Victorian Government at war with NIMBYs over skyscrapers for suburbs plan
Take a long hard look at the suburbs, Melbourne. The eclectic neighbourhoods stitch together like a patchwork to form a vibrant city — one of the most liveable in the world.
Soak it in because it will never be the same again.
The population is about to explode to London levels. The modest buildings that make up the suburbs will be bulldozed for highrise towers to house residents in shoebox apartments at the expense of character and charm.
Traffic congestion will worsen, infrastructure will struggle to keep up and the slide down the liveability index will follow.
Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan says Melbourne will be home to nine million people by 2050.
To put that in some important context, the population now is roughly 5.5 million. So an additional 3.5 million people will be added on top in the next 25 years.
Do you know how long it took Melbourne to reach an initial population of 3.5 million? It took 165 years.
The Federal Government controls immigration and targets are through the roof. As a result, the states are scrambling to provide enough homes for the influx of overseas arrivals and to create a situation where first home buyers are not priced out.
The Victorian Government says it will build 2.24 million new affordable homes by 2051.
That's 86,000 new homes a year over the next 26 years. But how they get there is controversial and has been met with plenty of backlash.
The Allan Labor Government has introduced sweeping overhauls of planning controls that give them the green light to force suburbs to accommodate residential towers with little regard for building height, amenity or impact on the environment.
Hundreds of millions of dollars of strategic work carried out by local councils over decades has been overridden as Planning Minister Sonya Kilkenny approves projects that one expert says will turn quiet neighbourhoods into 'slums'.
'It's disgusting,' said Leith van Onselen, chief economist at macrobusiness.com.au and former economist at the Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.
'Melbourne is already the most unsustainable city in Australia. If you're going to stuff 3.5 million more people in over 25 years, you're going to need to bulldoze people's homes into highrise and get rid of the democratic process.
'If you stuff thousands more people into existing suburbs, you can't recreate the green space and parks. You consolidate a groups of blocks with backyards into highrise. It means more traffic, more cars, more overcrowding everywhere. You're going to end up creating a slum.
'Get used to it. There is no other future.'
Councils pushing back against skyscraper for suburbs plan
In Greensborough, 17km northeast of the Melbourne CBD, there's uproar over a plan to add a 17-storey highrise apartment tower to its main street — significantly higher than the tallest existing building.
The tower was last month ticked off by the Planning Minister under the newly-minted Development Facilitation Program (DFP) — one that removes local councils from the approval process altogether.
Decisions made by the minister under the DFP cannot be appealed to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT).
A Banyule Council spokesperson told news.com.au the council had no formal role in assessing the application, had limited opportunity to provide comment and had concerns ignored about building height and lack of car parking.
Banyule Mayor Elizabeth Nealy said the Victorian Government must work closer with councils and the community on projects of this scale.
'We understand and share the community's frustration at the lack of consultation. This is a significant proposal for Greensborough, and is another example of local planning decisions not being made by locals,' she said.
Almost 1000 people have signed a petition against the building, declaring it 'would not only change the character and landscape of Greensborough but could potentially strain our local resources and infrastructure'.
But a Victorian Government spokesperson told news.com.au the tower is going ahead 'exactly where more homes should go — right on the main street, next to the train station, close to Greensborough Plaza, shops, services and jobs'.
The spokesperson said that since the start of the year, more than 2000 homes have been approved through the DFP.
'We're fast-tracking social and affordable housing in Greensborough so more Victorians can have access to a safe and secure home,' they said.
But in other suburbs, new contests are emerging. In Murrumbeena, 13km southeast of the CBD, an eight-storey development for 110 apartments was pushed through by the minister.
Glen Eira City Mayor Simone Zmood said last month that the plan went ahead despite objections from council about sunlight and commuter parking issues.
'Reducing 90 car spaces and losing commuter and short-term car parking will have a significant impact on car parking demand,' she said.
It's a similar story in Brunswick, 5km north of the CBD, where the minister approved a project likened to the Great Wall of China a day after the council voted not to support it.
The nine-storey tower was granted approval in March. Merri-Bek councillor Sue Bolton said it was 'worse than pathetic' that just 3 per cent of the project was for affordable housing.
'I think this would be a disastrous precedent if the minister agrees to this and it shows (the developer is) thumbing their nose to the community and running off to the minister,' she said.
Box Hill, 14km east of the CBD is another example of the minister using powers under the DFP to force a major build on a community that says it will do more than good.
Whitehorse City Council objected to a $1.5 billion, seven-tower development last year that will house 1700 apartments over 50 storeys.
