Who's who in the EU-US trade war?

ADVERTISEMENT
The trade war between the European Union and the United States is heating up.
Donald Trump's decision to slap the bloc with a 20% across-the-board tariff has upended deeply intertwined commercial bonds between the two sides of the Atlantic, threatening to dismantle reliable supply chains, hike production costs, fuel inflation, wreck profitable businesses and wipe off untold value in imports and exports.
The tariffs, which Washington has described as "reciprocal" but which Brussels has called
"neither credible nor justified"
, are seen as a forceful attempt to unilaterally redesign the multilateral economic order established after World War II – the same order that the EU has consistently defended and promoted through numerous trade deals.
With billions at risk of obliteration, the EU is doubling down on the need to find a negotiated solution, while keeping its cards close to its chest in case of retaliation.
These are the main characters in the trade war.
Ursula von der Leyen: the one at the top
Ursula von der Leyen.
European Union, 2025.
Ursula von der Leyen
has firmly positioned herself on the frontline of the trade war.
The reason is self-evident: the European Commission she leads has exclusive competence to determine the commercial policy of the 27-country bloc, giving her a vast margin of manoeuvre to decide how to react to Trump's disruptive tariffs. A staunch defender of transatlantic ties, von der Leyen has already made an offer to bring down the heat: a "zero-for-zero" deal to remove
all tariffs
on industrial goods.
"Europe is always ready for a good deal. So we keep it on the table," the Commission president said on Monday. "But we are also prepared to respond through countermeasures and defend our interests."
Should the tit-for-tat escalate, it will ultimately be up to von der Leyen to decide which areas of the American economy will be hit and which will be spared. She will also have the final say on whether or not to trigger the Anti-Coercion Instrument (ACI), which the Commission has never used since its introduction in 2023.
Von der Leyen faces a significant daunting challenge, however: communication channels. She has not spoken with Trump since a congratulatory call after his electoral victory.
Maroš Šefčovič: the all-smiles envoy
Maroš Šefčovič.
European Union, 2025.
Little did
Maroš Šefčovič
know after his unexpected appointment as European Commissioner for Trade that he would soon be navigating an all-out trade war.
The 58-year-old Slovak, known in Brussels for his flashy smile and colourful ties, has the powerful – albeit, in this case, unenviable – task of managing the bloc's trade relations, making him the go-to person after President von der Leyen herself.
Šefčovič has travelled twice to Washington DC and held several phone calls with his American counterparts (more about them later) in a bid to get a better understanding of what the Trump administration's endgame might
actually
be. So far, he has come back completely empty-handed, an ominous sign for the negotiations ahead.
"Let's be clear: engaging the US will take both time and effort," Šefčovič cautioned after a meeting of trade ministers in Luxembourg.
"The US views tariffs not as a tactical step but as a corrective measure. We are fully prepared to sit at the negotiation table whenever our American partners are ready."
ADVERTISEMENT
Beneath the smile Šefčovič brings considerable negotiating experience to the table following his role as the key point man for the EU executive in its labyrinthine wrangling with the UK over Brexit.
Bjoern Seibert: the shadow operator
Bjoern Seibert.
European Union, 2024.
Only those deep into the EU bubble know the name of
Bjoern Seibert
.
The soft-spoken, bespectacled chef de cabinet of Ursula von der Leyen has often been referred to as an
éminence grise
, a power broker who wields an oversized influence quietly in the shadows. Seibert proved instrumental in reinforcing EU-US ties by developing close contacts with key people in the Joe Biden administration.
But that invaluable network evaporated overnight when Trump and his team took over the White House, forcing Seibert to start from scratch. Von der Leyen's aide-de-camp joined Šefčovič on his latest Washington trip, a sign of how deeply involved he is in the process. Before that, he
travelled
to the American capital on his own to meet members of Trump's National Security Council and the National Economic Council.
ADVERTISEMENT
The German is in regular touch with ambassadors in Brussels to ensure member states are duly informed and, crucially, on board with the Commission's initiatives. He is supported by
Tomas Baert
, von der Leyen's trade advisor.
Sabine Weyand: the consummate insider
Sabine Weyand.
European Union, 2022.
