Friedrich Merz becomes Germany's chancellor after historic defeat in first round vote

Hours after he suffered a historic defeat, Friedrich Merz was elected as German chancellor on Tuesday.
The leader of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) had been widely expected to win the vote to become the country's 10th chancellor since World War II.
No candidate for chancellor in post-war Germany has failed to win on the first ballot, but Merz, 69, was six votes short, winning just 310 of the 316 he required to secure a majority in the lower house of parliament, or Bundestag.
After announcing the result Bundestag President Julia Klöckner implored her colleagues to come to a result. 'The whole of Europe, perhaps the whole world, is watching this election,' Spahn said, adding, 'I appeal to everyone to be aware of this special responsibility.'
Because the votes were secret ballots, it was not immediately clear who had defected from Merz's camp and it might never be known.
He received 325 votes in the second ballot.
Germany has not had a majority government since the collapse of Olaf Scholz's SPD-led three-way coalition last November.
Merz won the federal election in February with 28.5% of the vote for the CDU/CSU conservatives. On his campaign trail, he promised voters that he would revitalize the German economy, tighten immigration, and boost the country on the world stage at a time when far-right movements are surging amid political uncertainty abroad and a weakened NATO alliance.
The coalition government has promised to revive the economy amid a global trade war sparked by President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs and increasing pressure on Europe to boost its defense spending.
The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), which looks set to become the largest opposition party in parliament, seized on his failure to attack Merz.
'Merz is damaged, whatever else happens in future,' Bernd Baumann, the party's parliamentary group leader, said according to Reuters.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Herald Scotland

3 hours ago

• The Herald Scotland

Mahmoud Khalil speaks out after being released from ICE custody

"Your words of support, your messages, have kept me going," Khalil said in brief remarks. "Still, the fight is far from over." He planned to continue speaking out against what he called a genocide in Gaza, and American support, including from Columbia, for Israel's siege of the Palestinian territory after the 2023 Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel. Israel has denied this accusation, though some human rights observers have reached this conclusion. At the airport, Khalil approached the crowd to take a Palestinian flag from a friend, then draped it over the stroller of his son Deen, who was born 2 months ago, while Khalil was detained in Jena, Louisiana. Asked if he had a message for the Trump administration, Khalil said, "My existence is the message. Palestinian existence is a message." A day earlier, a federal district judge in New Jersey ordered Khalil's release after over three months in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody following his advocacy at the Ivy League campus. The order marked a blow to the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian student protests. Ocasio-Cortez said Khalil's detention by the Trump administration was solely political. "It is an affront to every American," she said. "We will continue to resist the politicization and the continued political persecution that ICE is engaged in. We welcome Mahmoud home." Why was Khalil in ICE detention? Khalil, a lawful permanent resident born in a Syrian refugee camp, was a student negotiator and spokesperson for pro-Palestinian demonstrators in spring 2024. Students called on Columbia to divest from its investments in Israel that helped propel war efforts. Israel's siege of Gaza has killed 55,700 Palestinian people, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's health ministry. The mounting death toll came after Hamas-led attacks in Israel that killed 1,200 people and took 251 others hostage, Israeli tallies show. Critics, including university administrators, accused the protesters of creating an unwelcoming environment for Jewish students. Organizers have denied accusations of antisemitism, and Khalil spoke out against antisemitism on CNN. Columbia's encampment demonstrations triggered similar protests on college campuses across the country. On March 8, federal agents detained Khalil, without a warrant, at his university-owned apartment building lobby in Manhattan. His wife Noor Abdalla, who is born in the United States and was 8 months' pregnant then, was by his side as they returned from dinner with friends. In recorded cell phone video, Abdalla repeatedly asked agents why he was being taken and what agency they represented. They gave her no responses before taking Khalil, who appeared calm in footage. His detention triggered waves of protests in New York City calling for his release. Eventually, Khalil arrived to a Louisiana ICE detention center, where he'd stay for over 3 months. During that time, his son was born and other international students were detained in the Trump administration's sweeping crackdown on immigration. Khalil's case was the first of several high-profile incidents in which pro-Palestinian student activists were detained by immigration authorities and targeted for deportation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio alleged Khalil participated in "antisemitic protests and disruptive activities" that "undermine U.S. efforts to combat anti-Semitism." Rubio cited an obscure provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to revoke Khalil's green card on the basis that he threatened American foreign policy interests. What did the judge rule in Khalil's case? Federal district Judge Michael Farbiarz of New Jersey ruled June 11 that Rubio had no authority to detain or deport Khalil on foreign policy grounds. Farbiarz said the government's other argument, that Khalil "fraudulently or willfully" misrepresented material facts on his application for permanent residency, could still be used to detain him. On June 20, Farbiarz called Khalil's months-long detention in a Louisiana detention center potentially punitive. "Extraordinary circumstances" warranted Khalil's release, Farbiarz said. Among those were findings that Khalil - who has no criminal record nor has been charged with any crimes - didn't pose a flight risk or a danger to others in the community. Farbiarz, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, also raised concerns about the chilling effect his detention had on free speech, and the ability of an immigration judge to take on such issues. Justice Department lawyers didn't object to evidence presented. They also didn't present proof alleging Khalil committed violence, property destruction or incitement to violence, Farbiarz added. After the ruling, the Trump administration disputed Farbiarz's order, arguing he had no authority in immigration removal proceedings. Meanwhile, administration officials said Khalil was twice removable on foreign policy grounds - namely over accusations of antisemitism and support for the Hamas militant group, and that he misrepresented information to obtain legal status. While Farbiarz has ruled out the foreign policy argument, the court is considering information he submitted to immigration officials. Khalil's lawyers have called the administration's allegations "meritless." Khalil has a pending lawsuit in New Jersey federal court against the Trump administration. Khalil's lawyers say the Trump administration violated his constitutional rights around free speech and due process. A day after his arrival to Newark, demonstrators planned to rally in New York City in support of Khalil. Columbia didn't respond to an email request for comment. Smiling alongside his wife and son, who he'd only seen once during his detention, he looked at the crowd and vowed to continue demonstrating. "This is why I will continue to protest with every one of you," Khalil said. "Not (even) if they threaten me with detention, even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine." Contributing: Michael Karas, The Bergen Record; Michael Loria, USA TODAY.

