Adults making under $80K can't afford to live comfortably in any state: report
A single adult earning less than $80,000 per year cannot afford to live comfortably in a single U.S. state, a new report found.
The report, released by SmartAsset on June 4, also revealed that families of four must earn more than $200,000 to live comfortably in nearly every state.
To reach these conclusions, SmartAsset — a personal finance site — used data from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Living Wage Calculator to quantify the baseline costs of living for single adults and families with two adults and two children.
Factoring into these costs are housing, transportation, taxes and other items.
Using these baseline costs, the site then applied the 50/30/20 budgeting rule — under which 50% of income goes toward necessities, 30% goes toward discretionary spending and 20% goes toward savings, debt or investments.
Single adults
The report found that West Virginia is the most affordable state for single adults, with a salary of $80,829 being enough to live comfortably.
In 18 other states, adults earning between $80,000 and $90,000 would be able to afford a reasonable and sustainable lifestyle. Among them were Arkansas, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan and New Mexico.
The remaining 31 states require salaries above $90,000, and 15 of these — most of which are located on the coasts — require salaries exceeding $100,000.
The most expensive state was Hawaii, where a single adult would require an income of $124,467 to live comfortably. This was followed by Massachusetts ($120,141), California ($119,475) and New York ($114,691).
Overall, the report also found that an individual in any state needs to earn roughly $5,844 more this year than last year in order to have a comfortable budget.
Families of four
For a family of four with two working adults, the most affordable state to live in is Mississippi, the report found. Here, an income of $186,618 is required to live comfortably.
This figure fell below $200,000 in just six other states: Kentucky ($192,941), Arkansas ($193,773), Alabama ($194,522), West Virginia ($195,354), South Dakota ($197,933) and Louisiana ($199,597).
Meanwhile, the most expensive state for a family of four was Massachusetts, where an income of $313,747 was required to live comfortably. This was followed by Hawaii ($294,362), Connecticut ($290,368) and California ($287,456).
Overall, a family of four in any of the 50 states needs to bring in about $9,360 more than the previous year in order to have a comfortable budget.
___
© 2025 The Charlotte Observer.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Is $15 an hour enough? Only for DINKs in these states, data shows
(NEXSTAR) — Since 2009, the federal minimum wage in the U.S. has been $7.25 an hour. A new bill introduced in the Senate hopes to raise it to $15 an hour next year, followed by incremental increases to reflect inflation. In some states — including those that already have a minimum wage of $15 an hour or more — that rate isn't enough to cover the average costs a resident may have, according to MIT's Living Wage Calculator. The calculator takes into account the basic needs a family of varying sizes may have, like food, housing, child care, and transportation, to determine how much a worker must earn hourly to be 'self-sufficient.' Estimated living wages are available for all 50 states, their counties, and major metro areas. A Nexstar analysis found that, based on MIT's calculations, a $15 an hour rate isn't enough for a single adult, working 40 hours a week every week, to cover their basic needs in any state. The closest is West Virginia, where an hourly wage of $19.43 would suffice. It also wouldn't be enough for a family of four, with both adults working, to be self-sufficient in any state. Mississippi has the lowest hourly rate necessary for both adults at $22.43 an hour. In 15 states and the District of Columbia, meanwhile, the Living Wage Calculator found that for the same family, both adults would have to be earning $30 an hour or more to cover the same basic needs. In Massachusetts, an hourly living wage for two adults with two children is $37.71, according to MIT's calculator. Other states where the living wage is double the proposed federal minimum wage are: Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. (A recent study found that a family of four would need an annual household income of more than $200,000 to live comfortably in 43 states — that equates to both adults earning more than $40 an hour, before taxes and other withholdings.) The situation is vastly better for adults considered to be a 'DINK': dual-income, no kids. In 18 states, a household comprised of two adults who are both working, the pair could cover their needs while both earning under $15 an hour. According to MIT's Living Wage Calculator, Arkansas has the lowest necessary rate at $13.59 an hour. Close behind is West Virginia at $13.60. Other states where the estimated living wage for two working adults falls below $15 an hour include: Alabama, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. An hourly wage of $15 is nearly enough in Texas, where DINKs require $15.04 an hour to cover their basic needs. These calculations are estimates, and every family's situation is different. A working couple with no kids in the Little Rock, Arkansas, area, for example, has a living wage rate of $13.90 an hour, which is higher than the state average. The same couple in Hot Springs, Arkansas, would each need to earn at least $13.36 an hour, more than 20 cents below the state average. According to the data produced by MIT's Living Wage Calculator, no state's minimum wage is enough to be considered a living wage for a single working adult, DINKs, or a family of four where both adults are working. In the District of Columbia, however, the current minimum wage is higher than the living wage outlined for a dual-income, no-kids household. MIT's Living Wage Calculator estimates DINKs in the nation's capital may need an hourly wage of only $17.01. The minimum wage in D.C. is $17.50 an hour, and will increase to $17.95 an hour on July 1. Several of the nation's largest metros have higher minimum wages than their respective states. In Denver, the minimum hourly wage is $18.81, $4 higher than the state's $14.81 rate and nearly 50 cents higher than the estimated living wage for DINKs living in the city. You can find the estimated living wage for your region at MIT's Living Wage Calculator. The bill has bipartisan support, with Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) cosponsoring the legislation. The GOP-controlled House and Senate, though, have also been focused on Trump's priority legislation. President Donald Trump previously referred to the current rate of $7.25 an hour as a 'low number' in December, but the White House declined to comment on Hawley's proposed legislation to The Hill earlier this month.
