2025 NHL Draft survey: Scouts dish on top defense prospects, Roger McQueen, Ivan Ryabkin
Welcome to my 2025 NHL Draft scouts survey.
This year-end annual project polls NHL scouts with a different set of two or three questions each year, granting them anonymity to encourage honest — and hopefully candid — answers.
This year, 16 scouts (including multiple directors) were sent three questions on hot-button topics in the 2025 class. They were asked which of the seven consensus top defensemen after Matthew Schaefer they liked the best and least, for their comfort level with Roger McQueen as a top-10 pick and for their opinions on difficult and mercurial Russian prospect Ivan Ryabkin.
Here are the full results, plus some of the back-and-forths I had with them on their answers.
A year ago, I asked a version of this question about the top D grouping in the 2024 class, and I thought it really worked, allowing scouts to reveal something about the group without asking them to just give me their rankings. Because slotting the D behind Schaefer has been a major topic of conversation in this year's draft, I decided to bring the question back. And the results were again really interesting.
Advertisement
Four different players received votes as the 'best' of the bunch: Mrtka (8), Smith (5), Reid (3) and Aitcheson (2). Reid and Aitcheson were also mentioned in the 'least' category. There was less of a consensus in the 'least' category, with five of the seven players getting a vote or a mention at the bottom of the group. Fiddler was most often slotted at the back (6), followed by Boumedienne (4), but Hensler and even Reid and Aitcheson were mentioned there as well.
Scout 1: Best: Smith. Least: Boumedienne.
Is it the decision-making/reads for you with Boumedienne?
Yes, and the carelessness with which he makes the poor decisions.
Scout 2: Best: Reid. Least: Aitcheson.
Anything in particular you don't like about Aitcheson?
Hockey sense.
Scout 3: Out of that D group, I like Mrtka best and Boumedienne least.
Scout 4: Best: Smith. Worst: Fiddler.
Scout 5: Unfortunately, I can't answer based on a lack of information. The only opinion I can offer is I think Aitcheson will be overdrafted. Great kid who will end up playing in the league, but will always be fighting expectations early on, given how high he could end up going.
You would have seen Reid a lot in the OHL. You prefer him to Aitcheson?
I didn't see him listed at first … Yeah, I prefer Reid over Aitcheson, but it's close. Aitcheson had some big moments this year offensively; he had multiple OT winners this year, but outside of his shot, I don't see him being as offensive at the next level. Aitcheson plays hard and likes the physical stuff, but he's not a particularly strong defender. I see Reid as being a smarter player and a better skater than Aitcheson. But again, I didn't do huge deep dives on these guys this year.
Scout 6: Every year, it seems we have a mushy group of first-round D. These guys are not as good as last year's crop. Smith and Aitcheson are at the top for me. Their offensive skill and activity in transition, combined with the physical tools you want from a top-4 D, makes them hard to pass over. They both need to learn to defend, but I believe that is a matter of development time. All the others are very good players and would be strong picks. I don't have much difference between them. Boumedienne is at the back of the pack, but not by much. There is a lot to like still; he moves pucks well and can skate. I just worry he is not dynamic enough offensively to be more than a bottom-pair puck mover.
Curious: What holds Mrtka back from being in the group with Smith/Aitcheson for you, as opposed to that next group? I have him with Smith/Aitcheson.
Advertisement
I have Mrtka third in that group after Smith and Aitcheson. I don't think his production is a good indication of his impact on ice, and outside of size, he has no high-end attributes. He is too much of a project for me to want before either of the other two. Being well-rounded at his size should get him to the NHL, and his high-side could be the highest if he develops as one hopes, but there is more risk as well.
Scout 7: Best is Smith. Worst is Boumedienne.
Scout 8: Best: Mrtka. He's a project, but his potential is worth it. Least: Fiddler. His puck game isn't good.
Scout 9: Best: Mrtka.
Scout 10: I like Mrtka best (raw but in the very end, the best upside). I like Blake Fiddler least from this group (hockey sense is a bit questionable).
Scout 11: Best: Mrtka. Least: Fiddler. I'm not too much different than your order.
Scout 12: Can't answer the second and third questions (but) I like Mrtka among the D, personally.
