A new ticket for Auckland?
Newsroom reports:
Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown has expanded his Fix Auckland campaign from one candidate to two with the addition of deputy Desley Simpson, now he is recruiting a team to gain influence on the council.
The treaty that Brown reached with Simpson, seeing her decide against challenging the mayor at October's election, is intended to be a forerunner to the Fix Auckland slate for council seats.
Brown says he alone was Fix Auckland in 2022 but now wants a team. 'She will be standing for Fix Auckland and we look forward to others joining us.'
This is a very significant move, as it means Desley will be dropping the C&R ticket which she has been elected on previously. Will Fix Auckland stand against C&R or co-operate with them?
A right-leaning councillor, Sharon Stewart, is retiring from the Howick ward and that seat alongside fellow ward councillor Maurice Williamson, could be a possible joint Fix Auckland ticket.
The Whau ward councillor, Kerrin Leoni, is contesting Brown's mayoralty so her ward seat could yet be another Fix Auckland target, having swung between C&R and Labour candidacies in past elections.
Manurewa-Papakura ward councillor Angela Dalton, who had a strong personal following as a former local board chair, is also retiring, leaving an opening that could fit Brown's intentions. Dalton's Papakura colleague, Daniel Newman, has supported Brown's major initiatives.
A ticket which reduces the number of high spending Councillors would be a good thing. But if Fix Auckland and C&R end up splitting the vote, then it may backfire. Ideally all the non-left tickets should co-operate rather than compete.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
3 hours ago
- 1News
Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil freed from immigration detention
Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil was released today from federal immigration detention, freed after 104 days by a judge's ruling after becoming a symbol of US President Donald Trump 's clampdown on campus protests. The former Columbia University graduate student left a federal facility in Louisiana today. He is expected to head to New York to reunite with his US citizen wife and infant son, born while Khalil was detained. 'Justice prevailed, but it's very long overdue,' he said outside the facility in a remote part of Louisiana. 'This shouldn't have taken three months.' The Trump administration is seeking to deport Khalil over his role in pro-Palestinian protests. He was detained on March 8 at his apartment building in Manhattan. Khalil was released after US District Judge Michael Farbiarz said it would be 'highly, highly unusual' for the government to continue detaining a legal US resident who was unlikely to flee and hadn't been accused of any violence. ADVERTISEMENT 'Petitioner is not a flight risk, and the evidence presented is that he is not a danger to the community,' he said. 'Period, full stop.' During an hourlong hearing conducted by phone, the New Jersey-based judge said the government had 'clearly not met' the standards for detention. The government filed notice Friday evening that it's appealing Khalil's release. Khalil was the first person arrested under Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's devastating war in Gaza. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil must be expelled from the country because his continued presence could harm American foreign policy. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. (Source: Associated Press) The Trump administration has argued that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be deported as it considers their views antisemitic. Protesters and civil rights groups say the administration is conflating antisemitism with criticism of Israel in order to silence dissent. Farbiarz has ruled that the government can't deport Khalil on the basis of its claims that his presence could undermine foreign policy. But the judge gave the administration leeway to continue pursuing a potential deportation based on allegations that he lied on his green card application, an accusation Khalil disputes. ADVERTISEMENT The international affairs graduate student isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. He served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists and wasn't among the demonstrators arrested, but his prominence in news coverage and willingness to speak publicly made him a target of critics. The judge agreed today with Khalil's lawyers that the protester was being prevented from exercising his free speech and due process rights despite no obvious reason for his continued detention. The judge noted that Khalil is now clearly a public figure. Khalil said today that no one should be detained for protesting Israel's war in Gaza. He said his time in the Jena, Louisiana, detention facility had shown him 'a different reality about this country that supposedly champions human rights and liberty and justice'. 