Paul Reid will receive €50k salary as head of new planning authority

FORMER HSE CHIEF Paul Reid will receive a salary of €50,000 in his new role as chairperson of An Coimisiún Pleanála, a new planning authority that will replace An Bord Pleanála.
His appointment was approved by Cabinet this afternoon after Housing Minister James Browne brought a memo for information to establish the new body.
Reid served as the Director General of the HSE from 2019 to 2022. He was chief executive of Fingal County Council from 2014 to 2019, and is a member of the board of Uisce Éireann. He also chaired the Citizens' Assembly on Drugs in 2023.
An Coimisiún Pleanála is being established in line with the phased commencement of the Planning and Development Act 2024, which was
approved by the Houses of the Oireachtas in October last year
.
The Act essentially allows for the restructuring of An Bord Pleanála.
The reformed and renamed commission will have a new governing board and will be subject to statutory mandatory timelines to give confidence and certainty to applicants.
Advertisement
Speaking at a press conference this afternoon, the Housing Minister said the commission 'is probably the single most important agency we have in this State'.
'It decides not only housing and how quickly that can be delivered, but also our transport, our education and our hospitals,' he said.
Asked how he came to appoint Reid as its new chairperson, Browne said he looked at the State agencies, particularly those under his own remit, and sought people who were on the boards 'who would fit that bill'.
'I identified Paul Reid as somebody having that governance experience, that management experience, because this is going to be a real hands-on role.'
Browne confirmed that Reid would receive a salary of €50,000 per year as chairperson. He said he would 'have to check' whether he will also be entitled to allowances, but said 'I'm not aware that there is any'.
'Mr Reid will be expected to be very hands on on an almost daily basis, engaging with the CEO to ensure that this change of management happens as well with this huge body,' he said.
In January of last year,
Paul Mullan was appointed head of An Bord Pleanála
for a term of seven years. It was expected that he would assume the role as head of An Coimisiún Pleanála.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sunday World

13 hours ago

• Sunday World

Tanning salon hit with €2,600 fine for selling sun-bed session to 15-year-old girl

In the case before Ennis District Court, Judge Alec Gabbett imposed a fine of €1,000 and costs of €1,600 on Shannon based sun-bed business, Solcraft Ltd for selling a sun-bed session to a 15 year old girl at its sun-bed premises, Cosmopoli Tan in Shannon last November. Frequent sunbed use is known to increase skin cancer risk. Photo: Getty A judge, who has stated that it is a pity that there is not a ban on sun-bed operators facilitating sun-bed sessions for adults, has imposed a €2,600 penalty on a sun-bed business selling a sun-bed session to a minor. In the case before Ennis District Court, Judge Alec Gabbett imposed a fine of €1,000 and costs of €1,600 on Shannon based sun-bed business, Solcraft Ltd for selling a sun-bed session to a 15 year old girl at its sun-bed premises, Cosmopoli Tan in Shannon last November. The Health Service Executive (HSE) brought the rare prosecution under Section 4 of the Public Health (Sunbeds) Act 2014 after a 15 year old 'secret shopper' was deployed by the HSE to do a test purchase at Cosmopoli Tan at Unit 7, Block E, Bru Na Sionna, Shannon on November 26th 2024. Solicitor for the HSE, Barry Kelleher of of Comyn Kelleher Tobin solicitors told the court on Friday that on the date 'a 15 year old child attended at the salon and approached the counter and asked for use of sun-bed session' Mr Kelleher said that 'the child asked for three minutes of time and she was told that she could get four minutes for the price of three'. Mr Kelleher said that the child 'was never asked for her age or ID'. He said that the firm has no previous convictions. He said that the transaction took place and the child left the premises. Solicitor for the firm, John Casey said that the business has a number of notices placed across its premises saying 'No ID, no sunbed' and similar notices. Frequent sunbed use is known to increase skin cancer risk. Photo: Getty News in 90 Seconds - June 21st Mr Kelleher said that that there was a further inspection of the premises in April of this year as there was a report of underage sale continuing. Mr Casey said that on that date the company was found to be in compliance. Mr Kelleher said the test purchasers deployed by the HSE don't actually take the sun-bed sessions. Judge Gabbett said: 'You would need danger money to do that.' Mr Kelleher told the court that people aged under 35 who undergo sun-bed sessions increase their risk of contracting melanoma by 75pc. Judge Gabbett said that 'children should not in these premises - that is very straightforward' Judge Gabbett said that he was imposing the €1,000 fine as a deterrent to ensure compliance. When the case first came to court last month, Judge Gabbett remarked that it is a good thing that children are banned from having sun-bed sessions stating 'it is a pity that this doesn't apply to adults as well." Asked on the level of enforcement activity under the Public Health (Sunbeds) Act, a spokesman for the HSE said last month: 'In 2024, ten fixed payment notices were served and four prosecutions taken by the National Environmental Health Service under the Public Health (Sunbeds) Act 2014. He said: 'Two of the prosecutions were for sales to minors and both were upheld by the court.' He added: "In 2023, seventeen fixed payment notices were served, and four prosecutions taken by the National Environmental Health Service (NEHS) under the Public Health (Sunbeds) Act 2014. Two of the prosecutions were for sales to minors and one was upheld by the Court.

