New US-Iran Agreement Stricter Than 2015 JCPOA
The US is seeking to ink a new agreement with Iran similar to their 2015 JCPOA but with stricter conditions, including a permanent and structural change in Tehran's nuclear capabilities.
The deal comes despite pressures imposed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who seek a 'zero enrichment' and a Libya-style deal that dismantles Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
Diplomats from all sides of the negotiations told Reuters on Friday that an initial framework under discussion preserves the core of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) - scrapped by President Donlad Trump in 2018 during his first term.
Eight sources said a deal may not look radically different to the former pact, which Trump called the worst in history, but would extend duration to 25 years, tighten verification, and expand so-called sunset clauses that pause but don't completely dismantle aspects of Iran's nuclear program.
Stricter Deal
Under the terms being discussed, Iran would limit stockpile size and centrifuge types, and dilute, export or seal its 60% uranium stock under unprecedented International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) scrutiny - all in exchange for substantial sanctions relief, all the sources said.
Also, under proposals discussed in rounds of talks in April, Iran would cap enrichment at 3.67%, in line with the JCPOA, all the sources said, including three Iranian officials.
Tehran is also open to granting the IAEA expanded access to its nuclear sites, the Iranian sources said.
A senior regional source close to Tehran said the current debate over Iran's uranium stockpiles centers on whether Iran 'will keep a portion of it - diluted - inside the country while sending another portion abroad, possibly to Russia.'
Meanwhile, the Reuters report mentioned several sticking points, mainly related to Washington's demand to address the Iranian ballistic program, while Iranian officials say their missile development is not up for negotiation.
Another striking point is related to Iran's refusal to dismantle its entire nuclear infrastructure.
Diplomats said Netanyahu sees a rare opening because last year's military campaigns crippled Iran's air defenses, and decimated Hezbollah's missile arsenal - Tehran's primary deterrent.
'This is a historic window for Israel to strike Iran's nuclear sites,' said an official in the Middle East.
The United States, he said, opposes such a move for several reasons - chief among them the concerns of Gulf Arab states, which Washington cannot ignore given its deep strategic and economic ties in the region.
Israel is demanding 'zero enrichment' and a Libya-style deal that dismantles Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
One regional security official said Washington is pressing to include the ballistic missile program in the talks, but Tehran 'continues to reject any discussion.'
He added that the problem is that without addressing the missile issue, Trump cannot claim that the new deal goes beyond the JCPOA.
One Iranian official previously told Reuters it would not go beyond the requirements of the 2015 deal, offering only to avoid building missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads as a 'gesture of goodwill.'
Trump Ups Pressure
While Trump further increased the pressure against Iranian oil, US expects new discussions with Iran 'in the near future' on Tehran's nuclear program, despite the postponement of those planned for Saturday.
The talks between the two countries, enemies for four decades, aim to conclude a new agreement to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons - an ambition Tehran has always denied having - in exchange for lifting the sanctions that are crippling its economy.
Washington and Tehran were set to meet for a fourth round of negotiations on Saturday in Rome, after both parties reported progress in previous discussions. But Iran confirmed the postponement on Thursday after the Omani mediator cited 'logistical reasons.'
Washington nevertheless indicated it "expects that new discussions will take place in the near future," stating that the date and location of those originally planned for this weekend were never confirmed.
Meanwhile, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot told AFP that other discussions scheduled for Friday, between Iran on one hand, and the United Kingdom, France, and Germany on the other, will also not occur.
Barrot is in Washington, where he met his US counterpart Marco Rubio.
Rubio told Fox News that Iran should not be afraid of nuclear inspections, including by Americans, amid diplomatic efforts between the two countries over Iran's nuclear program.
Oil Purchases
Trump, who has revived his so-called 'maximum pressure' policy on Iran by pressing it to negotiate while threatening to bomb it if diplomacy fails, promised Thursday to be uncompromising in the effective implementation of sanctions dating back to his first term. Specifically, radical measures against Iranian oil.
'All purchases of Iranian oil or petrochemical products must cease, NOW,' the American president emphasized on his Truth social network. 'Any country or person buying any amount of Iranian oil or petrochemical products will be immediately subjected to indirect sanctions.'
Trump's warnings come a day after Washington announced new sanctions against seven companies accused of being involved in selling Iranian oil.
In response, Iran slammed a 'US policymakers' contradictory approach, and their lack of good faith and seriousness to progress on the path of diplomacy.'
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said 'these sanctions, designed within the framework of the criminal and failed 'maximum pressure' policy, expose Washington's contradictory behavior and its lack of sincerity in advancing diplomacy.'
