logo
Merz, Trump and more: Why the world is loving military so much

Merz, Trump and more: Why the world is loving military so much

First Post5 days ago

Across continents and political ideologies, nations are embracing their militaries with unprecedented fervour from Germany's first-ever Veterans Day to Trump's parade politics and a global surge in defence spending read more
First Lieutenant Zachary Buher and Staff Sergeant Cesar Lua, members of the U.S. Army's Charlie Company, 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division operate a M1A2 SEP V3 tank during the Army's 250th Birthday parade in Washington, D.C., US., June 14, 2025. Reuters
Across continents and political systems, a striking global shift is underway — a rising embrace of military power not just as a tool of defence, but as a central pillar of national identity and state legitimacy.
From the celebratory tone of Germany's first-ever Veterans Day to Donald Trump's insistent revival of martial symbolism in the United States, governments are rekindling national pride through the lens of armed forces.
This renewed affection for military institutions is not emerging in a vacuum. It's being shaped by active wars, changing geopolitics and a growing perception of external threat and internal instability.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Germany's U-Turn: Veterans Day and the 'Strongest Army in Europe'
In a nation long haunted by its militaristic past, Germany's first national day for military veterans marked a cultural transformation. Germany's Defence Minister Boris Pistorius presided over commemorations held nationwide, referring to the day as a 'long-overdue signal of recognition' for the country's soldiers. This was more than just ceremony — it signalled Germany's shifting national narrative around its military.
Sarah Brockmeier-Large from the Peace Research Institute in Frankfurt described the development as evidence of a new societal consensus: that a functioning democracy requires strong armed forces. Particularly after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the Bundeswehr's role began to be reimagined from a relic of a dangerous past to a guardian of European stability.
The political momentum didn't stop at cultural shifts. With Friedrich Merz's rise to chancellorship, Germany began implementing policies to radically expand its defence capability.
Merz declared his aim to build the 'strongest conventional army in Europe,' promising increases in troop strength, new military equipment and greater integration into Nato-wide planning. His pledge to raise defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP—higher than even US levels—was both a statement of autonomy and an answer to long-standing demands from Washington.
Trump's parade and the politics of power projection
Across the Atlantic, the symbolic revival of the military under President Trump took a more theatrical form. But Trump's 79th birthday parade was overshadowed by widespread protests against his use of power, yet the military spectacle itself remained central to his political messaging.
Trump framed the parade as a necessary affirmation of American military greatness, vowing that enemies of the U.S. would meet 'total and complete defeat' at the hands of its soldiers.
Though the event was mired in political tension and civil unrest, the intent was unmistakable. Trump was reaffirming the military as a source of national pride and authority. This narrative, even amid domestic chaos, has helped normalise the public celebration of armed might, making military symbolism a cornerstone of political legitimacy in the US once again.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Wars as catalysts: Ukraine, West Asia, Africa
It would be simplistic to suggest these developments are purely domestic. Ongoing global conflicts have created an atmosphere where military readiness is not just relevant — it's existential. The war in Ukraine remains a critical driver, especially for Europe. Trump's unpredictability regarding Nato commitments has compelled European nations to spend more and prepare for scenarios without guaranteed US protection.
In parallel, West Asia continues to convulse with violence. According to the Geneva Academy, more than 45 armed conflicts are active in the region, involving both state and non-state actors and drawing in foreign powers like Russia and the US. Africa, too, faces similar turmoil, with over 35 non-international armed conflicts in countries such as Ethiopia, Mali and Nigeria.
These theatres of war have prompted an unprecedented increase in defence budgets. According to the Council of the European Union, the continent saw a 30 per cent rise in defence expenditure between 2021 and 2024, hitting €326 billion ($377 billion). Further investment is expected as part of the EU's Readiness 2030 plan, which includes €150 billion ($173.5 billion) in defence loans and substantial funding for joint procurement and research.
Asia's response: From assertiveness to alarm
While Europe re-arms, Asia grapples with its own powder kegs. China has continued to assert military pressure on Taiwan and the South China Sea region, prompting alarm in neighbouring countries and accelerating regional arms races. India, surrounded by two hostile neighbours — China and Pakistan — finds itself under strategic compulsion to boost its military preparedness.
Operation Sindoor highlighted India's military necessities in a volatile neighbourhood. Pakistan is a 'military state' indistinguishable from the terrorist networks it harbours. India recently sent out multiple delegations across the globe to bust the Pakistani narrative of separation between state and non-state actors in the country. Pakistan watchers have said for long that the non-state actors in Pakistan have the patronage of its military establishment.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With Bangladesh showing increasing hostility and the global community largely silent, India has few options other than strengthening its own deterrence.
The Indo-Pacific, in this regard, mirrors Europe's urgency. Nations are not just reacting to threats — they are preparing for scenarios where alliances may fail and self-defence becomes the only option.
The blurred line between soldier and state
Nowhere is the militarisation of state identity more pronounced than in regimes where the armed forces are the government. In Pakistan and North Korea, the military is not just an arm of the state but its ruling entity. Pakistani generals are said to not only guide national policy but are celebrated for military failures — an absurdity that reveals the deep entrenchment of the military in public life.
This blurring of lines fosters authoritarianism. When the military becomes the symbol of unity and stability, democratic institutions and civilian oversight often erode. Trump's militarised political rhetoric, Germany's stance under Merz and China's aggression all suggest that even democratic nations are increasingly comfortable with ceding more political space to military logic and institutions.
Industrial complex: Militarisation as economic strategy
Behind the uniforms and parades lies a booming defence economy. The European defence industry, as reported by the Council of the European Union, saw a nearly 17 per cent increase in turnover in 2023, with over €158 billion ($182.7 billion) in revenue. Job creation has followed suit, with more than 580,000 employed across military aeronautics, naval and land sectors.
This investment is not just about security — it's about industrial strategy. A stronger defence industry is seen as a route to greater economic independence and technological superiority. With small and medium enterprises deeply embedded in the supply chain, militarisation has become an engine of economic growth and political capital.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A new global normal?
States are no longer relying solely on diplomacy or multilateral institutions to ensure peace. Instead, they are returning — some proudly, others cautiously — to the old logic of strength through force.
From Berlin to Washington, Paris to New Delhi, the love for the military is not just emotional. It is strategic, economic, and, in many cases, political. Whether born out of necessity, nostalgia or national insecurity, this global wave of militarism is not a blip. It is a symptom of a world bracing for conflict.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump issues worldwide travel alert for Americans amid Israel-Iran conflict: Here are dos and don'ts
Trump issues worldwide travel alert for Americans amid Israel-Iran conflict: Here are dos and don'ts

