Deep Dive: Hong Kong's Education Bureau cuts subsidised Primary One classes for two schools

Deep Dive delves into hot issues in Hong Kong and mainland China. Our easy-to-read articles provide context to grasp what's happening, while our questions help you craft informed responses. Check sample answers at the end of the page.
News: Two Hong Kong schools won't run subsidised Primary One classes in 2025-26
Education Bureau will not allocate classes to schools with low student enrolment
Two Hong Kong schools in areas with declining school-age populations will not run any subsidised Primary One classes in the upcoming academic year.
Last month, the Education Bureau sent letters to all subsidised and government primary schools. The letters informed them about class structures and staffing arrangements for Primary One to Six over the next academic year.
Two schools, Aplichau Kaifong Primary School in Southern district and Price Memorial Catholic Primary School in Wong Tai Sin, were not allocated any subsidised Primary One classes for the 2025-26 academic year after failing to secure enough pupils.
Aplichau Kaifong Primary School was founded in 1954. It ran eight classes during the 2024-25 academic year, with one class each for Primary One to Four and another two each for Primary Five and Six.
Price Memorial Catholic Primary School, established in 1963, is currently operating 11 classes, including one each for Primary One to Three.
Under the current system, schools that fail to enrol enough Primary One students have three options.
Hong Kong's latest budget plans include reduced spending on education, public servant pay freeze
The first is to privately fund a class, the second involves applying to the government for a special review, and the third is to merge operations with another institution.
However, the bureau recently announced new rules restricting survival options for under-enrolled, government-funded schools.
Starting next year, any subsidised school that fails to meet its 16-child enrolment target will not be allowed to privately run a Primary One class if it has already done so in the past six years. In addition, schools can no longer apply for a special review to run a Primary One class.
The bureau will also require schools that privately fund a batch of pupils to continue doing so until the children finish Primary Six.
Currently, students who were initially privately funded can receive subsidies once they reach more senior grades. However, this was under the condition that the school met its enrolment target for Primary One the subsequent year.
The school sector had estimated it would cost around HK$12 million (US$1.5 million) to operate one class per grade for six years.
Hong Kong's low birth rate has put many schools at risk of closing. Education authorities have reported that the number of Primary One pupils in the city was expected to drop from 48,600 this year to 37,500 in 2031.
Staff writers
Question prompts
1. According to News, which of the following are true?
(1) The number of Primary One students in Hong Kong is expected to drop.
(2) Schools with low enrolment can apply for a special review under the new rules.
(3) It costs a lot of money for schools to run private Primary One classes.
(4) Many schools have seen an increase in student enrolment.
A. (1), (2) only
B. (1), (3) only
C. (2), (3) only
D. (3), (4) only
2. Using News, list TWO key changes the government has announced for self-financed Primary One classes.
3. Do you agree with the education authorities' move to cut subsidised Primary One classes for schools with low enrolment? Explain using News, Glossary and your own knowledge.
Photo
Aplichau Kaifong Primary School in Southern district. Photo: Handout
Question prompts
1. Why is this school in the news? What challenge is it currently facing?
2. What measures could the school take to address these challenges? Explain using News and your own knowledge.
Issue: Schools with low Primary One enrolment consider survival options
Two public schools explore merging, operating privately to deal with low student numbers
Education authorities have welcomed the merger option, saying they would offer funding to cover expenses
Two Hong Kong public schools with insufficient enrolment numbers are exploring their options, hoping to continue running Primary One classes by operating on a private basis or merging with another institution amid the city's shrinking student population.
Aplichau Kaifong Primary School in Southern district announced last month that its incorporated management committee, the institution's governing body, had decided to apply to the Education Bureau to operate Primary One classes in the coming academic year on a self-financed basis.
'Different stakeholders unanimously support the school to continue operating,' it announced on its website and social media platforms, without mentioning specific financial plans.
Meanwhile, in Wong Tai Sin, Price Memorial Catholic Primary School, sponsored by the Catholic diocese of Hong Kong, is planning to merge with another school in the same district under the diocese.
The diocese said that pupils in Price Memorial Catholic Primary School would attend the same school in the coming academic year. A merger would be arranged with the other institution for the following school year.
'Later, the school will have to submit a merger plan to the Education Bureau, and the merger of the schools can only be confirmed after the plan has been approved,' the diocese said.
Rising costs in Hong Kong means more people are buying second-hand, shopping abroad
The bureau has promoted the merger option, saying it would offer up to HK$1 million (US$128,509) to schools that choose to do so to cover additional expenses.