'Whether you are a US citizen, an immigrant or just a person on this land doesn't mean that you are less of a human,' he said, adding that 'justice will prevail, no matter what this administration may try to portray' about immigrants. The La Salle Detention Facility is seen in Jena, Louisiana. (Source: Associated Press) Khalil had to surrender his passport and can't travel internationally, but he will get his green card back and be given official documents permitting limited travel within the country, including New York and Michigan to visit family, New Jersey and Louisiana for court appearances and Washington to lobby Congress. In a statement after the judge's ruling, Khalil's wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, said she can finally 'breathe a sigh of relief' after her husband's three months in detention. 'We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others,' she said. 'But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family.' The judge's decision comes after several other scholars targeted for their activism have been released from custody, including another former Palestinian student at Columbia, Mohsen Mahdawi; a Tufts University student, Rumeysa Ozturk; and a Georgetown University scholar, Badar Khan Suri.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Curious, Concerned: Picton Residents Weigh In On SH1 Changes
Article – Kira Carrington – Local Democracy Reporter Picton residents have stopped by an NZTA display to show the proposed relocation of SH1 through the town. In a small room in Picton's library, dozens of people have gathered to discuss the intricacies of truck routes, intersections, school crossings and parking spaces. They pored over stands and wall displays, showing the proposed permanent State Highway 1 route along Kent Street to the ferry terminal, instead of through central Picton. The proposed changes have already caused controversy, with one resident calling them 'horrible', when they were announced on 11 June. NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi's pop-up sessions on Tuesday and Wednesday hummed with questions, fresh ideas and a bit of debate, but not from Heather Hopkins, a resident of upper Kent Street, who had popped in to see how the highway would go past her home. She was pretty happy, she said. 'I'm not really affected, I just wanted more information,' Hopkins said. '[I have] no concerns at all, it'll be free flowing, once everyone gets used to it.' In the evening session, people were most drawn to the board showing where Kent Street met the Wairau Road/SH1 intersection, which would take ferry passengers and freight trucks from the terminals out of town under the new proposal. Lara O'Brien, who lived around the corner from Kent Street, said the intersection's new alignment would cut residents off from their own town centre during peak traffic. Drivers on SH1 south of Kent Street wanting to get into central Picton would need to make a right-hand turn onto Wairau Road towards Nelson Square. During peak ferry traffic, they would be stuck in a right-turning lane with no gaps, O'Brien said. 'These people [leaving the ferry terminal] get to just go, but people going to town, when do they get to go?' O'Brien said. 'You get 60 trucks coming out of the ferry terminal. This is going to be a congestion point for locals coming out of town.' Another group lingered around the board showing the relocation of the Picton School crossing on Kent Street. Many of the attendees were reluctant to speak publicly about their opinions on the divisive subject. The loss of roadside parking and problems with trucks parking along the road were common complaints. A truck driver from Levin, whose cousin was a Picton-based truckie, came along to the evening session. He said NZTA did a similar consultation about a pedestrian overpass in Levin and he was sceptical that feedback would alter the proposal. A Picton resident praised NZTA for moving the crossing outside Picton School back to its original position, saying he didn't know why it was put there a few years ago. 'They're just putting it back to where it was, because people don't use it.' NZTA regional manager of system design Robert Osborne said the sessions were a valuable way of sharing information with Picton residents and getting their feedback. 'The drop-in sessions were all well attended, with around 30 – 40 people each session and some coming to visit us a couple of times to ask further questions,' Osborne said. 'We received a great range of questions and comments, which will help us with our detailed design work. 'We also understand… that there will likely be a wide range of opinions about them. However, this project is aimed at improving Picton's roads and making it easier for people to get around. 'We look forward to continuing to hear from the community about our plans.' Design plans would now be finalised and work would start next winter.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Tai Rāwhiti Protest: A Burning Question On Ngāti Oneone's Redress
