Hong Kong Bets the Future on a Vast Tech Zone by China's Border

Markets Magazine
Northern Metropolis could align the city even more with the mainland, at a time when its finance and property sectors are faltering.
In a village on Hong Kong's outskirts, Wong Chin Ming inspects zucchini, watermelons, cherry tomatoes and kale growing in his greenhouses. For 19 years he's been raising crops here on the site of what was once a factory. Soon his farm will be wiped off the map to make way for a massive development, which China hopes will be Hong Kong's answer to Silicon Valley. The government is setting aside 300 square kilo­meters (116 square miles) for the project, an area more than twice the size of San Francisco.
It's called ' Northern Metropolis,' yet, for now, it's anything but. Hong Kong's hinterland is a hodgepodge of sleepy hamlets, apartment blocks and stray dogs. Rusty fences surround warehouses, abandoned cars lie in bushes, and scores of cabins built to quarantine patients during the Covid-19 ­pandemic sit empty. Northern Metropolis won't grow organically over decades like California's storied tech hub near Stanford University or the glittering skyscrapers of Hong Kong, where companies and citizens had enjoyed greater autonomy from Chinese Communist Party rule before the government cracked down in 2020.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Washington Post

30 minutes ago

• Washington Post

Israeli strikes on Iran cap dramatic shift in Mideast strategic balance

JERUSALEM — While the world braces for President Donald Trump's decision on bombing Iran and the tectonic waves that could follow, here in the Middle East, the earthquake has already struck. Israel's go-for-broke attacks on Iran launched just over a week ago — after decades of intense but largely covert conflict between the two powers — have dramatically shifted the strategic balance in a way that will probably prevail whether American bombers enter the fray or not, according to analysts in Israel, across the region and beyond.