Chim Hon-ming, chairman of the Hong Kong Island School Heads Association, said underperforming institutions should not delay shutting down by running private classes.
Chim, who is also a primary school principal, explained that it was better to close down since there wouldn't be enough students to justify the number of local primary schools.
Education sector lawmaker and fellow principal Chu Kwok-keung said new rules from the Education Bureau meant that schools that had successfully applied to operate private classes were more likely to shut down if they failed to secure enough pupils again.
Beginning next year, schools that privately fund a batch of Primary One pupils must continue doing so until the children finish Primary Six.
The extra financial burden of operating private classes would encourage schools to rethink their options, as they must bear the cost of running a class for six years instead of just one, Chu said.
Wong Tai Sin and Southern districts have some of the city's most rapidly ageing populations. The number of six-year-olds in Southern district fell from 1,500 last year to 1,400 this year. The population is expected to shrink further to only 900 in 2029.
Staff writers
Question prompts
1. List ONE way the Education Bureau will support schools that choose to merge.
2. Using Issue, explain how the demographic trends in Wong Tai Sin and Southern districts could impact schools in these areas.
3. To what extent do you agree with Chim that it would be better for schools struggling with student enrolment to close down? Explain using News, Issue, Glossary and your own knowledge.
Graphic
Illustration: SCMP Graphics
Question prompts
1. What is being shown in the graphic, and how does it relate to the information in News and Issue?
2. According to Issue, what measures can be taken to support primary schools in Hong Kong facing enrolment challenges?
Glossary
subsidised: partly paid for by the government or another organisation
merge: to combine or join together
birth rate: the number of individuals born in a population in a given amount of time. Hong Kong's birth rate has been declining for some time. Although the number of babies born in Hong Kong reached 36,700 in 2024 – an 11 per cent jump from 2023 – the figure is still the third-lowest since data was first made available in 1961.
unanimously: agreed upon or supported by everyone involved
diocese: the area under the control of a bishop, a high-ranking priest in the Christian church
Some areas of the city are seeing more dramatic demographic shifts than others. Photo: Shutterstock
Sample answers
News
1. B
2. Under the new rules, schools must fully fund these classes until the cohort graduates from Primary Six, even if they later meet the enrolment requirements. Additionally, schools that fail to enrol enough students for a subsidised Primary One class can no longer apply for a special review.
3. I partially agree with the new rules, as they reflect the reality of the declining school-age population and help allocate resources efficiently. However, removing the option for a special review and requiring schools to fully fund self-financed classes increases financial pressure, leading to more closures and fewer choices for parents. While the policy may be necessary, greater flexibility and support for affected schools would help minimise disruptions for students and families. (accept all reasonable answers)
Photo
1. The school has not been allocated any subsidised Primary One classes for the 2025-26 academic year due to low student enrolment. New rules from the Education Bureau say it cannot apply for a special review or switch to subsidised funding later, making it difficult to continue operating.
2. The school could consider merging with another institution. Additionally, policymakers could provide more flexibility in funding rules to support schools struggling with low enrolment.
Issue
1. The Education Bureau is offering up to HK$1 million to schools that opt for a merger, helping to cover additional expenses associated with the transition.
2. Demographic trends show a declining number of six-year-olds in these districts, further reducing potential enrolment. In Wong Tai Sin, the number of Primary One-age children dropped from 2,200 in 2024 to 1,900 in 2025, while Southern district's figures are expected to fall to just 900 by 2029. These factors make it increasingly difficult for small schools to remain open without financial support.
3. I partially agree with Chim's view that schools struggling with student intake may need to close down. The declining student population, especially in areas like Wong Tai Sin and Southern district, makes it difficult for schools to remain sustainable. However, schools like Aplichau Kaifong and Price Memorial Catholic Primary School are exploring alternatives like merging or running self-financed classes, which shows that closure isn't the only option. While continuing private classes can be financially burdensome, more support and flexibility could help struggling schools avoid closure and better adapt to demographic changes. (accept all reasonable answers)
Graphic
1. The single student in a dusty classroom represents the city's shrinking student population. It illustrates the information in the news and how Hong Kong is coping with a significant decline in the number of six-year-olds expected to enrol in Primary One in the coming years.
2. Measures could include offering financial support, such as the HK$1 million subsidy for schools opting to merge, providing more flexible funding options, and encouraging schools to collaborate or merge with other institutions to ensure their survival. Additionally, promoting community outreach to increase enrolment could also help.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

