Creatify Crosses $9M ARR, Raises $15.5M Series A to Launch the First End-to-End AI Ad Agent for Video

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Creatify, the AI platform powering high-performance video advertising, today announced $15.5 million in Series A funding co-led by WndrCo and Kindred Ventures. The round brings Creatify's total funding to $23 million, with early investors including NFDG, Millennium New Horizons, Creator Ventures, and Leadout Capital.
Trusted by over a million marketers and 10,000+ teams — including Alibaba.com, Comcast, Binance, NewsBreak, Tec-do, and Zumper — Creatify uses generative AI models and integrated workflow tools to automate the entire video ad lifecycle, from creative inspiration and generation to testing and optimization. The company recently surpassed $9 million in annual recurring revenue within 18 months of launch.
'Video is the most valuable format in digital advertising, but it's still the hardest to produce at scale,' said Creatify co-founder and CEO Yinan Na. 'We built Creatify to remove these barriers. Just as Shopify revolutionized e-commerce, we're doing the same for video ads—making them fast, effective, and accessible to businesses of all sizes.'
The funding coincides with the launch of AdMax, the first end-to-end AI ad agent to combine creative inspiration, production, testing, and performance analytics in one workflow. AdMax introduces:
Ad monitoring that turns top competitor and category ads into actionable campaigns
AI-powered video generation that creates dozens of UGC-style and product showcase videos in minutes
700+ AI-generated avatars enabling multilingual, cross-platform execution without traditional production costs
Creative testing engine built for Meta and TikTok, optimized for ROAS and CPA
API access and team workspaces that streamline video production at scale while maintaining brand consistency
'Great technology turns storytelling into real business results,' said Jeffrey Katzenberg, Founding Partner at WndrCo, who will join Creatify's board of directors. 'Creatify represents the next leap forward. It's not just making video ads easier to produce, it's redefining how modern advertising works. In a world where brands must show up everywhere, all the time, Creatify is purpose-built to meet that demand at scale.'
According to Steve Jang, Founding Partner at Kindred Ventures and early investor in Uber, Coinbase, and Perplexity: 'Generative media and LLMs are making a profound impact in how people and brands market and advertise their ideas and products. Creatify's AI agent collapses the slow, expensive, and constrained process of making and deploying video ads into a modern, super fast, and high-fidelity experience. We're thrilled to back Creatify on this mission to reinvent the global advertising market using generative AI.'
Enterprise brands are already seeing meaningful results. Zumper now produces over 300 videos monthly with Creatify, saving $20,000 per month. NewsBreak advertisers are launching tailored creatives in minutes — not days — with better performance across audience segments.
'If we want TV advertising to evolve and grow the way advertising has in social media, we need to make the process much easier,' said James Borow, Vice President of Product and Engineering, Universal Ads, Comcast. 'It's innovative companies like Creatify who are identifying the biggest obstacles such as ad creation and then building the solutions that invite brands of all sizes to take advantage of the incredible benefits of TV advertising.'
'We want to make advertising on NewsBreak as fast, easy, and effective as possible,' said Ryan Ludlow, General Manager at NewsBreak. 'Creatify's Ad Creation tool removes creative roadblocks, giving advertisers a simple way to create high-quality video creatives in a matter of minutes--rather than days or weeks of working with a creative agency. Our most successful advertisers launch multiple creatives tailored to different audiences, monitor performance data, and quickly adjust their strategy. With Creatify, more advertisers now have the tools to do exactly that -- efficiently and at scale.'
Founded by former Meta and Snap technologists and contributors to FAIR (Meta's Fundamental AI Research lab), Creatify merges cutting-edge research with deep product expertise. The team plans to use the funding to expand R&D and customer success and roll out new features like AI-driven market insights and cross-platform publishing.
Creatify is the leading AI video ad platform, used by over 1 million people across 10,000+ teams globally. Its software automates the entire video ad lifecycle, helping marketers create, test, and optimize top-performing video ads in minutes. Creatify is backed by WndrCo, Kindred Ventures, NFDG, Creator Ventures, Millennium New Horizons, and Leadout Capital. Learn more at www.creatify.ai.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Motor 1