Forbes

31 minutes ago

• Forbes

Silicon Valley's Leadership Lessons

Leadership lessons from Silicon Valley for future readiness Mature organizations lose their vitality. Complex organizations lose their responsiveness. Successful incumbent market leaders, because they are typically both mature and complex, lose their charm, and become endangered. Not surprisingly, there has long been a search for ways to restore vigor and zest to such organizations. Inevitably, when such discussions arise, the success of Silicon Valley is cited as an alternative example of both energy and imagination; of being able to move fast and change things in a big way. The recent DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) initiative is one such effort. The advertised idea was to learn from the 'new economy,' and apply those lessons learned to large, bureaucratic, government agencies. That this does not appear to have happened is probably due more to chaotic execution and the mischief of ideologues than to a failure in the promise of Silicon Valley as an organizing inspiration for the rest of us. Not entirely coincidentally, the UK's Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) is another example. Inspired, in part, by the American Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency (DARPA), which, established in 1958 in response to the Soviet Union's Sputnik, has continually played an influential role in Silicon Valley successes, ARIA's American born Ilan Gur sees his organization as a means of supporting UK innovation, which he refers to as a 'tightly wound spring that's ready to release'. What is it, then, about Silicon Valley that leads it to be seen as a source of managerial lessons for organizational success, and what might those lessons be? To answer these questions, I took the opportunity to interview an old friend and IMD colleague, Jim Pulcrano, engineer, entrepreneur, academic, and who for over 25 years has been an observer of Silicon Valley's inner workings, leading more than 80 executive explorations of the Valley in search of such lessons. What follows is a sense of what leadership lessons Silicon Valley might offer those of us who work in mature, old-economy, industries, and especially those of us associated with successful, incumbent, market-leaders, in such industries: Thinking Differently Jim Pulcrano: I think that the Silicon Valley lessons all begin with one word: '"urgency." Mature firms often become comfortable—they've grown strong, built moats, have big balance sheets. But that comfort is a trap. Silicon Valley thrives on discomfort. Everyone there is asking, 'What's next?' and 'How fast can I disrupt myself before someone else does?' Bill Fischer: And how does that urgency manifest itself? Pulcrano: Through relentless questioning. The best innovators don't start with answers—they start with better questions. What if we made a 10X improvement, not 10%? What if we killed our core product before someone else did? What if our future doesn't look like our past? Fischer: This is a dramatically different way of thinking than we typically see in more traditional organizations. Pulcrano: Revitalization requires daring and courage. Mature companies often cling to what worked in the past; the leaders usually built their legacies on products and systems that have outlived their utility and should be disrupted. In contrast, Silicon Valley is all about 'dream big or stay home.' It teaches us that innovation isn't about fine-tuning yesterday's model—it's about asking bold, even uncomfortable, questions. That culture of relentless curiosity that we hear about so often; it's gold. Fischer: So, it's about more than simply having a flashy R&D team? Pulcrano: Exactly. You need a network that nourishes innovation—not just exploits it. One important lesson is that in the Valley geographic proximity makes a difference. Everything is tightly packed together: venture capital, prototyping labs, universities, and legal experts. Ideas bounce around fast. That 'proximity stew' keeps innovation alive. For incumbents, the question becomes: how do we recreate that bubbling ecosystem internally? In a mature company, you've got to mimic that intensity. Create idea collisions. Flatten silos. Interest engineers in talking to marketers, finance to R&D. In Silicon Valley, the network is the superpower. People move freely—from startup to corporate, from VC to academia, then back. The real learning happens in the spaces between. Incumbents need to stop thinking in organizational charts and start thinking in ecosystems. Who do your innovators know outside your organization? What cross-pollination is happening? Who is the go-to person on X? Are you one of them? Leadership lessons Fischer: how different is the practice of leadership in such organizations? Pulcrano: First, leaders must normalize failure. In the Valley, failing fast and moving on is a badge of honor. Max Levchin, Elon Musk's Paypal cofounder, struggled with his first four startups struggled (and mostly failed). The fifth was PayPal. Most legacy firms? They'd have fired him after the second flop. Fischer: Failure becomes data? Pulcrano: Exactly. In the Valley, failure isn't the opposite of success—it's part of the process. That's a cultural shift. Leaders must model that by sharing their own missteps. Celebrate intelligent risk-taking, not just polished outcomes. Nobody wants to fail, it's f**king awful, but if you're trying to do something new, whether it be the technology, the business model or some combination, failure is likely, so learn from it. Second, diverse thinking isn't a bonus—it's a baseline. The best decisions in VC firms often come after heated debates. The VC firm Greylock Partners has even studied this—their biggest wins were investments that triggered the fiercest internal arguments. So if your executive team always agrees, you're in trouble. Fischer: That's quite a departure from many boardrooms; it reminds me of the adage: 'polite teams get polite results.' Pulcrano: It is. And that leads to another principle: permissionless innovation. In the Valley, junior people prototype without asking for five layers of approval. Those prototypes could be products or sales models. Leaders should ask themselves: "Am I enabling action, or am I an obstacle?" Fischer: What does that look like in practice? Pulcrano: One example is Google X. When a moonshot project failed—after years and millions invested—the team that shut it down got a bonus. Why? Because they made the right call. They stopped something that wasn't going to work and freed resources for better bets. Does Culture Really Eat Strategy for Breakfast? Fischer: Peter Drucker famously told us that 'culture eats strategy for breakfast,' so I'm interested in what you think about organizational culture, and how important it is for success in Silicon Valley? Pulcrano: A few things about culture: First: optimism. Even when Silicon Valley Bank [SVB] collapsed, in 2023, the Valley shrugged and poured money into AI startups the next week. That attitude? 'What if it works?'—it's infectious. Second: role models. Everyone in the Valley knows someone who built something, or at least tried. That proximity to success makes ambition feel doable. Third: constructive promiscuity. At a typical Valley barbecue, people swap business cards before burgers. It's not impolite—it's expected. Fischer: Am I right in thinking that the way you see it in Silicon Valley is that a lot of culture is tactical? Pulcrano: In the Valley, it's curiosity and opportunity rolled together. Everyone is 'on the make' always, but everyone is also looking to help, invest, and collaborate. That ethos is powerful. But it can fade—especially as wealth accumulates, risk aversion creeps in, and firms become protectionist. What does the Future of Silicon Valley Look Like? Fischer: I'm in interested in how durable these lessons might be? Silicon Valley has dominated for over fifty years. But can it continue? What might the next fifty look like? Pulcrano: That's a provocative question. I'm optimistic, but cautiously so. Silicon Valley's strength has always been reinvention. Semiconductors, personal computing, the internet, biotech, social media, AI—wave after wave. Each time, it adapted. But now? Fischer: You're not convinced? Pulcrano: I'm seeing signs of incumbent behavior. Some of the giants—Google, Meta, Apple—are acting like the very firms they once disrupted. Risk-averse. Bureaucratic. More lawyers than engineers. That's worrying. Fischer: So, what would it take to stay relevant? Pulcrano: It needs fresh blood. And that's under threat. Immigration policies, visa restrictions—they're slowing down the global talent pipeline. Remember, 60% of the Valley's tech workforce isn't U.S.-born. Choke that off, and the Valley stops breathing. Fischer: So, the magic is in the mix? Pulcrano: Always has been. People come not just from Harvard and MIT, but from India, China, Nigeria, Slovenia. They bring their ambitions, the chips on their shoulders. That stew of dreams and hunger—that's Silicon Valley's secret sauce. Fischer: Can other regions replicate the magic of Silicon Valley? Pulcrano: Not exactly, but they can recreate parts of it. You need three ingredients: talent, money, and ideas, and they must come together efficiently. But it's the efficiency with which you mix them that makes the difference. Fischer: That efficiency being? Pulcrano: Access. In the Valley, the customer, the VC, the tech shop, the legal expert—they're all accessible within 30 minutes. You pitch an idea at breakfast, and prototype it by dinner. That's hard to reproduce in sprawling ecosystems or hierarchical, process-driven multinationals. Fischer: How can incumbents inside large firms imitate that? Pulcrano: Start small. Create internal innovation hubs where people are free to experiment. Kill bureaucracy. Protect intrapreneurs. Build a real network of mentors. Most importantly, ensure sharing and success are incentivized. If ideas stay locked in departments, or behind IP walls, you've already lost. Final Thoughts Fischer: This has all been very interesting! If you could leave our readers with one challenge—especially leaders in mature firms—what would it be? Pulcrano: Ask yourself: 'Am I creating a space where innovation is possible, or merely tolerated?' Then look around. If your team is afraid to disagree, if failure is punished, if new ideas die in PowerPoint—your culture needs rewiring. And, if you are wondering whether you need to go to California to do this: you don't. The Valley isn't a place—it's a mindset. You just need to think like a rebel—and surround yourself with others who will, too.

