Government supports all green mobility, says heavy industries minister Kumaraswamy
New Delhi: Union heavy industries and steel minister H.D. Kumaraswamy has weighed in on the automotive industry's concerns about state governments equating hybrid and electric car incentives, stating that the government continues to support all clean fuel for automobiles.
He said the government has incentivized hybrid cars under subsidy schemes such as FAME II, and hybrid ambulances under PM E-drive. In addition, under the PLI-Auto scheme, the government supports all kinds of fuels besides EVs, including CNG, LNG and biofuels.
"Under the FAME-II Scheme, EV (electric vehicles) and hybrid version of e-4W was allowed for incentivization. Similarly, in case of PM E-drive scheme, a hybrid version of e-ambulances, that is, electric plug-in hybrid & strong hybrid shall be incentivized," said Kumaraswamy in an email interview with Mint.
Also read: Ola Electric's founder Bhavish Aggarwal pays ₹20 crore to top up collateral as shares slide
"Further, besides EV, the government supports all kind of fuels viz. CNG, LNG, and bio-fuels under the PLI Auto Scheme," he added.
FAME, or Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric (and Hybrid) vehicles scheme, ran for two iterations from FY15 to FY19, and from FY20 to FY24. Currently, the PM E-drive scheme has replaced the FAME schemes. Under all these schemes, consumers could purchase electric vehicles at a subsidized price. The government then reimbursed manufacturers the difference.
PLI-Auto is a ₹25,938-crore production-linked incentive scheme for automobiles and automotive components, announced in 2021. It provides incentives to automakers to manufacture vehicles that run on green fuel.
Mint reported on 29 May that leading electric car makers Tata Motors Ltd, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd and Hyundai Motor India Ltd are up in arms over the Delhi government's draft paper proposing equal incentives for hybrid cars and electric vehicles.
On the issue of supply disruptions of rare earth magnets from China, the minister said the automotive industry has sought help from MHI, and that "MHI and the government of India" are actively working with industry stakeholders to understand the issue and find solutions.
Kumaraswamy also said battery makers in the country have faced hurdles in meeting timelines under the production-linked incentive scheme for advanced chemical cells (PLI-ACC) due to unavailability of technology, skilled manpower, and upstream components, besides challenges in importing essential equipment and machinery. He clarified however, that by 2030, India will have indigenous ACC capacity of over 100 gigawatt-hours.
Also read: Rahul Jacob: Manufacturing is crying out for a reality check
"However, with support and hand holding M/s Ola Cell Technologies Private Limited (OCTPL) has reported successful installation of 1.4 GWh capacity," said the union minister. "Apart from the PLI beneficiary firms more than 10 companies have already started setting up cell manufacturing unit for more than 100 GWh capacity," he added.
The problem echoes similar challenges faced by India's PLI scheme for solar modules, as Mint reported on Monday.
The ₹18,100-crore PLI-ACC scheme was introduced in May 2021 to incentivize setting up of 50 gigawatt-hours of battery storage capacity. Three companies -- Rajesh Exports Ltd, Ola Electric Mobility Ltd, and Reliance Industries Ltd -- have been awarded 40 gigawatt-hour of storage capacity till date. This means the companies will receive benefits to set up every unit of battery capacity.
Indian manufacturers are capitalizing on the heightened demand for cell components like Cathode active materials, Anode active material, aluminium and copper foils, with many companies setting up component manufacturing units in India to achieve higher value addition and strengthen supply chains.
The ministry of heavy industries, which is also the nodal ministry for the PLI-Auto scheme, is expecting claims worth about ₹2,000 crore from the industry in FY26.
Under the scheme, manufacturers have to claim incentives for the sales of zero-emission vehicles or other eligible components achieved in a fiscal year, in the following year. For instance, benefits for FY25 sales under the PLI-Auto scheme will be claimed and disbursed in FY26.
Also read: India bulks up its drugs PLI scheme in renewed pushback against Chinese imports
The expectation for FY26 claims come after a disbursal of ₹322 crore in FY25 to four manufacturers. This time, the minister said the government was expecting nine manufacturers to claim incentives under the PLI-Auto scheme.
"Disbursal of incentive under PLI Auto is expected to increase over the years as the number of applicants achieving DVA certification increases as applicants are able to achieve localization as per scheme guidelines. Further, the applicants are expected to achieve DVA certification for more number of AAT products and variants. As more number of OEMs are likely to achieve DVA under the scheme in the coming years, the disbursal will rise in coming years," said Kumaraswamy.