26 minutes ago

• Motor 1

'Not Having Wireless CarPlay in a $30K Car Is Kinda Crazy,' Says Honda Civic Driver. Then He Finds a Workaround

Your phone charges wirelessly, your earbuds sync automatically, and your car might even drive itself. So why are so many drivers still plugging in cords like it's 2014 just to use CarPlay? In a series of TikToks, creator Bishi (@bishifindsdeals) reveals that the 2025 Honda Civic Sport model is still reliant on wires to access apps and other functions from a smartphone. Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . 'I love my Honda Civic so much, but one thing I hate the most about this car is that it does not come with wireless CarPlay at all,' Bishi says. His post has been viewed 150,000 times as of this writing. Bishi captions it, 'Not having wireless carplay in a 30k car is kinda crazy.' His post notes that it is eligible for commission. Bishi then lists numerous options to add some wireless living to cars still rocking that tether. These devices act as intermediary dongles that spoof a wired connection between a smartphone and the vehicle's infotainment system. Once paired via Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, they trick the car into thinking a physical cable is connected, enabling wireless CarPlay in vehicles that technically only support it through a wired connection. They're not made or endorsed by Apple, and buyers report that they vary in quality. But the right device can provide a wireless upgrade for people who drive older models or those in new base-model vehicles. Why Don't Automakers Include Wireless? Trending Now 'It Works:' Woman Shares How to Find Out if Furniture Fits in Your Car—Before You Buy From Facebook Marketplace 'He Wears That Little, Dangly Cross Earring:' Woman Says 'Car Guys' Are Major 'Red Flags' for Dating. Is She onto Something? Honda, Toyota, Mazda, and Hyundai often only include the feature in higher trim levels or as an optional infotainment add-on. The reason usually boils down to a combination of cost and technical complexity. Wireless CarPlay requires more than just Bluetooth; it depends on dual-band Wi-Fi (typically 5 GHz) to handle the bandwidth required for smooth audio and screen projection. That requires different antennas, more robust processing, and a system to manage thermal output, especially in dashboard units with limited space and airflow. Carmakers aiming to keep base model prices competitive often opt to leave those components out. There's also the issue of licensing and software integration. While Apple doesn't publish its licensing fees publicly, it's widely reported in industry forums and analyst reports that integrating CarPlay—especially wirelessly—adds to both unit and development costs. For automakers already facing narrow profit margins on entry-level vehicles, that added expense might not be worth it. Modern World, Outdated Technology Not having wireless capabilities in a vehicle in 2025 seems out of step with most consumer expectations. Physically tethering a phone to a USB cable just to get navigation on your dash feels outdated. Perhaps particularly so in a world where features like heated seats and adaptive cruise control were once luxuries, but now often come standard. Many drivers now view wireless smartphone integration as another baseline requirement . Instead, they're met with feature segmentation that positions wireless CarPlay as an upsell, bundled with premium infotainment packages or only available on trims that push the total price several thousand dollars higher. This gap between expectation and reality has given rise to a growing aftermarket ecosystem, especially among younger drivers comfortable with DIY tech. Plug-in adapters that enable wireless CarPlay are now widely available through Amazon, TikTok Shop, and direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms. Some are from known brands like Carlinkit or Ottocast, which offer Federal Communications Commission-certified devices with regular firmware updates. You can also buy from less established brands. But while many work well enough, customers mention issues including laggy connections, audio dropout, and software bugs. More importantly, these dongles function by spoofing a wired connection, something Apple has never officially supported and which raises questions about security, stability, and compatibility with future iOS updates. Still, if you, like Bish, can't bear to plug in your phone to use wireless, those aftermarket products may be just the solution. 'Let's be honest, it's the big 2025, so you can't be seen using wires just to get some CarPlay in your car,' he says. Motor1 contacted Bishi via direct message. We'll be sure to update this if he responds. More From Motor1 The 20 Most American-Made Cars of 2025 'That's Obviously a Villain Car:' Man Spots Honda Fit in Parking Lot. Then He Notices the Back 'The Pedal [Could] Shift Out of Position:' Honda Recalls a Quarter-Million Cars Over Faulty Brake Pedals Honda Will Supply New Parts for Old Cars, Starting With the NSX Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

