Effort to transform Colorado politics by 2030 takes shape

The question sounds innocuous: "When you think about having more courageous and representative politics in Colorado, what does that mean to you?"
Yes, but: It's the precursor to much more. The organizers who asked the question just finished a statewide listening tour called Courageous Colorado, the start to an overhaul of the state's elections and campaigns to make them less partisan.
The goal is to implement policy changes at the local or state level by 2030.
The big picture: The effort is the outgrowth of Proposition 131, a failed 2024 campaign to institute all-candidate primaries and ranked choice voting.
Unite for America, a national democracy reform group that pushed Prop. 131, paid in part for the tour, Axios Denver has learned.
The League of Women Voters, CiviCO and Veterans for All Voters, all civic engagement groups, are co-hosts.
Between the lines: A similar statewide listening tour ahead of the 2016 election led to a ballot initiative to roll back the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, known as TABOR.
What they are saying: "We have to also transform the way campaigns are run," Landon Mascareñaz, the lead organizer of the tour told us, lamenting their "divisive nature."
State of play: Courageous Colorado organized 20 town halls across the state through late May to spur the conversation and generate a 2030 agenda.
At each stop, attendees — ranging from a handful to more than a dozen — discussed and ranked their support for 23 pre-generated ideas to boost "courage and representation."
The list included overhauls of campaign finance, civic education, a citizens' assembly, minor party ballot access, term limits and new methods of voting.
The top ideas from the tour, Mascareñaz says, were campaign finance reform, better civic education, open political primaries, ranked choice voting and term limits for local leaders.
Inside the room: The stop in Boulder drew 10 people. Mascareñaz started the hourlong conversation by outlining how representation is short-cut in Colorado because of noncompetitive seats in the state Legislature and Congress — a parallel talking point from the Prop. 131 campaign.
Attendees expressed cynicism about the ability to change the status quo, but Mascareñaz urged them to stay engaged. "We didn't get into this challenge overnight. We're not going to solve it in one listening session," he said.
What's next: This week, organizers are hosting a retreat in Leadville for advocacy groups to evaluate the data from the listening tour and consider a path forward.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