In FY26, state-run Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL) will aim to increase its revenue by 20-25% and double it's profits on the back of its existing orderbook of Vande Bharat trains, navy gun mounts, transmission lines, coal gasification projects, and boilers, the minister said.
"In the current fiscal, BHEL is focused on consolidating project execution before expanding into newer domains," said the minister. 'We want BHEL to focus on delivery discipline first. Diversification into non-power sectors rail transport, defence systems, transmission and coal gasification will continue, and in some years, will contribute significant percentage of revenue."
BHEL is also set to become the nodal agency for demand aggregation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and will develop an application to facilitate charging services, Mint reported on 21 May.
On 2 June, the ministry notified the guidelines for the scheme to promote the manufacturing of electric passenger cars in India (SPMEPCI), which was launched in March 2024. The scheme allows foreign electric carmakers to import completely built-up units of their vehicles at a reduced import duty, in exchange for investing at least ₹4,150 crore towards manufacturing electric cars in India. They will be allowed to import 8,000 cars every year for five years at an import duty of 15%, as opposed to the 70% levy on imports otherwise.
But electric carmakers have to achieve localization of 25% in three years, and 50% localization in five years to qualify for benefits under the scheme. Investments also have to be made in plant and machinery, electric vehicle charging systems, or research and development.
American electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc. has not shown interest in the scheme yet, Kumaraswamy had said on 2 June in a press conference. But other manufacturers including Mercedes Benz, Hyundai, Kia, and Skoda-Volkswagen had shown interest in the scheme, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Investors shift to European markets as Trump tariffs, economic data fuel uncertainty in US stocks, says LGT's Advani
For over a decade, the US market and growth stocks have dominated most portfolios, with the magnificent 7 stocks giving outsized returns to investors. However, the US is currently facing a confluence of challenges and there has been broad weakness in US assets, as equities, bonds and the US dollar have weakened this year. Tariff-induced inflation, fiscal imbalances, and signs of labor market cooling are contributing to an environment of heightened uncertainty and instability. With this backdrop, investors have started to look beyond the US, with Europe seeming like a preferred market for multiple reasons. The valuation of European equities remains undemanding, even after the run up this year. Governments are ramping up spending on infrastructure and defence, and this fiscal regime shift should benefit companies in construction and materials, real estate, telecom and utilities. Germany has taken a lead in fiscal stimulus by announcing a EUR 500 billion spend to bolster national security, infrastructure development and green transition. This could spread further across Europe. De-escalation of US-China trade tensions is a positive for Europe which has significant exposure to both US and China. European banks have strengthened their capital bases due to robust earnings in recent years, and are well-positioned to navigate the recalibrating European economy. Likewise, European insurance companies maintain stable income streams and strong solvency ratios. This offers substantial buffer to mitigate potential impacts from geopolitical uncertainties. The strengthening fundamentals of European regions demonstrated through Q1 company earnings beat (57% of the companies reported earnings beats, the fifth straight quarter of above long-term average proportion of beats) also support the investment case for European equities. While EPS revisions have faced pressure due to trade policy uncertainties and global macroeconomic concerns, the trend appears to stabilize as tensions ease. The European Central Bank has cut interest rates 8 times in a year, acknowledging that inflation is in control and within reach of it's 2% target. The Euro has strengthened over 10% against the dollar this year and is close to a 3-year high, signalling optimism toward the European economy. In conclusion, renewed interest in European equities is being driven by both domestic and international capital flows, signalling growing confidence in the region's prospects. Additionally, international investors are diversifying away from US assets due to factors like policy uncertainty and tariff risks, further boosting capital inflows into European markets. The author, Nikhil Advani, is the Managing Director of International Business at LGT Wealth India. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making investment decisions.
Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
After assembling 99% of its phones, India faces a harder manufacturing test
New Delhi: Over the past decade, India's electronics manufacturing sector has been defined by one thing: the mobile phone. From 2014 to 2024, the country went from assembling less than 30% of the phones it consumed to 99%, thanks largely to the ₹1.9 trillion Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme. According to the ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY), the value of India's electronics production rose nearly fivefold to ₹9.5 trillion in 2023-24, from ₹1.9 trillion in 2014-15. Yet, for all the triumph in scale, for India to emerge as a global manufacturing powerhouse, it has to go beyond smartphones and also break free from its role as an assembly shop. To make mobile phones, electronic manufacturing services (EMS—or contract manufacturers) companies depend on imports of key components, including cameras, displays, high-end battery packs, semiconductors, and printed circuit boards (PCBs). Even other electronic products—smart TVs, CCTV cameras, computers, wearables, and hearables—are assembled from imported components. If product assembly is about managing global supply chains and focuses on integration and system level performance, 'manufacturing of components involves deeper scientific and engineering complexity," says Vinod Sharma, chairman of the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII)'s National Committee on Electronics Manufacturing. PLI boost Components are the DNA of electronics. However, the components that go into electronic goods in India are still largely sourced from China, Korea, and Taiwan. 'Even now, 85–90% of the electronics component value is imported," says a MeitY report. In 2023, only $15 billion of India's $101 billion electronics output came from components, the report noted. 'Without component manufacturing, there is no ecosystem. You can't make a product unless you can source the heart of it locally. Otherwise, you're just screwing parts together," says Sanjiv Narayan, co-founder of Syrma SGS Technology, a three-decade-old electronics manufacturing company. The ₹3,700 crore company, which exports 30% of its production, has 13 factories manufacturing electronics, automotive, telecom, and industrial electronics products, among others. In an effort to incentivize component manufacturers and boost localization, the government launched a ₹22,919-crore Electronics Component Manufacturing Scheme (ECMS) in April. The last date for companies to apply for benefits under the scheme is 31 July. ECMS will run for six years, from 2025-26 to 2031-32. It offers incentives for the manufacture of various components, including camera modules, displays, and multi-layer PCBs. As CII's Sharma put it, 'Components of components need to be there. The components policy is trying to address this issue by giving incentives for creation of the local ecosystem." Indeed, in a release announcing the launch, MeitY stated: 'The scheme aims to develop a robust component ecosystem by attracting large investments (global/domestic) in the electronics component manufacturing ecosystem, increasing domestic value addition by developing capacity and capabilities, and integrating Indian companies with global value chains." ECMS envisages attracting investments to the tune of ₹59,350 crore, generating production worth ₹4.5 trillion and creating additional direct employment for 91,600, as well as many indirect jobs. It has already received 70 applications— 80% from small and mid-sized players. According to reports, large companies such as Tata Electronics, Foxconn and Dixon Technologies are among the applicants. Queries sent to MeitY are yet to elicit a response. The scheme could provide the missing piece for expansion beyond smartphones. If implemented effectively, it will help build domestic supply chains for crucial components—an essential step in reducing dependence on imports. While the new PLI scheme has a long list of components, India does not have expertise in all of these. Initially, it will go with electro-mechanical components such as relays, switches, fuses and capacitors, for which manufacturing is already happening locally. These are the low-hanging fruit that Indian manufacturers can go after immediately. There is local expertise in parts such as camera modules and the industry will have to bank on collaborations, or global manufacturers might set up base here to make these. Interestingly, back in the 1980s India had a thriving components hub, with up to 80% of the black & white TVs sold in the country manufactured with locally sourced components. But later, with technology shifts, limited scale and zero import duty on components, the ecosystem for electronic parts died an early death. Engineering complexity For all the ambition, manufacturing components is a complex business, vastly different from assembling electronic products such as smartphones. The latter is akin to putting together 400-500 components, including cameras, sensors, a battery, memory, integrated circuits, and other parts to make a fully functional device. While all of that may seem complicated, assembling a smartphone is like a walk in the park compared to making components. To put that in context, each of the 500 or so components in a smartphone has multiple components within them. 'A manufacturer of components is dealing with far more complexity than someone who is assembling those components," says Narayan. 'It is foundational engineering. Making components requires advanced materials science capabilities, highly specialized machinery, precision control at nanometer scales." For instance, making advanced batteries needs understanding of complex battery chemistry, rare materials and very precise manufacturing. 