Miami Herald
4 days ago
- Miami Herald
Where home values increased and decreased most
Where home values increased and decreased most Sharp changes in home values can have many ripple effects throughout the local economy. In the short term, both potential homesellers and homebuyers may be impacted by changes in local competitive forces and affordability. Over time, these changes can affect the city's tax base, current homeowners' refinancing options, demand in the local job markets, and other dynamics may be impacted by such changes, eventually making its way to many intertwined bottom lines from city to individual resident. With this in mind, SmartAsset ranked 100 of the largest cities based on the biggest one-year changes in the typical home value between 2024 and 2025. Key findings Home values increased by over 13.5% in Irvine, California. At the end of March 2024, the typical home in Irvine was estimated to be worth $1.42 million. This shot up to $1.61 million by the end of March 2025. The five-year increase in home values in Irvine was also the highest studywide at 82.1%Knoxville, Tennessee, sees 80% growth in home value over five years. Second only to Irvine on the five-year timeframe, Knoxville homes were valued just over $198,000 in early 2020-and just over $356,000 by 2025. Growth over the one-year timeframe showed a cooling trend with a modest 2.11%.Home prices cool down this year in these otherwise hot Florida cities. Naples, Florida, saw the biggest decrease in home values at -5.9% to around $581,000. Saint Petersburg, Florida, ranked second in this metric at -4.92%, bringing home values down to just above $364,000. This comes after a recent growth spurt in home values for both cities, bringing the five-year change to 63.4% and 52.3%, Midwestern cities join the ranks of California cities for high growth in home values. Milwaukee (8.2%) ranks second this year for highest growth in home values at 8.2%, with a modest home value of nearly $209,000 compared to its first- and third-place Californian counterparts, where home values teeter closer to $1.5 million. Also making the top 10 cities for home value growth this year are Cleveland (6.5%); Toledo, Ohio (5.8%); and Madison, Wisconsin (5.2%).Demand is strong in Kentucky cities. Louisville and Lexington ranked eighth and ninth for home value growth. In Louisville, a 5.4% increase puts home values now around $249,000, compared to a 5.3% increase for an estimated value of nearly $316,000 in Lexington. Top 10 cities where home values increased most Cities are ranked based on the biggest increase in home values between 2024 and 2025. Irvine, California One-year change in home values: 13.57%Five-year change in home values: 82.14%Typical home value, 2025: $1,614,607Typical home value, 2024: $1,421,723Typical home value, 2020: $886,480 Milwaukee One-year change in home values: 8.19%Five-year change in home values: 61.94%Typical home value, 2025: $208,725Typical home value, 2024: $192,916Typical home value, 2020: $128,891 San Jose, California One-year change in home values: 7.06%Five-year change in home values: 46.88%Typical home value, 2025: $1,521,021Typical home value, 2024: $1,420,733Typical home value, 2020: $1,035,550 Santa Ana, California One-year change in home values: 6.54%Five-year change in home values: 50.26%Typical home value, 2025: $862,825Typical home value, 2024: $809,867Typical home value, 2020: $574,211 Cleveland One-year change in home values: 6.5%Five-year change in home values: 52.72%Typical home value, 2025: $113,400Typical home value, 2024: $106,478Typical home value, 2020: $74,252 Anaheim, California One-year change in home values: 5.97%Five-year change in home values: 49.59%Typical home value, 2025: $945,098Typical home value, 2024: $891,835Typical home value, 2020: $631,781 Toledo, Ohio One-year change in home values: 5.77%Five-year change in home values: 55.6%Typical home value, 2025: $123,094Typical home value, 2024: $116,383Typical home value, 2020: $79,112 Louisville, Kentucky One-year change in home values: 5.43%Five-year change in home values: 36.87%Typical home value, 2025: $249,200Typical home value, 2024: $236,376Typical home value, 2020: $182,075 Lexington, Kentucky One-year change in home values: 5.33%Five-year change in home values: 51.12%Typical home value, 2025: $315,819Typical home value, 2024: $299,842Typical home value, 2020: $208,984 Madison, Wisconsin One-year change in home values: 5.23%Five-year change in home values: 44.35%Typical home value, 2025: $407,621Typical home value, 2024: $387,377Typical home value, 2020: $282,378 Top 10 cities where home values declined most Cities are ranked based on the biggest decline in home values between 2024 and 2025. Naples, Florida One-year change in home values: -5.86%Five-year change in home values: 63.39%Typical home value, 2025: $581,115Typical home value, 2024: $617,283Typical home value, 2020: $355,666 Saint Petersburg, FL One-year change in home values: -4.92%Five-year change in home values: 52.34%Typical home value, 2025: $364,399Typical home value, 2024: $383,254Typical home value, 2020: $239,203 Austin, Texas One-year change in home values: -4.82%Five-year change in home values: 29.82%Typical home value, 2025: $522,717Typical home value, 2024: $549,172Typical home value, 2020: $402,659 Oakland, California One-year change in home values: -4.71%Five-year change in home values: -1.68%Typical home value, 2025: $751,605Typical home