logo
Bose Vs. Sony: Which Headphones Are Best?

Bose Vs. Sony: Which Headphones Are Best?

Forbes11-06-2025

A good pair of headphones should accomplish three tasks: They should have stellar audio quality, exceptional active noise cancellation (ANC) and a long battery life to last through an international flight. Two of my favorite pairs of wireless headphones, the Bose QuietComfort Ultras and the Sony WH-1000XM6s, go toe to toe with these must-have features. But if you're stuck trying to decide between Bose versus Sony headphones, there are a few things to consider before you add them to your cart.
I tested both pairs of headphones for at least three weeks to determine which pair is best. The short answer: It's complicated, and it truly comes down to what you're seeking to get out of your next pair of wireless headphones. Here are the standout features, and here's what can help you decide between Bose versus Sony headphones.
Forbes Vetted
Forbes Vetted ratings are based on thorough evaluations by our editorial team to help you choose the best products with confidence.
Battery life: 24 hours (with ANC) | Drivers: 35mm | Weight: 9 ounces | Case: Hard case | Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth 5.3 (up to two connections) | Wired connectivity: 2.5mm
Best for:
Skip if:
Forbes Vetted
Forbes Vetted ratings are based on thorough evaluations by our editorial team to help you choose the best products with confidence.
Battery life: 30 hours (with ANC) | Drivers: 30mm | Weight: 8.9 ounces | Case: Hard case | Wireless connectivity: Bluetooth 5.3 (up to two connections) | Wired connectivity: 3.5mm
Best for:
Skip if:
The Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones are built of mostly plastic, and it's this plastic that's my main knock against the brand. For a flagship pair of headphones, the design feels a little cheap. That shouldn't sway die-hard audiophiles from this pair of headphones, though. The Bose QuietComfort Ultras are sturdy—I've taken them on multiple international flights, dropped them and more. I also don't use the bulky carry case because it's just another thing to haul on a plane. To date, they still look brand-new, so they're pretty darn sturdy.
The design has plush, swappable leatherette ear pads that are comfortable to wear for long periods of time. The longest flight I've taken this pair on was a 13-hour flight to Seoul, South Korea; I wore them most of that flight with my glasses on in comfort. I only wish that the design was a little less front and center and mechanical. While Bose prides itself on its audio quality (more on that in a second), it looks very utilitarian.
While the Bose headphones have a design that feels more mechanical, Sony opted for a sleeker build. Bose places its branding front and center on each ear cup; you know that someone is wearing the Bose headphones. Sony keeps its branding more subtle, placing it just above the ear cup. I'm a huge fan, and it's a good design choice—the headphones look luxe. Another feature that Sony added back into the headphones' design from their predecessor, the WH-1000XM5s? A foldable design. The WH-1000XM5s couldn't fold into a more portable package; they could only flip the ear cups in and out. It's a necessary addition, and I'm glad Sony added it back in.
When I initially unboxed them, I worried that the swappable ear cups—less plush than the Bose headphones I tested—might not be enough to wear for long periods of time. The headphones quickly proved me wrong. Glasses wearers may have some minor wear issues, but that's not my biggest design gripe: The midnight blue color I received shows my fingerprints and natural facial oils. It's easy to wipe it down, but I recommend opting for the Platinum Silver finish to reduce the dirt.
If you had asked me even a couple of months ago which pair of headphones had the better sound quality, I would have said without hesitation: It's Bose. Now that the Sony WH-1000XM6s have launched, it's more complicated.
The Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones have a rich audio quality, and it's partially why I named them the best wireless headphones you can buy right now. They can easily hit deep bass frequencies with ease on Ashnikko's and Kendrick Lamar's songs, and the audio balance in Remi Wolf's funk-infused 'Cinderella' and 'Photo ID' is simply lovely.
Bose also stands out for its intuitive app. Don't expect dedicated EQ presets, as Bose doesn't offer any, but you can adjust bass, mids and trebles up and down six points to find a sound that suits you. The app also offers two other listening modes, Motion and Still. Motion puts you in the center of the action for a more immersive experience, while Still is built for when you're sitting at your desk. Turn your head to the left and right, and the music stays firmly in front of you for a concert-like sound. These come at the minor cost of audio quality, though.
The Bose headphones also offer a slew of technologies to keep the audio quality consistent. Your headphones are only as good as the data transfer. These headphones include aptX Adaptive codec, which can dynamically transfer higher amounts of data, and thus higher-resolution audio quality; it's specifically for Android. The headphones also offer advanced audio coding (AAC), which essentially does what aptX does, only for Apple devices, so its audio quality is great across both Android and iOS devices.
