Two of Jozef Puska's brothers found guilty of withholding key information about Ashling Murphy murder
A jury has convicted murderer Jozef Puska's two brothers of withholding crucial information from gardaí investigating the murder of schoolteacher Ashling Murphy.
The two men's wives have also been found guilty of burning the killer's bloodstained clothes in an effort to obstruct his prosecution.
Jozef Puska (35) murdered Ms Murphy (23) on January 12th, 2022, by repeatedly stabbing her in the neck after attacking her while she exercised along the canal towpath outside Tullamore, Co Offaly. He was later convicted of murder and is serving a life sentence.
The Central Criminal Court jury on Tuesday accepted the prosecution's case that his brothers, Lubomir Jnr (38) and Marek (36) misled gardaí by failing to disclose crucial and vital information when they gave witness statements.
READ MORE
The jury found their wives – Viera Gaziova (40) and Jozefina Grundzova (32) – burned Jozef Puska's clothes to impede his arrest or prosecution.
The 12 jurors unanimously found the brothers guilty, while the two women were found guilty by majority verdicts.
All four were living with Jozef Puska, his wife Lucia, and 14 children at Lynally Grove, Mucklagh, Co Offaly, when the offences occurred in January 2022.
All defendants had pleaded not guilty to all charges.
It was the State's case that the two brothers misled gardaí and withheld 'crucial, relevant and significant' information when they gave voluntary interviews in Tullamore two days after Ms Murphy's death.
This included information that Jozef Puska returned home on the night of the murder with visible injuries, admitted to killing or seriously injuring a woman with a knife and subsequently travelled to Dublin.
The 12 jurors at the Central Criminal Court gave their verdict in relation to the two brothers after deliberating for 13 hours and 40 minutes over five days, before returning again to the courtroom 16 minutes later to reveal their decisions on the charges against the two women.
Ms Justice Caroline Biggs thanked the panel of seven men and five women for their service and excused them from jury service for life.
The four family members were remanded on continuing bail until July 7th, when their sentence hearings will take place.
More to follow ...
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Boston rape trial: Judge declares mistrial after jury unable to reach decision
A jury has been unable to reach a verdict in the case of the Dublin firefighter accused of raping a US woman in Boston over St Patrick's Day weekend last year. Terence Crosbie (38) was on trial for raping a 29-year-old attorney in a shared hotel room while his Dublin Fire Brigade colleague Liam O'Brien slept. On Friday afternoon, when the jury of eight men and four women returned to the courtroom to outline that they they could not reach a verdict, the judge said: 'I find that this jury is hung.' After more than 22 hours of deliberation over four days the jury of eight men and four women were unable to reach a decision. READ MORE On Friday afternoon, following queries by the jury and statements that they could not reach a verdict, judge Sarah Ellis said: 'I declare that this jury is deadlocked and I declare a mistrial.' His next trial is set for October 14th. After declaring a mistrial Judge Ellis increased Mr Crosbie's bail from $10,000 to $50,000 declaring Mr Crosbie to be a flight risk. 'The state of the evidence is no longer speculative in this case,' Judge Ellis said. Mr Crosbie was one of more than 10 members of Dublin Fire Brigade who flew into Boston on March 14th to participate in the St Patrick's Day parade. The woman alleged that later that night she met Mr O'Brien at The Black Rose bar, returned with him to the Omni Parker House hotel, had consensual sex and fell asleep in separate beds. She alleged she awoke to a man she did not know raping her and disparaging Mr O'Brien who was snoring. 'I know you want this; [Mr O'Brien] can't even do this for you – what a loser,' she claimed Mr Crosbie said. The complainant and Mr Crosbie both testified during the five-day trial. Prosecutors said the complainant's testimony that she 'woke up' with a man raping her was supported by CCTV footage of Mr Crosbie entering the hotel room at the time in question and the complainant leaving 20 minutes later. Just because the woman went home with Mr O'Brien 'doesn't mean that that man's hotel roommate gets to rape her', prosecutor Erin Murphy told the court. Mr Crosbie 'isn't the unluckiest man in the world; he is the man who raped,' she said. His defence lawyer Daniel C Reilly asked jurors to end Mr Crosbie's 'nightmare' with an acquittal. Mr Crosbie was steadfast in his denial of the assault, insisting through his attorneys, police interviews and his own testimony that he 'didn't touch' the woman. 