Mistral AI CEO Arthur Mensch warns of AI ‘deskilling' people: ‘It's a risk that….'
Image for representative purpose
Mistral AI
CEO and former
Google DeepMind
researcher
Arthur Mensch
recently said that the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on white-collared jobs is an 'overstatement'. In an interview with The Times of London at the VivaTech conference in Paris, Mensch dismissed the idea that AI will result in huge job cuts. Instead, he sees AI 'deskilling' people as one of the biggest threats to the
job market
. Mensch said that as people rely more on AI to search and summarize information, they may stop thinking critically themselves. "It's a risk that you can avoid, if you think of it from a design perspective, if you make sure that you have the right human input, that you keep the human active," Mensch said at the Paris conference earlier this month.
"You want people to continue learning," he continued. "Being able to synthesize information and criticize information is a core component to learning."
Mistral AI CEO responds to Anthropic CEO's remark on losing over half of entry-level jobs to AI
During the interview, Mensch also responded to recent warnings of losing jobs to AI including the one by Anthropic CEO
Dario Amodei
. Dario said that AI may replace half of entry-level white-collar workers in the next five years. "We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming," Amodei told Axios in an interview published last month. The 42-year-old CEO emphasized that most people remain unaware of the impending transformation, calling it a reality that "sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it."
Mensch said "I think it's very much of an overstatement," adding that he believed Amodei liked to "spread fear" as a marketing strategy.
Instead of job cuts, Mensch believes AI will reshape office work, with more emphasis on human interaction. 'I do expect that we'll have more relational tasks because that's not something you can easily replace,' he said.
6 Awesome New Features Coming in Android 16!
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Colleagues or overlords? The debate over AI bots has been raging but needn't
There's the Terminator school of perceiving artificial intelligence (AI) risks, in which we'll all be killed by our robot overlords. And then there's one where, if not friends exactly, the machines serve as valued colleagues. A Japanese tech researcher is arguing that our global AI safety approach hinges on reframing efforts to achieve this benign partnership. In 2023, as the world was shaken by the release of ChatGPT, a pair of successive warnings came from Silicon Valley of existential threats from powerful AI tools. Elon Musk led a group of experts and industry executives in calling for a six-month pause in developing advanced systems until we figured out how to manage risks. Then hundreds of AI leaders—including Sam Altman of OpenAI and Demis Hassabis of Alphabet's DeepMind—sent shockwaves with a statement that warned: 'Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks, such as pandemics and nuclear war." Also Read: AI didn't take the job. It changed what the job is. Despite all the attention paid to the potentially catastrophic dangers, the years since have been marked by AI 'accelerationists' largely drowning out AI doomers. Companies and countries have raced towards being the first to achieve superhuman AI, brushing off the early calls to prioritise safety. And it has all left the public very confused. But maybe we've been viewing this all wrong. Hiroshi Yamakawa, a prominent AI scholar from the University of Tokyo who has spent the past three decades studying the technology, is now arguing that the most promising route to a sustainable future is to let humans and AIs 'live in symbiosis and flourish together, protecting each other's well-being and averting catastrophic risks." Yamakawa hit a nerve because while he recognizes the threats noted in 2023, he argues for a working path toward coexistence with super-intelligent machines—especially at a time when nobody is halting development over fears of falling behind. In other words, if we can't beat AI from becoming smarter than us, we're better off joining it as an equal partner. 'Equality' is the sensitive part. Humans want to keep believing they are superior, not equal to machines. Also Read: Rahul Matthan: AI models aren't copycats but learners just like us His statement has generated a lot of buzz in Japanese academic circles, receiving dozens of signatories so far, including from some influential AI safety researchers overseas. In an interview with Nikkei Asia, he argued that cultural differences in Asia are more likely to enable seeing machines as peers instead of as adversaries. While the United States has produced AI-inspired characters like the Terminator from the eponymous Hollywood movie, the Japanese have envisioned friendlier companions like Astro Boy or Doraemon, he told the news outlet. Beyond pop culture, there's some truth to this cultural embrace. At just 25%, Japanese people had the lowest share of respondents who say products using AI make them nervous, according to a global Ipsos survey last June, compared to 64% of Americans. It's likely his comments will fall on deaf ears, though, like so many of the other AI risk warnings. Development has its own momentum. And whether the machines will ever get to a point where they could spur 'civilization extinction' remains an extremely heated debate. It's fair to say that some of the industry's focus on far-off, science-fiction scenarios is meant to distract from the more immediate harm that the technology could bring—whether that's job displacement, allegations of copyright infringement or reneging on climate change goals. Still, Yamakawa's proposal is a timely re-up on an AI safety debate that has languished in recent years. These discussions can't just rely on eyebrow-raising warnings and the absence of governance. Also Read: You're absolutely right, as the AI chatbot says With the exception of Europe, most jurisdictions have focused on loosening regulations in the hope of not falling behind. Policymakers can't afford to turn a blind eye until it's too late. It also shows the need for more safety research beyond just the companies trying to create and sell these products, like in the social-media era. These platforms were obviously less incentivized to share their findings with the public. Governments and universities must prioritise independent analysis on large-scale AI risks. Meanwhile, as the global tech industry has been caught up in a race to create computer systems that are smarter than humans, it's yet to be determined whether we'll ever get there. But setting godlike AI as the goalpost has created a lot of counter-productive fear-mongering. There might be merit in seeing these machines as colleagues and not overlords. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Reddit Co-founder Uses AI To ‘Hug' Late Mother, Internet Warns Of ‘False Memory'
