logo
What challenges do whistle-blowers face in South Africa's battle against corruption?

What challenges do whistle-blowers face in South Africa's battle against corruption?

IOL News30-05-2025

South Africa, led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, has amended various laws to combat corruption, however, whistle-blowers are exposed to risk, with some in hiding.
Image: Supplied
While South Africa has implemented various anti-corruption laws, including a National Anti-Corruption Strategy, concerns have been raised about the ineffective whistle-blower mechanisms and the whistle-blowing framework, which limits the reporting of wrongdoing.
Among key anti-corruption laws that have been amended are the Prevention of Combating of Corrupt Activities Act, the Anti-Money Laundering Legislation General Laws, and the National Prosecution Authority Amendment Act, which stemmed from the Zondo Commission Report.
Mary de Haas, a KwaZulu-Natal violence monitor, said whistle-blowers' lives are at risk, and it seems that politicians are untouchable, as corruption continues and often leads back to politicians.
She mentioned at least two whistle-blowers whose lives are at risk after they exposed corruption. People in government, from the president down, are promising help for whistle-blowers, but there is nothing, she said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'Patricia Mashale was a very senior admin person within the police, and she reported corruption to the then National police commissioner General Khehla Sitole about Free State management corruption. He (Sitole) sent it back to them, and her life became endangered.
'Mashale can't live with her children because her house is under surveillance, and there is no financial support for whistle-blowers. How could people live when they have lost a job, have been illegally dismissed, and they can't live in their own homes because they are under surveillance and may get killed?' De Haas asked.
She said, Warrant Officer Meshack Makhubo, who opened the second docket in the Senzo Meyiwa case, is also in danger.
'There was an attack on his home. It wasn't just a break-in attack. It was an onslaught on his home. They want him dead because he knows too much about corruption in the police and the cover-up in the Meyiwa case..
'I have been informed that a lot of people now just keep quiet even when they know about corruption. They just go with it because when you open your mouth or you show that you are reporting it, your job is the first thing on the line. A lot of the dismissals are swift, and the Labour Court has confirmed they are illegal,' De Haas said.
She added that the other thing they do is bring a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) suit, which is filed to silence or intimidate someone who has spoken out about a matter of public interest.
'I've got one against me, which is nonsense. I mean, there is no substance in it at all, but they try to shut you up by threatening to sue you if you report them. That's how bad it is,' she said.
Devoshum Moodley-Veera, an integrity activist, PhD student at the School of Public Leadership and ACCERUS at Stellenbosch University, said there has been a lot of talk around the amendment of the Protected Disclosures Act for years, but it is yet to be seen whether law alone can assist in whistle-blower protection.
'Whistle-blowing is multi-faceted with several role players involved, yet we see a blame culture on whose role is it to protect whistle-blowers. With the laws not providing a dedicated institution to deal with whistle-blowing complaints, I am afraid that retaliation will increase under the current whistle-blowing framework, as we have seen severe cases such as Babita Deokaran and Pamela Kabini,' Moodley-Veera said.
She added that the Feinstein and Devine report of 2021 examined the sufficiency of the primary whistle-blower laws by juxtaposing 17 countries with the standards established by the European Union Whistleblowing Directive (2019/1937).
South Africa met only five of the 20 criteria to be included in whistle-blowing laws, which makes whistle-blowing legislation ineffective in South Africa.
Moodley-Veera said the country can be commended for a number of anti-corruption initiatives, however, the implementation remains weak.
'The Transparency International Corruption Perception Index is used to measure anti-corruption effectiveness. Thus far, South Africa has scored 41, the same as the previous year, showing no progress. The score is below the global average of 43, having dropped by three points since 2019. It should be noted that this index shows perceived levels of corruption in the public sector, not the number of cases reported or experiences of the public,' Moodley-Veera said.
She highlighted that there is a trust deficit in the country, and citizens would like to see action and accountability, which are severely lacking.
'Action should be taken. Institutions should appoint competent, ethical leadership to implement these initiatives. Legislation should be reformed, and laws should be developed to address the current context and situation in the country. The use of Western laws does not help the country in its current state,' she said.
During the State of the Nation Address, President Cyril Ramaphosa said the government had started taking steps to expose and punish corrupt activities in the public and private sectors, to reform institutions, making them stronger, more transparent, and restoring a professional and effective public service.
He said the NPA Investigating Directorate had at that time enrolled over 34 corruption cases, charged 202 accused individuals, and 65 accused entities.
'We are making progress in the fight against corruption with over 1,300 corruption convictions in four years, including 500 government officials. R14.18 billion assets frozen in corruption and state capture cases. Thirty-four cases were enrolled, involving over 200 accused persons, including former ministers and some of the largest corporate companies in the country, such as McKinsey and ABB.
'The NPA has finalised a comprehensive settlement agreement with company ABB to pay over a further R2.5bn in 'punitive reparations to South Africa' for its part in state capture. This adds to the R6 billion ABB already paid to Eskom in 2020,' Ramaphosa said.
Moodley-Veera explained that the challenges experienced with asset recovery by the Asset Forfeiture Unit and Investigating Directorate, both positioned within the National Prosecuting Authority, are the slow disposal rates of cases, which lead to high management costs and high recovery costs, resulting in loss of value.
The high costs of appointing curators to manage the frozen assets as part of property management. There is also a lack of technical and forensic skills within these institutions for asset recovery. This lack of technical skills results in unsuccessful confiscation proceedings. There is also a lack of capacity, inadequate budgets, poor collaboration, political interference in the criminal justice system and the law enforcement agencies, Moodley-Veera explained.
She added that one of the biggest successes of anti-corruption efforts in South Africa was that the late Dudu Myeni (former South African Airways chairperson) was found to be a delinquent director by the courts under the Companies Act. This was after the state capture proceedings.
'Another success is that due to transparency, the State Capture commission proceedings were broadcast in the media, and also the report was shared with the public. There has also been more public awareness around whistle-blowing, and some of the biggest cases of retaliation were made public. This shows that whistle-blowing is indeed one of the tools to be used for anti-corruption measures. As a country, we have also seen the vital role played by media and civil society organisations in addressing corruption in South Africa.
'However, there are persistent challenges such as ineffective whistle-blowing laws, cases that are delayed, high costs of litigation, and regulators and state institutions lacking independence to deal with corruption cases. There is also a lack of resources to deal with cases,' she said.
'Civil society organisations have come together to develop and launch the Zondo Tracker to also oversee the implementation of the Zondo recommendations,' Moodley-Veera said.
She added that anti-corruption initiatives should not be seen as a responsibility of the state only, but should be a collaborative effort to achieve a society that is free from fraud and corruption.
gcwalisile.khanyile@inl.co.za

