Record foreign asset disclosures as govt steps up scrutiny: Finance ministry

New Delhi: The Union ministry of finance on Friday said it is intensifying scrutiny of foreign assets and income held by Indian residents, using global tax information-sharing frameworks.
This crackdown has caused a record number of taxpayers to disclose offshore holdings in their income tax filings for the assessment year (AY) 2024–25, it said in a statement.
The ministry said that the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) conducted a comprehensive comparison of financial data received from over 100 countries under the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) mechanism with the foreign asset and income disclosures made in income tax returns (ITRs).
This exercise covered all major jurisdictions, including Switzerland.
In cases where discrepancies were detected—such as unreported or underreported offshore holdings—the tax department proactively reached out to taxpayers through SMS and emails, urging them to review and update their filings.
'As a result, a total of 24,678 taxpayers reviewed their ITRs and 5,483 taxpayers filed their belated return for the AY24-25, reporting foreign assets valuing to ₹ 29,208 crores and additional income of ₹ 1,089.88 crores as foreign income,' the finance ministry said.
'Suitable action under the extant provision of law is under consideration for non-responsive taxpayers,' it added.
The ministry's announcement came in the backdrop of a PTI report citing data from the Swiss National Bank, which showed that Indian funds in Swiss banks more than tripled in 2024 to Swiss Franc (CHF) 3.5 billion (around ₹ 37,600 crore)—marking the highest level since 2021, when deposits peaked at CHF 3.83 billion.
The sharp rise was attributed largely to an increase in funds held through local branches and financial institutions. However, customer deposits—direct holdings by Indian clients—rose by a modest 11% to CHF 346 million ( ₹ 3,675 crore), accounting for only about one-tenth of the total.
This increase comes after a steep 70% plunge in Indian deposits in 2023, when the total fell to a four-year low of CHF 1.04 billion.
The government's data-driven enforcement has led to a surge in compliance.
A total of 231,000 taxpayers reported foreign assets and income in assessment year 2024–25, up 45.17% from 159,000 in the previous year, the ministry noted.
The government's intensified use of international data-sharing agreements, along with targeted outreach and enforcement, appears to be driving greater transparency and voluntary compliance among taxpayers with offshore assets. Enforcement actions are underway for those who continue to remain non-compliant, the ministry said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Economic Times

36 minutes ago

• Economic Times

UAE rule, wary I-T to deter dodgy crypto deals

Mumbai: In the lane to launder money, the skill to move cryptos to control companies and properties in Dubai has been honed over the past few years. But treading that alley would soon become tougher. Dual, albeit unrelated, developments in India and the UAE would force money movers to devise new tricks. First, Income tax (I-T) officials, hunting for illicit homes of Indians over the past six months, now strongly suspect that some property purchases were made with cryptocurrencies; second, a new regulatory regime in the Middle East country, would soon end payment in cryptos, other than stable coins, to freely buy goods and services. "When Indian residents use crypto to purchase real estate, they bypass Indian banking channels and FEMA scrutiny. But, under the new UAE regulations (expected from August), merchants would no longer accept crypto directly. Only entities licensed by the UAE Central Bank would be allowed to convert stablecoins to AED after collecting full KYC. While this framework ensures the buyer's identity is recorded, it remains unclear whether such data would be shared under the India-UAE tax treaty," said Purushottam Anand, founder of the law firm Crypto raiding a leading UAE developer having roots in Mumbai and clients across India, a northern office of the I-T department found that more than 460 buyers in the 650-odd property deals have no record of having remitted money through banks to acquire the properties. According to findings which were shared with other I-T centres two months ago, the arm of the UAE realtor which brokered the deals was aided by a network of 86 sub-brokers who later shared details with the tax office. According to tax circles, some of the clients had paid in cryptos, probably under the belief it would go untraced. Earlier this year, the department had found that hundreds of mule accounts were opened by a few persons in Kerala to deposit cash, use the money to buy cryptos -either on local platforms or through peer-to-peer transactions-and then move the coins to other wallets before encashing the them in UAE, or buying assets like properties, or transferring them to third parties. "When digital assets move from exchanges to P2P platforms or private wallets, monitoring becomes difficult, creating opportunities for illegal activities such as ransomware attacks, laundering, tax evasion, and potentially terrorist financing. Although the exchanges are required to report 'suspicious transactions', including withdrawals, with the Financial Intelligence Unit-India, such risks can be further addressed through stricter enforcement of TDS provisions, i.e. Sections 194S or 195, ensuring tax compliance for all crypto transactions, whether conducted on or off exchanges. Additionally, specifying the reporting entities and the format for disclosures under Section 285BAA will improve traceability," said Ashish Karundia, founder of the CA firm Ashish Karundia & Co. 'PAYMENT TOKEN REGULATIONS' The new 'Payment Token Services Regulation' lays down the rules and conditions established by the UAE Central Bank for granting a licence or registration for payment token services-which include payment token issuance, token conversion, and token custody and transfer. Under the rules no merchant or anyone in the UAE selling goods or services can accept a virtual asset unless it's a dirham payment token issued by a licensed issuer. Also, a bank cannot act as a payment token issuer. UAE is working on Dirham-linked stable coin (like USDT or Tether which is pegged to the dollar)."This would have implications for India which has close economic and financial ties with the UAE. By bringing digital assets such as payment tokens under a structured licensing and anti-money laundering framework, the regulation adds a layer of safety and transparency to cross-border digital financial flows. For Indian individuals and businesses engaging in the UAE's digital economy, on one hand this means greater clarity, reduced risk of fraud, and alignment with global best practices; on the other hand, the clear prohibition on anonymous crypto instruments like privacy tokens reinforces the global trend toward traceable and regulated digital transactions. This is something India is also actively pursuing through its own financial intelligence mechanisms. This would deter transactions in property, high value luxury products bought by Indians in UAE using crypto tokens," said Siddharth Banwat, partner at CA firm Banwat & Associates dealers said the UAE rules are not entirely fool-proof as coins can be routed through platforms in multiple jurisdictions whose cooperation would be vital to spot the trail. But the very presence of licensed intermediaries collecting and storing information would deter money movers.

