If Anwar's constitutional questions are preposterous, absurd and legal nonsense, let the court say it — Hafiz Hassan
JUNE 6 — Cornell Law School offers an insightful read on qualified immunity.
It says that qualified immunity is a type of legal immunity that protects a government official from lawsuits alleging that the official violated a plaintiff's rights, only allowing suits where officials violated a 'clearly established' statutory or constitutional right.
A plaintiff is the party who sues in a civil suit.
A defendant is the party sued.
It says further that qualified immunity balances two important interests—the need to hold public officials accountable when they exercise power irresponsibly and the need to shield officials from harassment, distraction, and liability when they perform their duties reasonably. (Emphasis added)
When determining whether a right was 'clearly established,' courts in the US consider whether a hypothetical reasonable official would have known that the defendant's conduct violated the plaintiff's rights.
Courts conducting this analysis apply the law that was in force at the time of the alleged violation, not the law in effect when the court considers the case.
Qualified immunity is not immunity from having to pay money damages , but rather immunity from having to go through the costs of a trial at all. (Emphasis added)
Accordingly, courts must resolve qualified immunity issues as early in a case as possible, preferably before discovery.
Qualified immunity only applies to suits against government officials as individuals, not suits against the government for damages caused by the officials' actions. (Emphasis added)
Although qualified immunity frequently appears in cases involving police officers, it also applies to most other executive branch officials.
Does qualified immunity apply to a prime minister in Malaysia?
That's the constitutional question proposed to be referred by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim for a ruling by the Federal Court.
Some, even from the legal fraternity, have vilified Anwar and his legal team for the proposed constitutional questions which have been called preposterous, absurd and 'legal nonsense'.
But if they are such, let the court having the ultimate authority say it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
11 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Trump celebrates ‘big win' as US court allows National Guard deployment in Los Angeles
SAN FRANCISCO, June 20 — A US appeals court yesterday ruled that President Donald Trump could continue control of National Guard troops in Los Angeles, over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump ordered the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines into Los Angeles this month in response to protests over federal immigration sweeps — a move opposed by city leaders and Newsom. A lower court judge had last week ordered Trump to return control of the California National Guard to Newsom, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles was 'illegal.' But a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that Trump was within his rights when he ordered 4,000 members of the National Guard into service for 60 days to 'protect federal personnel performing federal functions and to protect federal property.' 'Affording appropriate deference to the President's determination, we conclude that he likely acted within his authority in federalising the National Guard,' they said in their 38-page ruling. Trump celebrated the decision in a post on Truth Social Thursday night, calling it a 'BIG WIN.' 'All over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done,' Trump wrote. Members of the California National Guard are deployed outside a complex of federal buildings in Santa Ana, California June, 18, 2025. — Reuters pic 'Not a king' The state of California had argued that Trump's order was illegal because it did not follow the procedure of being issued through the governor. The judges said Trump's 'failure to issue the federalisation order directly 'through' the Governor of California does not limit his otherwise lawful authority to call up the National Guard.' But the panel said it disagreed with the defendants' primary argument that the president's decision to federalise members of the California National Guard 'is completely insulated from judicial review.' Governor Newsom responded to the decision saying Trump 'is not a king and not above the law.' 'Tonight, the court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court,' he posted on X. 'We will not let this authoritarian use of military soldiers against citizens go unchecked.' Newsom added in a separate post on his personal X account 'the fight doesn't end here', adding 'we will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of US military soldiers against citizens.' The state could request the case to be reheard, or it could petition the Supreme Court for intervention. People protest against federal immigration sweeps, during the Juneteenth holiday in New York City June 19, 2025. — Reuters pic Immigration tensions The ruling comes against a backdrop of heightened tensions in Los Angeles, which has become ground zero of Trump's immigration crackdown across the United States. The city has seen scattered violence but mostly peaceful protests in recent weeks, ignited by an escalation in federal immigration sweeps that have targeted migrant workers in garment factories, car washes and other workplaces. Local media reported further raids across the city yesterday targeting Home Depot stores, a home improvement retailer where day labourers often gather in parking lots seeking work. The protests, though largely peaceful, saw sporadic and spectacular violence. Damage included vandalism, looting, clashes with law enforcement and several torched driverless taxis. Trump, who has repeatedly exaggerated the scale of the unrest, also sent 700 US Marines to Los Angeles despite the objections of local officials, claiming that they had lost control of the 'burning' city. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard over the wishes of a state governor. Trump appointed two of the judges on the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit panel, and former president Joe Biden appointed the third, the New York Times reported yesterday. — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
13 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump to make Iran war decision in ‘next 2 weeks'
