Iran's foreign minister meeting European counterparts to seek 'diplomatic solution' with Israel
IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER will meet his British, German and French counterparts in Switzerland today to seek a diplomatic solution to the ongoing conflict with Israel.
Abbas Araghchi will also meet the EU's foreign commissioner, Kaja Kallas, as he seeks to negotiate a settlement before US President Donald Trump decides on whether to take military action against Tehran.
Yesterday,
Trump delayed a decision on whether to join Israeli attacks on Iran
as Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer urged for restraint in the Middle East. The US president said he was still hopeful of reaching a negotiated solution with Tehran.
It comes as missile strikes by Israel and Iran continued overnight, as the conflict enters its second week. Israel's military said it struck a weapons research facility in Tehran overnight and an 'inactive' nuclear reactor in Arak.
Advertisement
Iran's nuclear energy boss condemned the 'barbaric and unlawful' attack on the critical infrastructure, demanding that the UN watchdog intervene. Tehran launched an early attack on Israel this morning, with several air raid sirens heard in the country.
Britain's foreign minister David Lammy met with his American counterpart Marco Rubio in Washington DC yesterday, welcoming the two-week pause on US involvement.
'A window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution,' he said in a statement.
The UN Security Council is also due to convene today for a second session on the conflict, at Iran's request, with support from Russia, China and Pakistan.
Includes reporting by Press Association & AFP News
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
40 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Assisted dying closer to becoming law in England, Wales after vote
Assisted dying is a step closer to being made legal in England and Wales after proposed legislation cleared the House of Commons in a historic vote. A majority of MPs backed a bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives. Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a bill they argued has been rushed through, the proposed legislation took another step in the parliamentary process. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. This means the bill has completed its first stages in the Commons and will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both houses must agree the final text of the bill before it can be signed into law. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 - potentially coinciding with the end of the current British government's parliament - before assisted dying is offered. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Supporters of assisted dying have described the current law as not being fit for purpose, with desperate terminally ill people feeling the need to end their lives in secret or go abroad to Dignitas, a Swiss non-profit organisation providing physician-assisted suicide, alone, for fear loved ones will be prosecuted for helping them. Today was the first time the bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. Labour MP Ms Leadbeater has argued her bill will "correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it". During an hours-long debate today, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. Conservative former minister James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died "painfully" from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue "not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance", and was driven in his opposition by "concerns about the practicalities" of the bill. MPs had a free vote on the bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a YouGov poll published on the eve of the vote. The survey of 2,003 adults in Britain, suggested 73% of those asked last month were supportive of the bill, while the proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle stood at 75%.
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Gaza facing drought
The UN children's agency UNICEF is warning that the Strip is facing a man-made drought - as its water systems collapse amid the ongoing Israeli bombardment. Juliette Touma Communications Director with the UN's Palestinian agency UNWRA joins Paul Cunningham to discuss.
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
The Israel-Iran conflict is splitting Trump's MAGA movement in two
Ted Cruz on Iran. Full interview tomorrow. — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 18, 2025 AS WAR CLOUDS gather over the Middle East and Donald Trump edges closer to authorising military strikes, an objector has emerged from inside his own ranks. Meet the lead dissenting voice: Tucker Carlson. You may have come across footage of a tense exchange this week between two of Trump's most loyal allies – Republican Senator Ted Cruz and right-wing broadcaster Tucker Carlson – clashing over the situation in Israel and Iran. In a fiery interview, Carlson grilled Cruz on why the United States, and Trump in particular, are flirting with the idea of striking Iran in support of Israel. Cruz defended the president, citing biblical obligation and national security threats. Iran, he argued, is 'trying to murder Donald Trump'. Carlson, on the other hand, rejected both the religious framing and the geopolitical justification, labelling the strikes a mistake and warning that Trump's foreign policy credibility hangs in the balance. The exchange revealed a widening schism within the MAGA movement — between those who support Trump's 'America First' pledge to end 'forever wars', and those who see Iran as a pressing threat to US and Israeli security that must be addressed militarily. MAGA civil war? Trump's supporters are no longer unified on foreign policy. At its core, the MAGA divide is over what 'America First' actually means. For some, it's about rejecting foreign entanglements and endless wars. For others, it includes projecting strength abroad and standing by allies like Israel, especially against common enemies like Iran. Trump, who once decried the invasion of Iraq as 'the worst decision ever made,' now flirts with another conflict in the region . 'I may do it, I may not do it,' he said cryptically when asked whether the US would join Israeli efforts to hit Iranian nuclear sites. A destroyed building in Tehran, Iran. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Trump's comments shook his base, exposing a growing divide. On one side are traditional conservatives like Senators Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell, who believe the US must act to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. 'President Trump understands the threat the ayatollah presents to us, not just Israel,' Graham said, voicing confidence that Trump would ultimately side with Israeli forces. On the other side are populist nationalists like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, who see any military action as a betrayal of Trump's promise to avoid foreign wars. 'Anyone slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the Israel-Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Greene wrote on X. 'We are sick and tired of foreign wars.' Even Trump's own vice-president, JD Vance, long sceptical of foreign intervention, has attempted to bridge the gap, insisting that Trump 'is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals.' But the balancing act is proving more difficult as rhetoric escalates and the conflict enters its second week. Advertisement Online MAGA resistance The Trump backlash hasn't been limited to Capitol Hill. Trump's broad online coalition is now fractured, with many influencers who strongly supported the president taking sharply different stances. Tucker Carlson's public opposition drew a rebuke from Trump, who called him 'kooky'. That, in turn, sparked defence from various pro-Trump voices. Right wing content creator Candace Owens called the moment 'unbelievable', arguing that Trump had 'completely fractured his base.' Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones warned that backing war against Iran was 'the stuff nightmares are made of.' Still, some in the MAGA media ecosystem have remained firmly pro-Trump. Far-right influencer Charlie Kirk declared his 'full and complete trust' in Trump's judgement, while activist Laura Loomer reminded followers that 'America First is whatever President Trump says it is.' Others, like Jack Posobiec, have tried to hold the movement together, warning that 'regime change war would break up the MAGA coalition', which he suggested the neoconservatives are counting on. Voters say no to foreign wars US polling reflects the internal disunity. A YouGov/Economist survey found 60% of Americans (including a majority of Trump supporters) oppose US military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. In an Echelon Insights poll, 45% of voters said they supported Israel's strikes on Iran, while 35%were opposed. Asked what role the US should play, only 8% said that they would favour joining Israel in military attacks, while 41% said they want America to stay completely out. The message is clear: Trump's voters are worried about another foreign war. Even Trump's own intelligence chief, Tulsi Gabbard, has voiced caution. In recent congressional testimony, she acknowledged that Iran's uranium enrichment was at a record high, but said there was no evidence they were building a nuclear weapon. She later warned that the 'political elite' was 'carelessly fomenting fear' that risked global catastrophe, a stance which reportedly infuriated Trump. Some Republicans such as Congressman Thomas Massie have even joined with Democrats to try to block any unauthorised military action. 'This is not our war,' Massie posted. 'Congress must decide such matters.' What happens next? For now, the future of US involvement remains uncertain. Trump has insisted that Iran 'cannot have a nuclear weapon,' while hinting at further escalation, posting ominously that the US knows 'exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding.' Whether Trump ultimately strikes or holds back, the political damage may already be done. The Iran-Israel conflict has laid bare ideological tensions in the MAGA movement that have simmered beneath the surface for years. In the words of Carlson: 'What happens next will define Donald Trump's presidency.' Perhaps it will reshape his movement altogether. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