Whereas the Sony WH-1000XM5s couldn't match the Bose QuietComfort Ultras, the Sony WH-1000XM6s now rival the competition. Bose sounds more professionally balanced, or 'cinematic,' if you will, and can immerse you in the action with those modes; Sony focuses on putting you in the center of the action. 'Ma Meilleure Ennemie' and 'Sucker' from the Arcane soundtrack sound more like they're being performed live in my living room, and it's a boon to the listening experience. The headphones support LDAC, which is a sound codec that allows for more data transfer, and thus allows for a richer audio experience. They also support AAC, but not aptX Adaptive.
That said, the Sony Sound Connect app is lackluster: It's not nearly as intuitive as the Bose app. Open it, and you can see Ambient Sound Control, which controls your ANC. You can also see what's called Listening Mode; this mode gives you two different sub-modes to turn your music into a background 'coffee shop' sound or cinema mode for movies. To be blunt, these modes are mediocre. You can choose from a handful of EQ presets, or you can create custom EQ if you prefer. You can do this by listening through a couple of different options to find your preferred balance. There are a slew of other features, like spatial audio, scene analyzers (which can analyze your environment and make audio adjustments on the fly) and listening habits, the latter of which can help you maintain safe listening levels, but they're sprinkled in hard-to-find spots.
If you prefer a more lifelike experience to your listening, the Sony WH-1000XM6s should be your go-to. Just keep in mind that the app may be difficult for you to navigate at times. However, if you prefer more cinematic listening sessions, the Bose headphones are best for you. You really can't go wrong with either in terms of audio quality; both are rich and detailed.
The Bose QuietComfort Ultras can last up to 24 hours on a single charge, but there are a few caveats to hit that number. For one, the Motion and Still immersive modes need to be off; using them drains more battery, to around 18 hours. If they get low on battery, a 15-minute charge gets 2.5 hours of music playback, which is significantly more time for less playback than Sony offers.
The Sony WH-1000XM6 headphones can last up to 30 hours—with ANC on. That's a massive difference that, if you tend to take long-haul flights or forget to charge your headphones, can make or break your listening experience. In the event you do forget to charge them, three minutes of charging can get three hours of music playback in a pinch. If you frequently forget to charge your headphones, pick up the Sony headphones.
Both pairs of headphones offer stellar noise-cancellation technology, and both dive deeper so you can get the level of ANC that you prefer. Bose offers three different modes: Aware, which is a transparency mode so you can hear outside noises; Immersion, which turns on Still or Motion, depending on your preferences; and Quiet, which is the ANC mode. It's worth noting that while Quiet mode offers noise control, it's locked, so you can't change it. But you also shouldn't have to change it—the ANC is powerful enough that airplane engines sound whisper quiet, which is exactly what you want in a pair of noise-canceling headphones. In fact, these are currently my best noise-canceling headphones pick.
Sony's WH-1000XM6s offers three modes, too: Off, which turns off the transparency and the noise-canceling modes; Ambient Sound, which is the transparency mode; and Noise Canceling, which activates the ANC. It's good enough for most needs, but I live next to not one but two elementary schools, and I look out onto a lovely park. When the children get out and play at the park, I can still hear some sounds slip past the ANC. It also couldn't compete against the New York City subway noise as trains whizzed by me. It's on par with Bose, but Bose slightly edges out the Sony WH-1000XM6s. If you value ANC above all else, Bose is the answer here, and you should opt for them.
If you're considering the Bose versus Sony headphones, it boils down to a few features. Both have incredible audio quality that showcase a rich audio quality. Both are very comfortable, and both have a sturdy, durable build that should last for some time.
If you tend to forget to charge your gear, the Sony headphones may be the better option: It's hard to put a price on that 30-hour battery life. And if you prefer a sleeker design, the Sony headphones are the best choice for you.
However, if you want unparalleled ANC, the Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones should be your pick. There's also something to be said about using an intuitive app. I've found Bose's app easy to use in my two years of experience testing them as my main pair of travel headphones, and that's important when you're on the move.
The Forbes Vetted team has published hundreds of tech and electronics guides that leverage our hands-on testing and research, including audio stories for all of your listening needs, like wireless headphones, wireless earbuds, outdoor speakers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Barron Trump made millions from family's lucrative crypto firm: report
Barron Trump made millions from family's lucrative crypto firm: report