'Right now, India is building the research, deep tech ecosystem and infrastructure needed for this level of manufacturing. As these areas grow, we have a strong opportunity to reduce our reliance on other countries," says Varun Gupta, co-founder of Boult. The company designs, develops and manufactures wireless earbuds, headphones, smartwatches and speakers, among other electronic gear. Each component is a mini-system in itself. Take for instance, the multilayer ceramic chip capacitor (MLCC) energy storage device. Its size varies widely for different applications, ranging from ultra-miniature (0.25 x 0.125 mm) to large (5.7 x 5.0 mm). The ultra-miniature MLCC, which is used in space constrained applications such as smartphones, hearables, wearables, etc., is manufactured by stacking alternating layers of ceramic dielectric material (insulator) and metallic electrodes, then sintering and applying external terminations. This process involves creating 50-100 thin ceramic sheets, printing electrode patterns on them, stacking the sheets, and then firing the stack at high temperatures to create a solid, monolithic structure that ranges in size from a few grains of rice to about a fingernail. Again, companies making camera modules for smartphones will need local supplies of image sensors, lens, infrared filters, digital signal processors (to convert images into digital format, etc.) The global market for camera modules was $43.3 billion in 2023 and is expected to be $68.5 billion in 2028, according to Markets and Markets. South Korea's LGInnotek, and China's OFILM and Sunny Optical Technology are among the large global manufacturers of camera modules. The skills needed for assembly-line operations and manufacturing components are also different. A diploma holder or electronics/mechanical engineer will be ready for assembly operations after about 30 days of training. For component manufacturing, the same talent will have to be trained for up to six months to become familiar with additional manufacturing lines, industrial gases, contamination control, temperature, pressure and working in dust free, ultra-clean environments, among myriad things. Smartphone-centric assembly EMS in India has largely been mobile phone-centric," says CII's Sharma. 'It's like a 4x400 relay race—we've run the first lap, but the remaining three are even more critical." The first leg of India's relay was defined by contract manufacturing of smartphones. Companies such as Foxconn, Wistron, Dixon, and others became the backend for Apple, Xiaomi, OnePlus, RealMe and other brands, while Samsung also scaled up, setting up a large smartphone factory in Noida. PLI-led manufacturing—where the government gives sops between 4-6% on incremental sales—not only made the country self-reliant (largely in smartphones) but also helped scale up local makers such as Dixon Technologies, Optiemus Infracom, Syrma SGS Technology. It also attracted global companies, including iPhone makers Foxconn and Pegatron, and electronic components makers Jabil Circuit and others. But assembly is not manufacturing, and setting up a component ecosystem will help address that lacuna. 'Our value addition in electronics is only 10–15%," says Saurabh Agarwal, tax partner and manufacturing practice lead at EY India. 'It shows that because of PLI, India is among the largest assemblers of phones in the world. But a lot needs to be done to increase local value addition. A lot of critical components are being imported." Also, unlike in smartphones, in the non-mobile categories, which include televisions, air conditioners (ACs), washing machines, IT hardware, and industrial electronics, the volumes are way less compared to what China does and hence makers can't derive economies of scale. In smartphones, India has a better record with around 300 million units being made (read: assembled) and Apple also ramping up production here. However, India still heavily relies on imports for products such as laptops, desktops, other IT hardware and key parts of TVs and washing machines. 'IT hardware players didn't have to make in India to sell in India as import duties were nil to low. Laptop and desktop companies weren't in the same predicament as phone makers like Apple or Samsung," says CII's Sharma. Made in India? CII's Sharma sees design as the third lap of India's EMS relay—and the most ignored. 'You can't build a brand without design. And unless Indian companies invest in original product and component design, we'll never have a Samsung or a Panasonic," he says. This view is echoed by Gupta of Boult. The company reported revenue of ₹3 crore in 2017, its first year, and in 2024-25, clocked ₹750 crore. For manufacturing, it relies on imports of key parts such as chips, drivers, and LED screens. 'We've set up our own SMT (surface mount technology, which embeds chips on a printed circuit board) lines and source plastics and packaging domestically," says Gupta. 'But core manufacturing still depends on global suppliers," he adds. The final lap, CII's Sharma believes, is about building brands. And here, India has stumbled repeatedly. One of the reasons often cited by the industry is lack of volumes. Local brands cannot compete with cheaper imports and are forced out. Though, this is changing in some areas, like ACs. India now makes 22-25 million ACs a year, up from 9-10 million a decade back. China is still the global AC hub with 90 million units, India now has the volumes, which justifies making PCBs for AC inverter controllers, which are currently imported from China. One way to create economies of scale is to collaborate rather than compete. For example, Ashok Gupta, chairman of Optiemus Infracom, argues that India lacks a 'we' culture. 'Instead of collaborating, Indian brands tried to go solo. Without economies of scale, they couldn't survive. The government gave us the PLI cherry. But industry players didn't work together to build the cake," says Gupta. Optiemus has four factories in Noida and makes drones, wearables, hearables, and telecom gear, among other products. It now manufactures for brands such as Realme, Noise, and Boat. EY India's Agarwal points out that companies can scale up from assembly to brands once they have the know-how. For instance, when Intel set up its factory in Taiwan back in the 1980s, local company TSMC benefited and today it is the largest contract manufacturer of chips in the world. New opportunities India's next challenge lies in building a broader industrial base. Companies such as Syrma SGS, Boult and Optiemus are positioning themselves to tap new opportunities in telecom, automotive, and medical devices. Even Lenovo, a Chinese company, has expanded its Puducherry facility to accommodate server manufacturing—an indication that India's next manufacturing chapter is beginning to take shape. But experts warn against over-reliance on incentive schemes. 'Your business model must be viable on its own," Optiemus' Gupta says. 'We have passed the first baton," CII's Sharma says, referring to his relay analogy. 'If we fumble the next stages—building components, design, and brands—we'll never win the race."