2 days ago

• Yahoo

2026 Election: Here's who's running for governor in Arizona

PHOENIX - 2026's election season may seem far away, but some have already started to lay the groundwork for a gubernatorial run, in what could be a tight race. Here's what to know. Arizona is required to hold a gubernatorial election in 2026, due to the state's constitution. Dig deeper Under Arizona's constitution, the state's executive offices, including the Governor, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction, serve four-year terms beginning in January 1971, following the regular general election that happened months prior, in 1970. Katie Hobbs has been the state's governor since 2023. She took office after she won the November 2022 election against her Republican opponent, Kari Lake. What's next As a result of Proposition 131, which was approved by voters in 2022, a gubernatorial candidate will select a running mate as lieutenant governor, and the two will be elected on a joint ticket. Prior to the passage of Proposition 131, Arizona's Secretary of State would have succeeded as governor in the event of a governor's death, incapacitation, or removal from office. A number of candidates have expressed their intent to run for the state's top office. What we know Per the Arizona Secretary of State's website, as of June 3, 2025, there are 15 people who have filed Statements of Interest to run for governor. They include: Saint Omer "Captain" Kakou Lisa Castillo Risa Lombardo William Pounds IV Barry Hess Christopher Ames Andy Biggs Isiah Gallegos Christian "Maverick" Grey Robert McVeigh Donald Mucheck Scott Neely George Nicholson Karrin Taylor Robson Alan White It is important to note that, according to the Secretary of State's Office, filing a Statement of Interest only indicates a person is collecting petition signatures for a possible nomination. It is not a formal candidacy declaration because it requires the filing of a nomination paper. A number of politicians have announced their decision to not run for governor, and that includes Kari Lake, who last ran for governor in 2022. According to a report by Iowa-based newspaper Des Moines Register, a spokesperson for Lake confirmed that she is not running for office, amid speculation she will run Iowa's governor seat. Another person previously deemed as a potential gubernatorial candidate is Adrian Fontes. According to a Washington Post article in December 2024, Fontes previously considered challenging Hobbs in the primary, but he has opted to run for re-election as Secretary of State instead. What we know Hobbs has yet to make any official announcements on whether she will run for a second term. However, she is eligible for re-election under Arizona's constitution. Local perspective On April 22, 2025, Fox News reported that President Donald Trump has endorsed both Karrin Taylor Robson and Andy Biggs' respective campaigns for governor. In a post on TruthSocial, President Trump called both Taylor Robson and Biggs "fantastic candidates" and "terrific people." "Either one will never let you down," Trump wrote. On his social media page, Biggs said he has also received the endorsement of Charlie Kirk. A 2021 article by the Associated Press describes Kirk as a "conservative provocateur" and the leader of the group Turning Point USA. The Primary According to figures from a poll conducted from May 12 to May 16, 2025, by Noble Predictive Insights, 24% of those surveyed support Taylor Robson in a four-way hypothetical primary that includes Biggs, Kirk, and incumbent State Treasurer Kimberly Yee. In that same poll, Biggs had 17% support, while 37% of those surveyed say they are not sure as to who they will support. As noted above, Kirk has endorsed Biggs' campaign. Meanwhile, Yee has opted to run instead for the GOP's nomination as Superintendent of Public Instruction. Officials with Noble Predictive Insights said due to Biggs' and Kirk's "shared ideological profile and overlapping favorability ratings among GOP voters," it is likely that some who support Kirk will rally around Biggs, going on to say that it is possible for Biggs to displace Taylor Robson and become the new front runner in the primary. The poll's margin of error is +/- 4.76%, involving a sample of 1,026 registered Arizona voters. The General Election Figures from the same Noble Predictive Insights poll show a tight race for Gov. Hobbs, with the incumbent Governor polling at 41% against Taylor Robson's 39%, and polling at 40% against Biggs, who was at 38%. In both hypothetical match-ups, 17% of those surveyed said they are unsure as to who they will support. This poll's margin of error is +/- 3.06%, involving a sample of 1,026 registered Arizona voters.

USA Today

4 days ago

• USA Today

I've been marching for immigrants' rights since I was a child. I won't stop now.