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Barron Trump made millions from family's lucrative crypto firm: report

Barron Trump, the youngest son of the 47th President, may have raked in millions of dollars from the sale of crypto tokens linked to the family's lucrative venture into digital tokens, according to report. The 19-year-old New York University student could have picked up a cool $40 million — $25 million after taxes — from the sale of digital assets by World Liberty Financial Group, the Trump family firm launched nine months ago after Barron persuaded his dad about the benefits of crypto, Forbes reported. 'Barron knows so much about this,' commander-in-chief said during an interview in September after the launch. 'Barron's a young guy, but he knows it — he talks about his wallet. He's got four wallets or something, and I'm saying, 'What is a wallet?'' Barron Trump, seen here at his father's second inauguration, is listed as a 'co-founder' on World Liberty Financial's website. AFP via Getty Images World Liberty has been a financial bonanza for the family. In March, World Liberty announced that it had sold $550 million worth of tokens. An Office of Government Ethics filing released by President Trump last week declared he had made $57 million from token sales. It also said that the real estate mogul held a 75% stake in his umbrella company, DT Marks Defi LLC, with unnamed 'third parties' holding the other 25%. Barron Trump is listed as a 'co-founder' of World Liberty Financial alongside the president, as well as Eric and Donald Trump Jr, the president's two eldest sons. Forbes, which provided no direct evidence for its claims of Barron Trump's massive digital windfall, suggested that he owned a 7.5% stake in Delaware-based World Liberty. The stake would mirror what the NYU freshman holds in the Trump Organization's Washington, DC hotel, Forbes said. The Post has approached a Trump Organization spokesperson for comment. Trump once derided digital assets such as Bitcoin as 'a scam' but he has since U-turned and embraced cryptocurrencies. REUTERS Barron Trump's name does not appear in the company's solitary SEC filing from October 30 last year. Also listed as business partners in the venture are Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and his son, Zachary. An analysis by Bloomberg, the financial news outlet, estimates the president's net worth has doubled since the start of his 2024 campaign, standing at just over $5.4 billion

How ChatGPT Broke My Brain (And Why I Still Use It Every Day)
How ChatGPT Broke My Brain (And Why I Still Use It Every Day)

Forbes

time4 hours ago

  • Forbes

How ChatGPT Broke My Brain (And Why I Still Use It Every Day)