While von der Leyen, Šefčovič and Seibert operate at the highest political level, there are hundreds of well-versed, battle-tested experts in Brussels working on trade at a technical level, patiently going through the nitty gritty to find American imports that can be slapped with counter-tariffs. Among these,
Sabine Weyand
stands out from the crowd.
A long-serving Commission official, Weyand leads the mighty Directorate General for Trade (DG Trade) and has a panoramic, privileged view of all commercial decisions involving goods, services, intellectual property and foreign investments. Under von der Leyen's command, DG Trade has expanded its arsenal of trade defence measures, making the department more reactive and assertive.
Weyand's credentials will come in handy for the trade war: she was the EU's deputy chief negotiator for Brexit and spearheaded the conclusion of several free-trade deals, including
the EU-Mercosur
agreement, which brings together 780 million consumers.
ADVERTISEMENT
EU leaders: the perpetually divided
The leaders of Greece, Italy and the Netherlands during an EU summit.
European Union, 2025.
The European Commission might have exclusive competence over trade but that does not necessarily mean it can go solo, close its eyes and hope for the best.
With the stakes reaching the stratosphere, von der Leyen will have to secure the buy-in from member states to ensure a united, coherent front against the White House. After all, the tariffs are expected to be highly damaging to national economies, so speaking directly with
EU leaders
is indispensable to understanding and managing the tit-for-tat.
But leaders, in classic fashion, are divided on how to proceed. Some, like
French President Emmanuel Macron
, want to go all-out and deploy the most hard-hitting options. Others, like Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, advocate a measured approach to focus on negotiations rather than immediate retaliation. Behind the scenes, leaders are lobbying von der Leyen to spare sensitive and lucrative sectors.
How the debate plays out will determine what happens next: the Commission's countermeasures can be blocked with a qualified majority of member states.
ADVERTISEMENT
Donald Trump: the disrupter-in-chief
Donald Trump.
Mark Schiefelbein/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved.
The image of
Donald Trump
revealing his self-styled "reciprocal tariffs" on a large chart has quickly become iconic – or controversial, depending on where you're from.
Tariffs were a rallying cry during Trump's anything-goes campaign and are now a central element of his second presidency, which in less than three months has proven extremely disruptive for virtually every corner of international relations.
The president has repeatedly evoked the prosperity of America's Gilded Age to justify the imposition of the punishing duties, portraying his unprecedented initiative as
the only possible way
to rebalance the country's trade deficits. Not even the loud complaints from investors, many of whom backed his re-election, have weakened his resolve.
According to the White House, the tariffs will remain in place until the president concludes "the threat posed by the trade deficit and underlying nonreciprocal treatment is satisfied, resolved or mitigated." The condition leaves it entirely to Trump's discretion to decide, case by case, the longevity of the measures.
ADVERTISEMENT
Von der Leyen has her work cut out for her: Trump has attacked the EU as a "monopoly" that was formed as a "unified force" against America. He has already rejected her offer for a "zero-for-zero" tariff deal, calling instead on the bloc to increase purchases of American energy and make the trade deficit disappear "in one week".
"The EU has been very tough over the years. It was – I always say it was formed to really do damage to the United States in trade," Trump said. "It's not going to be that way. It's got to be fair and reciprocal. It's gotta be fair. It's not fair."
JD Vance: the angry cheerleader
JD Vance.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
For Europe,
JD Vance
has become a synonym for angry speeches.
Since taking office, the US Vice President has ferociously denounced the EU for its
digital regulations
, migration policy, defence spending and supposed
lack of free speech
. His clash with Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office caused consternation and triggered an outpouring of solidarity from EU leaders towards the Ukrainian president.
ADVERTISEMENT
Most recently, Vance has taken a cheerleading role to defend Trump's tariffs against its numerous critics. In an interview with Fox News, the Vice President admitted the duties were a "big change" and their purported benefits would take time to arrive. "What I'd ask folks to appreciate here is that we're not going to fix things overnight," he said.
