‘Their determination is heroic': Portuguese youth mount fresh climate lawsuit against government
ADVERTISEMENT
Four young Portuguese people who fought a landmark claim at the European Court of Human Rights are bringing a climate lawsuit against their own government.
The youth have joined Portuguese youth-led association Último Recurso to file a legal challenge that they hope will force Portugal to set tougher targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions and to lay out long-term plans for carbon neutrality.
The announcement comes a year after the European Court of Human Rights
ruled
that Switzerland must do more to cut its emissions. The judgment in favour of a group of older Swiss women known as the
KlimaSeniorinnen
set a precedent that government inaction on climate change violates fundamental human rights.
Related
Meet the teen duo that won this year's Earth Prize Europe with their groundbreaking clean water tech
From Portugal to Russia, here's how Europeans experienced the hottest March on record
On the same day in 2024 the court threw out two other climate cases. One was brought against 32 European countries by a group of
six young Portuguese people
who argued that government inaction on climate change discriminates against them and poses a tangible risk to their lives and health.
The court did not accept their claim because they had not gone through their national court system before escalating it to the regional level, and because the other countries were not considered to have any legal obligations to the Portuguese youth.
Young people determined to carry on fight
They are now hoping to fulfill the first requirement. 'We are as determined as ever to continue our fight for a liveable future,' says Cláudia Duarte Agostinho, who is now 25, and is the oldest of the original group of claimants. She will be joined by her siblings Martim (22) and Mariana (13), as well as Catarina dos Santos Mota (24).
'We are pleased to join forces with this courageous group that has shown great commitment to stronger climate action,' says Mariana Gomes, founder of Último Recurso. 'Their determination reflects the same values that drive Último Recurso - the urgent need to hold wrongdoers accountable for the damage they cause to our future.'
Siblings Claudia Agostinho, Mariana Agostinho and Martim Agostinho pose for a picture by burnt pine trees in Leiria, Portugal, December 2017.
AP Photo
Portugal
's climate law and national energy plans commit it to cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 55 per cent by 2030, compared with 2005. However, analysis by Climate Analytics found this target is not enough to keep average global warming under the 1.5°C threshold in the
Paris Agreement
.
'Strong climate targets must be a priority for all, and we want Portugal to lead by example in tackling this crisis head-on,' says Gomes.
The Portuguese government has been approached for comment.
Related
Meet the climate catastrophe victim filing a criminal case against the bosses of oil firm Total
This decade-long climate lawsuit saw its plaintiffs grow from children into adults. Now, it is over
A new chapter in an eight-year legal battle
Gerry Liston is a senior lawyer at Global Legal Action Network, which supported the young people in their lawsuit at European Court of Human Rights and is continuing to help with the domestic case.
'By joining forces with Último Recurso, this group are beginning a new chapter in their now eight-year legal battle for urgent climate action,' he tells Euronews Green. 'Their determination is heroic and should inspire others to join the fight for a habitable planet.'
Último Recurso previously filed the first climate lawsuit against Portugal together with NGOs Quercus and Sciaena, which challenged the government for not complying with its own climate law. Judges did not initially want to accept the case but the Supreme Court said it was valid, and it has been sent back to the lower courts for a new hearing.
Liston says the new case would rely heavily on
the KlimaSeniorinnen ruling
and the evidence and arguments previously advanced before the European Court of Human Rights. He expects the case to be formally filed in the summer.
Even if they succeed, however, implementing a judgment is not straightforward. Switzerland has
pushed back
against the European Court of Human Rights' ruling and was recently
ordered
by the Council of Europe to do more to comply with it.
ADVERTISEMENT
As well as prompting the government into action, Último Recurso hopes that litigation will help spark debate in Portugal to help design fairer climate policies that protect present and future generations of citizens.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
13 hours ago
- LeMonde
Israel-Iran conflict: European diplomatic efforts in Geneva struggle to prevent escalation
Nearly four hours of intense closed-door talks were not enough to sway Iran, despite its current dire straits. In the plush rooms of Geneva's Intercontinental Hotel on Friday, June 20, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, along with his British and Germans counterparts, David Lammy and Johann Wadephul, as well as Kaja Kallas, the European Union's high representative for foreign affairs, only managed to "sketch out," in Barrot's words, "a diplomatic solution" with their Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi. "All the participants expressed their willingness to continue the discussions," the French minister said after the talks. When? That remains undetermined. The Iranian minister did not make an appearance alongside the Europeans later in the afternoon, saying in a statement he was concerned by "the three countries' inaction in condemning the acts of aggression by the Zionist regime." Iran has demanded that a ceasefire come into force before any talks can begin. "Iran is ready to consider diplomacy once again and once the aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable for the crimes committed," Araghchi said, as rumors swirled that parallel negotiations were being conducted, through Qatari mediation, between Iran and Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff. "Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one," Trump said just hours after the Geneva meeting, further undermining the European diplomatic initiative.
