This 65-year-old song is a timeless melody, Madhubala's beauty stole the spotlight, still rules romantic playlist, the song is…
This 65-year-old song is a timeless melody, Madhubala's beauty stole the spotlight, still rules romantic playlist, the song is…
In the glittering world of Bollywood, many songs come and go, but every once in a while, a song comes that strikes a chord like never before. These songs stay with you for years to come; they stir emotions so deep that nothing can match them. One such story belongs to a song that came out 65 years ago and is a cult classic.
The song we are talking about is none other than Mughal-e-Azam 's 'Mohe Panghat Pe.' This song was no less than a visual spectacle. Directed by K. Asif, it featured legendary actors like Madhubala opposite Dilip Kumar.. With a larger-than-life film, an emotionally rich story, and blockbuster tracks that captivated millions, this film had everything. But out of all the things, one song that stood out was
'Mohe Panghat Pe'. The minute people saw Madhubala in the song, donning a golden-yellow ensemble with traditional jewellery, grooving, people were enchanted.
The song was initially released in black and white, however, it was re-released in colourised format in theatres, showcasing Madhubala's beauty even more. She not only lit up the screen, she lit up the hearts. From her expressive eyes to her graceful dance and strong screen presence, what she created on the screen was no less than magic.
But behind this beautiful masterpiece was none other than the Nightingale of India, Lata Mangeshkar. Composed by the legendary Naushad, with lyrics penned by Shakeel Badayuni. Together, this trio created magic that turned 'Mohe Panghat Pe' into not just a song, but an emotion, a tune that resonates with classic film and songs enthusiasts.
Mughal-e-Azam wasn't just a film, it was a phenomenon. With a whopping budget of ₹1.5 crore at the time, it was the most expensive Bollywood film of its era. It broke multiple records, becoming the highest-grossing film and the one to run the longest in theaters.
Even today, the lyrics and the visuals of 'Mohe Panghat Pe' remain fresh in the minds of fans.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'90% Govinda lag rahe hain': Actor debuts fresh new look with moustache; but fans think it's a lookalike
Actor Govinda shared a brand new look on Instagram on Friday. However, it also led to some confusion among fans on whether it was even him in the picture after all. Govinda's new look got a few fans confused. The new photos showed a fresh look for the 90's star. He debuted a moustache and a thicker head of hair with large sunglasses. He wore a tweed, three-piece suit with a crisp white shirt. Govinda chose a questionable background for his photo, which looked littered with trash. Also read: Pahlaj Nihalani says David Dhawan spoiled Govinda and his career How did the internet react? Most fans loved his new look and asked when he's planning to make a comeback. 'Sir aap kab karoge comeback 😢❤️please sir batao (When will you make a comeback sir. Please tell us),' said one person. 'Ky bat h old energy (what an old time energy),' wrote a nostalgic fan. 'The Best of Bollywood 🙌🙌 Finallyyy I get to see A Perfect character look on you,' commented another. 'Looking even more handsome in the moustache, Bollywood hero number 1,' read another comment. A few fans were confused that the person in the photo doesn't seem to be Govinda himself. 'Damn bro, you look almost 90% of Govinda,' wrote a Maxtern, the YouTuber. 'Yar ye original Govinda sir lag rahe hai (he looks just like Govinda),' wrote another person. 'Original Bhi Nakli Sa Lag Rha Hai (Even the original is looking like a copy),' wrote a person. Fans of the actor let these people know that it is indeed the actor himself. A few others even commented that he looked like senior actor Raza Murad or Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis. Any hope for Govinda's comeback? Govinda was one of the biggest Bollywood stars in the 90s. However, his career took a nosedive after the early 2000s. Film offers dried up as a younger crop of actors took over. He tried to make multiple comebacks, never landing on his feet like his fans expected him to. Recently, even his wife Sunita Ahuja gave her take on why Govinda has not be able to breathe life back into his career. She said that he is now surrounded by yes men who never give him genuine feedback and only praise even his shoddiest works.
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
'Detective Sherdil' movie review: Whodunit with missed opportunities
A little 'Knives Out', a bit of Sherlock Holmes, and a generous helping of Bollywood masala. That is the mix 'Detective Sherdil' tries to serve up. Set inexplicably in Budapest (where everyone conveniently understands Hindi), the film kicks off with the murder of a flamboyant billionaire tycoon (Boman Irani). What appears to be a hate crime soon spirals into a tangled mess of family secrets, backstabbing heirs, and one dog named Rabbit with a share in the Dosanjh plays the titular character, a quirky sleuth with charm and wit. While he brings his trademark likability, the character often slips into caricature, which takes some weight away from the mystery. Diana Penty's role feels underwritten. Boman Irani makes the most of his limited screen time, and Chunky Pandey does the same. Ratna Pathak Shah and others feel stiff and underused..'Kuberaa' movie review: Slick performances in preachy the film is just okay. Despite being set in a city as cinematic as Budapest, it never fully capitalises on the potential of the location. The production feels flat. While the film avoids being entirely predictable, its twists do not land with the impact they aim for. Some scenes lean too heavily into sketch-like comedy, occasionally breaking the narrative rhythm. The score echoes more iconic detective films but lacks its own distinctive identity. In the end, 'Detective Sherdil' has an intriguing setup and flashes of potential. However, the execution is uneven. Whether this marks the beginning of a new detective franchise or fades into a one-time experiment is unclear. That, perhaps, is another mystery on its own.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
In Sitaare Zameen Par, Aamir Khan finally faces the man in the mirror, as he trades perfection for vulnerability