The plans were fast-tracked using the DFP but Whitehorse Mayor Denise Massoud said council received no response to its objections.
But the Premier fired back, questioning why the council would oppose the plan.
'It's probably up to Whitehorse Council to explain to their community why they don't want to provide the opportunity for more residents to live close to such great public transport options,' she said.
Shadow Minister for Planning and Housing, Richard Riordan, told news.com.au the government's sweeping overhaul of planning is a huge problem.
'The Liberals and Nationals support increasing housing supply, but we believe it must be done with respect for the distinct character of Melbourne's suburbs,' he said.
'Local councils and communities must continue to have a say in how their neighbourhoods evolve. Change works best when it's shaped by the people who live there.'
He argued the Greensborough project risks repeating the government's 'past planning failures'.
'Just because land sits near a train station doesn't mean it's automatically suitable for high-density towers,' he said.
'Melbourne's suburbs are valued for their unique character; quiet, leafy streets and well-established amenity built over decades. Labor's blanket planning changes risk destroying that fabric, without tackling the real causes of the housing crisis.'
'We got the Liberals hook, line and sinker'
The DFP is not the only lever the Allan Government has pulled to drastically overhaul the planning process.
It also announced late last year the 60 suburbs where it will seize planning controls to increase housing density.
The so-called 'activity centres' include affluent suburbs like South Yarra, Prahran, Windsor and Brighton.
The aim is to build 300,000 homes across the areas but height limits for the areas have not been specified.
Jacinta Allan said it is proof that she is 'a builder, not a blocker'. But Mr Riordan said neighbourhoods would be 'under threat'.
'It's not going to resemble the Melbourne and the city that everyone has loved and has made us one of the most livable cities for a long time,' he said.
During a protest against the plans in the bayside suburb of Brighton last October, local Liberal MP James Newbury said '20-storey apartment' towers would pop up in people's streets.
A Labor MP told The Guardian they were not surprised by the opposition.
'We got the Liberals hook, line and sinker,' the MP said. 'They responded exactly as we expected them to.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Collingwood: ‘The Lamington' pad's red hot auction result
An ultra-cool Collingwood apartment known as the Lamington has smashed expectations after selling for more than $1m on Saturday. The two-bedroom home at 3F/68 Oxford St with red tiles, metals and glass throughout was advertised with a $900,000-$950,000 asking range. Short-listed for an Australian Institute of Architects' interiors award, the warehouse conversion is located within a factory complex that formerly belonged to one of Australia's first department store chains, Foy & Gibson. The apartment's owner commissioned architectural practice Rexroth Mannasmann Collective to transform its shell into an eclectic abode with a wall of tall windows, 3.6m-high steel-trussed ceilings and polished hardwood floorboards. A horizontal red line features on many of the walls including in the open-plan living and dining area is much like a strip of jam inside a lamington – contributing to the apartment's unofficial name. There's also a central pod within the home containing a laundry and bathroom. One of the pod's walls has a flip-top desk and foldaway bed. The residence has been featured in both Vogue Living and the Architectural Review magazines. Jellis Craig inner north partner Simon Shrimpton said a $900,000 bid started the auction as three bidders competed for the 'very cool' apartment. It was placed on the market at $950,000 and ended up fetching $1.025m. 'The apartment sold a young couple from Fitzroy and the underbidders were a couple downsizing from the eastern suburbs,' Mr Shrimpton said. 'The couple who bought were very excited, they were the first to inquire and the first ones through the door at the first open for inspection,' Mr Shrimpton said. 'They were absolutely in love with the place and all the design aspects and nuances it has.' Mr Shrimpton said that for inner Melbourne apartments, well-designed homes with stylish flair tended to attract a lot of interest. 'Bespoke, architecturally-designed apartments are few and far between and when they are offered to the market, buyers will always line up to compete for them,' he added. Also on Saturday, a double-fronted, Victorian-era house at 1 Peel St, Newport, sold for $1.21m. The three-bedroom house, in need of some work including replastering, had a $1.05m reserve. The Agency property partners Leigh Melbourne and Noah Lautman-Wurt had the listing. Mr Melbourne said that a young couple from the western suburbs purchased the property, out of three bidders. 'The bidding was fast and furious,' Mr Melbourne said. He noted that homes at Peel St's bottom end, near The Strand in Williamstown, did not often come up for sale. 'In my 25 years covering the area, it's the second property I have sold down here,' he said. Mr Lautman-Wurt said the auction started with a $1m bid, with a buyer's advocate and family among the underbidders.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Western United given 14 days to pay overdue wages or run risk of losing players