With Vance taking a hands-on role in the White House's decision-making – Trump has tasked him with securing a new buyer for TikTok – the EU might have no choice but to deal directly with the man that has publicly berated the bloc.
Interestingly, as CNN
reports
, Vance used to oppose trade protectionism.
Howard Lutnick and Jamieson Greer: the counterparts
Howard Lutnick (left) and Jamieson Greer (rigth).
Associated Press.
Who do you call when you want to call the United States?
ADVERTISEMENT
If the call is on trade, the most obvious answer would be
Howard Lutnick
, the US Secretary of Commerce, and
Jamieson Greer
, the US Trade Representative. These are the two people that Maroš Šefčovič has been talking to in recent weeks, trying, without success, to find a workable compromise.
While Greer keeps a low profile, Lutnick seeks the spotlight.
The Commerce Secretary, a billionaire and former CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, is a regular presence on news shows, where he delivers provocative lines in a Trumpian fashion. He shares an ideological approach to tariffs similar to that of the president, going as far as
saying
they would be "worth it" even if they led to a recession.
Like Trump, Lutnick has taken exception to the trade deficit the US has with the EU.
ADVERTISEMENT
"The European Union won't take chicken from America. They won't take lobsters from America. They hate our beef because our beef is beautiful and theirs is weak," Lutnick said last week. "It's unbelievable."
Peter Navarro: the tariff evangelist
Peter Navarro.
Ben Curtis/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved
The fact that Šefčovič held several fruitless meetings and phone calls with Lutnick and Greer has prompted an awkward question: is he talking to the people calling the shots?
One of these people is
Peter Navarro
, a Trump loyalist who spent four months in prison after being held in contempt of Congress over the January 6 investigation.
With an economic doctorate from Harvard University, Navarro has been an ardent critic of free-trade deals and a fierce proponent of tariffs as a solution to trade deficits. He approaches the economy through the lens of national security and has written various books detailing his hawkish views on China. In 2019, it was
revealed
that Navarro had invented the character "Ron Vara" to quote himself in his book
Death by China
.
ADVERTISEMENT
He now serves as Trump's senior counsellor for trade and manufacturing.
In an op-ed for the Financial Times, Navarro castigated foreign nations for their "barrage of non-tariff weapons," like value-added tax (VAT), currency manipulation and product standards, which he says "strangle" US exports. The 75-year-old singled out the EU for what he called "the use of lawfare" to target America's
Big Tech companies
.
"The US will now match the substantially higher tariffs and crushing non-tariff barriers imposed on us by other nations," Navarro wrote. "This is not a negotiation. For the US, it is a national emergency triggered by trade deficits caused by a rigged system."
The White House: an intricate inner circle
Donald Trump with members of his cabinet.
Evelyn Hockstein/AP
There are many roads leading to Trump.
ADVERTISEMENT
The president's economic team also features
Scott Bessent
, the Secretary of the Treasury;
Kevin Hassett
, the director of the National Economic Council, who is Seibert's counterpart; and
Stephen Miran
, the chair of the Council of Economic Advisers.
Bessent, a Yale-educated hedge fund manager, is seen as one of the most moderate characters in the White House and has urged countries to negotiate with Trump to bring down the level of the tariffs, which he says are now at "maximum".
"President Trump is going to be personally involved in these negotiations, and he believes, as many of us do, that there's been an unfair playing field, so the negotiations are going to be tough," Bessent told Fox News.
Closer to the president is
Susie Wiles
, his media-shy chief of staff and gatekeeper;
Stephen Miller
, the deputy chief of staff and the architect of Trump's hardline migration policy; and his family members, including
Donald Trump Jr
,
Eric Trump
and his wife
Lara Trump
.
ADVERTISEMENT
And of course, there is
Elon Musk
, the CEO of Tesla and X, who has been given a mighty non-Cabinet position in the administration to slash the federal budget. Notably, Musk has not embraced tariffs with the same fervour as Trump's inner circle. The mercurial billionaire has publicly lashed out against Navarro, calling him a "truly moron", and endorsed the idea of a
"zero-tariff zone situation"
between the US and the EU.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Euronews

