Trump stance on Crimea threatens to cause rifts in EU and Nato
Donald Trump
's offer for the US to recognise
Russia
's annexation of Crimea has suddenly confronted European capitals with an agonising choice: stick with
Kyiv
or side with Washington.
Some European officials fear differences over the Trump administration's one-sided draft accord will put bilateral relations with London, Berlin and other capitals to the test, undermine transatlantic security and potentially derail a Nato summit in late June.
The Europeans have always been 'in a weak position to stand up to the US', said Jeremy Shapiro, director of the US programme at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). 'They've been trying to avoid it for that reason.'
European hopes of being included in the US-led talks were dashed on Wednesday when US secretary of state Marco Rubio pulled out of a meeting in London with Ukrainian and European officials and Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff opted instead to make his fourth visit to the Kremlin.
READ MORE
The Trump administration has presented Kyiv with the outline of a take-it-or-leave-it deal, with terms highly favourable to Moscow – including US recognition of Russia's sovereignty over Crimea 11 years after it annexed the Ukrainian peninsula in contravention of international law.
French president Emmanual Macron hosts a meeting between European and US diplomats in Paris last week. Photograph: Ludovic Marin/ AFP via Getty Images
President Volodymyr Zelennskiy refused once again on Tuesday to recognise Russia's sovereignty over any of the territory it has seized since 2014. Kyiv, however, is ready to live with de facto Russian control in return for western security guarantees.
On Wednesday, Trump lashed out at Zelenskiy's stance, calling it 'very harmful' to his peace efforts and 'inflammatory'.
'He can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country,' the US president wrote on Truth Social.
Washington's offer to endorse Moscow's control of Crimea, breaking with the agreed policy of Nato, is possibly the biggest concession it has made to Moscow in recent months in its haste to strike a deal.
A close ally of German chancellor-to-be Friedrich Merz said late on Wednesday that Europe could not accept the proposal. 'Putin would achieve all his goals and the message that would be sent out would be: 'I can afford such aggression. I will prevail in the end and achieve my goals',' Thorsten Frei, a senior MP with the centre-right Christian Democrats said on a television show. ''And that means ... if you look at the tradition in which Putin sees himself, that he will continue.'
The Trump administration has also ruled out Ukraine's membership of Nato – a long-standing Russian objection to a Nato pledge to allow Kyiv into the alliance at a future point.
While Moscow has been lavished with inducements, Kyiv has been subjected to pressure and threats. It has been offered little in exchange for giving up its territory.
'The worst case would be if [the US] cannot reach a deal between Ukraine and Russia, and this is all pushed on Ukraine. This is when Europe would have to choose [between Ukraine and the US],' said a senior EU diplomat.
Ukrainian officials said before Wednesday's talks they were prepared to discuss other terms of Washington's outline deal.
'Ukraine is ready to negotiate – but not to surrender,' said deputy prime minister Yulia Svyrydenko on X. 'There will be no agreement that hands Russia the stronger foundations it needs to regroup and return with greater violence.'
Western officials told the Financial Times that European capitals would not endorse any move by the US to recognise Crimea as Russian or pressure Kyiv to agree to it, and they would hold fast to a long-held position that they would not accept anything regarding Ukraine's sovereignty that Zelenskyy opposed.
'Crimea is Ukraine,' EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas told French news agency AFP on Tuesday.
For Europeans, the idea of recognising Crimea's annexation – the first land-grab by military force in Europe since 1945 – is an anathema since it would eviscerate the rules-based order that has underpinned peace on the Continent for generations.
'Crimea and future Nato membership aspirations are red lines for us,' said a second senior EU diplomat. 'We can't give them up.'
Even if the US acted unilaterally, it would reward Russian aggression and encourage Moscow to pursue its claims in Georgia and Moldova and menace other former Soviet countries such as the Baltic States that are Nato and EU members.
The Trump administration had already been told that it would be impossible for European capitals to recognise Crimea as Russian, according to a senior European official. Nato's biggest European powers needed to 'discourage' Washington from doing that unilaterally, the official said.
The status of Crimea could create a big diplomatic crisis for Nato – whose stated position is never to recognise Russian control over the peninsula.
Prior to the US offer, Nato officials were trying to downplay internal rifts over Ukraine, insisting that the alliance's annual leaders' summit in The Hague would focus on defence spending, not the war, according to officials involved in the discussions.
But the proposed deal and the possibility that the US could abandon talks, blame Kyiv and normalise relations with Moscow – could lead to a bust-up among Nato leaders.
'The core issue for the summit is where we are on Ukraine,' said a senior western official.
Similar rifts are likely to widen also within the EU, in particular over what to do about the bloc's economic sanctions imposed on Russia should Washington decide to go ahead and lift its restrictions.
'Things don't look good at all,' said an EU official. Any move by the US to recognise Crimea as Russia or demand that European capitals ease sanctions on Moscow would 'kill EU unity ... [it's] all looking messy'.
The 23 European capitals who are members of the EU and Nato are trying to find compromises with the Trump administration on future US commitments to European security and a trade deal to avoid a full-blown tariff war that could severely affect their economies. Many fear that Washington could use the issue as leverage in those discussions.
Shapiro, of the ECFR, was sceptical about the ability of the EU to stay united.
'If the Americans walk away, it is just not going to be possible for the Europeans to be unified on Ukraine. The Americans have been the source of unity on Ukraine.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
24 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
EU foreign ministers to meet over Middle East, Ukraine
EU foreign ministers are meeting in Brussels at the start of a week of high-level diplomacy on the Middle East and Ukraine, with the NATO summit in The Hague tomorrow and a summit of EU leaders on Thursday. Foreign ministers will give their initial response to an EU report which holds that Israel is in breach of its obligations under its trade arrangements with Europe due the conduct of its war in Gaza and its activities in the occupied West Bank. Ministers are also expected to reiterate calls for a de-escalation of the Israel-Iran crisis following the US bombing of key Iranian nuclear sites. Foreign ministers will begin with a briefing from the EU intelligence and situation centre on the unfolding crisis over Israel's attack on Iran, which has now been joined by the United States. In a statement, Tánaiste Simon Harris said he was deeply concerned by the very real risk of an extremely dangerous spiral of escalation in the Middle East following the US military action. He said the EU had a role in spearheading a diplomatic solution to the crisis. However, US President Donald Trump has made it clear he does not see any role for the European Union. Separately, foreign ministers will give their first assessment of a searing indictment of Israel's policy on Gaza and the West Bank in a report produced by the EU's Special Representative for Human Rights. The review, circulated to member states on Friday, held that Israel is in violation of Article 2 of the EU Israel Association Agreement, which binds both sides to human rights and international humanitarian law obligations. Last night, Israel dismissed the report as a "moral and methodological failure," saying it should be dismissed entirely. EU chief diplomat Kaja Kallas will take stock of how foreign ministers view the findings before briefing EU leaders later in the week. It seems likely that a menu of options to hold Israel to account - possibly including trade sanctions - will not be presented to foreign ministers until their next meeting in July.
RTÉ News
24 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Iran weighs retaliation against US for strikes on nuclear sites
Iran and Israel traded air and missile strikes as the world braced today for Tehran's response to the US attack on its nuclear sites and US President Donald Trump raised the idea of regime change in the Islamic republic. Iran vowed to defend itself yesterday, a day after the US joined Israel in the biggest Western military action against the country since its 1979 Islamic Revolution, despite calls for restraint and a return to diplomacy from around the world. Commercial satellite imagery indicated the US attack on Saturday on Iran's subterranean Fordow nuclear plant severely damaged or destroyed the deeply buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it housed, but the status of the site remained unconfirmed, experts said. In his latest social media comments on the US strikes, Mr Trump said "Monumental damage was done to all nuclear sites in Iran." "The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform. Mr Trump earlier called on Iran to forgo any retaliation and said the government "must now make peace" or "future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier". The US launched 75 precision-guided munitions including bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles against three Iranian nuclear sites, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, told reporters. The UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the US strikes. Rafael Grossi, the agency's director general, told CNN that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground. A senior Iranian source said that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved elsewhere before the attack. Reuters could not immediately corroborate the claim. Tehran, which denies its nuclear programme is for anything other than peaceful purposes, sent a volley of missiles at Israel in the aftermath of the US attack, wounding scores of people and destroying buildings in Tel Aviv. But it had not acted on its main threats of retaliation, to target US bases or choke off oil shipments that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Attempting to strangle Gulf oil supply by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite conflict with the US Navy's massive Fifth Fleet based in the Gulf. Oil prices jumped today to their highest since January. Iran's parliament has approved a move to close the strait, which Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Iran's Press TV said any such move would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. General Caine said the US military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. The US State Department issued a security alert for all US citizens abroad, calling on them to "exercise increased caution". Yesterday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called on China to encourage Iran to not shut down the strait, telling Fox News it would be a "terrible mistake". "It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours," he said. The Israeli military reported a missile launch from Iran in the early hours of this morning, saying it was intercepted by Israeli defences. Air raid sirens blared in Tel Aviv and other parts of central Israel. Iran has repeatedly targeted the Greater Tel Aviv - a metropolitan area of around four million people - the business and economic hub of Israel where there are also critical military assets. Iranian news agencies reported air defences were activated in central Tehran districts to counter "enemy targets", and that Israeli air strikes hit Parchin, the location of a military complex southeast of the capital. In a post to the Truth Social platform yesterday, Mr Trump raised the idea of regime change in Iran. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" he wrote. Mr Trump's post came after officials in his administration, including US Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, stressed they were not working to overthrow Iran's government. Israeli officials, who began the hostilities with a surprise attack on Iran on 13 June, have increasingly spoken of their ambition to topple the hardline Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment. As Tehran weighed its options, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi is expected to hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow today. The Kremlin has a strategic partnership with Iran, but also close links with Israel. Speaking in Istanbul yesterday, Mr Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses and there would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated. Russia's foreign ministry condemned the US attacks which it said had undermined the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and warned of the conflict spreading in the Middle East. The UN Security Council met yesterday to discuss the US strikes as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the Security Council the US bombings in Iran marked a perilous turn in the region and urged a return to negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme.
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
'Massive' Russian attack on Kyiv kills at least five
Ukraine said that "another massive attack" on the capital Kyiv killed at least five people, a day after the country's top military commander vowed to intensify strikes on Russia. Diplomatic efforts to end the three-year war have stalled, with the last direct meeting between the two sides almost three weeks ago and no follow-up talks scheduled. AFP journalists in Kyiv heard the buzzing of a drone flying over the city centre and explosions, as well as gunfire. "Another massive attack on the capital. Possibly, several waves of enemy drones," said a statement from Tymur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv's military administration. Four people were killed in Shevchenkivsky district, where part of a residential high-rise building was destroyed, and another person was killed to the south in Bila Tserkva, said Interior Minister Igor Klymenko. AFP journalists saw around 10 people sheltering in the basement of a residential building in the centre of the capital waiting for the attack to end, most of them scrolling their phones for news. The latest strikes came after Ukrainian commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky vowed to intensify strikes on Russia. "We will not just sit in defence because this brings nothing and eventually leads to the fact that we still retreat, lose people and territories," he told reporters, including AFP. Syrsky said Ukraine would continue its strikes on Russian military targets, which he said had proved "effective". "Of course we will continue. We will increase the scale and depth," he said. 'Fair response' Ukraine has launched retaliatory strikes on Russia throughout the war, targeting energy and military infrastructure sometimes hundreds of kilometres from the front line. Kyiv says the strikes are a fair response to deadly Russian attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure and civilians. At least four people were killed in an overnight Russian strike on an apartment building in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk, while a strike on a Ukrainian army training ground later in the day killed three others, officials said. In wide-ranging remarks, Syrsky conceded that Russia had some advantages in drone warfare, particularly in making fibre-optic drones that are tethered and difficult to jam. "Here, unfortunately, they have an advantage in both the number and range of their use," he said. He also claimed that Ukraine still held 90 square kilometres of territory in Russia's Kursk region, where Kyiv launched an audacious cross-border incursion last August. "These are our pre-emptive actions in response to a possible enemy offensive," he said. Russia said in April that it had gained full control of the Kursk region and denies that Kyiv has a presence there. Russia occupies around a fifth of Ukraine and claims to have annexed four Ukrainian regions as its own since launching its invasion in 2022 - in addition to Crimea, which it captured in 2014. Kyiv has accused Moscow of deliberately sabotaging a peace deal to prolong its full-scale offensive on the country and to seize more territory. The Russian army said Sunday that it had captured the village of Petrivske in Ukraine's northeast Kharkiv region. Russian forces also sent at least 47 drones and fired three missiles towards Ukraine between late Saturday and early Sunday, the Ukrainian air force said.