Telegraph

4 hours ago

• Telegraph

Germany's crisis-hit car industry is the key to its rearmament

Once the pride of the nation, Germany's car industry is reeling from an annus horribilis of poor sales, job losses and the threat of unprecedented factory closures. But defence firms have found a silver lining in the decline of the 'auto' trade: rehiring skilled workers to build equipment for a new German army that may soon have to defend Europe from Russia. Sources in the European defence industry, which will play a critical role in German rearmament, say they are eager to snap up engineers who have been let go by car companies so they can be put to work producing tanks and infantry fighting vehicles. Discussions are also being held in Berlin about repurposing car factories to produce military equipment. 'Let's put it this way: there's a similarity in the jobs, which means teaching an expert to weld vehicles other than cars takes less time than [training] a new person,' said a defence industry source. 'Thus, job offers usually work quite well for those who left the car industry.' It comes as Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, seeks to turn his country into a major European security power, after decades of Berlin taking a back seat on geopolitical issues. Mr Merz, the centre-Right Christian Democrats (CDU) leader, has vowed to increase German defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP and transform the Bundeswehr, the German armed forces, into the 'strongest conventional army in Europe'. The CDU chief has created a special €500 billion (£430 billion) fund to rebuild Germany's crumbling infrastructure, a key requirement for the rapid transit of Nato troops and tanks to its eastern flank. His coalition government is also mulling a possible return to conscription, and last month unveiled the deployment of a new brigade of soldiers in Lithuania to defend the border with Russia – the first permanent military deployment by Germany since the Second World War. The dramatic shift in German defence policy, known as the 'Zeitenwende' or turning of the times, has created unprecedented opportunities for the German arms industry, which used to be a pariah in the country due to its Nazi past. At the same time, years of economic stagnation, Donald Trump's tariff war, poor electric car sales and fierce competition from China have all wrought havoc on the once mighty German car industry. A recent study by the Institute for Economic Research (Ifo) said the German car industry is facing its worst slump since the pandemic, with two fifths of businesses struggling with a shortage in orders. 'Intensifying competition, especially from outside Europe, seems to be increasingly taking its toll on the German automotive industry. The crisis in the German car industry is continuing,' the Ifo said. Another study by EY, an audit firm, found that the German car industry suffered 19,000 job losses in 2024 and now only employs around 760,000 people in Germany, the lowest figure since 2013. But Mr Merz's rearmament policy could come to the rescue. Rafael Loss, a German security expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said discussions were under way to convert German car factories, which might otherwise have closed down, so they can be used to build weapons, such as one Audi factory in Brussels. Volkswagen, which is Europe's biggest carmaker but losing sales to China, is also understood to be looking for alternative uses for its factories in Dresden and Osnabrück. 'In cases where you have a car factory that already has skilled workers and is equipped for production of heavy machinery, that is one of the stronger arguments for the defence industry getting involved to prevent job losses,' he said. Mr Loss added that electricians could also have a valuable role to play in developing military technology that has similar design features to civilian cars. 'This could be applied to micro-electronics, the sort of electronic devices you see in automated cars such as proximity sensors for parking,' he said. 'They are not too different from the sensors being used in military vehicles.' Germany's 'Zeitenwende' policy began under Olaf Scholz, the previous chancellor, who announced the concept in a major speech in 2022 responding to Vladimir Putin's illegal and full-scale invasion of Ukraine. He vowed that Germany would no longer be a bystander on issues of European security, as he created a €100 billion special fund for the Bundeswehr, in addition to giving billions of euros in aid to Ukraine. Mr Scholz was initially reluctant to provide German military support, due to fears of angering Putin, but eventually sent tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, air defence systems and huge quantities of ammunition to Kyiv. His successor, Mr Merz, wants to take German support even further, having swept to victory in elections last February and formed a coalition propped up by Mr Scholz's Social Democrats. 'Germany is back,' he has declared. Now there is speculation as to whether Mr Merz will finally agree to send powerful long-range Taurus missiles to Ukraine, a step that the government of Mr Scholz always maintained was a step too far that would drag Berlin into open conflict with Moscow. Mr Merz's government maintains a policy of secrecy on the nature of arms supplies to Ukraine, which it says is to keep Moscow guessing, although critics wonder if it really means that he has developed cold feet about the Taurus system. The coalition is also hampered by doveish figures in the Social Democrats, who hold many of the same views about Russia as their former leader Mr Scholz. At the same time, the rise of the Kremlin-friendly far-Right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party – which came second place in the last election – is putting pressure on Mr Merz to temper his actions against Russia. Some German officials have been slightly taken aback by the highly positive response to Mr Merz's rearmament policy, fearing that expectations have been set too high for his government. 'We know expectations in Europe are high, and we view this defence reform as an important and necessary step,' one source said. 'But buying tanks, building tanks, this is not something that Germans are enthusiastic about,' they added, citing Germany's previous and far more infamous attempt to build the biggest army in Europe.