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Tulkarem refugee camp faces renewed demolitions in the West Bank
02:08 20/06/2025 Illegal immigration: 4,000 law enforcement officers deployed in France France 20/06/2025 Russia-Ukraine drone attacks intensify as peace talks collapse 20/06/2025 Nuclear talks in Geneva between Iran, Europeans begin 20/06/2025 Abortion is highly restricted in microstates such as Monaco, Andorra 20/06/2025 Israel-Iran war enters its second week with multiple strikes 20/06/2025 Israel-Iran war: Intense destruction in Iran, negotiations at a standstill 20/06/2025 'In military terms, US and Israel would be able to destroy Iran nuclear program, weaken their govt' Middle East 20/06/2025 Escalating air war between Israel and Iran enters second week 20/06/2025 'Collective problem needs collective solution: Global warming projected to increase well beyond 2°' Environment
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
EU review indicates Israel breached human rights in Gaza
Israel's actions in the Gaza Strip indicate a breach of the human rights provisions contained in its Association Agreement with the European Union, a highly anticipated review from the bloc's diplomatic service has found, citing a collection of findings by independent international organisations. The breach stems from Israel's war on Gaza and the stringent conditions applied to the deliveries of humanitarian aid, which have stoked fears of widespread famine among Palestinians living in the densely populated enclave. It also covers Israel's decades-long occupation of the West Bank, where settlers have engaged in violent acts. Europeans have reacted with shock and fury at reports of Palestinians being killed by the Israeli army while waiting for supplies at distribution sites. The review was conducted by the European External Action Service (EEAS) and sent to member states on Friday under a restrictive format to avoid leaks. "There are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement," a senior diplomat told Euronews, quoting the conclusions contained in the document. The review was launched last month at the request of 17 countries, led by the Netherlands, to determine whether Israel was still complying with Article 2 of the Association Agreement, which states bilateral relations "shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles, which guides their internal and international policy and constitutes an essential element of this agreement". Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden backed the Dutch call. Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy and Lithuania were against, and Latvia adopted a "neutral" position, sources said then. Israel decried the decision and called on Brussels to keep bilateral dialogue going. "We completely reject the direction taken in the statement, which reflects a total misunderstanding of the complex reality Israel is facing," a spokesperson of Israel's foreign ministry said in May. "This war was forced upon Israel by Hamas, and Hamas is the one responsible for its continuation." The outcome of the review will be discussed by ambassadors on Friday and Sunday and later by foreign ministers on Monday. High Representative Kaja Kallas will personally brief EU leaders during a summit in Brussels on Thursday. Kallas, who walks a fine line to keep all countries on the same page, has recently hardened her tone towards Israel and what she calls "weaponisation" of humanitarian aid. "It is very painful for me to see the suffering," Kallas said earlier this week. "When I'm hearing that 50 people have been killed in the line for getting flour, it is painful, of course, I ask myself, what more can we do?" It will be up to member states to decide what course of action, if any, the EU should take in response to the critical findings. Possible options include the complete suspension of the agreement, which is highly unlikely, or the partial suspension of certain provisions related to free trade, research, technology, culture, and political dialogue. Some options will require the unanimous support of all 27 member states, while others will require a qualified majority, meaning at least 55% of countries representing at least 65% of the bloc's population. Any decision to suspend the trade aspects of the agreement will be in the hands of the European Commission, and diplomats say that here too, an agreement will be difficult to reach. No action until July Given the short timing between the release of the review and Monday's meeting, concrete action is not expected to be taken until foreign ministers meet again in July. A senior diplomat said it was "difficult" to predict whether the 17-strong group will remain united on the next steps, but hoped the findings would help "increase pressure" on Israel to alleviate the human suffering inside the war-torn strip. "There are three important points that we want to see," the diplomat explained, speaking on condition of anonymity. "First, a full and immediate end to the humanitarian blockade. Second, meaningful steps towards a ceasefire that enable the release of all hostages. And third, we would like to see that no more steps are taken to make the two-state solution more difficult." The review coincides with the military escalation between Israel and Iran, which will also be high on the agenda when foreign ministers meet on Monday. It remains to be seen how the discussion on Iran will influence the deliberations on Gaza. A diplomat from another country said it was "critical" to keep the political attention on Gaza rather than "looking somewhere else", meaning Iran. "If the report goes as far as we imagine, how many member states will still be willing not to do anything and keep on saying that it's business as usual?" the diplomat said. "Those member states will have to justify their inaction." But the sense of urgency is not equally shared. Several capitals insist the EU should focus on keeping open lines with Tel Aviv instead of cutting them off. "For us, what is important is to keep a decent level of communication with Israel. We want to keep the Association Agreement as it is," a third diplomat said. "For many of us, trade with Israel is important, and we don't want to shut the doors." A fourth diplomat noted: "We're away the humanitarian situation is very bad (but) it won't stop being dramatic even if we do suspend the agreement." The review comes a day after Belgium, together with Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, asked the European Commission to examine "how trade in goods and services linked to illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory can be brought into line with international law".