an hour ago

• Euronews

Europeans largely support hikes in national defence budget, poll finds

Support for increasing national defence spending appears widespread in Europe although most seem to think that becoming independent from the US when it comes to security and defence before the end of the decade is impossible, a major new survey has found. Most of the more than 16,400 respondents polled across 12 European countries by the European Council of Foreign Relations (ECFR) stated that they are in favour of their countries upping their national defence spending with clear majorities in Poland, Denmark, the UK, Estonia, and Portugal. Pluralities in Romania (50%), Spain (46%), France (45%), Hungary (45%), Germany (47%), and Switzerland (40%) also expressed support for increased defence spending with Italy the only country polled where the majority (57%) was either "somewhat" or "strongly" opposed the idea. Yet the poll also finds that scepticism over the EU's ability to become independent from the US in terms of its defence and security over the coming five years runs high. Only in Denmark and Portugal did a majority of respondents feel optimistic about achieving independence from the US before the turn of the decade. Most respondents in France and Romania also seemed to believe it is possible (44% and 45% respectively). But most people in Poland, Estonia, and Spain thought the reverse. In Italy and Hungary, a majority of respondents (54% and 51% respectively) see EU autonomy on security and defence as "very difficult" or "practically impossible" to achieve in the next five years. Germans were meanwhile more or less evenly split on the question, with 44% thinking it possible to achieve, and 45% seeing it as difficult or rather impossible. However, support to Ukraine is not contingent on continued aid from Washington, the survey finds. Majorities or pluralities in 11 of the 12 countries polled are against the idea of Europe withdrawing its military support for Ukraine, pushing Ukraine to give up on territory occupied by Russia, or lifting economic sanctions on Russia even if the US shifts its policy across these points. The Donald Trump effect The results are driven in part by Donald Trump's return to the White House and the anti-European rhetoric he and some in his administration have used over trade and defence which has given rise to anti-American sentiment in some European countries. Still, although a majority of people in 10 countries thought Trump is damaging the relationship between the EU and the US, most are of the opinion that the relationship will be repaired once he leaves office. The survey comes a day before leaders of the 32 NATO member states gather in The Hague for their annual summit. Trump has demanded that the alliance's defence spending target be raised from its current 2% of GDP level to 5%, and cast doubt on Washington's long-term support for European security. The proposal currently on the table plans for an increase to 3.5% on core military spending, with an additional 1.5% on defence-related investments that would include infrastructure, cybersecurity and money to boost a whole-of-society approach to security. Yet Spain has poured cold water over the new target, which has to be unanimously approved by all allies, with Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez writing in a letter to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte last week that Madrid "cannot commit to a specific spending target in terms of GDP". "For Spain, committing to a 5% target would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive, as it would move Spain away from optimal spending and it would hinder the EU's ongoing efforts to strengthen its security and defence ecosystem," Sánchez wrote in the letter that was seen by The Associated Press. The ECFR survey however notes that respondents in Spain were slightly more worried about their country not spending enough on defence, at the expense of their security than they were about spending too much on defence at the expense of other areas of public spending. The vast majority though did not pronounce themselves on the issue. In fact on this question, the 12 countries were evenly split, with Denmark, the UK, Poland, Romania, and Germany joining their Spanish counterparts and the other six countries favouring the other stance. The EU has sought to allay some of its fear with its programme to boost defence production and deployment that it hopes will prompt member states to invest €800 billion into the sector over the next four years. The plan's main financial firepower comes from allowing member states to deviate from the bloc's stringent fiscal rules provided the additional spending is poured exclusively into defence. The other pillar, called SAFE, would see the Commission provide loans to member states at preferential rates than most would if they raised the money themselves on the market. The EU executive is also allowing untapped EU funds previously earmarked for other programmes to be repurposed for defence spending. Defence should also be one of the key topics on the agenda of a summit of EU leaders in Brussels on Thursday.

