people who protest against the invasion of Iran or the occupation of Palestine into terrorists'. Some protesters were carrying Iran flags, with others hoisting signs – distributed by the Islamic Human Rights Commission – that read 'choose the right side of history' alongside a photo of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Human rights group Liberty said banning Palestine Action 'would be a huge step change in how counter-terror laws are applied'. Sam Grant, its external affairs director, said in a statement: 'Targeting a protest group with terrorism powers in this way is a shocking escalation of the Government's crackdown on protest and we urge the Home Secretary to rethink. 'It's clear the actions of Palestine Action don't meet the Government's own proportionality test to be proscribed as a terrorist group, but the consequences for the group's supporters if ministers go ahead would be heavy – with things like wearing their logo carrying prison sentences. 'This move needs to be viewed in light of the sustained crackdowns on protest we have seen from successive governments over recent years, and the worrying fact that there are more and more non-violent protesters spending years in prison.' The Palestine Coalition is comprised of a number of different groups, including the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and Stop The War.