Hindustan Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump issues worldwide travel alert for Americans amid Israel-Iran conflict: Here are dos and don'ts

The Donald Trump-led State Department on Sunday posted a 'Worldwide Caution' on its travel alert page, citing the conflict between Israel and Iran. This comes a day after the US struck three Iranian nuclear bases. Trump stated that he is not ruling out a regime change in Iran. Donald Trump issued a travel alert for Americans worldwide(AP) In its latest alert, the State Department said: 'The conflict between Israel and Iran has resulted in disruptions to travel and periodic closure of airspace across the Middle East.' Officials further warned Americans about potential demonstrations against US citizens and interests. 'The Department of State advises U.S. citizens worldwide to exercise increased caution. Please read carefully our Travel Advisory, country information, and any recent security alerts when planning travel,' the press release read. Read More: How China, Pak, others reacted to US airstrikes on Iran: 'Catastrophic consequences' Meanwhile, the department also posted an update on Israel and the West Bank, saying the embassy in Jerusalem and Branch Office Tel Aviv will not be open to provide emergency US passport services on Monday, June 23. 'US citizens seeking to depart Israel or the West Bank should take the first available option, even if it is not your first choice of destination. Ben Gurion Airport remains closed, and there are still no regularly scheduled commercial or charter flights operating from there." Dos for Americans Abroad Monitor Local Conditions: Check country-specific travel advisories on for real-time updates on security risks. Enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP) at to receive alerts and facilitate emergency contact. Maintain a Personal Safety Plan: Prepare for unexpected crises by identifying safe locations, keeping emergency contacts updated, and ensuring your phone is charged, per the US Embassy in Saudi Arabia's security alert. Consider Evacuation Options: In Israel, contact the US Embassy for evacuation flights or cruise ships, as announced by Ambassador Mike Huckabee. Read More: Every US citizen a 'target': Iran after US strikes on Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow nuclear sites Don'ts for Americans Abroad Do Not Travel to High-Risk Areas: Avoid travel to Israel, Iraq, or Iran due to armed conflict, terrorism, and civil unrest. The State Department explicitly warns against travel to Iran, advising those present to shelter in place. Avoid Large Gatherings: Steer clear of protests or crowds, which may target US citizens or interests, especially in the Middle East. Do Not Ignore Airspace Closures: Refrain from planning air travel through regions with closed airspace, such as Israel or Iran, where commercial flights are limited.