Yahoo

33 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Top economist who previously sounded the alarm on tariffs sees a possible scenario where Trump ‘outsmarted all of us'

Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, laid out a potential scenario where President Donald Trump's tariffs are extended long enough to ease economic uncertainty while also providing a significant bump to federal revenue. That comes as the 90-day pause on Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs' is nearing an end. Businesses and consumers remain in limbo over what will happen next with President Donald Trump's tariffs, but a top economist sees a way to leave them in place and still deliver a 'victory for the world.' In a note on Saturday titled 'Has Trump Outsmarted Everyone on Tariffs?', Apollo Global Management Chief Economist Torsten Sløk laid out a scenario that keeps tariffs well below Trump's most aggressive rates long enough to ease uncertainty and avoid the economic harm that comes with it. 'Maybe the strategy is to maintain 30% tariffs on China and 10% tariffs on all other countries and then give all countries 12 months to lower non-tariff barriers and open up their economies to trade,' he speculated. That comes as the 90-day pause on Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs,' which triggered a massive selloff on global markets in April, is nearing an end early next month. The temporary reprieve was meant to give the U.S. and its trade partners time to negotiate deals. But aside from an agreement with the U.K. and another short-term deal with China to step back from prohibitively high tariffs, few others have been announced. Meanwhile, negotiations are ongoing with other top trading partners. Trump administration officials have been saying for weeks that the U.S. is close to reaching deals. On Saturday, Sløk said extending the deadline one year would give other countries and U.S. businesses more time to adjust to a 'new world with permanently higher tariffs.' An extension would also immediately reduce uncertainty, giving a boost to business planning, employment, and financial markets. 'This would seem like a victory for the world and yet would produce $400 billion of annual revenue for US taxpayers,' he added. 'Trade partners will be happy with only 10% tariffs and US tax revenue will go up. Maybe the administration has outsmarted all of us.' Sløk's speculation is notable as he previously sounded the alarm on Trump's tariffs. In April, he warned tariffs have the potential to trigger a recession by this summer. Also in April, before the U.S. and China reached a deal to temporarily halt triple-digit tariffs, he said the trade war between the two countries would pummel American small businesses. More certainty on tariffs would give the Federal Reserve a clearer view on inflation as well. For now, most policymakers are in wait-and-see mode, as tariffs are expected to have stagflationary effects. But a split has emerged. Fed Governor Christopher Waller said Friday that economic data could justify lower interest rates as early as next month, expecting only a one-off impact from tariffs. But San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly also said Friday a rate cut in the fall looks more appropriate, rather than a cut in July. Still, Sløk isn't alone in wondering whether Trump's tariffs may not be as harmful to the economy and financial markets as feared. Chris Harvey, Wells Fargo Securities' head of equity strategy, expects tariffs to settle in the 10%-12% range, low enough to have a minimal impact, and sees the S&P 500 soaring to 7,007, making him Wall Street's biggest bull. He added that it's still necessary to make progress on trade and reach deals with big economies like India, Japan and the EU. That way, markets can focus on next year, rather near-term tariff impacts. 'Then you can start to extrapolate out,' he told CNBC last month. 'Then the market starts looking through things. They start looking through any sort of economic slowdown or weakness, and then we start looking to '26 not at '25.' This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data