The Print

an hour ago

• The Print

Sun TV Network, Maran brothers & an old feud. How Dayanidhi-Kalanithi clash was waiting to spill over

In his 10 June notice, Dayanidhi alleged that Kalanithi, the Sun TV Chairman and Managing Director, did not hold any share in the company until 15 September father and former Union minister Murasoli Maran, according to notice, was in coma and on life support from late 2002 until his death in November 2003. The dispute centers around the allotment and transfer of shares following the death of their father Murasoli Maran on 23 November 2003. Chennai: A simmering feud within the influential Maran family, proprietors of the Sun TV Network, has come to the fore again after former Union Minister and DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran sent a legal notice to his elder brother Kalanithi Maran alleging 'fraudulent share transactions' that 'unlawfully transferred control' of the media empire since 2003. 'The fraudulent transactions took place during this period,' a source privy to the legal notice told ThePrint. 'It was on 15 September 2003, shortly after Murasoli Maran was brought back to Chennai from the US, Kalanithi allotted himself 12 lakh shares in the then Sun TV Private Limited at a face value of Rs 10 each. At the time, each share was valued between Rs 2,500 and Rs 3,000 with the company's reserves, surplus exceeding Rs 252 crore.' The allotments, the legal notice mentions, were made without board or shareholders approval, giving 60 percent of the shares to Kalanithi, reducing the stakes of the original promoter. 'The fair market value of these shares is estimated to exceed Rs 3,500 crore, but Kalanithi allegedly paid only Rs 1.2 crore,' Dayanidhi alleged in his legal notice as per the sources privy to the notice. The legal notice was served on seven individuals including Kalanithi Maran, and his wife Kaveri Maran. Although there have been tensions between Dayanidhi and Kalanithi for more than two decades, sources close to the family say that the rift has come to the fore in the absence of the senior family members such as Murasoli Maran and Murasoli Selvam. A source close to the family revealed that Murasoli Selvam, their uncle and Karunanidhi's son-in-law, and Murasoli Maran had previously brokered peace. 'Now, with both elders no more, the lack of their moderating influence has allowed the rift to escalate,' the source told ThePrint. It is not the first time that Dayanidhi has sent a legal notice to his elder brother Kalanithi. On 7 October 2024, three days before the death of Murasoli Selvam, Dayanidhi sent the first notice to Kalanithi. 'When Murasoli Selvam learnt about it, he called Anbu (Dayanidhi Maran) and warned him for taking the family dispute to public. He also asked the brothers not to spoil the name of former chief minister and the DMK's first family,' the source told ThePrint. Kalanithi is lovingly called 'Pugazh' (meaning fame) and Dayanidhi as 'Anbu' (Love) within the family circles, the family friend said. Kalanithi and Dayanidhi Maran are the grandnephews of DMK patriarch M Karunanidhi. Their father Murasoli Maran was a former Union Minister and former editor of DMK's mouthpiece 'Murasoli'. Later, Murasoli's younger brother Murasoli Selvam had taken over as the editor of the DMK mouthpiece. While Murasoli was married to Mallika, Selvam was married to Karunanidhi's daughter Selvi. Kalanithi had paid Rs 500 crore to sister Anbukarasi after he was served the first notice, according to the source. ThePrint reached Kalanithi and Dayanidhi Maran over phone for comments, but they were unavailable. This report will be updated as and when a response is received. Meanwhile, the Sun TV Network Limited wrote to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange (NSE) on 20 June that the alleged matter dates back to 22 years when the company was a closely held private limited company. 'All the acts have been done in accordance with legal obligations and the same had been duly vetted by concerned intermediaries before the public issue of the company,' it added. The allegations According to Dayanidhi's legal notice, the shareholding of Sun TV Private Limited was equally divided between two promoter families of Murasoli Maran and M. Karunanidhi. The DMK first family primarily held 50 percent of the shares through Karunanidhi's wife Dayalu Ammal. In his legal notice, Dayanidhi claimed that Kalanithi overnight got a 60 percent stake in the company after he allotted himself about 12 lakh shares in September 2003. This act reduced Murasoli Maran and Dayalu Amma's stake to 20 percent each, he adds. He also alleged that shares held by family-owned