I've been marching for immigrants' rights since I was a child. I won't stop now. | Opinion Los Angeles holds the moral consciousness of a divided nation. As the demonstrations continue and spread to other cities, let us be clear-eyed on who and what we are fighting for. Show Caption Hide Caption Protesters defy curfew order from LA mayor, police make mass arrests In an effort to curb vandalism and looting, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass announced a curfew for parts of downtown Los Angeles. Recent ICE raids in Los Angeles are unprecedented in their cruelty, targeting vulnerable immigrant communities. The deployment of the National Guard and Marines in response to peaceful protests against the raids is highly unusual. The handcuffing of Sen. Alex Padilla for questioning the administration's immigration policies highlights the escalating tension. Increased funding for immigration enforcement and potential changes to the census raise concerns about the future of immigrant rights. I was 6 years old when I first marched for immigrant rights in downtown Los Angeles. It was 1994, and then-California Gov. Pete Wilson was seeking reelection. To hold onto power, he championed the passage of Proposition 187, a ballot initiative that sought to deny social services to undocumented individuals and made the immigrant community his political scapegoat. Marching alongside immigrant families, I learned at an early age what it meant to petition one's government. Prop. 187 passed but was later ruled unconstitutional by the courts. What resulted thereafter was one of the greatest demonstrations of Latino civic engagement in American history that transformed the state's political makeup still felt to this day. ICE raids in Los Angeles show a new level of cruelty More than 30 years later, I was back on the streets of my city advocating once again for immigrants. Since early June, I have joined seniors, children, priests and others peacefully calling for an end to the latest indiscriminate raids conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Opinion: My hometown of LA has right to be angry as Trump sends in the Marines While raids of our immigrant communities are regrettably nothing new, what has transpired recently is unprecedented in its cruelty. We must call on the American public to ask itself what it will do while the demonstrations run their purpose and course. The examples are striking: When nearly 1 in 10 of our county's residents are undocumented, chances are we know someone without legal status because they attend our schools, work in our small businesses and contribute to our state and local tax base. We can begin by mobilizing financial resources to the immigrant-serving organizations supporting impacted families. There is a tremendous need to provide legal services, as many detained immigrants are already facing deportation without representation and due process. The president's recent call to expand deportations, especially in Los Angeles, underscores the importance of these resources. There is also an urgent need to closely monitor the developments of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, President Donald Trump's signature tax cut initiative. One of the provisions in the bill is to significantly increase resources for immigration enforcement, including an additional $75 billion over four years for immigrant detention and deportation. Opinion: From massive protests to a puny parade, America really let Donald Trump down President Trump is moving too far on immigration Public opinion polling is quickly making clear, especially among nearly two-thirds of Latinos, that Trump is moving too far on immigration. And 86% of Latino voters want a humane approach to immigration policy that includes a pathway to citizenship. Then there are the actions on the horizon that will decide if the events in Los Angeles can translate into long-term political change. At stake during the 2026 midterm elections and beyond is the control of the U.S. House of Representatives, key U.S. Senate races in Georgia and Texas, and governorships in places like Arizona and Nevada. Our votes can decide the leaders who hold these offices, and whether they will support or oppose the immigration policies of the remaining years of this president's administration. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. A political tilt may appear inevitable given the current political climate, but it is not guaranteed. Latino outreach and the case for voter participation remain a perennial challenge in American politics. During the 2024 presidential election, for example, 45% of Latinos reported no contact from any political party. Finally, preparations for the next decennial census, a constitutionally mandated process that aims to count all people in our nation regardless of their status, are already underway, and we must stay vigilant. Lawmakers are already attempting to add a citizenship question to the next census. If successful, immigrants will be dissuaded from participating for fear of being targeted, and the resulting undercount will cause us to lose our rights to political representation and federal resources for our communities. Los Angeles holds the moral consciousness of a divided nation. As the demonstrations continue and spread to other cities, let us be clear-eyed on who and what we are fighting for: dignity for the least among us and the defense of our democracy for all. What we choose to do now for them, as I did as a 6-year-old boy, will impact us and our country for generations to come. Christian Arana is the vice president of Civic Power and Policy at the Latino Community Foundation in Los Angeles.

Axios

5 days ago

• Axios

Direct democracy ballot reform push launches in Arkansas

Organizers of a proposed amendment to the Arkansas Constitution kicked off their petition signing campaign in Fayetteville on Friday. Why it matters: The measure, backed by Arkansas' League of Women Voters and Save AR Democracy, seeks to require a statewide vote before changing Arkansas' direct democracy process. It would also streamline legal reviews and prohibit the state Legislature from amending or repealing constitutional amendments. The big picture: Arkansas voters can change or reject laws enacted by the state Legislature through a citizen-initiated ballot process. Changes can be in the form of a proposed ballot initiative as a state statute (a change to a law) or a constitutional amendment (a more significant change to the state's constitution). They may also repeal legislation with a veto referendum. Yes, but: In recent years, lawmakers have made the process more difficult, passing laws that riddle it with technicalities and all but require a group to be well funded to gather petition signatures. State of play: The amendment's key provisions include: Prohibiting the General Assembly from amending a voter-approved constitutional amendment. Limiting challenges to the state Supreme Court to 45 days after the attorney general's office approves the language of ballot titles, and preventing challenges after signatures have been collected. Ensuring the names and titles of referendums align with those assigned by the General Assembly to the laws they seek to repeal. Requiring separate votes on legislation and its emergency clause, with at least 24 hours between. Barring the General Assembly from proposing amendments to the direct democracy process to voters, ensuring the people of the state initiate the process. Allowing canvassers to submit signatures under penalty of perjury, eliminating the need for notarization, streamlining the process.