Miami Herald

an hour ago

• Miami Herald

OpenAI makes shocking move amid fierce competition, Microsoft problems

A blind man once told me, "I wish I knew what a beautiful woman looks like". He started losing his sight from birth and lost it completely while he was still just a child. What do the engineers trying to make artificial intelligence know about intelligence? To me, they look like a bunch of blind men, trying to build a "living" statue of a beautiful person. The worst part is, they don't even know they are blind. Do you remember the scandal when an engineer from Google claimed that the company's AI is sentient? When I saw the headlines, I didn't even open the articles, but my conclusion was that either Google made a terrible mistake in hiring him or it was an elaborate PR stunt. I thought Google was famous for having a high hiring bar, so I was leaning toward a PR stunt-I was wrong. Related: Apple WWDC underwhelms fans in a crucial upgrade What is amazing about that story is that roughly six months later, ChatGPT came out and put Google's AI department into panic mode. They were far behind ChatGPT, which was not even close to being sentient. Engineers from OpenAI, were the ones to start a new era, the era in which investors are presented with a statue that sort of has a human face, and has a speaker inside playing recordings of human speech, expecting that the "blind" men working on it, will soon make it become alive and beautiful. Of course, investors are also ignorant of the fact that engineers are "blind". OpenAI is now faced with many rivals, and the developing situation is starting to look like a bunch of bullies trying to out-bully each other instead of offering a superior product. Meta's recent investment of $15 billion in Scale AI seems to have hit OpenAI quite hard. OpenAI will phase out work with Scale AI, said the company spokesperson for Bloomberg on June 18th. According to the same source, Scale AI accounted for a small fraction of OpenAI's overall data needs. It looks like Meta's latest move angered OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman. In a podcast hosted by his brother, he revealed that Meta Platforms dangled $100 million signing bonuses to lure OpenAI staff, only to fail. "None of our best people have decided to take them up on that," he said, writes Moz Farooque for TheStreet. Related: Popular AI stock inks 5G network deal Unless Altman shows some evidence, this can also be a way to mislead Meta's engineers into believing they aren't compensated fairly. Not that Zuckerberg wouldn't do such a thing, but only the people involved know the truth. As if OpenAI's competition is closing in, buying partner companies and trying to poach its staff by offering ridiculous bonuses aren't enough, the company has even more problems. It is bleeding money, and has issues with a big stakeholder. More AI Stocks: Veteran fund manager raises eyebrows with latest Meta Platforms moveGoogle plans major AI shift after Meta's surprising $14 billion moveAnalysts revamp forecast for Nvidia-backed AI stock OpenAI lost about $5 billion in 2024. There are no estimates on how much the company will lose this year, but according to Bloomberg News, the company does not expect to become cash flow positive until 2029. Latest developments will likely push that date farther into the future. Microsoft has invested about $14 billion in OpenAI; however, the relationship has turned sour since then. OpenAI has considered accusing Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior in their deal, reported the Wall Street Journal on June 16th. On June 19th The Financial Times reported that Microsoft is prepared to abandon its negotiations with OpenAI if the two sides cannot agree on critical issues. Meanwhile, OpenAI has started shockingly discounting enterprise subscriptions to ChatGPT. This had angered salespeople at Microsoft, which sells competing apps at higher prices, reported The Information. Related: Amazon's latest big bet may flop "In my experience, products are only discounted when they are not selling because customers do not perceive value at the higher price. If someone loses copious amounts of money at the higher price, how will the economics work at a lower price?" wrote veteran hedge fund manager Doug Kass in his diary on TheStreet Pro." OpenAI's price cuts could kick off a price war, with a race to the bottom even as OpenAI, Microsoft, Meta, and Google continue plowing tens of billions into developing it. "My suspicion, although those guys might be good (in theory) at technology, they are not good at business. I think they will find much less in the way of elasticity than they hope, because the problem is the quality of the output more than it is the price," said Kass. What will happen to OpenAI's cash flow positive plan after 2029? I doubt it is reachable with the now slashed prices. Will the company even live to see 2029? I think that is a better question. Related: Elon Musk's DOGE made huge mistakes with veterans' programs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Gizmodo