entities like Kungumam Publication, Kungumam Nidhi and Kal Investments, totaling about 2.85 lakh shares in Sun TV were also allegedly transferred to Kalanithi at Rs 10 each, consolidating his control further. Dayalu Ammal relinquished her shares in Sun TV on 28 October 2005, according to the legal notice. Dayanidhi further alleged that his elder brother bought 20 percent of the stake for just Rs 100 crore. Kalanithi purchased shares of Dayalu Ammal at Rs 3,173.04 per share, which was far below their fair market value, he claimed. While Kalanithi holds 75 percent of the Sun TV Network shares, Dayanidhi reportedly holds less than 20 percent. Also Read: Stalin's face front & centre, I-PAC hits ground running to shape DMK campaign for 2026 polls Past controversies Back in 2007, the Maran brothers had a rift with the DMK's first family after a survey was published in Dinakaran, a Tamil daily newspaper, that 70 percent of the respondents preferred as the DMK's successor over Karunanidhi's elder son That report led to Alagiri's supporters attacking Dinakaran's office in Madurai and setting it ablaze. Three people were killed in the episode. Not only did Karunanidhi publicly criticise Dayanidhi Maran for using the media to create divisions within the DMK, he and the family distanced themselves from the Marans. The DMK went ahead with launching its own television channels, including Kalaignar TV (entertainment channel), Kalaignar Seidhigal (news channel), to bypass Sun TV, which was until then seen as a DMK mouthpiece. Karunanidhi went to the extent of bringing the Government Cable TV distribution system to stop the monopoly of the Maran brothers, who had been controlling the cable distribution through Sumangali Cable Vision started in 2000. 'However, it became defunct later after the Maran family reconciled with the DMK's first family. It was Murasoli Selvam, uncle of the Maran brothers, who held talks with both the families and reunited them,' the above-mentioned source told ThePrint. From a weekly magazine to a media empire Sun TV Network Limited started as a Sumangali Publications Private Limited on 18 December 1985. After Kalanithi returned following his higher studies abroad, he took over the family's publishing business. In 1990, the media baron launched Poomalai, a Tamil video news magazine. Three years on, taking cue from the US television channels, Kalanithi founded Sun TV, with a three-hour Tamil programme everyday. In 1995, it became a 24 hours entertainment channel. Within five years, Kalanithi launched Sun News, a dedicated channel for news and current affairs in May 2000, which was the first ever 24/7 Tamil news channel in Tamil Nadu. In the same year saw the launch of Sumangali Cable Vision (SCV), a cable distribution company. 'After that there was no stopping Maran in building his media empire,' former DMK spokesperson a close aide of former chief minister Karunanidhi, told ThePrint. SCV remained a monopoly in the television cable distribution industry, which also had numerous television channels, he said.'With cable television distribution on one hand and having a bunch of television channels on the other hand, they held the fort for a long time.' As of now, Kalanithi Maran holds at least 36 television channels, apart from a production company, FM channels and three cricket teams. Sources in Sun TV Network shared that they hold three cricket teams, including Sunrisers Hyderabad in the Indian Premier League (IPL). 'Sunrisers Eastern Cape, a T20 franchise based in Gqeberha in South Africa, and the Northern Supercharges, based in Leeds in Yorkshire, are also held by Sun TV Network,' the source told ThePrint. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: DMK wants young blood to join Dravidian ranks. It's counting on role with mouthpiece, fellowship

Business Standard

an hour ago

• Business Standard

Epsilon to challenge China's dominance in EV battery cell materials

May set up ₹9K cr plant for making 100K tonnes of graphite anode Surajeet Das Gupta New Delhi Listen to This Article Rare earth magnet is not the only area where the Chinese dominate the world. They also control two other crucial areas of electric vehicle (EV) battery cell — manufacturing of graphite anode, required for lithium-ion batteries, as well as cathode powder, to make lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4 or LFP) battery. LFP batteries go into buses and commercial vehicles (CVs), and are considered safer. But an Indian company, Epsilon Advanced Materials, is trying to break into the market. It has finalised plans to set up a plant to manufacture these in Karnataka. To begin with, it is setting up a 100,000