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran-Israel war: SA calling on UN to broker peaceful resolution
Iran-Israel war: SA calling on UN to broker peaceful resolution

Eyewitness News

timean hour ago

  • Eyewitness News

Iran-Israel war: SA calling on UN to broker peaceful resolution

JOHANNESBURG - The South African government has expressed concern over the United States (US) military involvement in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. President Cyril Ramaphosa says he had hoped the US, particularly under President Donald Trump, would use its influence to promote dialogue between the warring nations. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya says South Africa is now calling on the United Nations to take the lead in brokering a peaceful resolution. ALSO READ: Trump says US strikes 'obliterated' Iran nuclear sites 'It was South Africa's sincerest hope that President Donald Trump will use his influence and that of the US government to prevail on the parties to pursue a dialogue path in resolving their issues of dispute. 'South Africa calls on the United States, Israel, and Iran to give the UN [United Nations] the opportunity and space to lead on a peaceful resolution of matters of dispute, including the inspection and verification of Iran's status of uranium enrichment, as well as its broader nuclear capacity.'

Ramaphosa urges dialogue after US strikes Iran
Ramaphosa urges dialogue after US strikes Iran

eNCA

time2 hours ago

  • eNCA

Ramaphosa urges dialogue after US strikes Iran

PRETORIA - President Cyril Ramaphosa has expressed concern over attacks by the United States' on Iranian targets, escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. WATCH: Rising tensions as missiles light up the skies This follows US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites — a move Ramaphosa says risks further destabilising the region. The president says South Africa had hoped that Donald Trump would use his influence to encourage dialogue, not confrontation. Ramaphosa is now urging all parties — the US, Israel, and Iran — to give the United Nations space to lead mediation efforts. That includes independent inspection of Iran's nuclear facilities and renewed commitment to peace talks. Vincent Magwenya, spokesperson for President Ramaphosa, says the government's strong support for diplomacy and the urgent need to avoid military escalation. South Africa urges dialogue to end Israel-Iran conflict — The Presidency 🇿🇦 (@PresidencyZA) June 22, 2025

National Dialogue? NMB wants its own metro dialogue, based more on action and solutions than talk
National Dialogue? NMB wants its own metro dialogue, based more on action and solutions than talk

Daily Maverick

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

National Dialogue? NMB wants its own metro dialogue, based more on action and solutions than talk