Last Updated: Ohanian used an old picture of himself with his mother and converted it into a short video clip. Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian used artificial intelligence to create a moment with his late mother, and the results left him quite emotional. Ohanian, the husband of Serena Williams, often uses his social media handles to show the importance of his family. He is frequently spotted spending time with Serena and their daughters, Olympia and Adira. Taking help from a cutting-edge AI, Ohanian chose an old picture of himself and his mother and converted it into a moving image that shows the mother and son hugging each other. 'Damn, I wasn't ready for how this would feel. We didn't have a camcorder, so there's no video of me with my mom. I dropped one of my favourite photos of us in mid-journey as a 'starting frame for an AI video' and wow… This is how she hugged me. I've rewatched it 50 times," he wrote in the caption. Damn, I wasn't ready for how this would feel. We didn't have a camcorder, so there's no video of me with my mom. I dropped one of my favorite photos of us in midjourney as 'starting frame for an AI video' and wow… This is how she hugged me. I've rewatched it 50 times. — Alexis Ohanian The post includes the original picture of the Reddit co-founder along with his mother, uploaded alongside the AI-generated video that shows a heartwarming moment. Despite being an emotional creation for him, the video had mixed reactions online, with many warning about creating fake memories with the help of AI, which can affect his mental health. One wrote, 'Be careful with this. Human memories are very malleable, and you'll remember what the AI shows you, whether it's true or not," while another added, 'I've tried this. But be cautious. At least do it repeatedly until you get one that perfectly matches your current memory of them, and delete the rest. Otherwise, you may create false memories. Be aware of what you're doing, potentially rewriting history in a way that can't be reversed." A comment read, 'It's not how she hugged you. You've been given a false memory," while another added, 'feels like I'm watching a bunch of people about to jump into a pit of despair following and worshipping the AI output." Amid the strong criticism from social media users, Ohanian, in a follow-up tweet on Monday, June 23, shared another message. Noting that he lost his mother almost 20 years ago, the businessman added, 'I lost my mom almost 20 years ago. Trolls can rest assured, that I've grieved sufficiently. My family couldn't afford a camcorder, and using tech to generate a few seconds of animation from a still is the equivalent of using AI to stabilise a poorly recorded video — or fill in the gaps of a deteriorated video — of her (if we'd had it). It's not a replacement for a loved one, nor should it be." I lost my mom almost 20 years ago. Trolls can rest assured I've grieved sufficiently. My family couldn't afford a camcorder and using tech to generate few seconds of animation from a still is the equivalent of using AI to stabilize a poorly recorded video — or fill in the gaps of… top videos View all — Alexis Ohanian Despite the negative remarks on the use of AI, a section of users appeared pleased, with some even creating their own videos of their parents and their close ones. First Published:
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Economic bunker buster for India, China': How this US senator's Russia sanctions bill would prove 'bone crushing' for trade- if passed
I ndia's economic advantage at buying Russian oil, given the lack of a "better deal" might soon turn to its disadvantage if the United States passes Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025. The bill, which is set to be taken up by the US senate, proposes imposition of 500% tariffs on all those countries buying energy from Russia. US Senator Lindsey Graham has publicly pushed for the bill warning that it would prove to be "economic bunker buster" for countries like India and China who have significantly increased their purchase of Russian oil. "I've got 84 co-sponsors for a Russian sanctions bill that is an economic bunker buster against China, India, and Russia for Russia's brutal invasion of Ukraine. I think that bill's going to time to vote on that bill," he told NBC News. — GOP4Ukraine (@GOP4Ukraine) Earlier, he had warned the two nations that if the bill got through, they would have "nobody to blame but yourself". "To China and India: if you continue to prop up Putin's war machine, you'll have nobody to blame but yourself," he said. Russia became India's top oil supplier after it significantly increased its imports of Russian crude oil in June, with volumes surpassing combined purchases from major Gulf suppliers like Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Amid global market instability triggered by Israel's offensive against Iran, Indian refiners are projected to buy 2–2.2 million barrels per day of Russian oil—marking a two-year high. What is Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 say? The bill requires the US President to impose sanctions on Russian leaders, military suppliers, and banks, raise tariffs on Russian imports to at least 500%, and restrict trade with countries dealing in Russian uranium or oil. It also bans US energy exports to Russia. "The President must increase the rate of duty on all goods and services imported into the United States from countries that knowingly engage in the exchange of Russian-origin uranium and petroleum products to at least 500% relative to the value of such goods and services," one of the provisions of the bill says. Moreover, it authorizes tough penalties if Russia obstructs peace with Ukraine, violates agreements, or escalates aggression. Trump has not yet commented on the bill. Russia and Ukraine have made limited headway in their peace negotiations. During a meeting in Istanbul on Monday, officials from both sides agreed to carry out another prisoner exchange, but no significant progress was made on broader issues. Meanwhile foreign minister S Jaishankar has, at several moments, defended India's position in buying Russian oil for the lack of a "better deal" saying that it wasn't "necessarily cheap". India has also made its stance clear in the Russia-Ukraine war with Prime Minister Narendra Modi categorically reiterating that it wasn't an "era of war". Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
