US expected to declare Biden fuel economy rules exceeded legal authority
WASHINGTON: The US Transportation Department is expected to declare that fuel economy rules issued under then President Joe Biden exceeded the government's legal authority by including electric vehicles in setting the rules, automaker officials said Monday.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the department's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on Friday submitted its interpretive rule, "Resetting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Program" to the White House for review.
The prior administration had "illegally used CAFE standards as a backdoor electric vehicle mandate – driving the price of cars up," he said in a statement.
Removing EVs from the calculations for credits and the regulatory mandates could result in lower overall fuel economy requirements.
NHTSA in June said it would hike CAFE requirements to about 50.4 miles per gallon (4.67 liters per 100 km) by 2031 from 39.1 mpg currently for light-duty vehicles.
Last year, 120 Republican lawmakers said NHTSA exceeded its authority by adopting fuel economy standards "that effectively mandate EVs while at the same time force the internal combustion engine out of the market."
The lawmakers said the agency "accounted for EVs in its regulatory baseline and factored that baseline into its determination of the maximum achievable CAFE standards."
House Republicans last week proposed killing the EV tax credit and repealing fuel efficiency rules designed to prod automakers into building more zero-emission vehicles as part of a broad-based tax reform bill.
Federal law requires NHTSA to set CAFE standards at the maximum feasible level.
The Environmental Protection Agency also plans to reconsider parallel vehicle emissions rules and rescind California's legal authority to ban sales of gas-only vehicles by 2035. The US Senate this week may take up legislation passed by the House to
rescind the approval for California's rules. Automakers like General Motors and Toyota are aggressively lobbying for repeal.
NHTSA said last year the rule would reduce gasoline
consumption by 64 billion gallons and cut emissions by 659 million metric tons. The agency said while some vehicles would be more expensive to buy, consumers would save on fuel costs with estimated net benefits of US$35.2 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Trump says he will decide on US involvement in Iran within two weeks
US President Donald Trump has announced that he would make a decision about US military involvement in Iran within two weeks, offering a timeframe for a possible intervention into a conflict that flared last week and has so far remained limited to Israel and the Islamic Republic. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision on whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Trump said via White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who asserted that Tehran might be 'a couple of weeks' away from being able to deploy a nuclear weapon. 'As for correspondence between the United States and the Iranians, I can confirm that correspondence has continued as you know we were engaged with six rounds of negotiations with them in both indirect and direct ways,' Leavitt said in a briefing. Leavitt delivered Trump's statement and discussed the president's thinking as he faced defiance from many in his own party over his comments on Wednesday, in which he said that he 'may' or 'may not' order US forces to participate in Israel's strikes against the Islamic republic. Steve Bannon, one of the most influential voices from Trump's 'America First' coalition, has warned against any US military operations supporting Israel's bid to destroy Iran's nuclear programme absent a diplomatic deal. 'We can't have another Iraq,' Bannon said in a discussion hosted on Wednesday by The Christian Science Monitor, referring to the war started in 2003, which is estimated to have killed some 4,700 US and allied troops. 'The Israelis have to finish what they started. They started this. They should finish it,' Bannon said. Other political figures, who have staunchly supported Trump over many years – including Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, and far-right pundit Tucker Carlson – have also come out against US military intervention. They are clashing with other Republicans who parrot Trump's insistence that Iran is likely developing nuclear weapons or already has one, which they call an outcome that must be stopped by any means necessary. Republicans supporting US military action against Tehran seem to include Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, whose military background carries weight with her colleagues. 'Maybe our public is not aware that 43 Americans lost their lives on October 7 [2023] at the hands of Hamas, which is an Iran-backed terrorist organisation,' Ernst said in a contentious Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Wednesday. Leavitt said that Iran only needed approval from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and two weeks to complete production of a weapon that would pose 'an existential threat ... to the entire world'. 'Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon,' she said. 'All they need is a decision from the Supreme Leader to do that, and it would take a couple of weeks to complete the production of that weapon, which would of course, pose an existential threat not just to Israel, but to the United States and to the entire world. 'That is something that the entire world, including countries like Russia, is in agreement with: that Iran should not and cannot obtain a nuclear weapon,' Leavitt added. The press secretary was also asked whether Trump might want to involve Beijing in possible negotiations, just hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a call in which they urged Israel and Iran to stop fighting. Asked whether Trump administration officials were concerned about China supporting Tehran, Leavitt said: 'I don't believe we're seeing any signs of that at this moment in time.' When pushed on whether a decision not to strike Iran might send a message to Beijing on Taiwan, Leavitt pointed to the 'very respectful' and 'cordial relationship' between Trump and Xi. She noted that Trump had 'long maintained' this relationship, even during his first term, emphasizing that the US and China 'share many strategic interests, not only in economics but also in global affairs and foreign policy'. Asked about the division among Republicans and the Trump base's reluctance to engage in a foreign war, Leavitt urged his supporters to 'trust' the president, citing his 'incredible instincts' and describing him as a 'peacemaker in chief' who preferred diplomacy but was not 'afraid to use strength as well'.
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump threatens to fire Fed chair Powell, calls him 'numbskull'
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump escalated his criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Friday – publicly mulling whether to fire the official and appoint himself to the central bank. The Republican leader, who regularly berates Powell over the bank's decisions not to lower interest rates, took to Truth Social to smear the banker as a "numbskull," "moron" and "obvious Trump Hater." "I fully understand that my strong criticism of him makes it more difficult for him to do what he should be doing, lowering Rates, but I've tried it all different ways," said Trump, who appointed Powell during his first term. "I've been nice, I've been neutral, and I've been nasty, and nice and neutral didn't work!" Powell's term does not conclude until next year. He has said his dismissal would be unlawful, and that he has no intention of stepping down voluntary if Trump asks. "I don't know why the Board doesn't override this Total and Complete Moron!" Trump posted. "Maybe, just maybe, I'll have to change my mind about firing him? But regardless, his Term ends shortly!" Trump lashed out after the Fed held interest rates steady for a fourth consecutive meeting on Wednesday, forecasting higher inflation and cooler growth as Trump's tariffs take hold. The projections were its first since Trump unleashed sweeping 10 per cent tariffs on almost all trading partners in April.--AFP
The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump disavows spy chief Gabbard's take on Iran's nuclear program
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey. 'She's wrong,' Trump said. In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that the U.S. intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon. 'The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon,' she said. On Friday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' She said the media has taken her March testimony 'out of context' and was trying to 'manufacture division.' The White House has said Trump would weigh involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict over the next two weeks. On Tuesday, Trump made similar comments to reporters about Gabbard's assessment. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets by saying Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead. Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment program is only for peaceful purposes. In March, Gabbard also described Iran's enriched uranium stockpile as unprecedented for a state without such weapons and said the government was watching the situation closely. She also said Iran had started discussing nuclear weapons in public, 'emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran's decision-making apparatus.' A source with access to U.S. intelligence reports told Reuters the March assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed. The source said U.S. spy services judged it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice. David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector, questioned the revised view offered by Gabbard on Friday, estimating it would take Iran at least six months to produce a crude nuclear 'device' that could not be delivered by a missile. To produce a nuclear weapon that could be delivered on target by missile would take Iran at least one to two years, said Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security. Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of U.S. intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged - without providing proof - are part of a 'deep state' cabal of U.S. officials opposed to his presidency. Gabbard, a fierce Trump loyalist, has been among the president's backers who have aired such allegations. The Republican president repeatedly clashed with U.S. spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favor and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials. (Reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt in Washington; Additional reporting by Jonathan Landay; Editing by Rod Nickel, David Gregorio and Tom Hogue)