I continue using ChatGPT daily—but I've learned to treat it how high performers treat ... More performance-enhancing tools—with structure, limits, and awareness. NurPhoto via Getty Images Even as a proponent of AI, I've learned the hard way: the biggest threat isn't automation—it's what I stop doing when I rely too heavily on machines. There was a stretch—weeks, really—when I couldn't finish a simple email without asking ChatGPT to do it for me. I'd start typing, feel unsure, and reach for a prompt. New tone. New angle. Just one more version. Every time, 'maybe this one' felt like the answer. And the dopamine hit? Instant. Novel. Addictive. What began as a tool to streamline marketing copy turned into paralysis. I stopped trusting my own phrasing. Iteration replaced decision making. And here's what surprised me most: the more I used AI to write small things , the harder it became to write important things . Tasks I've tackled confidently on my own for my entire life—like every Forbes article I've authored or even my own book—shifted from being sources of intellectual challenge and joy to overwhelming experiences filled with self-doubt. My thinking felt fuzzier. The inner voice I rely on to structure an argument or hold a tension had gone quieter. The Dopamine Loop of Prompting ChatGPT doesn't just give answers—it delivers a perfectly engineered cocktail of anticipation and novelty. Each version feels like it might be the one. Each response is a surprise, tapping into the psychological principle of intermittent reinforcement, famously demonstrated by psychologist B.F. Skinner, where unpredictable rewards significantly amplify behaviors, much like gambling addiction. For someone with an ADHD brain like mine—wired for pattern-seeking, shortcut-taking, and reward-chasing—ChatGPT is catnip. Every new draft becomes a low-effort opportunity to avoid doing the hard, focused work of starting and finishing something. It becomes a loop: Prompt → Output → Evaluate → Repeat. Each time I felt uncertain, I'd outsource the discomfort rather than work through it. Cognitive Offloading and the Erosion of Ownership This pattern has a name in cognitive science: cognitive offloading —relying on external systems to perform mental tasks we used to internalize. AI makes it easy to skip the generative friction that creativity often requires. I wasn't refining ideas—I was accumulating options. I wasn't editing—I was evaluating. And eventually, I wasn't writing—I was managing automated outputs. That doesn't just slow productivity. It reshapes the brain. Research by Adrian Ward and colleagues highlights how continuous dependence on digital tools for memory or problem solving reduces our ability to remember, process deeply, and engage analytically. Instead of actively shaping ideas, I found myself passively supervising generated content, weakening my own intellectual muscles. Even the Help Sometimes Gets in the Way I've known since high school that my best ideas emerge not at a desk, but while walking or in conversation—I literally think out loud. Colleagues joke that this clearly shows I was born to be a speaker, not a writer. When AI transcription tools arrived, they felt like the solution I'd been waiting for. Until I got the transcript back. It stripped the 'ums,' the tangents, the little asides to my kids mid-thought ('No, you can't have another popsicle, Daddy is working'), but it also erased the texture that made the thinking mine. I didn't need a cleaned-up version—I needed me in words. And I lost hours trying to get the AI to un-help. Why I Still Use It (And You Should Too) Such a horror story might naturally lead one to assume this article is tailor-made for the AI-resistant—something they can share aggressively with that one colleague who talks about ChatGPT as much as CrossFitters reminded you they did CrossFit in 2018. But here's the truth: I'm not anti-AI. Avoiding it is a recipe for irrelevance. I continue using ChatGPT daily—but I've learned to treat it how high performers treat performance-enhancing tools—with structure, limits, and awareness. When used intentionally, it's invaluable: It reveals blind spots. It lets me test structure and tone rapidly. It simulates collaboration when no one else is in the room. But here's the key: if I don't think first , AI doesn't help me—it replaces me. If I don't own my voice , it sounds like everyone else's. How I Reclaimed My Thinking—Without Ditching the Tech To preserve cognitive clarity, I built boundaries grounded in science: Start with your own sentence — I won't prompt until I've written my thesis, even if it's rough . This taps into The Generation Effect , a well-documented phenomenon showing that the act of creating information—not just reading it—builds stronger memory. — . This taps into , a well-documented phenomenon showing that the act of creating information—not just reading it—builds stronger memory. Avoid AI for first drafts — write first, then compare, not the other way around . Idea development followed by AI enhancement preserves individual voice and cognitive engagement. — . Idea development followed by AI enhancement preserves individual voice and cognitive engagement. Limit iterations — three options max, then decide . The Paradox of Choice and decision fatigue research —dating back to Schwartz and Iyengar's experiments—reveals that fewer options (e.g., 3 drafts max) reduce analysis paralysis and increase satisfaction. — . The Paradox of Choice and decision fatigue —dating back to Schwartz and Iyengar's experiments—reveals that fewer options (e.g., 3 drafts max) reduce analysis paralysis and increase satisfaction. Protect tech-free white space— schedule tech-free blocks, prioritizing clarity over speed . As I've previously explored , dedicated white space time can directly facilitate constructive and innovative thinking. This concept is supported by multiple studies , which consistently show that taking breaks—especially through walking—boosts creativity by as much as 60%. These aren't just habits—they're boundaries preserving the part of me no machine replicates. The Real Risk for Leaders This isn't just about writing—it's about attention, judgment, and trust: the core ingredients of leadership. The danger isn't AI replacing us—it's AI eroding our capacity for deep, sustained human thinking, tempting us away from uniquely human work: wrestling with ideas, navigating ambiguity, and staying with the slow burn of unfinished thought. AI is here to stay—and I'm grateful for it. It's powerful. It's essential. But if we don't approach it with intention, it won't just alter how we work. It will reshape how we think. That's not a technical shift. It's a leadership risk. We're not at risk of being replaced by machines—unless we stop doing the very things machines need from us. Let's protect our minds, not just optimize our prompts.

Big Take: Trump Policies to Cost US Tourism Billions
Big Take: Trump Policies to Cost US Tourism Billions

Bloomberg

time5 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Big Take: Trump Policies to Cost US Tourism Billions

Global tariff wars, multi-country travel bans, detentions and phone-seizures at the border. President Trump's 'America first' policies create a grim picture for one group in particular: international tourists. Foreign visitors to the US have been on the rise since the pandemic, with analysts previously expecting 2025 to be a bumper year for tourism. That is, until President Trump's second term began. This drop in tourism is forecasted to cost the American economy $12.5 billion this year. On Today's episode of the Big Take, host David Gura sits down with Bloomberg reporter and Big Take Asia host K. Oanh Ha to look at the state of the tourism industry in the US, and where in the world tourists are going instead.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store