Scout 13: Top to bottom:
1. Aitcheson
2. Smith
3. Mrtka
4. Boumedienne
5. Hensler
6. Reid
7. Fiddler
My D take likely puts (me) on an island …
Sascha ahead of Reid is the only thing that jumps out versus the consensus there, really. Sascha has been the most common answer at the back of that group.
I'm somewhat surprised at that. Sascha has a lot of work to do to complete his game — no question there. Just think the upside is pretty interesting if it comes together for him.
Scout 14: Best would be Mrtka and Reid. These guys have an edge for me, IQ-wise. Like least would be Fiddler and Hensler. More questions on sense with these two at this stage. All nice players, but bring different assets.
Scout 15: Best: Really close between Smith, Mrtka, Aitcheson. Smith in the lead. Least: Reid.
The Reid part is interesting. You're the first to slot him at the back of that group.
Advertisement
If I'm being honest, I probably answered that from a team perspective. Myself, I may have Hensler lower.
Scout 16: I've only seen the west kids. Same order as you put them in (Mrtka, Smith, Fiddler).
There were more yes (8) answers than no (4) answers to this one, but it wasn't a clear consensus, other than that it's close. If the results here are an indication of the way it'll go for McQueen, it looks more likely that he goes top 10 than not, however. That he participated in the combine and did well in interviews seems to have helped move some from apprehension to willingness, even if it didn't get everyone to outright confidence.
Scout 1: No.
Scout 2: Yes.
Scout 3: I would be OK taking a chance late top 10 on McQueen.
Scout 4: Yes, but it's close.
Scout 5: Loved McQueen the first time I saw him back at the U17 camp in Calgary. Looked like he was going to be a star. But back injuries are a black hole, so it's a bit of a shame.
Scout 6: He is saying/doing all the right things to assure teams that his back is not an issue. Draft-year injuries should not be deciding factors if you can get a sense of a player's value. In this case, there are enough games over the last two years to make an assessment of the player. His profile: a big, productive center that has underlying skill, usually goes in the top 10. I don't feel he is out of place there.
Scout 7: I have no problem with McQueen in the top 10.
Scout 8: Yes, it's not like there are 10 elite talents in this draft, so might as well.
Scout 10: I wouldn't take Roger McQueen in the top 10. He is a mid-first-rounder in my books.
Scout 11: No (but I didn't see enough of McQueen).
Scout 13: Yes.
Scout 14: I'd be comfortable taking him. While it's not ideal and there would be a level of risk, his talent and potential to be a star are higher than most.
Advertisement
Scout 15: No, worried about trouble there.
One of the most common things I heard coming out of the NHL Combine was that Ryabkin — whose attitude, maturity, discipline and even fitness had already been talked about for more than a year as an issue — was that his interviews went really poorly (even more poorly than expected in some cases). He also looked like he was in horrible shape. And so this question felt like it could be revealing of the gap between the player's perceived talent level and the actual range that teams might consider taking him.
Predictably, the answers were all over the place. Some teams don't even have him on their lists, and one director told me his team didn't interview him because it was a 'waste of time.' Others view him as a first-round talent and would consider even taking him as early as the late-first or second round. But the consensus seemed to be that he was a late-first/second-round talent and a Round 3-5 pick.
Scout 1: Second round. Fifth round. Not a fan of the person or the player.
Scout 2: Haven't seen him.
Scout 3: Ryabkin is a first-round talent that you maybe take a chance on on Day 2, like (Igor) Chernyshov last year.
Scout 4: Round 2 on talent (though that definition is tough). Probably consider Round 3-4. Seems like a big faller, but we'll see.
Scout 5: Don't know much about Ryabkin other than a lot of the chatter I've heard from scouts is that he is a major red flag.
Scout 6: Does a player have talent if he never shows it? His impact on games this year was very muted. If he were more impactful given the talent his underage play showed, he would be in the mid-to-late first alongside the other slightly undersized incomplete but dynamic forwards. Given how far his game has gotten off the rails, I would be willing to take the calculated risk on his talent after making a couple other selections — third round.
Advertisement
Scout 7: Ryabkin's not on our list.
Scout 8: On talent, probably first round. With all the big red flags on him, third round at the earliest.
Scout 10: On talent alone, Ryabkin's top six in the draft. Personally, I would draft him late first round. I have some personality doubts.