HKFP

an hour ago

• HKFP

Pride Month: Celebrating equal love in Hong Kong is no brainer

The clock is ticking. In just four months, the Court of Final Appeal's order requiring the Hong Kong government to implement a framework for the legal recognition of same-sex relationships will hit its deadline. The government now must make a choice: either come up with a complex new legal framework from scratch or take the straightforward, proven path that nearly 40 jurisdictions around the world have already taken. That path is the inclusion of all couples in marriage. With nearly 25 years of worldwide experience to draw from, the lesson is clear: equal marriage is the only fair, simple and equitable solution. Marriage can offer same-sex couples the clarity, dignity and full protection they deserve – and the social harmony that Hong Kong values. Only ending the denial of marriage will settle the debate. The evidence is compelling: inclusive societies attract talent, investment and tourism. Thailand's recent legislation to include same-sex couples in marriage has been hailed as a favourable advance with substantial economic implications. According to a recent study, equal marriage could bring an additional four million visitors to Thailand per year, generating roughly US$2 billion (HK$5.7 billion) in added economic value over the next two years. Tourism is a key pillar of the Hong Kong economy. As the city strives to recover from the Covid-19 pandemic and reaffirm its status as a global hub, embracing equal marriage would send a powerful message: that Hong Kong is open and future-oriented. And beyond tourism, the simple inclusion of same-sex couples in marriage will make it easier for businesses to thrive. The case for marriage equality, of course, is not just about economics; it's also a matter of public health. Research from around the world has shown that equal marriage leads to better mental and physical health outcomes. It reduces the stress, anxiety and depression that arise from institutional discrimination and social exclusion. Most strikingly, jurisdictions that have ended marriage discrimination have reported significant drops in suicide attempts among LGBTQ+ youth – a powerful reminder that dignity and legal recognition can save lives. A government survey released five years after Taiwan legalised same-sex marriage in 2019 – the first in Asia – showed that the legislation had a positive impact on public attitudes. More than 69 per cent supported equal marriage in 2024, up from 60.4 per cent in 2021 and 37.4 per cent in 2018. Equal marriage also streamlines public administration. It removes the need for parallel legal structures such as civil union, which not only create administrative inefficiencies, but also reinforce stigma by treating same-sex relationships as inferior. Opponents of change often invoke 'traditional values.' In truth, what we frequently call tradition is often more fluid than we think. In Hong Kong, Chinese customary marriages weren't abolished until 1971 – a reminder that the institution of marriage has always evolved with the times. Same-sex couples share the same aspirations as everyone else: to love, commit and care for their families. These are the values the law should protect and affirm. Today, Hong Kong is ready to welcome same-sex couples in marriage. A 2023 survey found that 60 per cent of the population supported marriage equality. Likewise, a 2025 survey revealed that 70 per cent of individuals in committed same-sex relationships expressed a strong desire to marry. The popular will is clear – it's time for the law to catch up. Fortunately for the government, the right law is also the easiest one to write. It does not need to create a new non-marriage marital status that provides legal protections and responsibilities across the hundreds of legal and economic provisions at stake – a status that will perpetuate, not end, discrimination and debate. Instead, the government can enact in effect a one-sentence change to the law, affirming the right to marry regardless of the sex of the two parties seeking to marry. The legal deadline will be met, and, more importantly, the people of Hong Kong will celebrate and move forward together, to the applause of the world. With courage and leadership, Hong Kong can become the 40th jurisdiction in the world– and the fourth in Asia – to show that families are helped and no one hurt when the law respects the dignity and inclusion of all. It's time for love to win here in Hong Kong. HKFP is an impartial platform & does not necessarily share the views of opinion writers or advertisers. HKFP presents a diversity of views & regularly invites figures across the political spectrum to write for us. Press freedom is guaranteed under the Basic Law, security law, Bill of Rights and Chinese constitution. Opinion pieces aim to point out errors or defects in the government, law or policies, or aim to suggest ideas or alterations via legal means without an intention of hatred, discontent or hostility against the authorities or other communities.

