Jay Tcath: The phrase ‘Free Palestine' is freeing no one, but it is killing some of us
Twice in a recent two-week period, two men were arrested for terrorist attacks while invoking 'Free Palestine.' For them, the phrase served as a rallying cry sanctioning violence.
Their targets were, in the deadly Washington, D.C., attack outside the Jewish Museum, a young couple, and in Boulder, Colorado, people attending a vigil for the 58 hostages held by Hamas.
For the two suspects — neither of whom is Palestinian — the phrase 'Free Palestine' was a license to kill.
They are not the only ones who understand it that way. It was just two months ago when the official residence of Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro was set ablaze after a Passover Seder event. The perpetrator, who has confessed, cited the governor's views on Palestine. Another 'Free Palestine' chanter struck and killed an elderly California Jewish man with a bullhorn in November 2023.
Not all 'Free Palestine' chanters understand it as a call to violence.
Yet the phrase's intentional lack of specificity is a big part of its utility: What the user means is left to the audience's interpretation. There are several prevalent understandings, ranging from noble to murderous.
'Free Palestine' can mean the justified yearning for Palestinians to enjoy the full freedoms, prosperity and security to which all people are entitled.
It can be a desperate plea for new, elected leaders. Hamas has governed Gaza with an iron fist — and no elections — since 2007, and the West Bank hasn't voted since 2006. This indifference to basic democracy does not portend well for what freedom would look like in a free Palestine.
For others invoking it, the phrase's imprecision is precisely the point. 'Free Palestine' can be exploited for misleading purposes. The lack of specificity avoids answering the most revealing question: Would a free Palestine be alongside Israel or instead of Israel?
Of course, Hamas and many of its global advocates shamelessly reject the 'alongside' option. In Gaza and elsewhere, they threaten anyone willing to accept such a peaceful compromise.
Other 'Free Palestine' supporters are unwilling to pay the negative public relations cost of acknowledging that 'instead of' is their nonnegotiable option. Why? Because their 'instead of' option can only be realized with the annihilation of a sovereign United Nations member country populated by 10 million Jews, Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Druze and others.
Editorial: We mourn the slayings of two young Israeli Embassy workers, and the crime's Chicago tiesThe 'instead of' option glorifies killing Jews, be it on Oct. 7, 2023, in Israel; in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; in Washington; in Boulder; and God knows where next. While we don't know where the next 'Free Palestine'-inspired attack will happen, we do know, tragically, it isn't a matter of whether it will happen. It is simply a matter of when.
In most instances, 'Free Palestine' is protected free speech in the United States.
But after this most recent series of 'Free Palestine'-motivated attacks and with an accompanying deafening silence of condemnation from most pro-Palestinian groups, is it so unreasonable to ask that those promulgating it own up to what it does and doesn't mean to them? And for us Jews.
The murderers do not indulge the lie of most pro-Palestinian advocates that there is a distinction between Jews and Zionists. Neither the California, Washington, Harrisburg or Boulder offenders bothered to inquire about their victims' identities or ideologies before attacking. Whether the victims were even Jewish or Zionist, or how they understood 'Free Palestine,' was irrelevant.
Politicalized catchphrases are proliferating. While many may seem innocuous, they can be dog whistles that are understood differently by different audiences. Our business, civic, educational, faith, media and political leaders have learned how to navigate these linguistic minefields. They now need to tune their antennas to the violent impact that 'Free Palestine' and the demonization of Zionists are having on American Jews.
Those of us yearning for both Israeli-Palestinian peace and Jewish safety worldwide understandably want to know what 'Free Palestine' means to those in our midst.
The Boulder attacker planned his violence for a year, authorities say. There are undoubtedly others right now planning their own attacks to 'Free Palestine.'
Such would-be assailants should know whether their attacks are endorsed or opposed by the 'Free Palestine' campaign they have adopted. We already know how two people over the last three weeks understood the phrase's imprecision. And we have seen and heard all too many applauding this resistance.
Attempting to define the meaning of another group's self-understanding is likely to evoke accusations of mansplaining. But in the absence of a widely embraced peaceful definition of 'Free Palestine,' being accused of insensitivity is easy to bear. We Jews are just trying to freely celebrate a Seder, visit a museum and rally for hostages. That yearning involves no duplicity or threats to others.
