Don't fear whistleblower channels like Edisi Siasat, enforcement agencies told
EAIC chairman Ismail Bakar said information from sources such as Edisi Siasat, if credible and relevant, should warrant prompt investigations.
PETALING JAYA : The Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) has advised enforcement agencies not to view allegations of misconduct, including those from unofficial sources like Edisi Siasat, as threats.
EAIC chairman Ismail Bakar said such disclosures should be seen as opportunities for agencies to strengthen their integrity and public trust, Berita Harian reported.
He said information from channels such as Edisi Siasat could still warrant attention and spur investigations if deemed credible and relevant.
'In some cases, such information can serve as the basis for initiating early investigation efforts,' he was quoted as saying.
'Under the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission Act 2009 (Act 700), EAIC is empowered to initiate investigations on its own accord if it deems that the matter is of significant public interest or necessary.'
Edisi Siasat, an anonymous Telegram channel, is known for publishing whistleblower-style allegations, particularly targeting public institutions and enforcement agencies.
Despite being unofficial, its posts often gain traction and trigger public debates.
Ismail said investigating such allegations, whether true or false, would show transparency and a commitment to institutional reform.
'If the allegations are baseless, investigations can clear the agency's name. But if misconduct is proven, further action can be taken against those involved.
'This approach aligns with the principles of accountability and good governance,' he said.
Ismail added that the EAIC welcomed information that could help boost integrity and urged the public to cooperate to ensure investigations were fair and evidence-based.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
35 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
WhatsApp location helps fire brigade rescue teen hikers lost on Penang's Bukit Cherok Tok Kun
BUKIT MERTAJAM, June 22 — Two youngsters who got lost in the forest while hiking at Bukit Cherok Tok Kun, famed for its biggest buttress trees in Penang, yesterday were swiftly rescued by the fire brigade, thanks to a handy smartphone. Assistant operations director of the Penang Fire and Rescue Department (JBPM), John Sagun Francis, said the victims sent their location via WhatsApp at 1.16pm to his department. 'A team from the Bukit Mertajam Fire and Rescue Station (BBP) was deployed to the location, where five personnel were involved in the search and rescue operation for the teenagers, with the assistance of the public. 'The two 18-year-olds were found and brought down safely, with the operation ending at 4.14pm,' he said in a statement, adding that the victims had been handed over to their guardians. — Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
44 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
‘Superteam' party of KJ, Rafizi, Syed Saddiq won't work, say analysts
An Umno Supreme Council member recently suggested that Khairy Jamaluddin, Rafizi Ramli, Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman and other political outliers form their party. PETALING JAYA : A political 'superteam' featuring big names like Khairy Jamaluddin, Rafizi Ramli and Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman might look good on paper, but won't go far in Malaysia's political terrain, analysts have warned. Personality conflicts and differing strategies by these high-profile politicians could sink a new party before it gained traction, says public policy specialist Kartini Aboo Talib of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 'Superteams may fail because of clashing egos, different leadership styles, undefined roles, or competing strategies and interests,' she told FMT. 'Unless each person is willing to give and take, and share the same goal of defeating a common political opponent, it's not going to work.' The idea of a new party was floated by Umno Supreme Council member Puad Zarkashi, who joked that high-profile but politically displaced leaders like Khairy, Rafizi and others should form a party together with 'solid bargaining power'. However, Malaysia has a long history of failed third forces, from Parti Socialis Malaysia to Pejuang to even Muda, all of which struggled to gain ground against dominant coalitions. Azmi Hassan of Akademi Nusantara said Malaysia's political ecosystem still revolves around parties with deep grassroots support. 'The names that are mentioned have one thing in common, that is, they are very critical of their party, whether current or former,' he said. 'But you need more than criticism and charisma. You need a membership base and a working party machinery.' Azmi cited the limited electoral success achieved by the youth-based Muda, despite Syed Saddiq's fame, saying that a party cannot survive on charisma or non-member support alone. 'It doesn't work that way. That's why Umno, PKR, DAP, PAS and Bersatu remain dominant because they have a strong grassroots base,' he said.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Sisters in Islam should be regarded as Muslim by common reputation and subject to fatwa — Hafiz Hassan
JUNE 22 — By definition, a Muslim is not limited to someone who professes the religion of Islam. To profess is to affirm one's faith in a religion. According to the majority decision of the Federal Court in the Sisters in Islam Forum case, only a natural person can profess a religion. However, by definition, a person includes a body of persons, whether corporate or unincorporated. Even if we accept the majority view that only a natural person can profess, there are five other categories under which a person may be considered a Muslim: (a) a person either or both of whose parents were Muslims at the time of the person's birth; (b) a person whose upbringing was conducted on the basis that they were a Muslim; (c) a person who has converted to Islam in accordance with the requirements of section 85; (d) a person who is commonly reputed to be a Muslim; or (e) a person who has stated, in circumstances where they were legally bound to tell the truth, that they were a Muslim, whether the statement was verbal or written. Lawyer Malik Imtiaz Sarwar giving a press conference after the Sisters in Islam's Federal Court decision on the appeal against 'deviant' fatwa at Palace of Justice, Putrajaya. Jun 19, 2025. — Picture by Choo Choy May Since a person includes a corporate body, that body is considered a Muslim if it is commonly reputed to be so — as in the case of Sisters in Islam. I respectfully agree with the single dissenting judge that the name Sisters in Islam clearly reflects its identity. By definition, Sisters in Islam should be regarded as Muslim by common reputation and therefore subject to fatwa. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