The upcoming National Dialogue has attracted a flood of criticism for being yet another talk-shop about the country's problems. In Nelson Mandela Bay, we have a different idea – let's have a talk driven by solutions and action. South Africans are abuzz with commentary and criticism of the National Dialogue announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa – mostly, and validly, centred on the view that the last thing the country needs right now is yet another talk-shop. We do not need to 'unpack' our social and economic problems, yet again. We know what they are. What we need is capable, competent, skilled and experienced people implementing solutions. Ordinary people all over this country are tired of hearing politicians talking; they have been saying this for a long time, and even more vociferously since the announcement of the National Dialogue, which is already looking to be a drawn-out process of talk and more talk continuing into next year. Meanwhile, the people of this country are highlighting the urgent need for action and change. They want jobs; they want to be able to do business; they want public services that work – healthcare, education, policing, transport, water, electricity; they want not to be dodging potholes; they want to see the corrupt behind bars. The principles of broad participation and diversity of voices – a 'people-led, society-wide process' seeking a shared vision and common values through the National Dialogue – are all well and good. However, as an intervention to bring about change, the whole initiative lacks a sense of urgency, seemingly blinded to the realities on the ground in our metros, cities, towns and rural villages that are fast becoming unlivable, unworkable and not conducive to retaining the investment we need to create jobs and grow the economy. The envisaged outcome of a 'programme of action to shape the future of the country' is also all well and good, but any plan is only as good as the people who implement it – their capacity and commitment, the support and resources at their disposal and how they are held accountable for delivery. Functioning municipalities are the foundation of service delivery to citizens and an enabling environment in which business can operate and create new jobs. Municipal dysfunction is now a critical hindrance to economic growth, and improving this level of government should be the absolute key priority. The Auditor-General's latest report on municipal audit outcomes presented a damning indictment of the dire state of financial management and performance management, stalled and delayed infrastructure projects and absence of accountability, which underpin failing municipal service delivery and crumbling infrastructure. The extension of Operation Vulindlela into addressing municipal service delivery, along with the review under way on the white paper on local government, are urgent and critical interventions that must lead to local government reform. Central to such reform must be the appointment of capable, qualified people and the effective performance management of officials and contractors that leads to actual consequences for non-delivery, underperformance and criminal actions. However, we are not operating in a policy vacuum in the meantime. South Africa is highly effective at developing policies and plans – we have a lot of very good structures and systems on paper; we are just not very good at implementing them. Our own version of dialogue That is why the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber proposes that this metro has its own version of a dialogue, focused less on talk and more on action. Dialogue, by definition, is a two-way street, a place where all parties can have their say. Just as important, if not more so, is that dialogue involves listening. Listening to the people on the ground who have first-hand knowledge and lived experience of the problems and who know what needs to be done to fix them. Dialogue is not mere conversation; it needs to come to a resolution, followed by action. That is the only way we will advance along that two-way street towards achieving positive change. Otherwise, we are endlessly circling a roundabout of conversation with no way to change lanes and exit onto the road towards our destination. Like the National Dialogue, such a 'metro dialogue' must be broad-based and participatory, involving local government, the business community and representative civil society organisations. The provincial government should be involved too, as well as relevant organs of the national government and state-owned entities such as Eskom and Transnet, because their support will be required to effect the change required. The difference is that this local dialogue would focus on solutions and actions, on enabling the implementation of plans and policies already in place and holding those doing the work accountable. The principle is local solutions to local problems. Local communities – in a broad sense of a business community in a particular sector or area, residents of a neighbourhood or township, NGOs working on similar issues – know what the problems are in their areas, they know what needs to be done about them, and they must be heard. A top-down approach driven out of a government office is not the answer. More than 70% of this