2 hours ago

• Gizmodo

The $14 Billion AI Google Killer

A new AI darling is making waves in Silicon Valley. It's called Perplexity, and according to reports, both Meta and Apple have quietly explored acquiring it. Valued at a staggering $14 billion following a May funding round, the startup is being hailed as a revolutionary threat to Google Search's search dominance. But here's the thing: it mostly just summarizes web results and sends you links. So why the frenzy? Perplexity billed itself an 'answer engine.' You ask a question, and it uses large language models to spit out a human-sounding summary, complete with footnotes. It's essentially ChatGPT with a bibliography. You might ask for the best books about the French Revolution or a breakdown of the Genius Act. In seconds, it generates a paragraph with links to Wikipedia, news outlets, or Reddit threads. Its pitch is a cleaner, ad-free, chatbot-driven search experience. No SEO junk, no scrolling. But critics say it's little more than a glorified wrapper around Google and OpenAI's APIs, with minimal proprietary tech and lots of smoke. It's fast, clean, and slick. But, they argue, at its core, it's mostly just reorganizing the internet. Big Tech's Obsession That hasn't stopped the hype. In May 2025, the San Francisco, California based company closed another $500 million funding round, pushing its valuation to $14 billion, a sharp increase from its $9 billion valuation in December 2024. Jeff Bezos, via the Jeff Bezos Family Fund, and Nvidia are among its notable backers And now, tech giants are circling. According to Bloomberg, Apple has held talks about acquiring Perplexity. Meta has also reportedly considered the move, though no formal offers have been confirmed. The logic is clear. Perplexity is fast-growing and increasingly seen as a 'Google killer,' especially among tech influencers and X power users. Traffic to its site has exploded in recent months. The company now offers a Chrome extension, mobile app, and a Pro version that gives users access to top-tier AI models like GPT-4 and Claude. Still, it's unclear what exactly makes Perplexity worth $14 billion, other than the fact that it's riding the AI wave. Why AI Skeptics Are Rolling Their Eyes For AI skeptics, Perplexity's rise is yet another example of hype outpacing substance. The site doesn't train its own models. It's not building new infrastructure. It's not revolutionizing search. It's just offering a polished interface to ask questions and get AI-generated summaries pulled from public websites. There are also growing concerns about how Perplexity sources its information. A number of news organizations, including The New York Times, Forbes, and Wired, have accused the company of plagiarizing and scraping content without permission or proper attribution. Journalists and publishers warn that this kind of AI-powered search experience threatens to cannibalize news traffic while giving little back to content creators. On June 20, the BBC became the latest outlet to threaten legal action against Perplexity AI, alleging that the company is using BBC content to train its 'default AI model,' according to the Financial Times. Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas has defended the company as an 'aggregator of information.' In July 2024, the startup launched a revenue-sharing program to address the backlash. 'We have always believed that we can build a system where the whole Internet wins,' Srinivas said at the time. So Why the Gold Rush? Simple. Search is money. Google earned $50.7 billion from search ads in the first quarter, a 9.8% increase year over year. If Perplexity can convince even a small share of users to switch, and then monetize that experience, it becomes a real threat. Apple and Meta, both increasingly wary of relying on Google, see Perplexity as a fast track into the AI search race. But the stakes go even deeper. Whoever controls the next search interface controls the user. Just as Google replaced Yahoo, Perplexity could theoretically replace Google. That's why Big Tech wants in, even if it's not entirely clear what they're buying.