value, 2024: $788,750Typical home value, 2020: $764,445 New Orleans One-year change in home values: -3.37%Five-year change in home values: 2.03%Typical home value, 2025: $237,012Typical home value, 2024: $245,268Typical home value, 2020: $232,293 Atlanta One-year change in home values: -2.97%Five-year change in home values: 22.68%Typical home value, 2025: $392,471Typical home value, 2024: $404,499Typical home value, 2020: $319,920 San Antonio One-year change in home values: -2.55%Five-year change in home values: 29.78%Typical home value, 2025: $252,434Typical home value, 2024: $259,034Typical home value, 2020: $194,516 Washington, D.C. One-year change in home values: -2.45%Five-year change in home values: 1.68%Typical home value, 2025: $605,881Typical home value, 2024: $621,083Typical home value, 2020: $595,865 Tampa, Florida One-year change in home values: -2.15%Five-year change in home values: 57.83%Typical home value, 2025: $379,136Typical home value, 2024: $387,462Typical home value, 2020: $240,219 Dallas One-year change in home values: -2.13%Five-year change in home values: 37.45%Typical home value, 2025: $311,280Typical home value, 2024: $318,069Typical home value, 2020: $226,463 Data and methodology This SmartAsset study examined home sale data for 100 of the largest metro areas in the U.S. to determine one-year and five-year price growth. Data for March 31, 2025, 2024 and 2020 comes from Zillow for single-family homes, condos and co-ops. This story was produced by SmartAsset and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Former NFLer Robert Griffin III was distraught when he ‘only' got $6.9M of $14M signing bonus — what happened
When the Washington Redskins signed then-rookie quarterback Robert Griffin III for his first contract in 2012, the deal's estimated $21.1 million price tag was all over the headlines. What didn't make the headlines was how much Griffin actually got to take home at the time. In a recent interview with former MMA fighter Demetrious Johnson the Mighty podcast, the former athlete revealed that the deal was structured to give him $14 million upfront as a signing bonus with the rest later, but he only saw $6.9 million appear in his bank account. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) "I called my agent immediately,' Griffin recalls. 'I'm distraught! 'Oh my god, they took all the money out. Where is the $14 million?' And he's like, 'Rob, it's taxes.'' Griffin admits the experience stung, but it ultimately highlighted a harsh truth: many pro athletes end up broke simply because they were never taught the financial basics. It's a lesson that resonates far beyond the sports world. Rookie athletes with rare talent in their sport are often entrusted with multimillion dollar contracts, but many are woefully unprepared for this windfall. Griffin admits he wasn't ready to manage his immense fortune when he was first signed. 'I wasn't financially literate when I first got into the NFL,' he told Johnson. 'I never had that kind of money.' This is why Griffin — who was just 22 years old at the time — was unaware that marginal tax rates for multimillionaires can be as high as 50% in some states, according to SmartAsset. However, a lack of essential financial skills isn't restricted to those who earn big payouts and have complicated tax situations. On average, U.S. adults could only answer 49% of 28 personal finance questions correctly, according to the 2025 TIAA Institute-GFLEC Personal Finance Index. This rate of financial literacy has remained more or less the same over the past eight years, according to the report. The report also found how detrimental this lack of financial skills could be. Adults with low financial literacy were twice as likely to be constrained by debt, three times more likely to be financially vulnerable and five times more likely to not have at least one month of emergency savings. Simply put, learning new financial skills could help you mitigate many of the economic risks most people face. However, there is another, potentially easier way to boost your personal financial security: hiring a professional. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it If you don't have the time or inclination to learn about money, you could simply hire a professional to manage your situation for you. Experienced accountants, tax advisors, investment advisors or financial planners can help you create a better path to any of your financial goals and place guardrails on your budget to make sure you're not vulnerable. Unfortunately, only 27% of U.S. adults work with financial advisors, according to a 2024 survey by YouGov. Those who may need this assistance the most are also the least likely to work with professionals. Only 9% of adults who did not finish high school work with financial advisors, while 45% of those with postgraduate degrees do. Hiring a professional can be expensive, but the costs are often offset by the added tax savings, improved investment outcomes and better money management that an experienced advisor can offer. This could be one of the reasons why the NFL Players Association launched its Financial Advisors Program to help connect professional athletes with a prescreened list of financial professionals. The platform helps protect young rookies from financial mistakes Griffin and his peers can be at risk of making. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Sign in to access your portfolio