Article – Zita Campbell – Local Democracy Reporter An online petition supporting the hap has over 1950 signatures. A fire signalling Tai Rāwhiti hapū Ngāti Oneone's call for the return of their ancestral lands has been burning for over six weeks. The hapū said it will stoke the fire until the grievance is resolved, but after three generations of attempting to remedy it, does not want the redress to fall on them. 'It always falls on us to 'make the case',' Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson told Local Democracy Reporting (LDR) when the movement started on 5 May. The Crown said any potential redress in this case is the responsibility of the landowner and the hapū. As part of its protest, members of Ngāti Oneone have inhabited Te Pā Eketū Shed, a warehouse-sized property on Gisborne's Hirini St. Rather than an 'occupation', the hāpu calls the action 'a reclamation of whenua'. The location is where Ngāti Oneone's marae and pā were originally established in 1852 before being removed for harbour development under the Private Works Act. Eastland Port, of which Trust Tai Rāwhiti is the sole shareholder, owns the shed and others on the hapū's ancestral land on Hirini St and the Esplanade. At the beginning of the protest movement, the hapū called on the trust, Eastland Port and Gisborne District Council to return land not used for 'core business'. Council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann told LDR the council had started exploring how land could potentially be returned following formal requests from Ngāti Oneone in 2024. This includes investigating the relevant legal processes, policy settings and the interests of other Treaty partners. However, Trust Tai Rāwhiti, which has a funding partnership with the council and serves as the region's economic development and tourism organisation, earlier said addressing historical Treaty breaches was not its responsibility, but rather a matter for the Crown, after it sought independent legal advice. 'We support Ngāti Oneone in pursuing this with the Crown,' chairman David Battin told LDR when the protest started. Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka had a different view. The 2010 Ngāti Porou settlement of historical Treaty of Waitangi claims includes Ngāti Oneone, Potaka told LDR. 'The matter being raised … is outside of the process for the settlement of historical Treaty claims. 'Any exploration of options to return and/or purchase the land is a matter for the landowner agency to undertake in discussion with Ngāti Oneone,' he said. Regarding Potaka's statement, a Trust Tai Rāwhiti spokesperson this week said trustees continued to 'engage directly with Ngāti Oneone and remained focused on constructive resolutions'. The 'reclamation of whenua' Gibson confirmed the hapū had met with the landowner groups involved under Trust Tai Rāwhiti and would have a meeting with the council next week. She was unsure whether the groups would respond individually or together. The hapū has committed to maintaining the protest for two months and then will reassess depending on outcomes, she said. 'We'll keep the fire burning until we've had an acceptable response.' In addition to the return of land, the hapū has made other requests to the landowners through an online petition signed by over 1950 as of Friday. The petition urges the Tai Rāwhiti leaders to take three actions: 'Whakahokia Whenua Mai', which requests the return of land not used for core business, 'Whakamana Tangata' and 'Te Tiriti'. Whakamana Tangata requests that Trust Tai Rāwhiti financially compensate Ngāti Oneone for 'the alienation' of their lands without conditions. 'Te Tiriti' requests that the leaders seek a pathway that treats Ngāti Oneone in the same vein as a 'Treaty' partner, rather than 'a community group'. Gibson said that after Eastland Port sold a shed on their ancestral land to the Gisborne Tatapouri Sports Fishing Club three years ago, they worried about what could happen to the rest of their ancestral land, so they started negotiations for the Te Pa Eketū Shed. If the land were sold, it would be harder to reclaim, she said. However, they then realised the port had other sheds in the area, not used for 'core business'. 'In my view, it's not an occupation, it's a reclamation of whenua,' Gibson said, explaining that the shed had been leased while negotiating the sales and purchase agreement. The port would send the hapū the bill, which they would send to Trust Tai Rāwhiti, who would pay Eastland Port (owned by the trust), she said. Trust Tai Rāwhiti was going to give them $1.4 million to purchase the shed, but the hapū wanted to use the money to buy the lot. When their request was denied, they understood and looked into other ways of obtaining the sheds, Gibson said. However, when the hapū got the sales and purchase agreement, things shifted. 'There were four clauses within the sales and purchase agreement, which undermined Mana motuhake [self-determination], which made it untenable,' said Gibson. On 5 May the beginning of the hapū's 'Reclamation of whenua', they were supposed to sign the sales and purchase agreement but decided to 'reclaim' the land instead.