Jay Tcath is executive vice president of the Jewish United Fund.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
FBI, DHS host call with governors over US threat environment after Iran strikes
Senior FBI and Homeland Security officials hosted conference calls with some of the nation's governors and top law enforcement officials on Sunday to discuss how the U.S. missile strikes in Iran impact an already dangerous threat environment, sources told ABC News. The calls included one with hundreds of state and local law enforcement officials from around the country and another with state governors and their staff. An FBI official said on the call that the agency's "posture is going to be enhanced" after the U.S. military action against Iran. The FBI is asking more personnel to be in the office, and continuing to "canvas sources" and monitor intelligence. Sources said there is currently no specific intelligence of a direct, credible threat against the U.S. homeland. The call with governors was meant to ensure that states are aware of the current threat environment and to encourage them to reach out to relevant state agencies, infrastructure partners and others who may be at risk, sources said. Federal officials specifically urged governors and their staff on the call to be vigilant for an uptick in cyber activity within their states and encouraged them to reach out to relevant state agencies, private sector infrastructure partners, and others who may be at risk, including Jewish institutions or groups associated with Israel. The call with law enforcement also included a representative from the Secure Community Network (SCN), a Chicago-based organization that helps protect Jewish institutions across the country and shares intelligence with the FBI and DHS. SCN's national director and CEO, Michael Masters, said on the call that the decision by the U.S. government to join Israel's military campaign against Iran "opens up a new chapter for all of us," and that Jewish institutions and Jewish leaders within the U.S. "should be considered at an elevated risk" for retaliatory violence. He said that in the hours right after the U.S. launched its strikes, SCN identified more than 1,600 "violent posts directed to the Jewish community on social media." A number that he said continues to grow. Expressing concern over what Iran might do in response to the U.S. military action, Masters said, "Historically, as many of us know, the intelligence community has determined that Iran would not strike in the U.S. unless a red line was crossed. …The so-called red line of the Iranian response doctrine was crossed." And Jim Dunlap, the deputy secretary for analysis at the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis, said the U.S. strike against Iran "raises the threat environment here in the United States." But he also said that, "from a terrorism perspective, we assess that Tehran's retaliatory efforts against the homeland are probably dependent upon the extent to which it believes U.S. actions threaten the regime's stability." "We have not yet observed the Iranians call for direct violence in the homeland," he added, though he said DHS is "closely" monitoring for "specific calls to violence and threats against the homeland." Without offering specifics, Dunlap said that "recent law enforcement disruptions" in the U.S. "could challenge Iran's ability to execute a plot in the homeland in the immediate term." The calls come after Homeland Security issued a bulletin calling on the public to report anything suspicious to officials with DHS Secretary Kristi Noem stating flatly that what's happening in Iran brings the potential for increased threats to the homeland in the form of "possible cyberattacks, acts of violence and antisemitic hate crimes." All state governors were invited to the call, but not all were able to make it for various reasons, so for some only their staff members attended, sources said.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump's Iran strike opens the door to a new era of Mideast peace and prosperity
As the aftershocks of Operation Midnight Hammer play out, Arab nations have the chance for an entirely new Middle East — at peace and headed to mass prosperity. Iran's nuclear threat is off the table, its chief proxies devastated and its allies either out of power or conspicuously failing to offer the regime any concrete support in its hour of direst need. And if the Islamic Republic should attempt any kind of retaliation, such as trying to close the Strait of Hormuz, it must expect a devastating US response that can only add to the risk that the Iranian people will rise up to dislodge the entire clerical regime. This leaves the Arab world poised for a new future: The leftist vision of 'pan-Arabism' bottomed out decades ago in the dead-end tyrannies of Moammar Khadafy and Saddam Hussein; the obsession with destroying Israel has only poured out lives and treasure on the sand while radicalizing populations that could be building prosperity. And a century of Europeans' advice and agendas for the Middle East has proved even less useful than the prior century of European imperialism. Whereas the Abraham Accord approach — friendship with America and Israel — is already enriching the nations that have signed on, allowing investment and progress that builds peace and stability. Rescued from the threat of Persian hegemony, Arab leaders could decide to fall back on the failed approaches of the past — but why repeat those tragedies? It's quite telling that Syria's new leadership — with all their past ties to al Qaeda and its death-cult prescriptions — seems to have responded to President Donald Trump's early outreach with interest and openness. Added cause for hope is how they last week declared their airspace open to Israel's defense