To watch an Aamir Khan film is to witness a man performing his myth. It is to see him step into what he has always been to the masses: an ideal, rehearsed and refined over time. Like every Bollywood star, he arrives upright, and untouchable. He offers the stage to others, briefly, until the narrative bends again towards him. He looks down, not necessarily with disdain, but with the burden of knowing. He guides, he instructs, he sermonises, as if he alone carries the moral compass. In every film, without fail, he tells the audience what is right, what must be done. As if it is never enough to play the role; he must also shape the world that watches. His myth is not just of craft, but of conscience. He is the perfectionist, the thinking Khan, the one who supposedly feels deeper, thinks wiser, acts better. So to watch him is not just to watch a performance. It is to be addressed. To be measured. To be shown, again and again, what the ideal man looks like. So, stepping into his latest Sitaare Zameen Par, I carried certain skepticism. The reasons weren't singular. I didn't want to be told, once again, how blind we've all been, how sharply he's always seen. That lesson had already begun long before the opening frame, though those pre-release interviews, swollen with certainty, were hard enough to watch. But deeper than that was memory. It was Taare Zameen Par (Sitaare Zameen Par being its spiritual sequel) where this long performance of moral authorship truly began. To be fair, the film was more than just a sermon; it had heart, depth, tenderness. And yet, it was also the film that first carved out the myth: the image of Aamir Khan not just as an actor, but as a moral architect. In the years that followed, 3 Idiots, PK, Dangal, Secret Superstar, the narratives became increasingly tailored to orbit his image, to elevate it, to consolidate it. The stories moved, but always around him. So the unease was not incidental. It was earned. And the concerns, like the myth itself, had multiplied over time. And then, to make matters worse, the opening scene of Sitaare Zameen Par plays out with a familiar discomfort. Written and performed in a way that makes you brace for the inevitable, that slow drift into Aamir Khan's familiar air of subtle superiority. He appears as Gulshan, the junior basketball coach, seated off the court, yet unable to stay silent. From the stands, he advises, corrects, guides the head coach, dissecting every misstep, convinced the game is being played all wrong, and that only he knows how to fix it. Did Dangal's second half cross your mind? It should have. That's the point. That's the worry. Awakening again. And as the minutes stretch into hours, those early fears don't dissipate. They sort of grow roots. Because underneath it all, the film reveals itself to be what so many others have been: a simplistic entertainer, occasionally stirring, occasionally funny, but ultimately predictable. Its moving moments are genuine, yes. But also calculated, bracketed by the kind of screenwriting sleight-of-hand you can see long before it arrives. Like every Aamir Khan crowd-pleaser, it soothes the middle-class heart and instructs the middle-class mind. And yet, what almost lifts the film, what brushes it against something more, is the sight of Aamir Khan beginning, finally, to take apart his own myth. He is no longer the man who knows everything, who cannot be wrong, who carries the moral compass like birth right. He is no longer the invincible one, the conscience in the room, the perfect mind in a world of flawed others. In Sitaare Zameen Par, he is none of these things. And in that choice, the film becomes something else, a deconstruction of everything that made him the middle-class messiah. There's a different kind of pleasure here, not the comfort he usually offers, but a reversal of sorts. After years of being the one who instructs, he is now the one being instructed. After years of touting wisdom, we see him being touted. There's a thrill in that turn. A faint excitement in watching him called out, for being too clever, too self-sure, too wrapped in the illusion of perfection. Also Read | Sitaare Zameen Par movie review: Aamir Khan delivers fully committed performance in heart-winning comedy So, in the film, as Gulshan, he is politically incorrect and unrepentantly arrogant. He is rude, self-centred, a man who carries the belief that the world is simply too small for his genius. And so, it's no surprise that over the course of three hours, he becomes the one in need of awakening. One by one, every character holds up a mirror. One by one, they throw him under the bus, not out of cruelty, but because he's earned it. They remind him what it means to be dismissive, to be blind to others' feelings, to think that brilliance excuses disregard. In every sense, the film becomes his journey, of ego unravelling, of self being slowly confronted. And strangely, this is a huge shift. For once, Aamir Khan doesn't hijack the story halfway through; he centers himself from the very beginning. And because of that, it becomes honest. It becomes his. And maybe that's why the performance begins to land, because it isn't designed to awe. He plays a man-child, emotionally immature, socially unaware. His wide-eyed earnestness, his furrowed brow, his awkward charm, they all fit. Because this time, he is the one being corrected. And, thankfully for once, he listens. Perhaps the film's deepest triumph lies in the realization his character finally reaches: that it is okay not to be right. That you don't have to be the one with all the answers, the intellect, the mastery. That not every battle needs to be won, not every moment needs to be conquered. For so long, in every film where he has championed the different, the misunderstood, the misfit, the arc has still bent towards triumph. Moral victory, yes, but often, unmistakably, material as well. Consider the ending of 3 Idiots. It isn't enough that Rancho finds joy in teaching, in shaping young minds. No, we must also be told that he has become a world-famous scientist, more 'successful' than the classmate who once mocked him. Or even take Taare Zameen Par. It isn't enough that Ishaan (Darsheel Safary) is seen painting, finally at peace with himself. The film must assure us that he has also won the competition. That's where the pain creeps in. This idea that to be different, to be gentle, to be inward, one must still, eventually, emerge as victor. As if kindness needs a medal. As if sensitivity must be redeemed by success. As if only by winning the cycle race, only by wearing the gold medal, can he earn the title Sikandar. But here, in Sitaare Zameen Par, something softens. For once, we are allowed to imagine a hero who does not need to win to be worthy. Who does not need history to remember him, as long as the present is better for his effort. A hero not made by applause, but by intention. One who learns that trying is triumph. That growth is grace. That perfection is not a crown, but a pursuit.