HKFP

a day ago

• HKFP

Explainer: What to know about Hong Kong taxi licences, and why their value is plummeting amid rise of Uber

The value of Hong Kong taxi licences has plummeted to a record low in recent weeks, now costing less than HK$2 million – less than a quarter of the value at their peak value. Some taxi industry bigwigs have suggested that the government could buy back the licences to offset the losses that license holders are experiencing. But what are taxi licences, who owns them, and how do they fit into the bigger picture of the industry's war against ride-hailing apps like Uber? HKFP explores the topic. What is a taxi licence? Taxi licences are synonymous with cab ownership in Hong Kong, as all taxi owners must possess a licence. They began to be issued by the government via public tender in 1964, during the British colonial era, and are now bought and sold freely on the market. There are a total of 18,163 taxi licences in the city, of which 15,250 are for urban taxis, 2,838 for New Territories taxis, and 75 for Lantau taxis. The number of licences for urban and New Territories taxis has been stagnant since 1994, the last time there was a public tender for them. In 2016, the government held a public tender for 25 Lantau taxi licences. Licences are bought like property: a buyer pays a down payment and then takes out a bank loan, repaying it in monthly instalments over years or decades. Take for example, cab driver Nigel Chan. He bought a taxi licence in August, he told HKFP, because he likes the flexibility of being able to drive whenever he wants, as opposed to renting a taxi and having to work specific hours. In addition to a down payment of HK$1 million, Chan has to pay an almost HK$10,000 monthly instalment for 25 years. The licences are permanent. Licence owners must pay an annual vehicle licence fee of HK$3,159 to the Transport Department. Who owns taxi licences in Hong Kong? Just like property and businesses, both individuals and companies can own taxi licences. As of the end of January 2024, about 59 per cent of taxi licences are held by individuals, while the rest are owned by companies. According to 2022 figures from the Transport Department, the top three companies holding the most taxi licences are Tai Wo Motors, Hung Yat Motors, and Chung Shing Taxi. They are also among Hong Kong's largest taxi companies that lease vehicles to cabbies. Tai Wo, Hung Yat, and Chung Shing have 603, 309, and 259 licences respectively. Tai Wo and Chung Shing are two of the five companies that successfully bid for the government's taxi fleet licences to launch a line of premium cabs. How are taxi licences a form of investment? Taxi licences are considered an investment tool. Cab companies that sell these licences tout the fixed number of licences, saying investors need not worry about an increase in taxis eroding investment value. Taxi licence holders can earn a monthly income by renting their vehicles to drivers. Licence owners can either find drivers themselves or pay agents or taxi firms to help lease their vehicles. How has the value of taxi licences changed over the years? The value of urban taxi licences – the most expensive of the three types – was HK$6.7 million at the start of 2015, according to a Legislative Council paper. But the value of urban taxi licences has plunged by as much as 57 per cent over the past 10 years, falling to HK$2.85 million at the end of 2024. The market price has continued plummeting this year, with an especially steep fall in May. The value reached HK$1.97 million this week. What's the reason for the nosedive? The fall in the value of taxi licences is largely attributed to the rising popularity of ride-hailing apps such as Uber, which arrived in Hong Kong in 2014. Ride-hailing apps operate in a grey area in the city, which requires vehicles offering rides to have a hire car permit. However, while drivers have been arrested, police have not conducted any major crackdowns. Drivers and customers have few issues offering or using ride-hailing services. Benson Hung, a lecturer at the Vocational Training Council who has researched the cab industry, said taxi licences were once seen as a good investment. Before Uber and other ride-hailing apps entered Hong Kong, the competition was only among cabbies, whose number was limited by the cap on taxi licences. 'There was a scarcity of resources. There was a limited supply of [point-to-point] drivers, so the value increased,' he told HKFP in Cantonese. While some taxi drivers are not opposed to ride-hailing apps, saying they provide an extra income stream as apps like Uber also allow customers to call taxis, it is taxi owners who paid millions for their licences that have the most to lose, Hung said. Increasingly, taxi licence holders might see reduced monthly returns because some taxi drivers may stop renting taxis, seeing their jobs as no longer lucrative. This would make taxi licence ownership less attractive, he explained. How has the taxi trade responded to the popularity of ride-hailing apps? The taxi trade has long urged the government to crack down on ride-hailing vehicles, calling them a threat to the industry. Chow Kwok-keung, chairperson of the Hong Kong Taxi and Public Light Bus Association, which represents taxi owners' interests, said in May that over 75 per cent of taxi owners had fallen into debt due to the impact of ride-hailing services. The government said in July that it would regulate ride-hailing platforms, for example, by introducing a new licensing system, and would announce legislative proposals within this year. However, no progress has been publicised. Amid the falling value of licences, industry bigwigs have suggested the government buy back licences. Cheng Hak-wo, chairperson of the Taxi Dealers and Owners Association and founder of Chung Shing Taxi, said in June that the government was partly responsible for the plunging value because it had turned a blind eye to ride-hailing apps. Therefore, authorities have the responsibility to protect licence holders, he argued. Lawmakers, however, have not lobbied behind the suggestion. Legislator Doreen Kong told HKFP that it depended on the 'economic environment' and whether the government had the ability to do so. 'I think the issue of taxis and ride-hailing apps needs to be looked at as a whole,' she said. 'When the government releases the framework [for regulating ride-hailing apps], then I can comment more.' In response to a reporter's question, Chief Executive John Lee said on June 10 that any decision relating to the use of public funds must be made with caution. He added that the framework the government was working on to regulate ride-hailing apps would also support the development of the taxi trade and raise the standards of taxi service.