against Iran's missiles and drones: The greatest menace they now face comes from Turkey, whose ruler is still playing the 'secure my power by blaming everything on the Jews' game. Iran's decision to give Hamas the green light for the Oct. 7, 2023, atrocities in Israel was plainly intended to both provide a distraction as Tehran made its final sprint to becoming a nuclear power and to head off any public Saudi-Israeli entente. That move has now proved an utter disaster for Iran on the first front; the results now open the door to Riyadh joining the Abraham Accords. If Democrats still held the White House, they'd side with the feckless Europeans in insisting that Middle East peace can't come until the question of Palestinians' future is completely resolved — when the truth has always been that those issues will only be settled by a region whose other powers can cooperate. Team Trump moved to finish off Iran's nuclear program purely to eliminate that one existential threat, not to force regime change there nor to remake the region's balance of power. But clarity about Washington's intentions, with humility about what America can accomplish unilaterally and an unmistakable US policy of achieving peace through strength, are sure looking like a pretty good recipe for making the Middle East great again.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Finally: A president who understands ‘peace through strength' just made the world safer
President Donald Trump's order to 'obliterate' Iranian nuclear-weapons sites just made the whole world a lot safer — not only because he kept a maniacal regime from acquiring nukes, but because other nations must now think twice before defying the United States. 'American deterrence is back,' proclaimed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. 'When this president speaks, the world should listen' — because the US military 'can back it up.' Advertisement And, indeed, US military might is a thing to behold. What a refreshing change from the Obama and Biden years. Time and again, President Joe Biden issued a toothless, finger-wagging 'Don't' — only for his targets to laugh and do as they pleased anyway, knowing that America's adversaries would face no real consequences. Advertisement 'Don't, don't, don't,' Biden threatened any 'hostile actor thinking about attacking Israel' after Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023; Hezbollah and the Houthis struck the Jewish state anyway. US drops $500M bombs on Iran The US military dropped six 'bunker buster' bombs on Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment plant Saturday night and on two other key sites. Prior to the airstrikes, Israel initiated extensive attacks on Iran's nuclear infrastructure and military. Satellite images show how part of the mountain protecting the facility was completely obliterated. This marks the first time that the US used the 15-ton GBU-57 bunker buster bombs in anger. 'Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said following the attack. Last year he told Iran 'don't' after it threatened to attack Israel; Tehran responded by launching hundreds of missiles at Israeli targets. Biden warned Vladimir Putin of 'severe consequences' for invading Ukraine; Putin went ahead. Advertisement Even after Iranian-backed militants killed three US soldiers and injured 30 others in Jordan last year, Biden's response was all but nonexistent. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Joe earned the world's contempt his first year in office with his disastrous Afghan withdrawal, and kept on earning it by repeatedly hesitating in getting Ukraine the arms it needed to do more than slow the Russian onslaught. President Barack Obama was no better. Recall his 'red line' on Syria's use of chemical weapons? When Bashar al-Assad used them anyway, Obama set off on an elaborate dance to not follow through — even facilitating Moscow's return to being a Mideast player when Putin offered face-saving cover for Bam's back-down. Advertisement Obama's answer to Iran's nukes was to hand the regime billions in exchange for promises to delay gaining them, a deal Tehran quickly violated. The Obama crew confused America's enemies with its friends; Biden was just confused — but each opened to door to chaos with bumbling that led to the rise of ISIS and Putin's first grab of Ukrainian territory on Bam's watch, then the latest Ukraine war plus the Middle East in flames after Joe took over. Yes, Trump prefers diplomacy, even to end Iran's nuclear ambitions. But he also warned that no deal meant 'bombing the likes of which they have never seen before' — and now has proved that his words aren't empty threats. And just as Putin, China's Xi Jinping and other malign actors saw Biden's Afghan bugout as a US retreat and a license for belligerence, they heard the rumble of Trump's massive bunker-buster bombs Saturday — and the message they sent about America's new resolve. It's true that Trump strongly prefers peace and is reluctant to use military power, but he's now proved beyond a doubt that he will use it — and to overwhelming effect — when necessary. Plus, US deception and strategic misdirection in advance of Saturday's strikes now make it clear that Trump's trademark ambiguity is reason for the other guys to worry about what he might do. Advertisement America is well-served by that 'unpredictability,' even as it was ill-served by Obama and Biden's predictable weakness. Bombing Iran's nuke sites won't guarantee better behavior from US adversaries, but the Putins and Xis of the world are on notice that they move at high risk of paying a far greater cost than they can afford. It's the very definition of deterrence: 'Peace through strength' makes the world safer. Thank goodness the nation has a president who gets it.