France 24

an hour ago

• France 24

'Noble to attend': Budapest prepares for 'banned' Pride march

"This legal wrangling only made many feel compelled to express their solidarity," 25-year-old engineering student Csanad Sebesy told AFP. "Now it is more noble to attend," he added. Sebesy is one of the record number of people -- more than 250 -- organisers said have applied to help at the parade despite the threat of penalties. He volunteered last year too, but said the preparatory training this time focussed more on legal issues. "I really liked that because there were concerns about the event existing in a legal grey area." Prime Minister Viktor Orban announced in February that he intended to ban the Pride celebration. Within weeks, the government had codified into law and the constitution provisions designed to prohibit the annual march. Those changes -- condemned by the European Union and rights groups -- advance the years-long clampdown on LGBTQ rights in the central European country. They allow authorities to fine organisers and attendees of a banned event up to 500 euros ($570) and empower police to use facial recognition to identify offenders. 'I don't give a damn' The organisers and Budapest city council tried to exploit a legal loophole to allow the parade to proceed but police still issued a ban. The capital's progressive mayor, Gergely Karacsony, insisted the march would go ahead regardless. He said the police decision had "no value" because a municipal event does not require formal authorisation. For many volunteers, this is the first time they have applied to help at the march. "After seeing the proposed legislation, I felt I had two options -- either I could completely collapse and not get up for three days or I could quickly figure out how to help," said Emma Elefanti. The 26-year-old student said she hoped in this way to support her loved ones in the LGBTQ community. "I don't care about being fined. It's not a meaningful deterrent. I'll gladly participate to help out the community," she told AFP. Marta Aleva volunteered to show that threats don't work. "Even if it's 30 degrees Celsius (86 degrees Fahrenheit) and we have to cover ourselves in mosquito repellent and sunscreen, we have to be there now," said the lawyer. "I don't give a damn about the ban." 'Psychological pressure' The Hungarian Helsinki Committee and two other rights groups have pledged to provide legal aid to attendees facing fines. Support is pouring in from abroad as well, with solidarity messages for Hungary's LGBTQ community displayed at Pride celebrations across Europe. Dozens of European Parliament lawmakers are due to attend the Budapest march and the assembly has promised to share safety tips. European Equalities Commissioner Hadja Lahbib and ministers from several EU countries are expected, organisers said. Under Orban, Hungary has progressively rolled back LGBTQ rights in the name of "child protection". The government's targeting of the parade has caused "immense psychological pressure" for volunteers, the head of the organising foundation, Viktoria Radvanyi, told AFP. But they dismissed Orban's warning about not wasting "money and time" on this year's parade, spending hours on tasks as mundane as inventories of high-visibility jackets. Since the ban was imposed, they also face a one-year prison sentence for continuing preparations. 'Not permissible' Despite the pressure, Radvani predicted this year's Pride would be "largest Hungary ever seen", surpassing the estimated 35,000 attendees of past years. "We're not just standing up for ourselves... If this law isn't overturned, eastern Europe could face a wave of similar measures," she explained. "We have seen many historical examples of what happens when people deprived of rights simply bow down." "But it is not permissible to march through the city or engage in behaviour that we believe is contrary to the interests of children," he told French LCI TV this month. The government suggested Kincsem Park racecourse or Puskas Stadium in Budapest as possible venues. But volunteer Sebesy predicted efforts to prevent the public parade would ultimately be in vain. "They can't change moral standards with regulations," he said. © 2025 AFP

Euronews

2 hours ago

• Euronews

NATO agrees to 5% defence spending target ahead Hague summit

NATO allies have reached a consensus to increase spending on defence to 5% of their countries' GDP by 2035, media reports showed on Sunday. According to the reports citing diplomatic sources, ambassadors from all 32 NATO member states signed the new spending pledge ahead of its major summit in The Hague on Tuesday and Wednesday. This week, allies are expected to commit to spending around 3.5 percent of GDP on "hard defence" that will include weapons and troops and an additional 1.5 percent on defence-related investments such as cybersecurity and military mobility. The 5 per cent pledge has long been championed by US President Donald Trump, but Trump hinted last week that Washington may not follow through, and should not be held to the same standard. The US currently spends around 3.2 to 3.4 percent of its GDP on defence. Trump cited decades of US financial support to back up his The Netherlands is hosting the annual meeting of the 32-nation alliance starting Tuesday, 24 June, with leaders scheduled to meet on Wednesday, 25 June. The heads of government want to hammer out the agreement on a hike in defence that appeared largely done last week, until Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez wrote to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte that committing Madrid to spending 5% of its gross domestic product on defense 'would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive.' Reports suggest the alliance will make a provision and exception that accommodates Madrid's situation. Around 45 heads of state and government are expected at the summit in the Dutch town for two- day summit. Meanwhile, hundreds of people protested on Sunday against NATO and military spending. Billed as a demonstration against NATO and the war in Gaza, protesters also denounced Israel and US military actions in Iran, chanting, 'No to war.' 'We are opposed to war. People want to live a peaceful life,' said 74-year-old Hossein Hamadani, an Iranian who lives in the Netherlands. Look at the environment. 'Things are not good. So why do we spend money on war?' he added. Almost a third of US allies still fall short of NATO's current aim of at least 2% of their gross domestic product, even though defence expenditure has increased since Russian President Vladimir Putin authorised a full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago. The summit is being guarded by thousands of military and police personnel, drones, no-fly zones, and cybersecurity specialists. Code-named "Orange Shield," the largest Dutch security operation to date, around 27,000 officers, that is half of the Dutch police force, will be present to provide security for the summit.