HC to hear afresh pleas against Maratha reservation from July 18
A three-judge bench of the Bombay High Court Wednesday said that it will hear afresh from July 18 a batch of pleas challenging the constitutional validity of the 2024 law providing Maratha reservation.
The bench noted that the state government's submission that an interim order passed last year that any applications for admissions to educational institutions or jobs at government authorities taking benefit of the impugned Act will be subject to further orders in the present proceedings still continues, therefore, it was inclined to conduct the final hearing on the pleas.
The Supreme Court on May 13 had asked HC to expeditiously hear the pleas including application by students appearing for National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) undergraduate and postgraduate exams of 2025. The students filed pleas seeking interim relief, claiming that a delay in the disposal of pleas was impacting their right to equal consideration in the admission process.
The pleas were not heard after the then Bombay HC Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya's transfer as the CJ of Delhi HC in January this year.
Justice Upadhyaya was part of a full or three-judge bench, which since April, last year, had been hearing the pleas against the Socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC) Act, 2024 that provided 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs to the Maratha community. The petitioners' arguments concluded on October 14, 2024.
Two days after the SC order, the Bombay HC, on May 15, constituted a new three-judge bench/full bench of Justices Ravindra V Ghuge, N J Jamadar, and Sandeep V Marne, which heard the pleas on Wednesday.
The 2024 law, which provided 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs to the Maratha community that constitutes nearly one-third of Maharashtra's population, had been at the forefront of political discourse last year during the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections.
Senior advocate Pradeep Sancheti, for the petitioner students, argued that education and career of thousands of students appearing for NEET exams will be affected if the interim relief of stay on the effect of the 2024 law was not granted to them.
However, Advocate General Birendra Saraf, representing the Maharashtra government, submitted that an interim order was issued by the HC on April 16, last year, and the same continued even till date, and the same was not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court.
Saraf argued that the same interim order will apply to the petitioner students, and their admissions will be subject to further orders passed by the HC.
He also submitted that interim relief cannot be sought by filing fresh petitions while the interim arrangement was made last year and the same continued from time to time.
The full bench led by Justice Ghuge then expressed 'inclination to commence the final hearing of the matter' and said it will begin the same on July 18.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Vijay Deverakonda booked under SC/ST Act over his remarks about tribal people during Retro pre-release event
Actor Vijay Deverakonda has found himself in trouble as a case has been registered against him under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for his remarks about tribal people during the pre-release event of Retro. The police confirmed the development to PTI on Sunday. Vijay Deverakonda faces trouble as police registers case against him for remarks against tribal people.(PTI) Case registered against Vijay Deverakonda Police stated that although the remarks, which likened the recent terror attack in Pahalgam to tribal conflicts from 500 years ago, were made in April, a case under the SC/ST Act was registered against the actor on 17 June following a complaint. "The actor made comments in April. However, based on a complaint, a case under the SC/ST Act was booked against him on 17 June,' a police official told PTI. The complaint was lodged by Nenavath Ashok Kumar Naik, also known as Ashok Rathod, who serves as the State President of the Joint Action Committee of Tribal Communities. He alleged that during the pre-release event of the film Retro, which stars actor Surya, the actor made statements that hurt the sentiments of tribal communities and caused serious offence. Rathod further claimed that the actor's comparison of tribal people to Pakistani terrorists was racially insensitive. What Vijay Deverakonda had said During the pre-release event of Surya's film Retro, Vijay addressed the Pahalgam terror attack and said, 'The solution to what is happening in Kashmir is also to educate them (terrorists) and ensure they don't get brainwashed. What will they achieve? Kashmir belongs to India, and Kashmiris are ours. India doesn't even need to attack Pakistan because Pakistanis themselves are fed up with their government and will attack them if this continues. Asalu 500 years back tribals kokkutunnatu, veelu buddi lekunda, minimum common sense lekunda chese panulu.' (They behave like tribals did 500 years ago, fighting without common sense). After facing backlash on social media for his comments, the actor expressed regret. He took to X and wrote, "It has come to my attention that a remark I made during the Retro audio launch event has caused concern among some members of the public. I wish to sincerely clarify: there was absolutely no intention to hurt or target any community, especially our Scheduled Tribes, who I deeply respect and consider an integral part of our country." The actor clarified that his intention was to promote unity, emphasising that India is one, its people are one, and the nation must progress together. He expressed disbelief at the idea that, while advocating for national solidarity, he would deliberately target or discriminate against any community, all of whom he considers part of his larger family. He concluded, "If any part of my message was misunderstood or hurtful, I express my sincere regret. My only aim was to speak of peace, progress, and togetherness. I remain committed to using my platform to uplift and unify — never to divide. Vijay Deverakonda."