The two-week deadline comes days after US president Donald Trump publicly mulled joining Israel's strikes on Iran. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump said Thursday he will decide whether to join Israel's strikes on Iran within the next two weeks as there is still a 'substantial' chance of talks to end the conflict. Trump's move to hit the pause button could open up space for diplomacy, after days of fevered questions about whether or not he would order US military action against Tehran. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt read out a message from Trump after what she called 'a lot of speculation' about whether the United States would be 'directly involved' in the conflict. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Trump said in the statement. Trump has set two-week deadlines that subsequently shifted on a series of other tough topics in the past, including the Russia-Ukraine war, but Leavitt denied he was putting off a decision. 'If there's a chance for diplomacy the president's always going to grab it, but he's not afraid to use strength as well,' Leavitt said. At the same time Leavitt reinforced the sense of urgency, telling reporters that Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in the space of a 'couple of weeks.' 'Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon. All they need is a decision from the supreme leader to do that, and it would take a couple of weeks to complete the production of that weapon,' she said. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon, saying that its program is for peaceful purposes. Trump said on Wednesday that Iran had asked to send officials to the White House to negotiate a deal on its nuclear program and end the conflict with Israel, although Iran denied making any such request. Washington and Tehran had continued 'correspondence' since Israel first struck Iran last week, Leavitt said. She said however that there were currently no plans for Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff to join European diplomats meeting Iran's foreign minister in Geneva on Friday. Trump met his top national security team in the White House Situation Room for the third day in a row on Thursday. He will have similar meetings daily until he leaves for a Nato summit in the Netherlands on Monday, the White House said. His two-week deadline comes after a tense few days in which Trump publicly mulled joining Israel's strikes on Iran and said that Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was an 'easy target.' Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path towards a deal to replace the nuclear deal with Iran that he tore up in his first term in 2018. But he has since backed Israel's attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities and military top brass, while mulling whether to join in. A key issue is that the United States is the only country with the huge 'bunker buster' bombs that could destroy Iran's crucial Fordo Iranian nuclear enrichment plant. 'We have capabilities that no other country on this planet possesses,' said Leavitt. The White House meanwhile urged Trump supporters to 'trust' the president as he decides whether to act. A number of key figures in his 'Make America Great Again' movement, including commentator Tucker Carlson and former aide Steve Bannon, have vocally opposed US strikes on Iran. Trump's promise to extract the United States from its 'forever wars' in the Middle East played a role in his 2016 and 2024 election wins. 'Trust in President Trump. President Trump has incredible instincts,' Leavitt said.
Malay Mail
17 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Oil drops after Trump opens diplomatic window on Iran
HONG KONG, June 20 — Oil prices tumbled today and equity traders fought to end a volatile week on a positive note after Donald Trump said he would mull over the next two weeks whether to join Israel's attacks on Iran, providing some much-needed relief to markets. Speculation had been swirling that Trump would throw his lot in with Israel, but yesterday he said he would decide 'within the next two weeks' whether to involve the United States, giving diplomacy a shot to end the hostilities. While tensions are sky high amid fears of an escalation, the US president's remarks suggested the crisis could be prevented from spiralling into all-out war between the Middle East foes. Since Israel first hit Iran last Friday, the two have exchanged deadly strikes and apocalyptic warnings, though observers said the conflict has not seen a critical escalation. European foreign ministers were due to meet their Iranian counterpart today in Geneva. In a statement read out by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, the president said: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' Leavitt added: 'If there's a chance for diplomacy the president's always going to grab it, but he's not afraid to use strength as well.' Both main oil contracts were down around 2 per cent today but uncertainty prevailed and traders remained nervous. 'Crude still calls the shots, and volatility's the devil in the room — and every trader on the street knows we're two headlines away from chaos,' said Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management. 'Make no mistake: we're trading a geopolitical powder keg with a lit fuse. 'President Trump's two-week 'thinking window' on whether to join Israel's war against Iran is no cooling-off period — it's a ticking volatility clock.' Stocks were mixed following a public holiday in New York, with Hong Kong, Shanghai and Singapore all up. Seoul's Kospi led the gains, rising more than 1 per cent to break 3,000 points for the first time in nearly three and a half years. The index has risen every day except one since the June 4 election of a new president, which ended months of political crisis and fuelled hopes for an economic rebound. Tokyo fell as Japanese core inflation accelerated, stoked by a doubling in the cost of rice, a hot topic issue that poses a threat to Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba ahead of elections next month. There were also losses in Sydney, Taipei, Manila and Jakarta. The Middle East crisis continues to absorb most of the news but Trump's trade war remains a major obstacle for investors as the end of a 90-day pause on his April 2 tariff blitz approaches with few governments reaching deals to avert them being imposed. 'While the worst of the tariffs have been paused, we suspect it won't be until those deadlines approach that new agreements may be finalised,' said David Sekera, Chief US Market Strategist at Morningstar. 'Until then, as news emerges regarding the progress and substance of trade negotiations, these headlines could have an outsize positive or negative impact on markets.' — AFP