Scout 11: Mid-first talent. Second round.
Scout 13: First round/third round, but that's because I have a lot of seconds I like.
Scout 14: I can only speak to what I saw this season, so talent would be mid-first. His stats from the past indicate he's got more skill, though. I just haven't seen that this season.
Scout 15: Early Round 2 on talent, Round 4 earliest with all the stuff that comes with it.
(Photos of Jackson Smith and Radim Mrtka: Dennis Pajot and Leila Devlin / Getty Images)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BKFC 76 results: Jessica Eye wins first fight back from retirement, beats UFC veteran Mariya Agapova
Jessica Eye is going home with a couple of cuts and some new bruises but a win on her record as the one-time UFC title challenger returned from retirement and beat Mariya Agapova at BKFC 76. The story of the fight was volume and accuracy with Eye outlanding Agapova by a wide margin as she consistently pressed forward to close the distance and then unloaded with a barrage of punches. When it was over, Eye had clearly done enough to earn the victory with the judges scoring the contest 49-45, 50-44 and 49-45 in her favor as she moves to 1-0 in the BKFC ring. Advertisement 'These bruises heal but the evil lives on,' Eye shouted to the Texas crowd. 'That's what you guys came here for. Are you not entertained?' The flyweights traded body shots to open the fight with Agapova then looked to use her reach at distance while Eye was methodically stalking her across the ring. While she did end up with a cut over her eye from an early exchange, Eye showed a lot of confidence while coming after Agapova while trying to set up a heavy right hand. Eye continuously looked to get inside while pressing Agapova against the ropes and then unleashing a barrage of punches. A couple of wild exchanges saw both fighters land some solid shots but Eye was landing with better power. The end of the third round saw Eye finally unleash her biggest succession of punches as she went hard to the body and then back up top to the head just before the bell sounded. Advertisement The crowd was getting a little restless as Eye was constantly pressing forward, pushing Agapova into the ropes and then trying to throw punches on the inside. That inevitably led to the referee breaking them apart and resetting in the center of the ring. Eye did manage to clip Agapova with a stiff right hand just before the fourth round ended that definitely got her attention. With two minutes remaining, Eye kept moving forward aggressively when she popped Agapova, who stumbled backwards before hitting the canvas. While Agapova complained that she got shoved rather than knocked down, the referee administered the required count before allowing the action to continue. Eye went back to the body again with another blistering combination just before the fight came to an end. Overall, Eye threw over 300 strikes during the fight and she connected with more than 200 shots, which was far more than Agapova across the five round fight. Advertisement Following nearly three years out of action, the 38-year-old veteran returned with a win on Saturday and it appears Eye plans to keep going with a new career started as a member of the BKFC roster. More from
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dream rookie Te-Hina Paopao puts up career numbers in just 1 half vs. Liberty
The post Dream rookie Te-Hina Paopao puts up career numbers in just 1 half vs. Liberty appeared first on ClutchPoints. When the Atlanta Dream drafted Te-Hina Paopao from South Carolina, they wanted a veteran point guard. The 22-year-old was one of the older players in this year's draft class. However, she has given the Dream what they wanted, fitting in well alongside Rhyne Howard, one of the league's best shooters. Against Sabrina Ionescu and the New York Liberty, Howard and her teammates needed more out of the rookie. Luckily for them, Paopao delivered in a big way in the first half. Advertisement Paopao fueled her team to a three point lead at halftime, tying her career-high with 16 points in the first half alone. She only missed one shot in the first two quarters, going 6-for-7 from the field and 4-for-5 from 3-point range. Paopao and Howard finished the third quarter as the only two Dream players in double figures. The game at the Liberty is a big one for Atlanta. The Dream have been a dominant team this season, but get to see how they stack up against one of the WNBA's elite teams. Offensively, Paopao's contributions had the Dream going blow-for-blow with Ionescu and Co.. However, the Liberty point guard far outscored any Atlanta player in the game. Despite that, though, the Dream held a lead into the fourth quarter. Advertisement A lot of Atlanta's season comes down to just how far Howard can take them. Allisha Gray and Brittney Griner are there to support her, but