Mahmoud Khalil vows to resume pro-Palestinian activism after release from US jail
Khalil, who recently graduated from Columbia University in Manhattan, was a prominent figure in the pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel student protest movement that swept campuses last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Middle East bully's nuke sites completely, totally obliterated': Donald Trump on Iran strikes
Delivering an address to the nation after US military strikes on Iran, President Donald Trump said the attack "completely and totally obliterated" the Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities targeted. L: Iran Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei | R: US President Donald Trump (Reuters photos) US on Saturday struck three Iranian nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan – with President Donald Trump asking Iran to agree to 'end the war' after the 'historic moment for the United States of America, Israel and the world'. Follow Israel Iran conflict live updates 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier,' Trump said in the address to nation. Confirming the strikes, US President Trump first posted on Truth Social, 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' In another post, Donald Trump wrote, 'I will be giving an Address to the Nation at 10:00 P.M., at the White House, regarding our very successful military operation in Iran. This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!' With the strikes, the US has officially directly joined the Israeli campaign with President US President Donald Trump on June 18 had said 'exactly' where the Iranian Supreme Leader is "hiding" is known, adding that 'at least for now, they are not going to kill him.' Donald Trump warned Ayatollah Ali Khamenei against further attacks, as he appeared to demand Tehran's unconditional surrender. Follow Iran-Israel conflict live updates Trump posted on Truth Social, 'We know exactly where the so-called ' Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' In another post, Donald Trump had written, 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' Israel said the strikes were needed to stop Iran from going further with its nuclear plans, claiming that the country is very close to having a weapon.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Now is the time for peace,' says Trump after bombing three Iranian sites- but did Iran outsmart the bombs?
Evacuations blunt the edge of U.S. firepower Live Events Inside the strikes: what was targeted U.S.-Israel coordination: A calculated escalation Did Iran anticipate the attack? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In a striking display of both military might and diplomatic paradox, President Donald Trump declared, 'Now is the time for peace,' just hours after ordering U.S. airstrikes on Iran 's most sensitive nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz , and attacks, coordinated closely with Israel, were intended as a decisive blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions and a dramatic intervention in the spiraling Israel-Iran as new details emerge, a different narrative is taking shape—one that raises questions about both the effectiveness and the real impact of this high-stakes state media revealed that the targeted nuclear sites had been evacuated 'some time ago,' a move that appears to have dramatically limited the physical and radiological consequences of the strikes. Sensitive materials and personnel were removed in advance, reportedly as part of a contingency plan to avoid casualties and prevent environmental preemptive action meant that, despite the deployment of advanced B-2 bombers and bunker-buster munitions, the U.S. strikes may have hit mostly empty facilities, blunting the intended effect of crippling Iran's nuclear deeply buried enrichment facility was the primary target, with the U.S. unleashing its most powerful bunker-busters. However, the extent of the damage remains unclear, and Iranian officials insist there were no casualties or radiation main uranium enrichment hub was also struck, but, according to Iranian sources, no radioactive material was present at the time, further limiting the risk of site, crucial for uranium conversion and fuel production, was similarly evacuated, and no significant radiological impact has been reported.U.S. officials confirmed that Israel was notified both before and after the strikes, underscoring a high level of coordination between the two allies. Israeli sources described the operation as a critical escalation, coming after days of Israeli strikes that had already weakened Iran's missile revelation that Iran had already cleared its nuclear sites before the strikes raises the possibility that Tehran anticipated the attack, potentially through intelligence or by reading the diplomatic and military signals coming from Washington and Jerusalem. This has sparked debate among analysts: Did the U.S. and Israel achieve their objective, or did Iran's advance warning and evacuation render the operation more symbolic than strategic?As President Trump calls for peace, the region remains on edge. Iran's leaders have vowed a response, and the risk of further escalation persists. The International Atomic Energy Agency reports no immediate radiological threat to the public, and European diplomats continue to push for de-escalation.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Experts warn Israel-Iran war outcome uncertain despite US involvement and Fordow claims
Experts warn Israel-Iran war outcome uncertain despite US involvement and Fordow claims Amid recent statements from US President Donald Trump on June 22, claiming the successful destruction of Iran's Fordow nuclear facility , experts are expressing doubts that American involvement will secure Israel's broader strategic objectives in its ongoing conflict with Iran. Israel's campaign against Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs has escalated in recent weeks, with growing speculation that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu aimed to draw in the United States. However, military analysts, security experts, and former diplomats caution that even with US military assistance, Israel's objectives, reportedly including regime change in Tehran, may not be achievable and could lead to regional destabilization . Also read: US forces bomb Iranian nuclear sites; 'Fordow is gone' says Trump by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo Strategic goals in doubt despite targeted strikes While Israel may have achieved operational success in striking specific Iranian targets, experts argue that these actions are unlikely to result in long-term strategic outcomes. Concerns persist about Israel's capacity to maintain a prolonged aerial campaign, particularly in the face of potential Iranian retaliation. Live Events 'There is a dominant trend in Israel going back to the formation of the state that has suggested to politicians that violence will deliver a solution to what are political problems,' said Toby Dodge, professor of international relations at the London School of Economics. 'My gut feeling is Iranian regime is more stable than has been suggested.' Analysts also point to Iran's decentralized defense system, which mirrors Hezbollah's network and complicates efforts to degrade its capabilities through conventional airpower. Fordow strike claim raises risk of escalation Trump's assertion that the Fordow facility, buried beneath nearly 90 meters of rock, has been destroyed remains unverified. Military specialists question whether US bunker-busting bombs could successfully penetrate the site and warn that such action could trigger retaliation against American assets. Also read: Steve Bannon's backroom role? Secret talks with Trump raise questions about U.S Iran strike strategy 'Subcontracting the Fordow job would put the United States in Iran's sights,' wrote former US Ambassador Daniel C. Kurtzer and former National Security Council official Steven N. Simon in Foreign Affairs . 'Iran would almost certainly retaliate by killing American civilians.' Experts note that escalation following such retaliation could draw the US into regime-change operations, a strategy unpopular among the American public. Operational momentum risks undermining strategy Questions have been raised about the coherence of Israel's approach, which appears heavily reliant on airpower with limited capacity for sustained conflict. Resource constraints, including fatigue among air crews, missile interceptor shortages, and aircraft maintenance cycles, may inhibit Israel's ability to continue high-tempo operations. Andreas Krieg, associate professor at King's College London's Department of Defence Studies, said, 'We'd learned the lesson that air power alone doesn't work. And then we learned in Iraq and Afghanistan that even massive numbers of boots on ground doesn't work.' Krieg also emphasized that Iran's command structure is designed to withstand decapitation efforts. 'You can take out key nodes, but the best [Israel] can hope for in killing Khamenei would be to trigger the succession crisis which in any case had been anticipated,' he said. Also read: Trick or TACO? Why has Trump set a 2-week deadline for Iran? Netanyahu's assumption that Trump would commit US forces to the campaign may also be politically flawed, particularly given low public support for intervention and growing divisions within Trump's base. In the absence of deeper US involvement, and with indirect talks between Iran and European countries underway in Geneva, analysts believe diplomatic avenues may still hold. Former NATO commander Wesley Clark has described successful air campaigns, such as Kosovo in 1999, as tools to bring adversaries to the negotiating table, not to achieve regime change. 'If Khamenei has the sense to step back, if America doesn't come in,' said Dodge, 'then Israel has stuck its finger in a hornets' nest.'