Irish Times

a day ago

• Irish Times

Sunbed business fined for selling session to minor

A judge has imposed a €2,600 penalty on a sunbed business for selling a session to a minor. In the case before Ennis District Court, Judge Alec Gabbett imposed a €1,000 fine and costs of €1,600 on Solcraft Ltd for selling a sunbed session to a girl (15) at its premises Cosmopoli Tan in Shannon, Co Clare , last year. It came after a 'secret shopper' was deployed by the Health Service Executive (HSE) to do a test purchase in Cosmopoli Tan at Unit 7, Block E, Bru Na Sionna, Shannon, on November 26th, 2024. Barry Kelleher, solicitor for the HSE, told the court that on the date 'a 15-year-old child attended at the salon and approached the counter and asked for use of sunbed session'. READ MORE Mr Kelleher said 'the child asked for three minutes of time and she was told that she could get four minutes for the price of three'. Mr Kelleher said the child 'was never asked for her age or ID'. He said the firm has no previous convictions, that the transaction took place and the child left the premises. Solicitor for the firm, John Casey, said the business has a number of notices placed across its premises saying 'No ID, no sunbed'. Mr Kelleher said there was a further inspection of the premises in April this year as there was a report of underage sales continuing. Mr Casey said on that date the company was found to be in compliance. Mr Kelleher said the test purchasers deployed by the HSE don't actually take the sunbed sessions. 'You would need danger money to do that,' the judge said. Mr Kelleher told the court that people aged under 35 who use sunbeds increase their risk of developing melanoma by 75 per cent. The judge said 'children should not be in these premises – that is very straightforward' and he imposed the €1,000 fine as a deterrent to ensure compliance. Asked about the level of enforcement activity under the Public Health (Sunbeds) Act, a HSE spokesman said last month: 'In 2024, 10 fixed payment notices were served and four prosecutions taken by the National Environmental Health Service under the Public Health (Sunbeds) Act 2014. 'Two of the prosecutions were for sales to minors and both were upheld by the court.'

The Journal

a day ago

• The Journal

Planning permission refused for new filling station on site of Creeslough explosion

PLANNING PERMISSION FOR a new filling station on the site of the explosion in Creeslough, Co Donegal in which ten people were killed has been refused by An Coimisiún Pleanála. Donegal County Council granted permission to Vivo Shell Limited to redevelop a service station and shop at the site in February. The decision was appealed by a number of family members of those killed in the blast in October 2022. Today, An Coimisiún Pleanála – which has replaced An Bord Pleanála – revealed that they are turning down the application. The planning authority said the proposed plan was 'out of character' with its surroundings in the village. The body said: 'Having regard to the existing character and the prevailing pattern of development in Creeslough, it is considered that the proposed development (as amended), by reason of its overall architectural treatment, scale and design, would be out of character with its surroundings, would seriously detract from the architectural character and setting of Creeslough and the streetscape and approach from Letterkenny generally. 'It is considered therefore, that the proposed development would be contrary to Policy ED-P-9, of the County Development Plan, 2024 2023 being of inappropriate layout and building design in the context of the existing landscape. 'To permit the proposed scheme (as amended) at this prominent location could have such a negative effect on the visual amenity and local character of Creeslough as to negatively impact on the wider , long-term regeneration and renewal of the village. 'The proposed development would, therefore, seriously injure the visual amenities of the area and the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.' Advertisement The proposed rebuild had allowed for the demolition of the existing building and the construction of a new structure that includes a shop, post office, deli, off-license, and fuel forecourt. A memorial garden and light-based sculpture with ten metal poles commemorating those who perished in the tragedy was also planned for the site. However, many of the families who lost loved ones in the tragedy said this was an insult to their memory considering they died in the metal and rubble of the blast. The families are still digesting the news which was relayed to them by their legal team and was also delivered by Donegal County Council. In a statement on behalf of the families affected by the tragedy, Phoenix Law said they have welcomed the decision. 'Phoenix Law made detailed submissions to the planning panel on behalf of the families, which were accepted by the panel, granting the appeal,' they said in a statement. 'Proposing development on this site while a criminal investigation is still ongoing was deeply inappropriate. The families believe the ground should be treated with dignity and respect, given the scale of loss and trauma suffered. The initial decision to grant planning permission rubbed salt in the wounds of the families. Darragh Mackin of Phoenix Law said: 'Today's decision has restored faith in the rule of law, where victims are treated with dignity and respect. 'We continue to call for a full public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the tragedy. The families remain committed to seeking truth, accountability and justice.' One of the family members who lost a loved one in the tragedy said 'This is terrific news. When we got the news yesterday that there would not be an oral hearing we were so disappointed and feared the worst. 'This is tremendous news. We simply do not want a new service station on the site in which our loved ones died.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal