The legacy of Sheffield's at-risk millennium icon
A former music museum labelled 'at risk' has been described as an "extremely unusual and distinctive piece of architecture" that represents the city of Sheffield.The National Centre for Popular Music has most recently been used as Sheffield Hallam University's student union building, but was cited as "extremely vulnerable" following news the union was relocating.The Twentieth Century Society included the landmark on its national list of buildings vulnerable to neglect, dereliction or demolition, but the university said it had no plans for demolition and was exploring alternative uses.Construction work began on the four 'kettles' in 1997 and it opened in 1999 as a millennium project.But the National Lottery-funded attraction closed 17 months later after it failed to attract enough visitors. In 2002 it was sold to Yorkshire Forward and a year later to the university.
Helen Jackson was chair of employment for economic development when the design process began, and Hillsborough MP when the museum opened.She says the design was part of regeneration plans for the city, following a rise in unemployment rates caused by a decline in industry across South Yorkshire."It represents a period when Sheffield were doing some very unusual and, in a way, imaginative work to counter the dreadful situation for the city because of the closure of so many of the steel plants and ensuing unemployment," she says."We aimed to get industries going that were helpful and welcoming for young people in the city and we chose pop music because The Human League and other groups were very popular at that time."The four 'kettles' were based on kettle drums and were covered in Sheffield steel to connect the design to the city's heritage."It didn't last that long but it was a symbol of Sheffield," says Jackson."It was not the thing that city councils do these days, they don't sadly have the imagination or cash to do this sort of thing, but we were proud of it and it was part of a regeneration package that was going to help alleviate unemployment."The policy to encourage the music industry in the city also led to the creation of Red Tape Studios and The Showrooms – both of which remain today.Jackson remembers a time when the plans for the venues were put forward to the city council's treasurer by none other than Sheffield band The Human League."I vividly remember a meeting about Red Tape Studios," she says."We had invited members of The Human League and they wandered in looking uncouncillor-like, in sandals, and joined us in trying to persuade the council treasurer who was a bit iffy about the whole thing."The treasurer said: 'I don't know about the money' and the band chipped in 'we can help with that', and so the ratepayers were saved."
In 1989, Simon Gedye, now chair of Sheffield Civic Trust, had just arrived in Sheffield and was working as an architect."There was very little investment in the city," he says."The city was struggling with design quality, so this was an important building at the time. It summed up a time of optimism and New Labour, the designer also worked on the Millennium Dome."Mr Gedye created a team and submitted architectural plans for The National Centre for Popular Music, but after being shortlisted he lost out to Nigel Coates who won the commission and went on to create the 'kettles'."Nigel Coates was the most prominent gay architect of his generation," says Mr Gedye."He's an interesting architect and a lot of his work was fairly ephemeral. So there's not much of his built work left, so this is an important building of his and for the city."There was a lot of National Lottery funding so there was huge change."There was a number of projects in South Yorkshire - Magna, the Earth Centre - and this was one of them, and they were ambitious in terms of their design and quality and in terms of what they were trying to do."
'Amazing and jewel-like'
Today, from his perspective of chair of Sheffield Civic Trust, Mr Gedye says the "iconic" building is an "important part of our built heritage"."We're in the business of promoting everything that's of quality in terms of architecture and public art in the city."We've been concerned about what was the National Centre of Popular Music building because it is iconic."It's an extremely unusual and distinctive piece of architecture. We've had a lot of discussion and concern that when Hallam University were moving their student union out it might be a risk to that building."There are a number of buildings of this age that are slightly under the age for listing by Historic England, which are changing and are at risk from not being protected."The group has now put in a local listing application for the building in a bid to ensure its protection.He says: "It's a very beautifully detailed piece of architecture. To some degree it has been obscured by its use as the student union because they've applied lots of film to the exterior of the building but it's a very clear and beautiful building internally."I've no doubt some people look at that building and say its ugly. It is stained at the moment but when it's cleaned and when you see the photographs of it new, it looked amazing and jewel-like."
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business News Wales
2 days ago
- Business News Wales
Dee Valley Social Enterprise Expands After Securing £500,000 Grant
A growing social enterprise that provides a lifeline for people in Corwen and Llangollen is expanding after securing £500,000 in funding. The grant from the National Lottery – People and Places fund will enable South Denbighshire Community Partnership (SDCP) to create two new jobs and extend services into the evenings and weekends as well as weekdays. The injection of cash also secures the future of the not-for-profit company for the next four years, according to Sally Lloyd Davies, who has been appointed as the new chief officer of the organisation. She takes over from Margaret Sutherland, who is retiring. The organisation was founded in 2011, with the 'double act' starting to work there on the same day five years later. As well as managing two community centres, Canolfan Ni in Corwen and Pengwern Community Hub in Llangollen, SDCP provides a raft of services designed to 'improve the health and wellbeing' of mainly older and vulnerable people in the Dee Valley. They include meals on wheels with 1,500 deliveries every year in Edeyrnion, lunch clubs serving 2,000 meals annually, social activities and a range of community transport services amounting to nearly 7,000 passenger journeys over the past 12 months. Last year funding from the Motability Foundation enabled SDCP to increase its fleet from three to five vehicles. The fleet consists of two minibuses, two wheelchair-adapted cars and a van fitted with ovens and fridges to deliver meals. According to Sally, none of what they do would be possible without the 'brilliant team' of 43 dedicated volunteers. She said: 'We are absolutely thrilled to secure this vital funding from the National Lottery Community Fund because it gives the organisation and the team security to know that we can carry on with the good work that we are doing. It's also going to enable us to develop some new initiatives and expand some services into evenings and weekends. 'Everything we do is driven by the community and that was one of the things that was highlighted when we consulted local people in Llangollen and Corwen about what they felt was needed in their communities. 'We will also be looking to work with partners to develop new projects that are going to look at education and upskilling people to get re-engaged with learning. In the meantime, the new tranche of funding will enable us to expand our existing services which are a lifeline for elderly and vulnerable people in the area. 'The food deliveries not only provides people with a nice hot, nutritious meal but the volunteers visit them daily when they deliver Monday to Friday and they are our eyes and ears. There have been occasions sadly we have found somebody that's fallen and we have been able to ring emergency service or get help for them from the GP or family. 'It's crucial for people who might otherwise be isolated and can literally be a life-saver. With our dial-a-ride service, people sign up for an annual membership fee and journey charge and then they book their journey with a minimum of 48 hours' notice subject the availability of our volunteer drivers. 'We always give priority to medical appointments – trips for hospital or GP appointments – and we also provide transport for people who want to go shopping or to see a friend. Making use of the two minibuses, we have been able to increase our social trips which are really well received because they really help in reducing isolation and loneliness. 'We have two wheelchair accessible vehicles and we are really lucky that the volunteers give us their time to provide the service in Corwen and Llangollen. They are the lifeblood of the organisation. Sally also paid tribute to Margaret Sutherland's 'inspirational leadership' since 2016. She added: 'I have learned so much from Margaret over the past eight years. I am determined to continue this work, and make both Margaret and our community proud.' Margaret Sutherland said: 'Knowing that Sally is going to take over makes my retirement a lot easier because it gives me peace of mind about the future of SDCP. I know it's in very good hands with Sally at the helm. I am confident that the organisation is going to thrive and continue to serve our community. 'For every £1 of funding we received, we have created £13 of social value and that's based on feedback from the community. A cornerstone of our success has been developing good relationships with Denbighshire County Council and the health board, enabling us to access more funding to provide more services. 'The reason we have been able to do so much is that we have worked in partnership with other organisations and we have become a go-to organisation to get things done in South Denbighshire.'
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Justice Jackson questions if `monied interests' are favored by court
Jackson's dissent came two weeks after she wrote that the court is sending a "troubling message" that it's departing from basic legal standards for the Trump administration. The court's six conservatives include three appointed by President Donald Trump in his first term. In a case involving the Trump administration, the Supreme Court on June 6 said Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency could have complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration. Jackson said a majority of the court didn't require the administration to show it would be "irreparably harmed" by not getting immediate access, one of the legal standards for intervention. "It says, in essence, that although other stay applicants must point to more than the annoyance of compliance with lower court orders they don't like," she wrote, "the Government can approach the courtroom bar with nothing more than that and obtain relief from this Court nevertheless." More: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson can throw a punch. Literally. The court's two other liberals - Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan - also disagreed with the majority's opinion in the Trump case. But Kagan joined the conservatives June 20 in siding with the fuel producers. Jackson, however, said there were multiple reasons the court shouldn't have heard the case from among the thousands of appeals it receives. Those reasons include the fact that the change in administrations was likely to make the dispute go away. But by ruling in the fuel industry's favor, Jackson wrote, the court made it easier for others to challenge anti-pollution laws. "And I worry that the fuel industry's gain comes at a reputational cost for this Court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests," she said in her dissent. A clock, a mural, a petition: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's chambers tell her story Jackson said the court's "remarkably lenient approach" to the fuel producers' challenge stands in contrast to the "stern stance" it's taken in cases involving fair housing, desegrated schools or privacy concerns. In response, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who authored the 7-2 opinion, pointed to other cases he said show the court is even handed. Those include its decision last year that anti-abortion doctors couldn't challenge the Food and Drug Administration's handling of a widely used abortion drug. More: Supreme Court revives suit against cop who fatally shot driver stopped for unpaid tolls "In this case, as we have explained, this Court's recent standing precedents support the conclusion that the fuel producers have standing," Kavanaugh wrote about the industry's ability to sue. "The government generally may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders," he wrote.
NBC News
3 days ago
- NBC News
In a scathing dissent, Justice Jackson says the Supreme Court gives the impression it favors 'moneyed interests'
WASHINGTON — Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized her colleagues on Friday in a scathing dissent on a case involving vehicle emissions regulations. In her dissenting opinion, she argued that the court's opinion gives the impression it favors 'moneyed interests' in the way they decide which cases to hear and how they rule in them. The court had ruled 7-2 in favor of fuel producers seeking to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency's approval of California clean vehicle emissions regulations. She also said she was concerned that the ruling could have "a reputational cost for this court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests." With the Trump administration reversing course on many of Biden's environmental policies, including on California's electric vehicle mandates, the case is likely moot, or soon to be, Jackson wrote, making her wonder why the court felt the need to decide it. "This case gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this court than ordinary citizens," Jackson wrote. The case said that the producers had legal standing to bring their claims, resting on a theory "that the court has refused to apply in cases brought by less powerful plaintiffs," she added. The decision has little practical importance now, but in future, "will no doubt aid future attempts by the fuel industry to attack the Clean Air Act," she said. "Also, I worry that the fuel industry's gain comes at a reputational cost for this court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests," she added. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has often faced claims that it is particularly receptive to arguments made by big business. The conservative justices have been especially skeptical of broad government regulations and they have consistently made it harder for consumers and workers to bring class action lawsuits. Last year, the court overturned a 40-year precedent much loathed by business interests that empowered federal agencies in the regulatory process. Some legal experts have pushed back, saying such allegations are misleading. Jackson concluded her dissent by noting the court's "simultaneous aversion to hearing cases involving the potential vindication of less powerful litigants — workers, criminal defendants, and the condemned, among others." Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who authored the majority opinion, responded to her claims, saying that a review of standing cases "disproves that suggestion." He mentioned several recent rulings in which liberal justices were in the majority, including one last year finding that anti-abortion doctors who challenged the abortion pill mifepristone did not have standing to sue. The bottom line, he added, is that the government "may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders." The underlying case stems from the EPA's authority to issue national vehicle emissions standards under the federal Clean Air Act. In recognition of California's historic role in regulating emissions, the law allows the EPA to give the state a waiver from the nationwide standards so that it can adopt its own. The case focused on a request made by California in 2012 that EPA approve new regulations, not the state's 2024 plan to eliminate gasoline-powered cars by 2035 for which it also sought a waiver.
