Soviet-Era Spacecraft To Reenter Earth After 53 Years In Orbit: Report
A former Soviet spacecraft is predicted to crash back to Earth this week. Weighing approximately 453 kg, Kosmos 482 will reenter the planet's atmosphere around May 10, CNN reported.
Launched in 1972, Kosmos 482 malfunctioned on its way to Venus. An issue with a timer resulted in an early engine shutdown, trapping the Soviet spacecraft in Earth's orbit for over half a century.
With the aircraft now set to crash down, scientists are unsure which part of it will reenter the Earth. Some think it will be the probe, also known as the "entry capsule."
The majority of space debris and meteors, which frequently veer toward a crash-landing on Earth, break apart due to friction and pressure as they strike the planet's dense atmosphere while travelling thousands of miles per hour.
Cosmos 482, being a Soviet reentry capsule, is expected to be equipped with a substantial heat shield. It was designed to survive the extreme temperature and pressure of landing on Venus.
The spacecraft "might well survive Earth atmosphere entry and hit the ground," wrote Dr. Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist and astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, on his website.
He added, "The risk of the object hitting people on the ground is likely minimal, and there's no need for major concern, but you wouldn't want it bashing you on the head."
According to scientists, Cosmos 482 may land within 52 degrees north or south of the equator. Even if the area contains a large portion of the ocean, entire countries are still vulnerable to an uncontrolled spacecraft crashing down on their territory.
Since a lot of the Earth is covered by oceans, scientists are optimistic that it will land in water. However, no one is certain about it.
If Cosmos 482 hits dry land, it's important that onlookers avoid touching the debris. Dangerous fuel leaks or other damage to humans and property might occur from the outdated spaceship.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
19 hours ago
- India.com
These four countries can fight wars in space, destroyed their own satellites because..., the countries are...
These four countries can fight wars in space, destroyed their own satellites because…, the countries are.... With technology dominating future warfare, future wars are not limited to Earth but have extended to space. Yes, you read that right. In the future, wars will be fought in space too—and that too with high-tech weapons. Space is not just a place for research; it has now become a whole new battlefield where high-tech weapons are going to decide the fate of countries. Some countries have already prepared themselves for war in space. These countries are not only deploying military satellites in space but have also acquired the capability to destroy enemy satellites. So, let us know about those four countries that have the power to fight a war in space. US Tops The List The United States has developed anti-satellite (ASAT) missile technology to step ahead in the future warfare. In 1985, US destroyed its own satellite by firing a missile from an F-15 fighter jet as part of an experiment. Not only that, America also has largest network of GPS, surveillance and spy satellites orbiting our planet. Don't Underestimate The Power Of Russia Following United States, Russia holds the second position in space capabilities. Russia's long history of space exploration, dating back to the Soviet era, includes numerous, and sometimes clandestine, missions and anti-satellite weapon tests since 2007. A 2021 incident, where Russia allegedly destroyed a satellite with a missile, generating a significant amount of space debris, raised international concern, including from the United States. China Also Has A Home In The Skies China is also in the race and is working on increasing its power rapidly. The country showcased its prowess in space in the year 2007, by successfully destroying one of its inactive weather satellites. The Dragon destroyed the inactive weather satellite with specially designed anti-satellite missile. The test made headlines across the world as it created a big problem of space debris. Currently, Beijing regularly launches military satellites in space. India Showed Its Strength India's significant advancements in space technology, particularly the successful 2019 anti-satellite missile test under Mission Shakti, demonstrate its rapidly growing space power and capabilities in space defence. This achievement positions India among the leading nations in this field.
Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
'Humans were never built to run': Harvard professor says walking beats workouts for a longer, healthier life
Renowned evolutionary biologist Daniel E. Lieberman , a professor at Harvard University , is turning heads — and slowing down treadmills — with his thought-provoking book Exercised . The core message? Contrary to popular belief, humans didn't evolve to run marathons or grind through intense workouts. Instead, our ancestors spent far more time sitting, walking, and conserving energy than sprinting or strength training. Speaking on the High Performance podcast, Lieberman debunks the modern fitness myth : 'We have to do this weird thing called exercise, which is voluntary physical activity for the sake of health and fitness — something nobody did until very recently.' — SandeepMall (@SandeepMall) Evolution Didn't Design Athletes — It Designed Survivors Lieberman explains that while physical activity is crucial, the kind we idolize today is historically unnatural. Our ancient relatives only moved as much as survival demanded — usually through moderate walking, hunting, gathering, or building shelter. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Semua yang Perlu Anda Ketahui Tentang Limfoma Limfoma Pelajari Undo 'Humans are unusually fat creatures,' Lieberman says with a smile, adding that biologically, our bodies are wired to store energy, not burn it off unnecessarily. From an evolutionary perspective, excessive exercise could even be seen as counterintuitive. His studies challenge the modern 'no pain, no gain' philosophy. While 150 minutes of activity a week — roughly 21 minutes a day — can reduce mortality by 30%, pushing beyond that can sometimes invite injury or burnout. 'It's not about running marathons. Just walking a bit more each day can do wonders,' Lieberman suggests. You Might Also Like: Harvard doctor's simple tip can boost your happiness in one minute. A startup CEO is already practicing it A Culture of Overexertion Lieberman warns against the growing culture of overtraining and pushing limits, especially among younger generations influenced by performance-driven social media. While elite athleticism is impressive, he emphasizes that the average human body simply wasn't built to endure constant strain. 'The obsession with optimum performance is overrated,' he said during the podcast. 'High performance is just achieving your goals and staying active — it doesn't need to mean winning medals.' Walk Before You Run — Literally At the heart of Lieberman's philosophy is the humble act of walking. More than a biological necessity, he presents it as a sustainable, natural form of exercise that aligns with how our bodies evolved. Ancient humans walked the equivalent of Los Angeles to New York every year — not because they wanted to, but because they had to. In modern times, incorporating simple changes like walking an extra metro stop or opting for stairs over elevators is more aligned with our evolutionary design than lifting weights for hours or pushing through rigorous cardio regimens. You Might Also Like: What's the best time for breakfast? Harvard doctor shares three rules If you've ever felt guilty for not signing up for that spin class or skipping leg day, Lieberman's research is a breath of fresh, science-backed air. His message is clear: being active is important — but balance is essential. So before you lace up for your next run, consider his advice. Maybe it's time we all gave our legs — and guilt — a little rest. After all, evolution might just be on your side.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
How face of a woman who lived 10,500 years ago, now reconstructed, challenges ‘genetic uniformity' among European hunter-gatherers
With DNA extracted from the body's remains, researchers have reconstructed the face of a woman who lived approximately 10,500 years ago in present-day Belgium. The findings of this analysis challenge earlier assumptions about genetic uniformity among European Mesolithic populations. The team, led by scientists from Ghent University, used advanced genetic and archaeological methods to bring the prehistoric figure to life—revealing a woman with blue eyes, slightly lighter skin, and distinct facial features. Archaeologist Philippe Crombé told CNN 'good quaity' DNA was taken from the woman's skull. The woman's facial reconstruction, including skin tone, hair, and eye colour, was derived from ancient DNA analysis, while other elements like her jewelry and tattoos were informed by broader archaeological evidence. The findings challenge previous assumptions that European hunter gatherers shared the same genetic makeup, according to Project Lead Isabelle De Groote. It also shows that there was already considerable variation in skin color among different populations. 'She had lighter skin than many other Mesolithic people studied so far,' Groote said. 'From the skull, we could also tell she was between 35 and 60 years old…. She had a high nasal bridge and strong brow ridges,' she added, highlighting that the features were similar to the Cheddar Man in the UK. Crombé noted that while most Mesolithic DNA samples belong to a similar genetic group, 'it is to be expected that in the wide area of Western Europe there's some variability, as there is today.' The woman's remains were discovered in the Margaux cave in Dinant during an excavation in the late 1980s, alongside the bodies of eight other women. Many of the bodies were sprinkled with ochre—an indicator of symbolic or ritual behavior—and covered with stone fragments. One skeleton bore post-mortem cut marks. De Groote noted that the 'cave was used over several hundred of years so that they were places of memory that people would go back to despite their mobile hunter-gatherer lifestyle.' 'They were still moving around because they were entirely dependent on natural resources,' Crombé explained. 'That forced them to move their settlements regularly.' The team is now working to analyse relationships among the buried individuals and studying dietary habits, including how much fish they consumed. (With inputs from CNN)