Western United has again been served with breach notices by a host of the A-League club's players over unpaid wages. It's the second time in two months that United has been issued breach notices by disgruntled players, who were also forced to endure late pay in May. United had 14 days from Friday to make the payments. If the club fails to meet the deadline, players will be entitled to leave to the club, regardless of their contract status. A club spokesman said United was in 'constant communication with all players' and was working 'closely with the PFA (Professional Footballers Australia) and the APL (Australian Professional Leagues) to ensure this is addressed in the coming days'. Earlier in the week, United officials had been confident the club's proposed new majority backers – KAM Melbourne – would have paid the players and staff their overdue wages by Friday. A pitch fit for the European champions 😉🤩 The @FIFACWC is underway with the Rose Bowl in perfect condition for @PSG_inside and @atletienglish yesterday thanks to our groundsman, Justin Lang ðŸ'�ðŸ'š — Western United FC (@wufcofficial) June 17, 2025 However, the money wasn't forthcoming, leading some players issuing breach notices via PFA. KAM Melbourne, a subsidiary of KAM Sports, was last month announced as financially embattled United's new controlling stakeholders. However, the deal is yet to be approved by the APL, which runs the A-League. PFA chief executive officer Beau Busch earlier this week said United's players and staff were 'victims of a governance model that is not fit for purpose, and where FA (Football Australia) and the APL appear unwilling to enforce their own regulations'. 'The professionalism of the Western United players and staff in the most trying conditions is a testament to their character and commitment to Australian football,' Busch said. 'The players (have been) left to fight for their most basic entitlement as employees. We will continue to ensure the players have access to the full resources of the PFA.'
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Ray White data reveals house-unit price difference in 15 blue chip suburbs
The dream of living in a blue-chip suburb is still in reach for younger Australians if they're willing to trade in a house for a unit, fresh data from real estate titan Ray White has revealed. While house prices remain at astronomical levels across much of the country's prime real estate, the gap in price between houses and units is wide enough in a host of up-market suburbs to make unit living affordable for first-home buyers. In Melbourne's iconic Hawthorn South, characterised by its vast patchwork of cafes, restaurants, heritage-listed buildings and elegant park spaces, median house prices are at $2.48m, but units are priced at $560,368, a massive $1.92m difference in cost. In Sydney's Homebush, which sits adjacent to the iconic Sydney Markets and Bicentennial Park, houses are priced at $2.24m, while units are priced at $677,393, for a $1.56m gap. Brisbane's riverside Hamilton, adorned with swanky Queenslanders and opulent modernist structures, houses go for $2.26m while units are listed at $717,358. Ray White chief economist Nerida Conisbee told NewsWire apartments offered Australians in their 20s and 30s a chance to live in suburbs with 'better amenity' as houses move beyond reach. 'To get an apartment, you might be closer to good retail precincts, better public transport, closer to your work,' she said. 'Also potentially to family and friends. I think this is one of the challenges a lot of younger people have. 'They may have grown up in an area but when they are looking to buy now, it's really expensive, but in some areas, there are definitely apartments available at a much more affordable price.' Ms Conisbee added solving Australia's affordability crisis would entail a greater shift to apartment living, even as builders continue to pump out four-bedroom homes that exceed the size of many emerging families. 'Australia is very unusual globally in that we have incredibly low densities,' she said. 'If you have a look at every other major city and even much smaller cities, they do have very high levels of high densities. 'We can't provide affordable housing in areas that have incredible amenity if we stick to the big homes in the future.' Every major city shows savings of at least $500,000 with an apartment buy over a house. In Adelaide's Walkerville, a tree-lined inner-north suburb, houses sit at $1.6m, while units are going for $604,328, a saving of nearly a million dollars. In Perth's beachside Mosman Park, houses are priced at $2.51m, while units are priced at $551,561, a near $2m difference. In Darwin's Larrakeyah, houses are $1.45m while units are $440,907. In Canberra's Reid, houses are $2.19m, while units are $617,050. Queensland's glittery Gold Coast, however, shows a smaller gap between house and unit prices compared to other major cities. In Southport, houses are $1.05m, while units are $637,051, for a $410,669 gap. Regional cities in popular coastal locations also present substantial gaps between house and unit prices. In the Sunshine Coast's Buderim suburb, which borders the Maroochydore and Mooloolaba beaches north of Brisbane, houses are priced at $1.3m, while units are going for $732,921. In Port Douglas, a Coral Sea town in Queensland's far north that faces out to the Great Barrier Reef, houses are listed at $1.71m, while units are $490,372.