U.S. President Trump says he's open to regime change in Iran
U.S. President Trump says he's open to regime change in Iran

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. President Trump says he's open to regime change in Iran

U.S. President Donald Trump suggested that could he see Iran rejecting its government leadership, after officials in his administration stressed that the White House was not seeking a regime change. Also read: Israel-Iran conflict updates 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change', but if the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change?' Mr. Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' The statement marked something of a reversal from Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday (June 23, 2025) morning news conference when he said that regime change was not part of the mission in the aerial bombardment of three Iranian nuclear sites.

"America's interference in countries should end": Maharashtra SP chief Abu Azmi
"America's interference in countries should end": Maharashtra SP chief Abu Azmi

India Gazette

timean hour ago

  • India Gazette

"America's interference in countries should end": Maharashtra SP chief Abu Azmi

Solapur (Maharashtra) [India], June 22 (ANI): After the Washington bombed Iran's three nuclear sites, Maharashtra Samajwadi Party President Abu Asim Azmi on Sunday said that the US 'interference' in other countries should end. Speaking to the media, Azmi also called Donald Trump's constant claim for the cessation of India-Pakistan hostilities an 'insult' to our country. 'America's interference in other countries should end. Dr Ram Manohar Lohia had said that India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Srilanka, and Nepal should form a federation to counter the US threats. America says they have stopped the India-Pakistan war. This is our insult. PM Modi has repeatedly said it is not true,' Azmi said. Azmi further slammed the US for its silence over Israel's military action in Gaza. 'America is not saying anything about the bombed and starving children in Palestine; it is supporting Israel. First, Israel attacked Iran, and then Iran retaliated. That person (Ali Khamenei) is 85 years old, ...The way he replied to Israel, he has done a wonderful job. I appreciate him,' he said. Azmi's remark came after the US, on early Sunday carried out 'massive precision' strikes on Iran's three nuclear sites -Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow- and warned of further retaliation if peace is not achieved. Rafael Grossi, the Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said that an emergency meeting would take place on Monday in light of the developments taking place in West Asia. Earlier in the day, the IAEA confirmed that there has been no reported increase in off-site radiation levels following the recent strikes on three key nuclear sites in Iran, including the underground enrichment facility at Fordow. 'Following attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran -- including Fordow -- the IAEA can confirm that no increase in off-site radiation levels has been reported as of this time. IAEA will provide further assessments on the situation in Iran as more information becomes available,' the agency said in a statement. Iran condemned the attacks, calling them a violation of international law and vowed to continue its nuclear program. A statement issued by Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) confirmed that early on Sunday morning, Iran's nuclear sites were 'subjected to savage aggression--an act in violation of international laws, particularly the NPT.' 'This action, which violates international regulations, unfortunately took place under the indifference--and even complicity--of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),' it said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the US military action under the leadership of Trump, stating that Trump's bold decision to target Iranian nuclear facilities will change history. Meanwhile, India continues its evacuation efforts for Indian nationals in Iran, with multiple flights planned to bring back Indians from the conflict-hit region. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store