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
In landmark order, Calcutta HC says transgender ID can be submitted while applying for passport; ‘big victory' says petitioner
Following an order by the Calcutta High Court after a battle lasting over a year, Anuprabha Das Majumdar, a transgender woman, can now apply for a passport with her transgender identity card. Directing the passport authority to consider the transgender identity card of Majumdar, Justice Amrita Sinha said on Wednesday, 'Transgender identity card of the petitioner shall be taken into consideration at the time of consideration of petitioner's passport application.' The ruling came after Majumdar filed a writ petition after the passport office denied her application for a passport even though she had a transgender identity card. Majumdar had applied for a passport in 2023 after getting her transgender identity card in February 2022. The Calcutta High Court's ruling effectively mandates the Regional Passport Office to recognise the transgender identity card as a valid document when processing Majumdar's fresh application, marking a significant acknowledgment of transgender individuals' rights under the 2019 Act. Speaking to The Indian Express, Majumdar's counsel Suman Ganguly said, 'As per my knowledge, this is a first case regarding the issuance of a passport on the basis of a transgender identity card. So this particular judgment will act as a precedent for the community in the future. They are being deprived of a lot of basic rights. The fight will go on, but this judgment will open a lot of doors.' Speaking to The Indian Express, Majumdar said, 'I had also faced the same issue while trying to obtain an Aadhaar card. They did not accept the transgender card but I contacted the authority under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019. After discussions, they (Aadhaar authority) took some time but they changed it.' 'Slowly, I changed everything, from my Aadhaar card to voter's card to PAN card. The passport authority said it is a major change so I have to go through the old process of gazette notification and all. They said they have not received any notification regarding the transgender ID card. We tried to contact the regional officer, sent emails, notices, etc. As a transgender person we only have this as the proof. After not getting a positive response, we moved the high court,' Majumdar added. The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019, enacted by the Indian government in December 2019 and with rules notified in September 2020, is a landmark legislation aimed at protecting transgender individuals' rights. It mandates equal treatment in areas such as education, employment, and access to public services, including the right to self-perceived gender identity. The Act also requires authorities to issue transgender identity cards, which serve as official recognition of an individual's gender identity. However, as Majumdar's case illustrates, implementation at the ground level has been inconsistent, often leaving transgender individuals struggling to access basic rights. During the hearings, Justice Sinha had expressed surprise at the passport authority for not knowing whether Majumdar had applied for a passport in 2023. 'The application was made in 2023. How can your authority say that she has not applied? That means they did not check it properly. How could the authority not have the knowledge of the application being made? These are online applications; they must be knowing it,' Justice Sinha had observed. Majumdar's counsel had also submitted a supplementary affidavit stating that she had applied for a passport, thus the counsel for the passport department sought time to take instructions. On Wednesday, the counsel for the passport office informed the court that the application had elapsed and if she reapplied, it will be considered. The transgender certificate and ID card are nationally recognised and provided by the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. Following this, the court ordered Majumdar to reapply for the passport. Majumdar told The Indian Expess, 'I am feeling very positive after the judgment. What all happened two years ago was very disturbing. As an Indian citizen, these are basic documents. This is a big victory for all transgender people. We face hurdles because of low awareness in society, but this is a law and any form of discrimination is a crime.' She said the fight will go on so that future generations do not have to face such hurdles. She has been invited for a senimar in the UK in July by an organisation that works for the legal rights of women. 'I will be applying for my passport via Tatkal once again and then a visa so that I can go for the seminar,' Majumdar said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Vijay Deverakonda booked under SC/ST act for remarks against tribal communities
A case has been registered against popular actor Vijay Deverakonda under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly making remarks about tribal communities during a movie pre-release event. The complaint was lodged with the police, and an official confirmed that a case was registered on June 17. The actor allegedly made these controversial remarks at an event held in April this year. Comments compared tribal wars with terror attack According to the police, Vijay Deverakonda compared the recent terror attack in Pahalgam to ancient tribal wars from five hundred years ago. This statement was quickly broadcast online and increased widespread criticism. According to PTI, the actor's words were seen as highly insensitive and aggressive by many people within the tribal community, indicating action from the authorities. The police confirmed the matter to the media and said that an investigation was currently going on. State tribal committee leader files complaint against Vijay Deverakonda The complaint was filed by Nenavath Ashok Kumar Naik, also known as Ashok Rathod, the State President of the Joint Action Committee of Tribal Communities. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending Local Enterprise Accounting Software [Click Here] Accounting ERP Click Here Undo In the complaint, Rathod accused the actor of hurting the feelings of the tribal people and making derogatory comparison by aligning his struggles with Pakistani terrorists. The complaint alleged that such remarks were charged racially and the scheduled tribes were depth, strict action was called against the actor. Vijay Deverakonda clarifies intent, expresses regret as investigation continues On May 3, in an attempt to clarify the situation, Vijay Deverakonda posted a statement on X (Twitter) expressing his respect for all communities, especially the Scheduled Tribes. He stated that he never intended to target or hurt any group. 'If any part of my message was misunderstood or hurtful, I sincerely regret it. My only aim was to speak about peace, progress, and togetherness. I remain committed to using my platform to unite, not divide,' the actor stated. The case is now being investigated further by authorities.