Mint
7 hours ago
- Mint
RBI's rate cut may not bring immediate EMI relief for all borrowers
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has cut the repo rate by 50 basis points (bps) and the cash reserve ratio (CRR) by 100 bps, raising hopes among borrowers of lower EMIs. But rate cuts by the central bank don't automatically translate into immediate relief for all loan categories. The actual transmission, whether faster, slower, or none at all, will depend on multiple factors, including the type of loan, when it was taken, the lending institution, and the benchmark it is linked to. Fixed or floating: the nature of your loan matters Certain loan categories — particularly personal loans and credit card debt — are typically offered at fixed interest rates. The rate set at the time of disbursement remains unchanged through the tenure of the loan, regardless of RBI's policy moves. Read this | Mint Explainer: RBI cuts repo rate by 50 bps. How will it impact lenders and borrowers? 'Most lenders offer loans in these categories as fixed-rate loans. Then there are categories, which are more of a mixed bag. For example, loans such as car loans and loans against securities," said Adhil Shetty, chief executive officer of BankBazaar. To be sure, some public sector banks even offer personal loans with a floating rate option. When it comes to car loans or loans against securities, the interest rate may be fixed or floating. If floating, these are linked either to internal or external benchmarks set by the banks. Since 1 October 2019, all new floating-rate loans must be linked to external benchmarks. However, older loans are often tied to internal benchmarks. According to RBI's Annual Report 2024-25, 35.9% of floating-rate loans are still linked to the marginal cost of funds-based lending rate (MCLR), an internal this: How you can get a loan against an insurance policy Home loans are predominantly floating-rate products, while fixed-rate options are also available. Borrowers who took home loans after October 2019 are generally linked to external benchmarks, while older loans may still be tied to MCLR. This distinction is crucial in determining how quickly borrowers benefit from the RBI's latest repo cut. MCLR vs EBLR: how your benchmark affects transmission For loans linked to MCLR, the transmission is typically delayed due to reset cycles, which may occur annually or half-yearly depending on the bank. Even though the RBI provides the formula for calculating MCLR, banks apply their own internal cost structures to arrive at their minimum lending rates. 'While the formula for calculating MCLR is given by the RBI, it is an internal benchmark, which means it will vary across banks. Banks will use their internal costs and calculation of risks to decide their minimum lending rate under MCLR framework. The variables include cost of funds for the banks (deposits), other borrowings, return on net worth, operating costs, tenor premium (longer loan tenor would mean higher risk premium) and negative carry from RBI's cash reserve ratio," explained Joydeep Sen, corporate trainer and author. The CRR, the percentage of deposits banks are required to maintain with the RBI, results in negative carry because these funds typically earn lower returns. Banks are allowed to factor this into their MCLR calculations. By contrast, loans under the external benchmark lending rate (EBLR) regime, most commonly linked to RBI's repo rate, usually see faster transmission. The repo-linked lending rate (RLLR) adjusts more swiftly, typically on a quarterly reset this: How you can get loan against mutual funds without breaking it As the repo-linked lending rate (RLLR) is directly linked to RBI's repo rate, it will usually lead to full quantum of repo cut getting passed onto the borrowers and the transmission is likely to happen faster as the EBLR framework follows quarterly reset cycle. NBFC loans: more flexibility, less transmission certainty For borrowers with loans from non-bank financial companies (NBFCs), the picture is more complex. While NBFCs are regulated by RBI, they are not mandated to follow the benchmark frameworks applicable to banks. 'NBFCs have their internal models to determine their base rates. These rates are influenced by factors such as cost of funds, overhead costs and asset-liability mismatches," pointed out Jagadeesh Mohan, founder of EMI Saver and former PhonePe executive. For NBFCs, assets are the loans they have extended, and liabilities are funds borrowed from banks, debt markets, or depositors. Asset-liability mismatches occur when most borrowings are of short tenure, while loans extended have longer tenures. Also read: How stock market investors can use liquid ETFs to manage cash Additionally, NBFCs can set their own reset frequencies. Existing borrowers may not necessarily benefit from RBI's repo cut, or the impact may be limited depending on the lender's funding costs, competition, and business strategy. 'NBFCs with better credit ratings might be better placed to pass on the benefits of RBI's repo cut due to the lower cost of raising funds on account of their credit rating and better access to funds through their distribution channel," said Abhishek Kumar, a registered investment advisor and founder of SahajMoney.