He said, 'The sanctions announced in recent days under various pretexts—targeting Iranian and non-Iranian individuals and companies—are a blatant sign of the US ongoing violations of international norms and its efforts to disrupt legal relations between developing nations through economic terrorism.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
4 hours ago
- Leaders
Saudi Crown Prince Discusses Region's Tensions with GCC, French, Italian Leaders
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman discussed the escalating tensions in the region following the US attacks with GCC leaders through a series of phone calls on Sunday, according to the Saudi Press Agency. Series of Phone Calls On Sunday, Saudi Arabia expressed its deep concern over the recent strikes and urged restraint to avoid more escalation, the Saudi Foreign Ministry said in a statement. The Crown Prince held separate telephone calls with several Gulf Cooperation Council leaders including King Hamad bin Isa Al-Khalifa of Bahrain, Sultan Haitham bin Tariq of Oman, Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani as well as Emir of Kuwait Sheikh Meshal Al-Sabah. Furthermore, the prince received a phone call from UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan. During the calls, the leaders discussed the latest regional developments, such as Israel's ongoing attacks on Iran and the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities earlier on Sunday. They stressed the unity and solidarity of GCC member states and emphasized the significance of collective efforts to exercise restraint, avoid further escalation, and seek diplomatic solutions to the conflict. On Sunday, Prince Mohammed also received a phone call from French President Emmanuel Macron and Prime Minister of Italy Giorgia Meloni. The calls focused on the latest developments in the Middle East and the consequences of the escalation of tensions in the region following the US strikes. US Strikes on Iran The US launched airstrikes on Sunday against Iran's nuclear facilities in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. 'The United States showed that they have no respect to United Nations Charter. They have no respect to international law. They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said. Moreover, Araghchi accused Trump of not only betraying Iran by abusing its commitment to diplomacy but also deceiving his own voters by implementing the wishes of a war criminal. 'He has betrayed not only Iran by abusing our commitment to diplomacy but also deceived his own voters by submitting to the wishes of a wanted war criminal who has grown accustomed to exploiting the lives and wealth of American citizens to further the Israeli regime's objectives,' he added. Israel-Iran War On June 13, Israel launched a wave of airstrikes on Iran under the name of Operation Rising Lion. The military campaign targeted Iran's nuclear facilities and killed top military commanders and nuclear scientists. As a response, Iran launched a retaliatory wave of missiles against Israel and targeted Tel Aviv. Israel also killed three more Iranian nuclear scientists, bringing the total number of scientists slain to nine, Gulf News reported. Currently, both countries are trading missiles and attacks amid intensifying efforts to halt the conflict. Related Topics: Iranian FM Heads to Moscow for Urgent Talks with Putin What They Said After the US Struck Iran's Nuclear Facilities Saudi Arabia Expresses Deep Concern over US Strikes on Iran Short link : Post Views: 66
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
NATO strikes spending deal, but Spain exemption claim risks Trump ire
BRUSSELS, Belgium: NATO on Sunday signed off on a pledge to ramp up defense spending before its upcoming summit, but Madrid insisted it would not need to hit the five percent of GDP demanded by US President Donald Trump. The claim by Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez sets up a potential clash with Trump, who has pressured allies to commit to that headline figure when they meet for the two-day gathering starting on Tuesday in The Hague. Spain had been the last holdout on a compromise deal that sees allies promise to reach 3.5 percent on core military needs over the next decade, and spend 1.5 percent on a looser category of 'defense-related' expenditures such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. Multiple diplomats at NATO said the agreement — set to be unveiled at the summit — had gone through with the approval of all 32 nations and that there was no exemption for Madrid. But within minutes Sanchez came out saying he had struck an accord with NATO that would see his country keep respecting its commitments 'without having to raise our defense spending to five percent of gross domestic product.' 'We understand the difficulty of the geopolitical context, fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries to increase their defense investment, if they so wish, but we are not going to do it,' he said. NATO diplomats now fear that Spain's position could undermine its carefully choreographed show of unity with Trump in The Hague, which already risks being overshadowed by the US decision to strike Iran. 'Not ok,' one diplomat said, on condition of anonymity. Madrid's claims came after Sanchez on Thursday threw a last-minute grenade into preparations for the gathering in the Netherlands by taking a strong stand against the agreement. In a blistering letter to NATO chief Mark Rutte, Sanchez said that committing to a headline figure of five percent of GDP 'would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive.' That prompted a warning from Trump that 'Spain has to pay what everybody else has to pay.' 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain,' he told reporters on Friday, calling the country 'notorious' for spending less on defense than other alliance members. The outburst from Madrid's center-left leader also sparked fury from other NATO members desperate to keep Trump — who has threatened not to protect allies spending too little — on their side. The pledge is seen as key both to satisfying Trump and helping NATO build up the forces it needs to deter Russia. After several days of wrangling involving Sanchez and Rutte, officials said Spain on Sunday signed off on the pledge. Diplomats said that language around the spending pledge in the summit's final declaration had been slightly softened from 'we commit,' to 'allies commit.' They insisted the fundamentals of the deal remained intact and that it applied to Spain. But government sources in Madrid said the linguistic tweak meant only those countries that opted-in were covered by the promise and that Rutte was set to send a letter to Sanchez saying that Spain will have 'flexibility.' Sanchez is facing a difficult balancing act of aligning with NATO allies and cajoling his junior coalition partner, the far-left alliance Sumar, which is hostile to increasing military spending. Spain has been one of the lowest-spending NATO countries on defense in relative terms. The country is only set to hit the alliance's current target of two percent this year after a 10-billion-euro ($11.5 billion) injection.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
UN chief warns of cycle of retaliation after US bombs Iran
United Nations chief Antonio Guterres warned Sunday against yet 'another cycle of destruction' and retaliation following the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, which he said marked a 'perilous turn' in the region. 'I have repeatedly condemned any military escalation in the Middle East,' the secretary-general told an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council. 'The people of the region cannot endure another cycle of destruction. And yet, we now risk descending into a rathole of retaliation after retaliation.' Rafael Grossi, director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), also called for restraint as he voiced fears over 'potential widening' of the conflict. 'We have a window of opportunity to return to dialogue and diplomacy. If that window closes, violence and destruction could reach unthinkable levels and the global non-proliferation regime as we know it could crumble and fall,' Grossi said. Speaking to the Security Council by video link, he said there were visible craters at Iran's key Fordo nuclear facility, 'indicating the use by the United States of America of ground-penetrating munitions.' But Grossi noted that no one had been able to assess the underground damage at Fordo. He added that 'armed attacks on nuclear facilities should never take place and could result in radioactive releases with grave consequences within and beyond the boundaries of the State which has been attacked.'