Spectator

5 hours ago

• Spectator

Why conservatives should embrace their Christian heritage

The heydays of Christian influence over European politics may seem long gone. In the UK, after the most recent general election, four-tenths of all MPs took secular affirmations – up from less than a quarter in 2019 – while in Europe, parties with explicitly Christian foundations often seem embarrassed about their religious heritage as they tumble down the polls. Yet Christians have not stopped turning up for those parties. To play to its strengths and resolve its identity crisis, the centre-right should embrace its Christian inheritance. By returning to this Christian inheritance, the centre-right can offer a vision that is compelling to all and re-establish its dominance Even as the centre-right shies away from invoking its Christian credentials, it continues to rally Christian voters around its banner. In the UK, according to the most recent wave of the British Election Study, Christian voters were 33 per cent more likely to vote Conservative, compared to only 15 per cent of non-Christians. In Germany, too, churchgoing Christians are more than twice as likely to vote for the CDU/CSU Union than the non-religious. Even in the notoriously secular France, Catholics disproportionately turn up for the centre-right, with 19 per cent of Catholics – and 29 per cent of regular churchgoers – voting for the centre-right UDC at the 2022 legislative election, where the UDC received only 14 per cent of the overall vote. This reflects a long-standing trend. A recent report by Bright Blue and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation argued that religiosity has been a core component of European centre-right's history as they dominated European politics over the course of the twentieth century. Since 1949, the CDU held the chancellorship for 49 years – 26 more than its main rival, the SPD – during which time its policy platform was largely dictated by Catholic social thought, emphasising the value of family and the importance of social cohesion. In Ireland, up until recent years, both Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael upheld a staunchly Catholic outlook on social policy as they maintained a stranglehold over Irish politics; their Catholicism waned only as their combined vote share began to tumble, but this abandonment of their roots has proven a poor recipe for electoral success. Even in the UK, where Christianity was not as explicit a part of Conservative Party philosophy, the Church of England is not described as 'the Conservative Party at prayer' without reason. This is not merely because Christians vote right-wing. A 2023 paper titled From the Death of God to the Rise of Hitler found that a key predictor for whether you joined the Nazi Party or not was whether you had a Christian first name. If your name was common on churches – think St George or St Martin in England – you were far less likely to do so. The values of the centre-right deeply reflect their Christian heritage, while far-right politics instead often offers a secularised version of religion; one where politics, rather than God, is the source of meaning, and the party takes on the role of the church. For the centre-right to succeed in the future, it should play to its strengths and embrace its Christian inheritance. First, by doing so, it would be playing into a renewed uptick in church attendance and religiosity. Between 2018 and 2024, church attendance in the UK has increased by 50 per cent, including by 300 per cent among the 18-to-24s. In France, as of 2025, the annual number of baptisms is the highest since records began 20 years ago. But second, and more importantly, the values that have allowed the centre-right to be successful are the values it inherits from Christianity: love of country, caring for your family and rewarding contribution. The late Pope Saint John Paul II, in Memory and Identity – the very last book he published before his death – wrote that 'patriotism … is covered by the fourth commandment, which obliges us to honour our father and mother…the patria truly resembles a mother…Patriotism, in other words, leads to a properly ordered social love.' The centre-right alone can provide a vision of country that represents a love of your closest neighbour rather than shutting off from the world, as some right-wing populists would prefer. On rewarding contribution, too, it is largely thanks to its Christian heritage that the centre-right believes that people should take responsibility for their actions – that we have free will and are accountable for our actions and should be rewarded or punished accordingly. Here, it has clashed with those on the left who see hard work or good character as the mere consequences of socio-economic factors and nothing that anybody deserves praise or blame for. Those beliefs – in country, family and contribution – are persuasive to all Europeans, not just Christians. By returning to this Christian inheritance, the centre-right can offer a vision that is compelling to all and re-establish its former dominance.