'There was nobody in my bed - my bed was empty,' Mr Crosbie told the court. 'I had no physical or sexual contact with her at all'. Mr Crosbie insisted that words the complainant attributed to the assailant such as 'loser' was 'not an Irish term'. His defence team called into question DNA evidence collected from the woman. Analysts found two male profiles but could not conclusively identify Mr Crosbie as the second male contributor. The defence also sought to discredit the woman's account citing 'gaps' in her memory, insisting she was inebriated and questioning her about psychiatric medication in cross examination. Mr Crosbie has been held at the Nashua Street jail in Boston since his arrest on March 16th, 2024.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Search under way for teenage swimmer off Meath coast
A search operation has been launched after a swimmer was reported missing in Laytown, Co Meath this evening. The teenage boy was reported missing by a member of the public just before 6.15pm. The Dublin-based Irish Coast Guard Rescue 116 helicopter and the Drogheda Coast Guard Unit were tasked to respond to the incident. The helicopter and coast guard unit were at the scene just before 6.40pm. Gardaí and a unit of the National Ambulance Service are also at the scene. The search for the swimmer remains ongoing.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Court of Appeal remits charges against allegedly unlicensed taximan to District Court
Charges against a Co Wexford man running an allegedly unlicensed taxi service − brought following a covert National Transport Authority (NTA) operation − will be remitted to the District Court following a Court of Appeal decision. In August 2022, an NTA enforcement officer – with assistance from An Garda Síochána – carried out a 'covert test purchase', posing as a passenger when availing of the man's allegedly unlawful taxi service. The man drove the NTA officer to a destination, before the latter identified himself. He recovered the money he'd used to pay his fare to keep as potential evidence. Charges were subsequently brought against the allegedly unlicensed taxi driver in the District Court. READ MORE These charges were dropped when a judge concluded that the NTA officer was, under the Taxi Regulation Act 2013, empowered only to take enforcement action against licensed operators – not unlicensed operators. The NTA officer accepted during the District Court trial that provisions for carrying out a test purchase or 'setting a trap' were not set out under legislation. The High Court upheld the District Court's decision following an appeal brought by the NTA. This was appealed to the Court of Appeal. In a judgment, Ms Justice Nuala Butler, on behalf of the three-judgment Court of Appeal, said a core issue in the case was the extent to which an investigator – ie, the NTA officer – could take steps in the course of their duties which did not have an explicit basis in law. In the Court of Appeal proceedings, the allegedly unlicensed taxi driver accepted that an enforcement officer may take steps in an investigation that are not explicitly set out in legislation, provided it does not go beyond what an ordinary person could do without legal powers. However, he maintained the District Court judge had been right to dismiss the charges against him, arguing that in conducting the covert test purchase, the investigator presented himself as exercising a power under law which he did not have. Ms Justice Butler noted that no statutory power is required by an investigator to do something an ordinary member of the public can do. 'If a member of the public is lawfully entitled to do something, then a person appointed under statute for a particular purpose is also entitled to do that thing unless in doing so he breaches a personal right of an affected person including a suspect in a criminal investigation,' she said. The judge said it was incorrect that a member of the public could not have carried out a covert test purchase. She said it was incorrect to assume that a covert test purchase could not be made by an investigator without expressed provision in law to do so. Ms Justice Butler concluded that the High Court was incorrect in upholding the District Court's decision to dismiss the charges against the allegedly unlicensed taxi driver. She said the NTA's appeal should be upheld, and the case be remitted back to the District Court.