municipality's income is derived from business customers. Business must be listened to, and through the Business Chamber, we have a business community incredibly willing to roll up their sleeves and offer expertise and resources to support the municipality in fixing problems. While the blame for all of the Bay's problems cannot be laid solely at the door of the Municipality, the political instability and resulting failure in the administration is at the root of the failure to have the basics in place to support living and doing business here. A local dialogue must press for a solution to root political interference out of the running of the administration, particularly in supply chain management and appointments of contractors. Revolving door The revolving door of acting city managers must be closed. In five years, at least 14 city managers have come and gone, many of them in an acting capacity, and we are on our third acting administrative head since the start of the 2024/25 financial year. Instituting an appointment process to recruit a permanent, qualified, experienced and competent city manager is imperative, and should not be a difficult thing to do. Similarly, recruitment must happen for the many municipal directorates headed by acting executive directors for extended periods, some also regularly revolving, and the substantial vacancies in funded posts at senior management level, for essential technical skills and in service delivery-related posts such as electricians, plumbers and artisans. Solutions exist for the metro's unacceptably high losses in revenue for electricity and treated water. We need to stop talking about them and implement them. Eskom, for example, stands ready to assist the municipality in addressing its electricity losses and financial unsustainability (what should be a profit-making function running at a R1.3-billion loss) through its Active Partnering programme – the politicians just need to say yes. The city is regularly faced with threats of the National Treasury withholding essential grants because of under-performance and non-compliance with grant conditions, and serious under-spending on capital and maintenance budgets (less than a quarter spent halfway into the 2024/25 financial year). The required infrastructure investment and maintenance can take place if suitable contractors are appointed timeously and the money available is spent effectively. An inability to spend money should be an entirely solvable problem, particularly if the supply chain management is capacitated and permitted to do its work without interference. In the news just this past week, the municipality announced plans to spend more than R1-million refurbishing dysfunctional 'business hubs' meant to support township entrepreneurs. The reason for this? The three facilities have decayed because of vandalism and theft, some hijacked by other organisations and one relying on illegal electricity connections. This highlights the municipality's inability to secure key infrastructure through security facilities and personnel, with surveillance, monitoring and response to prevent vandalism and theft. Again, a problem solved simply by hiring the appropriate services. The work of 11 geographic business clusters supported by the Business Chamber, as groups of businesses coming together to speak with a united voice and working together to address problems specific to their areas, we have seen a wave of solution-implementation and positive change. This includes businesses collaborating to clear litter and illegal dumping, repaint road markings, provide security to electrical substations, install street lighting and security cameras, repair potholes and clear stormwater drains – there is a long list. Similarly, technical task teams on electricity and sanitation, comprising engineers, other experts from business and senior municipal officials, are recording successes in improving the performance of the sanitation system and key electricity networks. This shows that partnerships and collaboration work, that fixing the metro's problems is possible. As much as we are tired of 'talk-shops', one of the great things that does come out of not only talking but listening to each other, is the formation of collaborations and partnerships – where we meet in mutual interest across boundaries of place, race, class, culture, religion or competing business interests and act together to bring about change. The municipality's acceptance of the help offered and agreement to work with business and civil society on the myriad problems requiring attention across the metro will be key to driving action and implementing solutions coming out of our proposed metro dialogue. In announcing the National Dialogue, President Ramaphosa said the idea was not a new concept in South Africa, that 'having dialogues is part of our DNA as a nation'. Yes, as the President said, we did end apartheid and establish a democracy through dialogue. But we are 30 years down the line and still face possibly even worse poverty, inequality and unemployment than we did in those days of optimism and hope of the 'rainbow nation'. Action and change – that is what we want to see out of any kind of dialogue, and it is up to us as 'ordinary' South Africans to make it happen. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store