HKFP

2 days ago

• HKFP

EU bans Chinese firms from major state medical equipment contracts

The European Union on Friday banned Chinese firms from government medical device purchases worth more than five million euros (US$5.8 million) in retaliation for limits Beijing places on access to its own market. The latest salvo in trade tensions between the 27-nation bloc and China covers a wide range of healthcare supplies, from surgical masks to X-ray machines, that represent a market worth 150 billion euros in the EU. 'Our aim with these measures is to level the playing field for EU businesses,' the bloc's trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said. 'We remain committed to dialogue with China to resolve these issues.' In response, China accused the EU of 'double standards'. 'The EU has always boasted that it is the most open market in the world, but in reality, it has gradually moved towards protectionism', foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said at a regular press briefing. 'Under the guise of fair competition (the EU) actually carries out unfair competition, which is a typical case of double standards.' The European Commission said in a statement the move was in 'response to China's longstanding exclusion of EU-made medical devices from Chinese government contracts.' Brussels said just under 90 percent of public procurement contracts for medical devices in China 'were subject to exclusionary and discriminatory measures' against EU firms. In addition to barring Chinese firms from major state purchases, 'inputs from China for successful bids' would also be limited to 50 percent, it said. Over the last three years, Brussels and Beijing have come into conflict in a number of economic sectors, including electric cars, the rail industry, solar panels and wind turbines. The decision on medical devices comes at a time of heightened trade tensions with President Donald Trump's United States, which has imposed customs surcharges on imports from all over the world, including Europe. The EU has decided to take a tougher stance on trade in recent years, adopting a vast arsenal of legislation to better defend its businesses against unfair competition. In April 2024, the commission opened an investigation into Chinese public contracts for medical devices, the first under a new mechanism introduced by the EU in 2022 to obtain better access to overseas state purchases. China, on the other hand, accuses Europe of protectionism. After a year of negotiations, the commission, which manages trade policy on behalf of the 27 member states, said it had failed to make any progress with China. 'The measure seeks to incentivise China to cease its discrimination against EU firms and EU-made medical devices and treat EU companies with the same openness as the EU does with Chinese companies and products,' Brussels said.