the Dream rely on their star. However, if Paopao's career half is a sign of what is to come, the future is bright. On a team that desperately needs scoring off the bench, the rookie's explosive half is a godsend. The Dream drafted Paopao ahead of two of her South Carolina teammates in the second round of the draft. Makayla Thompson and Bree Hall are both better scorers than the point guard. However, Paopao's value comes in her versatility. Regardless of if they win or lose, pushing New York to the limit is a good sign for Atlanta. The Dream still have a ways to go as contenders, including figuring out their rotations. If their rookie continues to shoot the lights out, though, head coach Karl Smesko will have no choice but to give her more minutes. Related: Natasha Cloud, Brittney Griner joyfully reunite before Liberty-Dream clash Related: Dream's Rhyne Howard hits 2nd 3-point milestone in back-to-back games
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fever guard Sophie Cunningham's All-Star voting position has WNBA world surprised
The post Fever guard Sophie Cunningham's All-Star voting position has WNBA world surprised appeared first on ClutchPoints. The Caitlin Clark Effect is undeniable and extends wider than many people even realize. If it was not clear by now, the early returns for WNBA All-Star voting, as conveyed by ESPN's Alexa Philippou, emphatically reinforce the notion that she is already the face of the league. The Indiana Fever star leads all players with 515,993 votes and is also giving some of her teammates a boost as well. Advertisement Indy boasts plenty of talent aside from Clark — Aliyah Boston is in third and Kelsey Mitchell occupies seventh place right now — but there are multiple supplemental contributors who are undoubtedly much higher on the list because of their association with the 23-year-old guard, or because of what they did on her behalf. Look no further than Sophie Cunningham, the woman who Fever fans have recently dubbed 'The Enforcer.' She currently has the 23rd-most votes, ranking above multi-time All-Stars and plenty of players who are simply having a superior season. Cunningham is averaging 6.4 points and 4.3 rebounds in 22.6 minutes per contest while shooting 38.2 percent from the field and 40.9 percent from 3-point range. The veteran is a valuable role player who works hard on defense, but she is obviously not All-Star material at this present time. Her massive spike in popularity can best be attributed to the physical aggression she unleashed on Connecticut Sun guard Jacy Sheldon, who had multiple heated exchanges with Clark in Tuesday night's game. With Indiana leading by double-digits late in the fourth quarter, Cunningham halted a Sheldon drive by wrapping around her neck area and bringing her down to the floor. A struggle ensued after the whistle, and No. 8 earned instant folk-hero status. Advertisement Sun head coach Rachid Meziane denounced the foul as 'stupid,' but it is clear many people, especially Caitlin Clark and Fever fans, appreciated the retaliation. Though, when such things like All-Star voting are impacted by viral moments and non-performance related factors, backlash is inevitable. 'The people voting for Sophie Cunningham to be an all-star need a serious evaluation,' @citimsc8 argued on X. 'Sophie Cunningham placing higher than Skylar Diggins, Jackie Young, and Rhyne Howard?' @ChristanWNBA posted, bewildered by the latest results. 'Clearly we aren't watching the same games.' Are things getting out of hand? The former Missouri star's potential All-Star candidacy is a polarizing topic, to say the least, but she is hardly the only player who is benefiting from the aforementioned Caitlin Clark Effect. Lexie Hull is enjoying a breakout campaign, shooting 56.3 percent from 3-point land (2.7 attempts per game), but she does not have the present or past credentials to justify a top-10 slot in the All-Star voting. Advertisement Kate Martin, Clark's Iowa teammate, is in the top-35 despite playing only 16.0 minutes per contest with the Golden State Valkyries. Indiana forward Damiris Dantas is logging less than 12 minutes a night and is raking in more votes than future Hall of Famers Tina Charles and Brittney Griner. The Fever are clearly the nucleus of the WNBA, regardless of their .500 record. Clark is a gold mine, as all those around her can attest, but Cunningham's ferocity is obviously giving her an abundance of standalone appeal as far as the public is concerned. The fan vote is worth only 50 percent, but if the former second-round draft pick continues to resonate with Indianapolis, she could possibly find herself in Gainbridge Fieldhouse for the 2025 All-Star Game. Related: Warriors guard Brandin Podziemski clowning Fever's Caitlin Clark for traveling Related: Big3 parts ways with influencer who posted Caitlin Clark highlights during in-game action
